Less than 1% of greenhouse gas is actually carbon dioxide.

[al...@gmail.com]

That's real data, not modeling data.

[olli...@gmail.com]

On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 at 3:43:40 AM UTC-6, al...@gmail.com wrote:
> That's real data, not modeling data.

Yes, factual information -- No contradiction.

Radiative Forcing
http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Climate/radiative_forcing.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Radiative-forcings.svg/600px-Radiative-forcings.svg.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_forcing

Water Vapor (gas) may be the most abundant GHG, but it is not dominant in radiative forcing.

[Cold Start Diesels]

In article <XnsAB22119...@0.0.0.1>

"al...@gmail.com" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's real data, not modeling data.

Why doesn't that stupid socialist bitch Greta Horndog know this?

[benj]

Because she is a stupid kid who believes the bullshit adults tell her.

Anyway, it's easier to tax fossil fuels than clouds and oceans.

[Mitch Raemsch]

On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 at 1:43:40 AM UTC-8, al...@gmail.com wrote:
> That's real data, not modeling data.

And why is that important?

[Sylvia Else]

On 11/12/2019 8:43 pm, al...@gmail.com wrote:
> That's real data, not modeling data.
>

What proportion of the greenhouse effect is caused by carbon dioxide?

Sylvia.

[%]

how much is over my house at any given moment

[Mitch Raemsch]

This statistic is completely wrong.
How much carbon dioxide comes from
the earth's plants for us animals?
There is an inaccuracy.

Mitchell Raemsch

[benj]

About 10% and no more than 15% according to NASA which is widely shown
to be a mouse-painting data faking alarmist organization. So even this
number is highly suspect. Given Temperature went DOWN 1940-1970 as
measured by Hansen's GISS data while CO2 was rising, puts the lie to all
CO2 nonsense. But it's SO hard to tax the water in the oceans!

[olli...@gmail.com]

On Saturday, December 14, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-6, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
>
> How much carbon dioxide comes from the earth's plants for us animals?
>

Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/styles/medium/public/2019-04/total-ghg-2019.jpg

Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/styles/medium/public/2016-05/global_emissions_gas_2015.png

One can see the human affect on CO2 Concentration from:
https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/wp-content/plugins/sio-bluemoon/graphs/co2_800k.png
https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/wp-content/plugins/sio-bluemoon/graphs/mlo_full_record.png

[olli...@gmail.com]

On Monday, December 16, 2019 at 12:20:14 AM UTC-6, benj wrote:

>
> About 10% and no more than 15% according to NASA which is widely shown
> to be a mouse-painting data faking alarmist organization.

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

al...@gmail.com amok-crossposted to 4 newsgroups:

> That's real data, not modeling data.

But, as I just told you, you are not considering the impact on the climate
of the substance in question.

To use an analogy, 200 mg of a cyanide solution in a (UK) cup of tea of
284 g (1 l H₂O has approximately a mass of 1 kg) already causes death
within minutes. That is less than 1 % of the liquid in the cup, too.

--
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.