Arindam Banerjee
unread,Mar 30, 2022, 5:27:50 PM3/30/22You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
On Thursday, 31 March 2022 at 07:44:55 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/28/2022 5:28 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 29 March 2022 at 05:01:36 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> On 3/28/2022 1:14 PM, ro...@pla.net.invalid wrote:
> >>> On 28/03/2022 01:14, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>>> These are for starters, lots more to be found if you type Arindam in
> >>>> sci.physics in google groups
> >>>
> >>> everybody here is supposed to have his own personal physics ? :-)
> >>>
> >> The cranks all do. There's Banerjee with his crashing armature physics,
> >> just watch his videos and "buh-LIEVE!!!" in his brand new physics,
> >> there's Archimedes Plutonium who thinks up brand new "physics" (and
> >> math) whenever he feels like it, McGinn (plus socks) and his cold steam,
> >> and plenty more no longer active, like the unemployed welder who refuses
> >> to use Einstein's special relativity when welding, and someone even
> >> resurrected Alexander Abian from the grave (Time has Mass/Blow up the
> >> Moon/We MUST re-orbit Venus into an Earth-like Orbit!)
> >>
> >> Of course none of these "new physics" (that's crankspeak) are compatible
> >> with each other, much less the real world.
> >
> > And morons like Moroney are also here, those who cannot distinguish between the cranks and the one genius here, that is, I, Arindam.
> The ONE genius?
Yes.
In this world there is but one genius to spy -
And he is none other than I,
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole god among lotsa devils.
Let's count the self-proclaimed purported "geniuses".
> There's McGinn, Plutonium, yourself, plus a ton of others who have since
> moved on, died or got committed into some mental health ward. Plus a ton
> of others who don't call themselves geniuses (AFAIK) but they KNOW their
> pet idea is 100% correct. Then there are any number of "geniuses" who
> have "replaced" relativity in sci.physics.relativity, also John Gabriel
> in sci.math, shall I go on?
As I said, a moron like you, Moroney, cannot distinguish between the cranks/fools/frauds/poseurs and myself.
Morons being morons, cannot have the powers of discrimination, that require higher intelligence.
You are the king of morons, Moroney. Born moron, named moron, brought up moron - that is what you are.
> Why should I prefer any one "genius" over any another?
More "how" than "why" for such a moronic question, which only the king of morons may ask.
No answer for the "why" in the above question.
If a "how", then the answer is prayer for greater wits, lack of bias, fresh approach, application and will to understand.
Pray, Moroney, pray.
> My comment on all the "geniuses" is: They sure make geniuses really
> STOOOPID nowadays!
My genius turns the revered established Nobelian Einsteinian geniuses into blithering twits.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee