Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Global warming projections from 1981 prove tellingly accurate | Rooted
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Sam Wormley
Jun 3, 2012, 8:10:57 PM6/3/12
to
bjacoby
Jun 4, 2012, 1:08:25 AM6/4/12
to
On 6/3/2012 8:10 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2012/04/12/global-warming-projections-from-1981-prove-tellingly-accurate/
>
From Article.
=====
A letter released overnight, signed by 49 former NASA scientists and
astronauts, criticises NASA’s public crusading on climate change. The
letter was sent late last month to NASA administrator Charles Bolden. It
reads in part:
“We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon
dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not
substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of
empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens
of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in
the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS
leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
“The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate
change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment
of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public
statements.”
But Glikson said he did not recognise any of the 49 names from the list
as climate scientists and instead said most appeared to be astronauts,
engineers and various technical specialists, and therefore from a
scientific point of view their arguments were not based in peer
review-based science."
====
Obviously, only the astronomer turned AGW propagandist is permitted to
pretend to be a "climate scientist".
Of particular interest is Hansen's graph of GISS data 2000-2012 in this
piece. You will find it clearly shows the "continued rapid warming"
that Sam Warmley always insists is going on. His frightening graph shows
a clear continued rise of .15 degree over the period.
Unfortunately, the actual GISS data (linked below) shows no such thing.
http://www.mrk-inc.com/users/bspam/AGWGISSCHART.htm
This is "mouse-painting" at it's finest. More than reason enough for Dr.
Hansen to be fired and drummed out of science forever, had he no
political pull. One can only wonder what he has been snorting through
those rolled up $100 bills he collects for speaking around the world.
So much for Dr. Hansen's "tellingly accurate" fake data. As the letters
suggest, "mouse-painting" is "very unbecoming" of NASA. Science AND
"journalism" obviously hitting a new low here.
> http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2012/04/12/global-warming-projections-from-1981-prove-tellingly-accurate/
>
From Article.
=====
A letter released overnight, signed by 49 former NASA scientists and
astronauts, criticises NASA’s public crusading on climate change. The
letter was sent late last month to NASA administrator Charles Bolden. It
reads in part:
“We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon
dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not
substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of
empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens
of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in
the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS
leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
“The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate
change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment
of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public
statements.”
But Glikson said he did not recognise any of the 49 names from the list
as climate scientists and instead said most appeared to be astronauts,
engineers and various technical specialists, and therefore from a
scientific point of view their arguments were not based in peer
review-based science."
====
Obviously, only the astronomer turned AGW propagandist is permitted to
pretend to be a "climate scientist".
Of particular interest is Hansen's graph of GISS data 2000-2012 in this
piece. You will find it clearly shows the "continued rapid warming"
that Sam Warmley always insists is going on. His frightening graph shows
a clear continued rise of .15 degree over the period.
Unfortunately, the actual GISS data (linked below) shows no such thing.
http://www.mrk-inc.com/users/bspam/AGWGISSCHART.htm
This is "mouse-painting" at it's finest. More than reason enough for Dr.
Hansen to be fired and drummed out of science forever, had he no
political pull. One can only wonder what he has been snorting through
those rolled up $100 bills he collects for speaking around the world.
So much for Dr. Hansen's "tellingly accurate" fake data. As the letters
suggest, "mouse-painting" is "very unbecoming" of NASA. Science AND
"journalism" obviously hitting a new low here.
Sam Wormley
Jun 4, 2012, 6:16:18 AM6/4/12
to
On 6/4/12 12:08 AM, bjacoby wrote:
> So much for Dr. Hansen's "tellingly accurate" fake data.
Can you specifically articulate exactly what data is faked
> So much for Dr. Hansen's "tellingly accurate" fake data.
and compare that with "unfaked" data?
bjacoby
Jun 4, 2012, 5:15:09 PM6/4/12
to
you are responding to! When temperature data is NOT rising and yet
Hansen's data show a RISE when plotting that SAME data so it will
"agree" with his previous "prediction", I call that FAKE DATA!
Sam, whey will you stop lying and give up this religious crusade of
yours to destroy civilization?
0 new messages