WarFare?

[The Starmaker]

war·fare
/'wôr?fer/
noun
engagement in or the activities involved in war or conflict.
"guerrilla warfare"
synonyms: fighting, war, combat, conflict, armed conflict, struggle, military action, hostilities, bloodshed, battles, skirmishes, campaigning, passage of/at arms, strife, hostility, enmity, antagonism, discord

No, it's not Warfare, it's LawFare!

Lawfare - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Lawfare
Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their legal rights.


In other words, What the Democracts are doing to Trump is a paradigmatic
form of torture in which water is poured over a cloth covering the face and breathing passages of an immobilized captive, causing the person to experience the sensation of drowning and drag it out untill
Trump is completely exhausted.

It's LawCrime.

It's considered ...a WarCrime.


The Democracts are...War Criminals.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[trolidous]

On 02/12/2024 09:29 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> war·fare
> /'wôr?fer/
> noun
> engagement in or the activities involved in war or conflict.
> "guerrilla warfare"
> synonyms: fighting, war, combat, conflict, armed conflict, struggle,
military action, hostilities, bloodshed, battles, skirmishes,
campaigning, passage of/at arms, strife, hostility, enmity, antagonism,
discord
>
> No, it's not Warfare, it's LawFare!
>
> Lawfare - Wikipedia
> en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Lawfare
> Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or
delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their
legal rights.
>
>
> In other words, What the Democracts are doing to Trump is a paradigmatic
> form of torture in which water is poured over a cloth covering the
face and breathing passages of an immobilized captive, causing the
person to experience the sensation of drowning and drag it out untill
> Trump is completely exhausted.
>
> It's LawCrime.
>
> It's considered ...a WarCrime.
>
>
> The Democracts are...War Criminals.

When a cop murders an African-American because of the
color of their skin, that is 'LawFare', right?

What is really strange however is that after typing
this for a while, I thought of the 'Radical Republicans'
and 'Reconstruction' a long time ago. If you read the
Constitution of Lenin, it explicitly says in Article 4
something like 'Soviet Socialist Republics can secede
from the Soviet Union'. Maybe about a year ago I thought
to myself. Was there ever a time that the North was
considering secession? Then I thought - yes- that was
the War of 1812. I am of the mind that the US has
recognized the existence of the Philippines. That
gives me the idea that the US court system has acknowledged
that 'Territories' can secede. Even India seemed to do
something like that recently based upon that general idea.
Has any US State ever voted to do something like 'commit
suicide', and abolish its existence as a State and become
a Territory again? I am thinking 'no'. Why? Perhaps
even the remotest possibility that they might risk their
government salaries is too 'horrible', even if you
tried to guarantee backwards and forwards that they
would keep their same jobs.

Why don't you read through those Hague Conventions
of 1899? Is that well thought through or not? Have you
ever seen a photo of the first Geneva Convention? They
probably did some studies of how to mix ink with blood
when they signed. To me it would seem to be able to
be summarized as - the medics will wear a distinctive
uniform - they will treat both sides - do not shoot
the medics. Is that really an outrageous agreement?

Who ever heard of the terms 'executive', 'legislative',
and 'judicial'. Then read Montesquieu and his 'The
Spirit of the Laws' (yes I looked it up just now to
see that his name was spelled correctly). I read and
skimmed some of it a few years ago. To me, I get the
idea that 'executive', 'legislative', and 'judicial'
was just a minor footnote. It seemed to me that major
parts were dedicated to the idea that there are 'laws
of god, laws of man, and laws of nature'.

Do 'laws of nature' exist? Where there is something
called 'philosophic idealism' as contrasted with
'philosophic materialism'. Do 'laws of god' exist?
Well, there are some people that call themselves
'atheists'. Do laws of man exist? I am thinking there
should be a new word generally used on the subject.
Now there is a term called 'anarchism'. To me, that
means 'without rule'. This might be different from
'without law'. There might be an array of arguments
against the idea that 'laws' exist at all. One of those
arguments is 'they just make them up as they go along,
and then discard them when it is no longer an advantage
to them'. I think the term should be 'alegalism' with
a different meaning from 'anarchism'. Its antonym would
be 'legalism'. When I type the term into the English
Wikipedia, I get evidence that the word might not exist.
I will cut and paste it here - 'The page ' ... 'does
not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for
review or request that a redirect be created, but consider
checking the search results below to see whether the topic
is already covered.' Maybe sci.physics could be evidence
that the 'laws of physics' do not exist? Well, maybe or
maybe not.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

The left wants to utilize the American law against Trump.
Why has he never been found guilty over anything over years?
Remember Hillary created the Russia Hoax.
She used Russia. Now she is saying the opposite.
But we already know she did. Trump is their enemy.
Just as America should be.

[Governor Swill]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 04:47:26 -0800, trolidous <trol...@go.com> wrote:

>On 02/12/2024 09:29 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > war·fare
> > /'wôr?fer/
> > noun
> > engagement in or the activities involved in war or conflict.
> > "guerrilla warfare"
> > synonyms: fighting, war, combat, conflict, armed conflict, struggle,
>military action, hostilities, bloodshed, battles, skirmishes,
>campaigning, passage of/at arms, strife, hostility, enmity, antagonism,
>discord
> >
> > No, it's not Warfare, it's LawFare!
> >
> > Lawfare - Wikipedia
> > en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Lawfare
> > Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or
>delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their
>legal rights.
> >
> >
> > In other words, What the Democracts are doing to Trump is a paradigmatic
> > form of torture in which water is poured over a cloth covering the
>face and breathing passages of an immobilized captive, causing the
>person to experience the sensation of drowning and drag it out untill
> > Trump is completely exhausted.
> >
> > It's LawCrime.

<snip>

Trump's been practicing 'lawfare' all his life. Using the courts to bend others to his
will, to escape payment of debts.

Karma's a beeyotch, ain't it Donnie?

Swill
--
Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

"I don't want everybody to vote. As a matter of fact, our leverage in
the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."
- Paul Weyrich, co founder of Heritage Foundation and Moral Majority

Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>