Can this be accomplished?
GreenXenon
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron[s]-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron[s]-per-second-per-square-meter.
Thanks
Archimedes' Lever
Come back when you finally get the right terms down.
Mark Harriss
Yep
GreenXenon
wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:57:48 -0700 (PDT), GreenXenon
>
> <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:
Where are the terms wrong?
GreenXenon
:
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:57:48 -0700 (PDT), GreenXenon
>
> <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:
Where are the terms wrong?
GreenXenon
Cwatters
"GreenXenon" <gluce...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:43e821fe-784d-4ed3...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Hi:
Not enough info. You will have to explain what the output media is ? Coper
wire? Air? Water? Constant area or variable? What frequency range? Audio?
Radar?
Mark Harriss
>
> Not enough info. You will have to explain what the output media is ? Coper
> wire? Air? Water? Constant area or variable? What frequency range? Audio?
> Radar?
>
>
It's obviously a raygun.
Mr.T
You being a completely moronic troll.
MrT.
Archimedes' Lever
The other day it was photons. Now it is electrons. And the 'per square
meter' crap is what? Are you going to spray the electrons out evenly,
like a grass seeder?
Bill
electrons. I searched google.com for the words...
measuring electrons
And came up with some interesting things. Might want to try that.
As to the negative replies, I suggest you try asking your question on
individual groups instead of posting to 5 groups with the same post. Then
you can see which groups offer constructive suggestions and which do not.
Then ask your future questions on the more positive groups.
Also you can search for the word forum along with a general topic word like
electronics and find some interesting discussion groups.
"GreenXenon" wrote in message
GreenXenon
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.engineering.electrical/msg/977409bf5d65aa1e?hl=en
:
> In article
> <43e821fe-784d-4ed3-8e86-bb1afcdec...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
> GreenXenon <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Most things can be accomplished if we knew what the hell you were talking
> about. Frequency changing can be done, yes, but what the rest of your post
> is about is anybody's guess.
In an electronic signal, amplitude measure the amount of electron[s]-
per-second-per-square-meter. More electron[s]-per-second-per-square-
meter means more amplitude.
Jerry Avins
In what medium? You talk big for a peabrain.
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
Cwatters
"Bill" <billnoma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:76o741F...@mid.individual.net...
> As to your question, I should think the problem would be how to measure
> electrons.
Perhaps you could just measure the power and ground current. The difference
is the output current.
Franc Zabkar
<gluce...@gmail.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>In an electronic signal, amplitude measure the amount of electron[s]-
>per-second-per-square-meter. More electron[s]-per-second-per-square-
>meter means more amplitude.
electrons-per-second-per-square-meter sounds like a unit for current
density in a very sensitive photomultiplier.
Otherwise your post makes no sense.
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
terryc
>> Come back when you finally get the right terms down.
>
> Where are the terms wrong?
Let me see, you cross post to a number of unrelated groups and ask a
question that involves animal, vegetable and mineral and
transmogortification. Either you do not have a clue as to what you want
or your education is nil or you are a troll.
If you seriously want an answer, correct one of the three and try again
next year/decade/century.
Mark Harriss
> You being a completely moronic troll.
>
> MrT.
>
>
YES!!!!!
Mr.T
"Mark Harriss" <bi...@blartco.co.uk
> wrote in message news:zP-dnQiAneshl5XX...@westnet.com.au...
> > You being a completely moronic troll.
>
Now there's an admission, even though I was actually referring to
GreenXenon. I doubt you could challenge him.
MrT.
Mark Harriss
Ahh T.... always trying to reinterpret stuff to suit yourself.
Mr.T
> Ahh T.... always trying to reinterpret stuff to suit yourself.
As opposed to your creative snipping?
MrT.
Mark Harriss
On rereading that earlier reply, I made a mistake: I thought
I'd quoted you unedited, my apologies T.
Mr.T
> On rereading that earlier reply, I made a mistake: I thought
> I'd quoted you unedited, my apologies T.
OK, consider me impressed. Not many have the guts to admit a mistake AND
make an apology.
Thanks Mark.
MrT.
Abbey Somebody
Wow... impressed and grateful. Another Usenet rarity.
Mark Harriss
You're welcome!
Igor
Rx: A freshman physics course.