Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

how to convert hubbles constant into SI units?

1,308 views
Skip to first unread message

dodster

unread,
Jun 1, 2004, 6:30:38 AM6/1/04
to
how to convert hubbles constant from conventional units into SI units?
kms(-1) Mpc(-1) to SI = s(-1)
please help send reply to dodste...@yahoo.com
thanks


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Michael Varney

unread,
Jun 1, 2004, 7:23:21 AM6/1/04
to

"dodster" <dodste...@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:40bc5...@127.0.0.1...

> how to convert hubbles constant from conventional units into SI units?
> kms(-1) Mpc(-1) to SI = s(-1)
> please help send reply to dodste...@yahoo.com
> thanks

This is a simple conversion that should be easy to do.

km/s 1/Mps is a speed/distance

This means that it is quite obvious that Hubble's constant has dimensions of
inverse seconds.

km = 1000 m

Mps is a mega parsec.

A parsec is defined in:
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/Parsec.html

with an approximation to meters as:

1 parsec = 3.086E16 m

And the prefix mega is 1E6

so 1 Mpc = 3.086E22 m

So, km/(s Mpc) ~ 3.24E20 1/sec

Hubble's constant, given in:

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/HubbleConstant.html

H0 = 81(+-8) km/(s Mpc) ~ 2.6E-18 1/s in SI

You really should know this. I believe they cover such unit conversions in
elementary school.

However, such a conversion is rather useless in its reduced SI form.

Finally;

www.google.com "how to use google"

jmfb...@aol.com

unread,
Jun 1, 2004, 6:58:27 AM6/1/04
to
In article <TEZuc.1$4Z....@news.uswest.net>,

But do they teach exponential arithmetic?


>
>However, such a conversion is rather useless in its reduced SI form.

Can calculators handle it? [impish emoticon laying a fish line
across the screen]


>
>Finally;
>
>www.google.com "how to use google"

I got problems with this suggestion. But then I'm having
all kinds of other problems from banks insisting that go
on-line, too.

/BAH


Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

Michael Varney

unread,
Jun 1, 2004, 8:09:18 AM6/1/04
to

<jmfb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:40bc705f$0$3119$61fe...@news.rcn.com...

I don't know... I never went. :-)

Sam Wormley

unread,
Jun 1, 2004, 9:25:26 AM6/1/04
to
dodster wrote:
>
> how to convert hubbles constant from conventional units into SI units?
> kms(-1) Mpc(-1) to SI = s(-1)

See: http://www.google.com/search?q=71+km%2Fs%2F+10%5E6+parsec

Bjoern Feuerbacher

unread,
Jun 1, 2004, 12:21:29 PM6/1/04
to

I think a possible use might be to get an order-of-magnitude estimate
for the age of the universe by simply calculating 1/H. However, one
should additionally convert the result then from seconds to years. ;-)


Bye,
Bjoern

divinelycomical

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 10:28:34 AM6/21/04
to
I found the reply to your question difficult to understand!
An easy explination may be
Ho is in its conventional units of KmS^-1 Mpc

Simply convert Mpc to km and divide the conventional units by your
converted value of Mpc to give you the value in units of S^-1. As
the Km/Km cancel out to give you S^-1

Sam Wormley

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 10:50:47 AM6/21/04
to
divinelycomical wrote:
>
> I found the reply to your question difficult to understand!
> An easy explination may be Ho is in its conventional units of KmS^-1 Mpc
>
> Simply convert Mpc to km and divide the conventional units by your
> converted value of Mpc to give you the value in units of S^-1. As
> the Km/Km cancel out to give you S^-1
>

See: http://www.google.com/search?q=71+km%2Fs%2F+10%5E6+parsec

0 new messages