info
Google Gruppi non supporta più i nuovi post o le nuove iscrizioni Usenet. I contenuti storici continuano a essere visibili.
Dismiss
Re: the composition of legth of two relatively moving rulers
21 visualizzazioni
Passa al primo messaggio da leggere
Dakota Vico
4 dic 2022, 13:37:1104/12/22
a
AetherRegaind wrote:
> Tom Roberts:
>> On 12/3/22 1:09 PM, Kevin Aylward wrote:
>>> [There is no ether] Sure, there is. Its just been renamed as "field",
>>>
>> Nonsense! The fields of QFT are not at all like the classical ether.
>> Ditto for the fields of GR. In particular, unlike the ether it makes no
>> sense to attempt to ascribe a "rest frame" to a field.
>
> In a typical course in physics, the fields that one is initially
> introduced to are the ones that occur in fluids, viz., the temperature
> field, the pressure field and the velocity field. Later in the kinetic
mathematical tools, fields etc. For visualized description and so on. You
may call them what you want, so far you know they are tools of
description. Fucking stoopid.
> Tom Roberts:
>> On 12/3/22 1:09 PM, Kevin Aylward wrote:
>>> [There is no ether] Sure, there is. Its just been renamed as "field",
>>>
>> Nonsense! The fields of QFT are not at all like the classical ether.
>> Ditto for the fields of GR. In particular, unlike the ether it makes no
>> sense to attempt to ascribe a "rest frame" to a field.
>
> In a typical course in physics, the fields that one is initially
> introduced to are the ones that occur in fluids, viz., the temperature
> field, the pressure field and the velocity field. Later in the kinetic
mathematical tools, fields etc. For visualized description and so on. You
may call them what you want, so far you know they are tools of
description. Fucking stoopid.
mitchr...@gmail.com
4 dic 2022, 15:02:3104/12/22
a
Distance does not go away.
The moving atom does not shrink.
0 nuovi messaggi