TIME AS WELL AS INTELLIGENCE ARE MANIFESTATION OF MASS
Paul Lutus
Only if you have no time left and are extremely dense.
--
Paul Lutus
www.arachnoid.com
Alexander Abian wrote in message <7g62cq$g5k$1...@news.iastate.edu>...
<snip>
Alexander Abian
In article <37264C89...@spacestar.net>,
kreeg <kr...@spacestar.net> wrote:
>>Abian wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I do consider Einstein's definition of TIME, i.e.,
>> TIME is what a watch measures (A.Einstein)
>> as nonconvincing and refuse to accept it. It is as nonconvincing as
>> accepting that
>> INTELLIGENCE is what IQ-test measures
>>Experience shows that many "very intelligent persons" score dismally on
>> the best designed IQ tests.
>>
Kreegier says:
>Ya, what ever, I consider Einstein's answers to be the best answers yet
>for those questions. It is almost impossible to define intelligence.
Abian answers:
Intelligence is produced as a result of the expenditure of some
cerebral ENERGY and thus as a result of expenditure of some MASS.
An intelligent way of determining intelligence, at the final
analysis will be based on the amount of cerebral energy (or mass)
spent.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABIAN TIME-MASS EQUIVALENCE FORMULA T = A m^2 in Abian units.
ALTER EARTH'S ORBIT AND TILT TO STOP GLOBAL DISASTERS AND EPIDEMICS.
JOLT THE MOON TO JOLT THE EARTH INTO A SANER ORBIT.ALTER THE SOLAR SYSTEM.
REORBIT VENUS INTO A NEAR EARTH-LIKE ORBIT TO CREATE A BORN AGAIN EARTH(1990)
THERE WAS A BIG SUCK AND DILUTION OF PRIMEVAL MASS INTO THE VOID OF SPACE
IQ 400
--
Sir Isaac Hemet.
Wisdom is my kingdom,
if I fail to make you wiser indeed,
at least amusement was guaranteed.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
ryk...@my-dejanews.com
ab...@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) wrote:
> ------------
>
> In article <37264C89...@spacestar.net>,
> kreeg <kr...@spacestar.net> wrote:
> >>Abian wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, I do consider Einstein's definition of TIME, i.e.,
> >> TIME is what a watch measures (A.Einstein)
> >> as nonconvincing and refuse to accept it. It is as nonconvincing as
> >> accepting that
> >> INTELLIGENCE is what IQ-test measures
> >>Experience shows that many "very intelligent persons" score dismally on
> >> the best designed IQ tests.
> >>
>
> Kreegier says:
>
> >Ya, what ever, I consider Einstein's answers to be the best answers yet
> >for those questions. It is almost impossible to define intelligence.
>
> Abian answers:
>
> Intelligence is produced as a result of the expenditure of some
> cerebral ENERGY and thus as a result of expenditure of some MASS.
> An intelligent way of determining intelligence, at the final
> analysis will be based on the amount of cerebral energy (or mass)
> spent.
Rod: I'd only add , to help clearify to others ,
the least brain cells used to solve a problem
the more intelligent .
Rod Ryker...
Gary Levell
Alexander Abian wrote in message <7g62cq$g5k$1...@news.iastate.edu>...
<snip>
>Intelligence is produced as a result of the expenditure of some
>cerebral ENERGY and thus as a result of expenditure of some MASS.
>An intelligent way of determining intelligence, at the final
>analysis will be based on the amount of cerebral energy (or mass)
>spent.
So don't spend too long thinking too hard otherwise there won't
be any mass left to think with.
I don't suppose that you have any equations to relate this effect,
or an experiment that we could do to prove this, perhaps like
standing on the bathroom scales and reading advanced QED,
then looking at the scales to see the change in mass(weight).
Sorry for the flippancy, but your postings generally seem to
be against the common lines of thought, and whilst there is a
chance that you are right and everyone else is wrong, you will
have to admit that that chance is very small.
-Gary