Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PLUTONIUM ARITHMETIC

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Alexander Abian

unread,
Jun 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/7/99
to
--------------


PROVE OR DISPROVE that in PLUTONIUM ARITHMETIC

(1) a + x = b has a solution (unique ?)

(2) ax = b with nonzero a has a solution (unique ?)

(3) addition is associative

(4) multiplication is associative


Recall that multiplication in Plutonium Arithmetic is defined (as
the addition) by considering the diagonal of the products of the
finite final segments.

Thus,

(1) ......0000000234 x .......000000072

is obtained as follows

4 x 2 = 8
34 x 72 = 2448
234 x 072 = 16848
0234 x 0072 = 16848
00234 x 00072 = 16848
000234 x 000072 = 016848
....... x .... = .....

and the answer is the diagonal

......016848


Hence ......0000000234 x .......000000072 = .....000000016848

Of course for the particular case of (1) there is no need to have all
the above steps. But the above steps show the process for the construct-
ion of the product of two arbitrary ap-integers.

P.S. Plutonium, Dr.Michel Albert's posting and especially Dr. Giffen's
posting answers some of your questions. He is quite knowledgeable in the
subject.

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABIAN TIME-MASS EQUIVALENCE FORMULA T = A m^2 in Abian units.
ALTER EARTH'S ORBIT AND TILT TO STOP GLOBAL DISASTERS AND EPIDEMICS.
JOLT THE MOON TO JOLT THE EARTH INTO A SANER ORBIT.ALTER THE SOLAR SYSTEM.
REORBIT VENUS INTO A NEAR EARTH-LIKE ORBIT TO CREATE A BORN AGAIN EARTH(1990)
THERE WAS A BIG SUCK AND DILUTION OF PRIMEVAL MASS INTO THE VOID OF SPACE


Bret Wood

unread,
Jun 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/7/99
to

Alexander Abian wrote:
>
> THERE WAS A BIG SUCK AND DILUTION OF PRIMEVAL MASS INTO THE VOID OF SPACE

Just how big was the "suck?" (Measured in 'Abian Units' of course.)

-Bret Wood
-bret...@cs.uoregon.edu


Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Jun 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/8/99
to
In article <7jhl02$ltb$1...@news.iastate.edu>
ab...@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:

> P.S. Plutonium, Dr.Michel Albert's posting and especially Dr. Giffen's
> posting answers some of your questions. He is quite knowledgeable in the
> subject.

In article
<Pine.GSO.3.95.990606...@esther.rad.tju.edu>
"Dr. Michael Albert" <alb...@esther.rad.tju.edu> writes:

> First of all, Abian correctly states that the objects
> he is defining are *not* the "standard" integers.
> He correctly defines operations on these objects
> to make them a "ring" (ie, addition and multiplication).
>
> Indeed, the example given seems familiar. On vague
> memory, I think if you take the "field of quotients"
> (and maybe fiddle a little) I believe you get
> a standard example of a "non-Archamedian field"
> (The standard real numbers are archemedain, ie,
> 1+ 1+ . . . + 1 is eventually bigger than any real).
>
> I can only assume that Dr. Abain, realizing that
> this leads to a "non-Archimedian" field, felt
> it would be best to call these "Plutonium" numbers.
>
> Dr. Abain, I assume you know the relevant references
> for where the details can be found and who originally
> published this example?
>
> Best wishes,
> Mike

Conic Section System: the regular two cones that meet at a point. And
from which all the conic sections of circle, ellipse, parabola,
hyperbola and even straight lines can be obtained.

Does anyone know if conic-section-system is unique to Euclidean
Geometry. Can Riemannian Geometry accomodate a conic section system?
Can Lobachevskian geometry accomodate the conic section system?

My guess is that it is true that Conic Section Systems are unique to
Euclidean Geometry. For at least, straight lines are impossible to
obtain in either Riem or Loba.

A possible definition of Conic Section System is that it keeps a
'solid angle' intersection to rest of surface area of sphere constant.
That is, it obeys the inverse square law of Coulomb force and gravity
force.

Can someone point to a reference of work on Conic Section Systems?

Chuck Stewart

unread,
Jun 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/8/99
to
(The kitty is struggling to get a large package into the accelerator guidways at
CERN...)

Bret Wood wrote:

> Alexander Abian wrote:
> >
> > THERE WAS A BIG SUCK AND DILUTION OF PRIMEVAL MASS INTO THE VOID OF SPACE
>
> Just how big was the "suck?" (Measured in 'Abian Units' of course.)

Well, that's what physicists worldwide must discover next.

Laboratories must use Abian units to measure the degree or intensity of the
"suck" produced when particle accelerators reproduce early universal
conditions..

(The kitty carefully places an Abian unit just outside "ground zero"...)

To produce enough Abian units to go around we're gonna have to accelerate
cloning research....

> -Bret Wood


--

Chuck Stewart

"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just lovable transgenic chimerae?"

0 new messages