Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Climate Change Has Shifted the Locations of Earth's North and South Poles
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Sam Wormley
May 15, 2013, 4:18:19 PM5/15/13
to
Climate Change Has Shifted the Locations of Earth's North and South Poles
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-has-shifted-location-north-south-poles
> Increased melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet and other ice losses
> worldwide have helped to move the North Pole several centimeters east
> each year since 2005
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-has-shifted-location-north-south-poles
> Increased melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet and other ice losses
> worldwide have helped to move the North Pole several centimeters east
> each year since 2005
Elmer Wright
May 15, 2013, 4:54:13 PM5/15/13
to
chance in the lingo, Global Warming -> Climate Change)
Sir, you must to be kidding, I refuse to think that you are fucking stupid.
ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
May 15, 2013, 5:07:00 PM5/15/13
to
Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> cut and pasted from some web site:
with physics, ass hat.
--
Jim Pennino
> Climate Change Has Shifted the Locations of Earth's North and South Poles
Whoopee, like that has never happened before, but it has nothing to do
with physics, ass hat.
--
Jim Pennino
Sam Wormley
May 15, 2013, 7:40:48 PM5/15/13
to
poles.
Sam Wormley
May 15, 2013, 7:41:56 PM5/15/13
to
refresher course. :-o
ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
May 15, 2013, 8:11:29 PM5/15/13
to
taken college level courses in both geology and physics.
Your cut and paste of this stuff to a physics group is just more of
your usual FUD.
--
Jim Pennino
Sam Wormley
May 15, 2013, 8:48:49 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 7:11 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
irritates you, jimp, you should skip over it. You are already
too angry.
> Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On 5/15/13 4:07 PM,ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> >>Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> cut and pasted from some web site:
>>>> >>>Climate Change Has Shifted the Locations of Earth's North and South Poles
>>> >>
>>> >>Whoopee, like that has never happened before, but it has nothing to do
>>> >>with physics, ass hat.
>>> >>
>> >
>> > It has everything to do with physics, jimp. Perhaps you need a
>> > refresher course. :-o
>
> No, ass hat, it is geology and I say that as someone who has actually
> taken college level courses in both geology and physics.
If shifting of the earth polar axis in a physics newsgroup
>>> >>Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> cut and pasted from some web site:
>>>> >>>Climate Change Has Shifted the Locations of Earth's North and South Poles
>>> >>
>>> >>Whoopee, like that has never happened before, but it has nothing to do
>>> >>with physics, ass hat.
>>> >>
>> >
>> > It has everything to do with physics, jimp. Perhaps you need a
>> > refresher course. :-o
>
> No, ass hat, it is geology and I say that as someone who has actually
> taken college level courses in both geology and physics.
irritates you, jimp, you should skip over it. You are already
too angry.
ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
May 15, 2013, 9:16:30 PM5/15/13
to
contempt and pity.
FYI ass hat, the Earth's polar axis is always shifting, it always has
been shifting, and it always will be shifting.
--
Jim Pennino
Michael Moroney
May 16, 2013, 8:17:49 AM5/16/13
to
Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Increased melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet and other ice losses
>> worldwide have helped to move the North Pole several centimeters east
>> each year since 2005
How can it move the North Pole east? The only direction from the North
>> Increased melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet and other ice losses
>> worldwide have helped to move the North Pole several centimeters east
>> each year since 2005
Pole is south. It is just a matter of which south (which longitude).
Richard Tobin
May 16, 2013, 10:16:09 AM5/16/13
to
In article <kn2ipd$lha$1...@pcls6.std.com>,
pole has been moving south down longitude 70 W at about 10cm / year.
Since 2005, it has been moving roughly at right angles to that line;
it is moving in a direction that would be east given a position of the
pole from some time in the previous hundred years or so.
-- Richard
Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
>How can it move the North Pole east? The only direction from the North
>Pole is south. It is just a matter of which south (which longitude).
According to the paper, since regular measurements began in 1899 the
>How can it move the North Pole east? The only direction from the North
>Pole is south. It is just a matter of which south (which longitude).
pole has been moving south down longitude 70 W at about 10cm / year.
Since 2005, it has been moving roughly at right angles to that line;
it is moving in a direction that would be east given a position of the
pole from some time in the previous hundred years or so.
-- Richard
Sam Wormley
May 16, 2013, 10:45:58 AM5/16/13
to
90° longitude is interpreted as East at the poles
etc.
Sam Wormley
May 16, 2013, 10:48:00 AM5/16/13
to
On 5/15/13 4:07 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
changing mass of melting ice due to global warming.
ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
May 16, 2013, 12:37:37 PM5/16/13
to
Did anyone even notice it?
Did anyone even care?
--
Jim Pennino
Elmer Wright
May 16, 2013, 3:44:25 PM5/16/13
to
Sam Wormley wrote:
>> LOL, the magnetic pole fluctuation is now because climate change (note
>> the chance in the lingo, Global Warming -> Climate Change)
>>
>> Sir, you must to be kidding, I refuse to think that you are fucking
>> stupid.
>>
>>
> Sorry, Elmer, the article refers to the geographic, not magnetic,
> poles.
How is this not almost the same, are you telling that global warming move
>> LOL, the magnetic pole fluctuation is now because climate change (note
>> the chance in the lingo, Global Warming -> Climate Change)
>>
>> Sir, you must to be kidding, I refuse to think that you are fucking
>> stupid.
>>
>>
> Sorry, Elmer, the article refers to the geographic, not magnetic,
> poles.
continents??
Sam Wormley
May 16, 2013, 4:12:33 PM5/16/13
to
Elmer Wright
May 16, 2013, 4:15:39 PM5/16/13
to
Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> Sorry, Elmer, the article refers to the geographic, not magnetic,
>>> poles.
>>
>> How is this not almost the same, are you telling that global warming
>> move continents??
>>
>>
> I wish you had read the article I posted.
Me too, would wish to make sense to begin with, then read.
>>> Sorry, Elmer, the article refers to the geographic, not magnetic,
>>> poles.
>>
>> How is this not almost the same, are you telling that global warming
>> move continents??
>>
>>
> I wish you had read the article I posted.
john
May 16, 2013, 5:09:41 PM5/16/13
to
are no longer cenred.
john
Elmer Wright
May 16, 2013, 5:13:53 PM5/16/13
to
john wrote:
>> > I wish you had read the article I posted.
>>
>>
>>
>> Me too, would wish to make sense to begin with, then read.
>
> If the axis changes, the ice caps are no longer cenred.
Valid point, that axis is like never will change.
>> > I wish you had read the article I posted.
>>
>>
>>
>> Me too, would wish to make sense to begin with, then read.
>
> If the axis changes, the ice caps are no longer cenred.
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
May 16, 2013, 5:14:41 PM5/16/13
to
"john" <johnse...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6169759d-a2f0-481d...@googlegroups.com...
=======================================
If the Easter Bunny farts, chocolate eggs will have
bubbles.
What do you think will change the axis, you
imbecile?
--
This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway.
When the fools chicken farmer Wilson and Van de faggot present an argument I cannot laugh at I'll retire from usenet.
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway.
When the fools chicken farmer Wilson and Van de faggot present an argument I cannot laugh at I'll retire from usenet.
john
May 16, 2013, 5:21:18 PM5/16/13
to
near where I live.
john
Elmer Wright
May 16, 2013, 5:25:54 PM5/16/13
to
john wrote:
> The equator used to run through Canada near where I live.
If true, has nothing to do with the axis.
> The equator used to run through Canada near where I live.
benj
May 16, 2013, 5:40:54 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 14:21:18 -0700, john wrote:
> The equator used to run through Canada near where I live.
>
> john
Oh Yeah? Well there used to be a mile of ice right above where my
> The equator used to run through Canada near where I live.
>
> john
computer chair is right now! Not so long ago either... But "global
warming" from CO2 melted it all...
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
May 16, 2013, 6:15:15 PM5/16/13
to
"john" <johnse...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2d6f5b49-35e1-49e5...@googlegroups.com...
===============================
The Earth’s crust is like the shell of an egg, cracked
and
broken. Even if you could prove your claim, it is
insignificant and has no bearing on a change in
axis.
Moving the crust with plate tectonics doesn’t change
the axis.
I repeat, what do you think would change the axis, you
imbecile?
1treePetrifiedForestLane
May 17, 2013, 1:01:38 AM5/17/13
to
that is a hypothesis, but I don't know
of any models that actually would relate; I mean,
til last yeat, I didn't believe in "currents
in the mantle," because the seismology is clear,
it's solid-state.
of any models that actually would relate; I mean,
til last yeat, I didn't believe in "currents
in the mantle," because the seismology is clear,
it's solid-state.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
May 18, 2013, 6:14:50 PM5/18/13
to
a new, microphysical mechanism was found.
> til last year, I didn't believe in "currents
> til last year, I didn't believe in "currents
0 new messages