NOVA tonight on "Dreams" and update on Brain Locus theory #19 Brain as Radio Receiver Theory
Archimedes Plutonium
since that time I have been gathering
some new data which may help to easily prove the
Brain As Radio Receiver theory.
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics, sci.med
From: plutonium.archime...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 7 2009 3:49 am
Subject: #18 another avenue of research supporting Brain Locus
theory-- consciousness ; support for Brain Locus theory
With tonight's NOVA show, gives me impetus to make this post message.
But I am too busy on other things
to continue and will have to save this book for future time where I
can focus strongly on it.
REVIEW of theory: Brain Locus and Brain as Radio
Receiver theory are one and the same theory only with
different names. I like to use Brain Locus for short, but
Brain As Radio Receiver probably explains more. This
theory was created by me in the early 1990s and it was
created by me, not to track down the theory of psychology and how the
brain works, truly works, but was created or discovered by me as a end
implication of the Bell Inequality of Physics and Superdeterminism
in an Atom Totality. You see, if the world is Superdeterministic,
means there is no free-will, and if
no free-will, means that some superentity must make force every
thought to be ordered up. That entity is the Nucleus of the Atom
Totality as some supercontrol center. So that all life becomes puppets
to this control
center. So how can all thoughts be ordered up? And that is rather easy
to visualize that our mind is nothing
but a radio receiver (crystal of a radio called the Brain-Locus and
is, or could be just a single atom). So the
Nucleus shots photons or neutrinos into the Cosmos that impinges into
the center of a brain to compose your every thought and every action.
So the brain is
nothing more than a appendage that carries out the thought or action
of the photons/neutrinos hitting the
brain locus of a single atom.
Now let me get to what NOVA information of tonight that is relevant.
NOVA says that there are at least two
types of dream states-- (1) nonREM dreams which are
mostly of past scenes in life (2) REM dreams which have a sort of
characteristic of some future state, or
simulations of the future or rehearsals for the future.
Now let me state what recent facts, data, and information I have been
considering about Brain Locus theory. Just a couple of nights ago on
TV was a Seabisquit the race horse during the Depression was
aired and I remember a statement that let the horse sleep if ever
caught in sleep. And I heard somewhere
recently that horses have a short sleep time, due to
weight on ground crushing their lungs.
And I heard some months ago about whales sleeping
where half the brain sleeps while the other half is
on alert.
And I heard that sharks have to sleep only they cannot stop swimming
so they sleep while making circles.
And I heard that all animals require sleep.
So, let me ask a question. Since it is necessary for all
animals to sleep, implies that the mind is a physics
phenomenon, not a biological phenomenon, for if it was
biological, then some animal species would have evolved to where
sleeping was not necessary.
And while watching NOVA, although NOVA did not give
me anything really new or worthwhile, NOVA did conjure up in me a
question. Question: what is the
need for sleep if all animals require it, and if it is a
physics phenomenon? And the answer would have to
be that the Mind as a Radio Receiver has to "tune itself".
So that Sleep is necessary for animal life, and probably
plants also, although noone has bothered to look for
signs that a plant is sleeping. That sleep is necessary
as a function of the crystal of the Radio is out of tune
and so, while we sleep, the incoming photons or neutrinos of the Atom
Totality Nucleus is tuning the Brain Locus Atom. The dream sort of
like is a "rewind"
like in a tape recorder that we rewind. In the REM sleep, the rapid
eye motion sleep the tuning is almost
complete for that night's rest and where it is fine-tuning.
For nonscientists reading this, let me suggest two films
about Ancient Greece, one had a title of Titans and one
had a title of Jason and the Argonauts. Focus on those
segments of the film where these gods in heaven order up what the
actions of the humans on Earth engage in.
That is sort of a flavor of superdeterminism. Only in
Superdeterminism everything is ordered up to happen
and where the gods are the protons and neutrons in the
Nucleus.
So, now, how can the Nucleus tune up a mind in an animal so that the
animal can think properly? There is
no animal tuner that runs to each animal every day
and rotates a dial to tune the mind-radio. So what happens is that the
Atom Totality Nucleus self tunes
each mind of each animal by sending that animal into a
sleep and dream state. And while the animal is sleeping, the photons
and neutrinos that deliver each thought is rewinding the atoms near
the brain-locus so that they are in tune after the sleep.
Now the reason I am concerned about the facts of various animals is
that all of them require sleep but all
of them have different brains to function. They vary in
brain size and brain needs and thus vary in amount of
sleep needed. So that a cat can sleep for 2 hours and then be good to
go for hunting the next 2 hours and then come back and sleep another 2
hours. Or an insect with its tiny brain needs only a little sleep. But
that a human with its large brain and complex functions
requires at least 8 hours per every 24.
The human brain is not large because of its functions
it must perform but large because it needs to do alot of
behaviour that involve coordination. A horse needs only
5 minutes of sleep because its brain easily says "go over to that
patch of grass to eat for the next 12 hours". Whereas a human
baseball batter cannot see a pitch because it is so fast that it sees
only a glimpse of the oncoming pitch but lets the brain organ
calculate
about where the ball will enter the batters reach. So the
horse mind does not need all that sleep but the human
mind needs a full 8 hours per 24 in order to coordinate
the bodies daily performance.
Now I think that there maybe a nice experimental proof of the Brain
Locus theory to be tested on insect's brains. If we can somehow remove
"burn out a patch of
atoms" of a brain in insects to where we narrow down
those atoms, and burn out those atoms causing immediate death, since
the crystal of that insect's mind
is no longer there to tune or to coordinate the rest of the body,
would be a proof that the Mind is a Radio
Receiver.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Archimedes Plutonium
Many years ago I thought of proving the Brain Locus theory by that of
a
application of Faraday's Cage where we surround the brain of a
isolated person
in the dark and see if the brain becomes disfunctional. I understand
that some
experiments have already done this sort of thing and the outcome was
disorientation of the persons involved. But the trouble with this is
that
neutrinos may provide the bulk of the messengers rather than the
photons
as messengers to keep the brain working.
So I am thinking of the opposite testing of that of interference.
Now I know that some whales are beached because the Navy uses some
harsh sonar. So can this be an example of where interference by humans
is
causing a disfunction of whale brains and whale mind?
So that if we take a human to test, is there a photon energy that
interfers with
the human brain or human mind to function?
Archimedes Plutonium
see a NOVA
show more than once. Tonight I saw this NOVA "What is Dream" and when
it
got to the experiments on REM sleep I asked some more questions.
If the mind of any animal is a radio receiver from the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality
as it shots photons and neutrino messages in our Brain which acts as
an
antennae and where our brain then processes the information encoded in
the
photons and neutrinos, then the need for sleep is to focus the Brain
Locus
as we focus a radio that is out of focus. The Brain has one or several
atoms
that acts as the antennae and the crystal of the radio. And when the
radio
is not in focus we hear just static. And our brains and mind if
deprived of sleep
is nothing but a "static state". When we are deprived of sleep, do we
not resemble
a radio that is out of tune and broadcasting just static noise?
So why do humans experience REM sleep? Why not just have ordinary
sleep and
why are the eyes involved in rapid motion? Well I think the answer may
lie in the
idea that sleep and dreams are required (for humans at least) to tune
up the Brain
Locus so it can receive those messages from the Nucleus of the Atom
Totality
and in the midst of tuning up the Brain Locus the photons and
neutrinos that bombard
the brain in sleep are in the act of tuning and so they carry messages
that revisit
one's past life. Think of it as rewinding a tape recorder or fast-
rewind that we rewind
some of the day's activities and in the course of this rewind, our
eyes become so
to speak-- rewound also. Like in a tape recorder rewind we hear
screeching sounds
and this is similar to the eyes in rapid motion is the rewind of the
day or some past
event all in the purpose of "Tuning the Brain Locus".
Now I said in another post, that if Sleep and Dreams were necessary
for all animals
implies that sleep is not a biological function but a Physics
function. What I meant by
that is that if sleep were biological, then it would have been evolved
to the point where
it no longer exists in animals since animals are most vulnerable when
they sleep. But
since sleep is required of all animals (and I believe also in plants),
implies that
sleep is a Physics necessity and that implies the brain and sleep as
tuning of a
radio, where the brain and mind is a radio.
Now I have not looked up Venus flytrap plants. They are plants, and I
wonder if
they require sleep? I have not looked them up nor have I thought of
devising some
sort of experiment that indicates Venus flytraps need sleep over a
period of time.
I would guess they do. Sleep also in plants maybe seasonal, like a
hibernation
of deciduous plants that are inactive over winter. So that plants may
sleep during
24 hours but also sleep over the entire winter.
I am confident that the Brain Locus theory is the true theory of how
the Mind works.
I am extremely confident it is the true theory because it is a
implication of the
Bell Inequality of Quantum Mechanics that we have to have
Superdeterminism.
And the only way to have Superdeterminism is that every thought is
controlled.
So I have no trouble in saying that the Brain Locus theory is the
ultimate truth of
the science of Psychology. My only problem, which seems to be
difficult and not easy
is to experimentally prove that the Brain Locus theory is true. Why it
is so difficult
is troubling to me, since it is the only theory of psychology that
places "thinking"
outside the human brain. So one would come to this theory and think
that a experimental
proof should be easy to come by since it is so different from any
other theory
of psychology where they all thought Mind was some inside chemical
reactions
in the brain.
But the reason the Brain Locus theory is so hard to experimentally
prove, is because
it is extremely difficult, perhaps impossible to place a human inside
a box that
does not permit photons or neutrinos to enter and thus shutting down
the mind
completely.
Archimedes Plutonium
they need some sort
of rest periods. They do need winter dormancy. But I want to see
something more
frequent such as a rest period per 24 hours.
I remember reading some facts about photosynthesis a long time ago and
remember
some paragraphs talking about the fact that plants need to do
something at night in
order to prepare themselves for the next day of sunlight. Something
about them switching
from oxygen release to that of carbon-dioxide. I do not remember the
details.
Anyway, what I am looking for is indication of plant's resting spells
per 24 hours.
So what if plants have what we might call a "plant brain," and where
would it be
located? I suspect it would be located at the inteface between a
plant's root system
and the above ground part of the plant. It would be in trees what is
commonly called
the heartwood. And I would envision it as simply a complex of atoms,
perhaps a molecule.
And the brain locus perhaps is in a organ of plants or it could be
located on every DNA molecule of that organism.
Now that is a possibility I had not considered. That the brain locus
of plants and animals
is not in the brain itself but on every DNA molecule inside the
individual organism.
If that is the case, then the need for sleep becomes even that much
more crucial because
the tuning up of each DNA molecule inside a body requires alot of
harmonization, and so
alot of energy. I doubt that the brain locus is on every DNA molecule.