Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: 21. love you King of Science, kiss kiss, Archimedes Plutonium for bringing us a cure of covid-19 via a MRI or CT scan at resonant frequency that kills a pocket of the virus allowing the white blood cells to kill the rest// Vitenskapens Konge

29 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Doctor Anagram

unread,
Jun 13, 2020, 1:32:30 AM6/13/20
to
The letters in

"Archimedes Plutonium"

can be re-arranged to spell

"Chimp Use Demon Ritual"

Ike Schroder

unread,
Jun 13, 2020, 10:06:47 AM6/13/20
to
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> 21. love you King of Science, kiss kiss, Archimedes Plutonium for
> bringing us a cure of covid-19 via a MRI or CT scan at resonant
> frequency that kills a pocket of the virus allowing the white blood
> cells to kill the rest

There's not much Plutonium in you, Archimedes. The vaccination upgrades
starting with covid95 will suffice in order, but it is crucial. You have
to maintain the record and the order. Mandatory kept RFID under your skin,
blockchain manner. Your crypto currency credits securely saved authorized
same place, which also is in your direct and indirect benefit. So you know
you are upgrade-able Agenda year 2021 ready, and the years yet to come.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Jun 13, 2020, 10:19:40 AM6/13/20
to
On Saturday, June 13, 2020 at 12:32:30 AM UTC-5, Doctor Anagram wrote:
> The letters in
>
World's first logical teaching of 6.02*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" and 5.98*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6
Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> can be re-arranged to spell
>
World's first logical teaching of 6.02*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" and 5.98*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6
Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


#2-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)



Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of .5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows two of my chemical models, one of CO and the other CO2


Length: 1150 pages

File Size: 1456 KB
Print Length: 1150 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLVMMSZ
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
                Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
                #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
                #1324 in General Chemistry
                #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)




#2-2, 50th published book

Geometry of the Chemical Bond; metallic, covalent, ionic//Chemistry Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


This is the second book of the Series -- True Chemistry. I left off of True Chemistry with trying to solve the Chemical bond when the proton and muon inside of each and every atom is doing the Faraday Law. And since that book was already 1154 pages long, I decided to start afresh in a second book devoted to solving the Geometry of the chemical bond of metallic, covalent and ionic.
Cover Picture: PHYSICS: Part 2: Extended Version: Halliday & Resnick, 1986, pages 654, 655 talking about Capacitors and my collection of some capacitors in my lab. The first one is a two prong wall plug taken apart to show what the prongs fasten onto when plugged-in (two parallel plates). The next three are spade and socket connectors (two parallel plates). Next is circular or hook plates, and last is a cylinder plate and socket.

Length: 131 pages




Product details
File Size: 1304 KB
Print Length: 131 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 21, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07TCVBD93
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#2-3, 81st published book

Animal-CO2 of the 3 CO2 isomers// Chemistry Series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


CO2 molecule has 3 isomers. An isomer means same chemical formula but different geometries. The 3 isomers of CO2 come from fire-CO2 and animal-CO2. The fire-CO2 has the carbon atom as central in the molecule and one of the oxygen atoms has a unshared dipole. The animal-CO2 has the carbon atom on the periphery with an unshared dipole.
This is very important chemistry science for it impacts Global Warming but also hugely impacts biology because plants can only live on animal-CO2 and the fire-CO2 is a toxic poison to plants, much like CO is a toxic poison to animals.

Here we learn new facts about the molecules CO, N2, CO2, O2 and even H2O, new facts we never understood before, all because the real electron is the muon stuck inside a proton doing the Faraday Law and that chemical bonding is governed not by electrons but by Dirac magnetic monopoles, and that makes the Lewis structure be based on 6 not 8.

New concepts in chemistry: Lewis structure based on 6, not 8, and the unshared dipole. For a Lewis Structure based on 6, not 8, is the only logical way that the strongest bonded molecules end up being CO and N2. With a Lewis 8 Structure, the strongest bonded molecules, by logic, note, by logic would have to be O2 and FH or possibly FB. However, the proof is that bond dissociation energy of CO is the highest, proving Lewis 6 Structure is the true structure of Chemistry.

source: chem.ucsb.edu

in kJ/mol

CO 1076
N2  946
CO2 532
O2  498
C2 as in diamond is 602 kJ/mol
H2O = 492
OH = 425
H2 = 432

Cover Picture is a winter stored potted clover that I am experimenting with and shows a animal-CO2 molecule going in, and going out is a O2 molecule that animals need to breathe.
Length: 15 pages


Product details
File Size: 1042 KB
Print Length: 15 pages
Publication Date: January 19, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B084217LB9
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#2-4, 38th published book

Hypothesis that Tar restores the Iron in Rust, back to the iron metal object// Chemistry series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Back in 2003 I noticed that while working on my roof, that when I pulled off tar on steel, that the steel was shiny bright iron with no rust while all around where no tar was, was much rust. So that started me to think whether tar acts as a chemical reaction in which it takes the iron atoms out of rust and places those iron-atoms-back-into-the-iron-object. Now that was 2003, and I have not had much time to really dive into experiments on this topic. For one reason-- I have to wait years for the tar to dissolve the rust and perhaps return the iron from iron oxide back into the original iron object. No, I do not have years and I was far too busy with other items of science. But now I plan to do more on this subject. Especially since in 2017 I discovered the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV, casting brand new light on chemistry and chemical reactions. The iron rust molecule Fe2O3 in New Chemistry where the .5MeV particle is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole, has to be reviewed in terms of this new found knowledge, and whether or not, tar can return the Fe2 back to the original metal object.

Picture cover: About 5 years ago this hammer and trowel were both iron rusted surfaces, both had iron rust, the trowel worse than the hammer. I put tar on the trowel rusty surface and today with a chisel removed some tar and see the shiny bright iron surface. I suppose if I had coated the hammer back then when I coated the trowel, the hammer would also be bright shiny iron. So the tar must have done something to not only remove the rust but restore the trowel to "more iron bright shiny surface", some claim (see below in text) that the tar only lifted the rust off the iron surface. I think there is more to it than just adhesion lift, and am thinking the tar takes the iron atoms out of iron oxide and puts the iron atoms back into the original iron object. So this is not a proof by any means, but a hypothesis, and a request for more research.
Length: 32 pages

File Size: 2655 KB
Print Length: 32 pages
Publication Date: April 9, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QK428KN

#2-5, 119th published book

Research Notebook of AP on True Chemistry Periodic Table of Elements based on 6, not the error-filled table of Old Chemistry, Chemistry Series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real true electron of atoms was the muon and this muon is stuck inside its attendant proton. The muon is of 105MeV while the proton is 840 MeV. The particle that JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered was not the electron of atoms but instead was the Dirac magnetic monopole. Such a huge huge mistake throughout all of chemistry and physics, to think the electron was 0.5MeV orbiting around a proton of 938MeV breaks even the angular momentum concept of physics, for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5 MeV particle traveling almost the speed of light around a 938MeV particle just will not stay together. And besides, in that Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom, their subatomic particles have no function, no job, no task, nothing. In that viewpoint of the atom, there is little wonder that their Table of Elements would be mostly error after error after mistake.
Length: 108 pages

Product details
File Size: 1083 KB
Print Length: 108 pages
Publication Date: May 21, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B0891TTP29
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#2-6, 123rd published book

World's first logical teaching of 6.02*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" and 5.98*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6
Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I was worried I did not reach the target audience on this topic of mole and Avogadro's number. The cover picture is a High School physics textbook, a later edition of PSSC that I took when I was in High School circa 1967. It teaches mole and Avogadro's number. So I needed to write this textbook starting High School, because it is shameful to teach wrong science in either High School or University.

Cover Picture is page 448-9 of PSSC Physics, 3rd ed., 1971, Haber-Schaim, Cross, Dodge, Walter, explaining how Rutherford in 1919 weighed the mass of the proton in a experiment. It is disheartening to find I cannot see that experiment in a Google search because of another famous experiment of Rutherford of the gold leaf. And lucky for me that I retrieved this PSSC book I used in High School circa 1967-8 that explains how the proton mass was weighed in physics history. The mass of the proton is vital to understand the mole and Avogadro's number concept. Sad of course that every Old Chemistry and Old Physics textbooks that teaches the concept mole and Avogadro number never mentions the proton mass as crucial to understanding.

Table of Contents
------------------------

1) I am irate over the lack of logic that goes into teaching the concepts of mole and of Avogadro's number.

2) Explaining the mole and Avogadro's number using nucleon as unit basis, with 8 lessons.

3) Survey of several textbooks to see if any teacher of chemistry or physics had the concept of mole and Avogadro's number correct.

4) Explaining the mole and Avogadro's number using the Hydrogen Atom, not the nucleon, as unit basis, with 8 lessons.

5) Replacing the word "nucleon" with hyasys and refurbishing the inaccurate number 6.02*10^23 with the more precise true number 5.98*10^23.

Length: 67 pages

Product details
File Size: 796 KB
Print Length: 67 pages
Publication Date: June 10, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B08B1GCRDH
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


Doctor Anagram

unread,
Jun 13, 2020, 11:06:52 AM6/13/20
to
The letters in

"Archimedes Plutonium"

can be re-arranged to spell

"Chimp's Luau Demon Rite"

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Jun 14, 2020, 11:32:26 AM6/14/20
to


#12-11, 120th published book

AP's Research Notebook on New Biology's replacement of Vaccinations with MRI and CT scans//Biophysics series, book 11 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is a research notebook not a textbook, for until the first patient is cured of virus in a MRI or CT scan with resonant frequency that kills a pocket of the virus inside the body, and that killing or deactivation of the virus allows the human immune system to accelerate in recognition of the viral invader by the white blood cells killing and removing all the remainder viruses inside the body. Once the first patient is cured by this new technique, will make the old way of medical science vaccinations rather as second rate handling of viral diseases. Once the first patient is cured, then this book will become a textbook, no longer a research notebook.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google image search of MRI machines, photo taken of my computer search.

Table of Contents
------------------------

1) Research Notes starting 16 May 2020

Length: 25 pages

Product details
File Size: 925 KB
Print Length: 25 pages
Publication Date: May 29, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B089FMMZHN

Professor Wordsmith

unread,
Jun 14, 2020, 3:14:08 PM6/14/20
to
I Demo Trump-Anus Chile

Doctor Anagram

unread,
Jun 14, 2020, 4:10:11 PM6/14/20
to
The letters in

"Archimedes Plutonium"

can be re-arranged to spell

"Daemon Mice Sulphur It"

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Sep 23, 2021, 7:19:15 PM9/23/21
to

On Saturday, February 20, 1993 at 3:18:11 PM UTC-6, john baez wrote:
> Week 6:
> 1) Quantum cosmology, talk given at Texas/Pascos 1992 at Berkeley by
> Alexander Vilenkin, preprint available in TeX form as gr-qc/9302016
> This is, as Vilenkin notes, an elementary review of quantum cosmology.
> It won't be news to anyone who has kept up on that subject (except
> perhaps for a few speculations at the end), but for those who haven't
> been following this stuff, like myself, it might be a good way to get started.
> Let's get warmed up....

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 1:37:55 AM9/24/21
to
SAVE AP's 199th book // A book of New Age, New Wave math & physics Conjectures/ Conjectures 24.1, 24.2, 24.3

Written in my Sophomore College TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbook is a chapter on Arithmetic-Algebra axioms.

7) Four important Axioms of Arithmetic-Algebra

List of 4 Arithmetic-Algebra Axioms.

The four Arithmetic-Algebra axioms that should be taught early and reviewed and summarized by 1st year college math classes.

This list is in a history of mathematics order, a order in which people first recognized the problem and how they dealt with it, even if they did not formalize the idea as a postulate or axiom of mathematics. And as can be seen in this history, some of these ideas go back to Ancient times such as the Ancient Greeks, that the idea was conceived in Ancient times but was later abandoned and sloppy math came into existence, sloppy and false. So we can perceive that ideas in math or science in general can sometimes be such that we discover the true ideas early, but later abandon them for other ideas that are false, only to have to return to the true ideas.

1) You cannot Remove or Subtract more than what is available. For example we ask someone to subtract 10 from 1. Impossible, because you cannot remove more than what is available to remove and remove is actually a better word to describe the operation of subtract. In Old Math however, they dreamed up a fake concept of negative number and for them 1 - 10 = -9. Those in Old Math saw nothing wrong in a idealism, fake idealism of removing more than what is available. This was known and discovered in Ancient mathematics, especially the Ancient Greeks who well knew that subtraction cannot go beyond what is available. The Ancient Greeks were a fussy bunch for they even denied the existence of irrational numbers as the Pythagoreans even threatened the penalty of death for those with irrational numbers. So of course they would be fussy about something such as negative numbers. But then there came a time in math history of what can be called a game of polynomials of finding the solutions of quadratic equations then higher degree polynomial equations. And this game was played mostly in Italy with that of Tartaglia and Cardan and others playing games of solving polynomial equations. In their play, they had a need for negative numbers and thus opened the flood gates of accepting negative numbers when in actuality, they never existed and cannot exist. Little would these game players of polynomials of algebra ever understand that a Polynomial equation never exists with a 0 or negative number all alone on the rightside of the equation. That the rightside of the equation has to always remain a positive Decimal Grid Number to be a valid polynomial equation, and in that manner, no negative numbers ever exist.

2) You cannot divide by zero. For example, if asked to divide 3 by zero, we have 3/0 and so we have a equation of 3/0 = k, and now multiply both sides by 0 we have 3 = k*0. Now we want to know what k is. But no matter what k is, the product is 0 and not 3. The havoc that this causes if we allow for division by 0, is that every number equals every other number, 1 =2, 2=3, etc. This was probably known also, by the Ancient Greeks but we have no documentation showing they knew this well. But we do have documentation by George Berkeley's 1734 "The Analyst". And it is a wonder, then, that they--the mathematics community, never realized division by 0 needed to be formally known as a axiom or postulate of mathematics. It is sad that in math history, the Ancient Greeks devised the postulate or axiomatic deductive system of mathematics, yet one of the most important of all axioms, you cannot divide by zero is missing in Ancient Greek math.

3) A true valid equation in mathematics must have a positive nonzero Decimal Grid Number, all alone on the rightside of the equation, at all times on the rightside of the equal sign. If Tartaglia and Cardan had known of this axiom or discovered this axiom, then they would not have caused the proliferation of the silly fake negative numbers. Mathematics gets its concept of equality from a balancing beam, much like those seen in some stores where you weigh fruit on one scale and on the other scale you place a known weight. For Old Math to think you can have 0 all alone on the rightside or have a fake negative number all alone on the rightside, was a grave error of logical reasoning. Just as no fruit-stand salesman has a "no weight on rightside" or has a "imagination of negative something on the rightside". A math equation is a valid equation if and only if a positive nonzero Decimal Grid Number is on the rightside of the equation at all times. Never can an equation of mathematics equal to zero. This was historically discovered by AP in 2015 and noted as a axiom of math algebra. And this axiom applies to all equations and to polynomials especially, for the polynomial equation is a special equation in both math and science, especially physics. Which brings us to the last of these important 4 axioms of mathematics. The axiom that qualifies a function is a function of mathematics.

4) A function of math exists only when it is a polynomial function. If you have a function and cannot convert it into a polynomial over a specific interval, then it is not a function. Trigonometry functions are not functions of mathematics until put into a polynomial form over a interval. Exponential functions are not functions of mathematics unless put into a polynomial form over a interval. Logarithmic functions are not functions of mathematics unless put into a polynomial form over a interval. The only functions in mathematics are polynomial functions over whatever interval is of concern. So in true mathematics, the only functions you will ever see are Polynomials. At present in math history in 2021, there are thousands and thousands of different so called functions. And is probably one of the greatest reasons that mathematics is a difficult and ugly subject for young people to make a career in. Old Math never had a clean-up department, but rather, had ever more and more ugly fake junk thrown onto the pile that is called mathematics. In the history of mathematics, so many proposed candidate functions failed that test of becoming a polynomial over a interval. AP discovered this axiom in 2016 in order to make all of Calculus simple and easy, but as it became obvious after 2016, that the *polynomial requirement* is essential in order to produce a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. So, what became a tool to make Calculus super easy to make math easy to work in because if all functions were polynomials, thus able to apply the two calculus power rules for derivative and integral. What became a aid in simplicity, and ease of working calculus, turns out that this polynomial function requirement is a necessity of mathematics because we cannot have a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus without this polynomial requirement. For details see AP's book 11th published book:

Old Math only got one of the 4 above listed critical axioms of Algebra correct, the one that you cannot divide by 0 axiom. But the other 3 were missed by Old Math, and shows how much the math community carries on without someone with a logical brain to think clear. As if mathematics was carried on by blind people.

Now Euclid in Ancient Greek times needed only 5 axioms with the parallel postulate being the 5th. So obviously with AP's conjectures that 6 is the magic number for all encompassing, due to 6 is all the number of EM laws needed to do all of physics, that we start this round of conjecturing on geometry and on arithmetic-algebra.

Conjecture 24.1
Statement: AP conjectures that Geometry needs only 6 axioms to do all of mathematics geometry and this seems reasonable in that Ancient Greeks needed only 5.

Conjecture 24.2
Statement: Mathematics is split into two houses, geometry and algebra-numbers. They are a duality to each other, much like particle to wave duality or electricity to magnetism duality of physics. Since 6 axioms are needed to do all of geometry, then 6 axioms are all that is needed to do all of algebra-numbers. And in the above listed 4 axioms, AP conjectures that all four of those are reduced to just the (1) what is a equation and (2) what is a function. The idea of no negatives and division by zero is never allowed comes out as a theorem from "what is a equation of math". So that leaves algebra-numbers with 4 more axioms to have 6 in all.

Conjecture 24.3
Statement: When the final 6 axioms of Geometry and of Algebra are fully realized, I conjecture they mirror image one another. For example the geometry axiom of "all right angles are equal to one another" would be the axiom in algebra that of the Pythagorean theorem A^2 + B^2 = C^2. In Physics EM 6 laws, we have the Faraday law as dual to the Ampere-Maxwell law where magnetism produces electricity in Faraday and where electricity produces magnetism in Ampere-Maxwell.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Nov 17, 2022, 1:48:16 AM11/17/22
to

> Thanks!!! Archie Poo for saving my worthless life during the pandemic, kiss kiss kiss---
On Saturday, June 13, 2020 at 12:32:30 AM UTC-5, Doctor Anagram wrote:
> The letters in
> On Friday, March 13, 1998 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James Kibo Parry wrote:
> > and "Admiral"
>
> AP writes: I do not know why I bother, for you only will continue to stalk all day-- all year-- all decade. The banging of your head on the floor-- Kibo as a baby -- must have been so damaging that you never recovered.
>
> AP writes: No Kibo Parry, not Admiral, something far far bigger, the King of Science, been so since 1990 with discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality. Science makes sense only if "All is atom" includes the Universe itself as a single big atom.
>
> Re: 1---AP's cure of covid-19, the MRI or CT scan at resonant frequency// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULING EARTH by Professor Wordsmith Jul 27, 2020, 3:33:16 PM

0 new messages