Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Slides from my first Physics Lecture, and a New Draft Paper Summarizing the Experimental Points of Contact which Affirm my Work

37 views
Skip to first unread message

Jay R. Yablon

unread,
Jun 16, 2013, 4:35:02 PM6/16/13
to
Dear friends:

This past week I gave my first physics lecture on the research in my recent
four published papers establishing that proton and neutrons are actually a
particular type of magnetic monopole (based on a theory called Yang-Mills
because those are the names of the two fellows who invented its foundations).
In the lecture, I consolidated all four of my papers totaling about 140 pages
into a 70 minute lecture (50 minutes talk, 20 minutes Q&A discussion) and 64
slides which you can download from
http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/physics-lecture-slides.pdf.

It would probably take someone a couple of weeks to read through and
thoroughly understand my four papers. The slides were designed to allow
someone to assimilate the same information within a couple of hours. Please
take a look.

Also, I prepared a new paper which you may read at
http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/fitting-the-2h-3h-3he-4h-binding-energies-3.pdf
which in ten pages lays out the multiple relationships I have found which very
clearly connect to experimental data that had never before been explained.
This is the ?tip of the iceberg? in terms of the multiple ways in which nature
herself validates my theoretical work at the parts-per-million level. My
hope is that people in the physics community will see these results, realize
that there is something real here, and then take the time to backtrack to
understand the theoretical foundations that got me to that point. A sort of
?inversion? of my work to lead with the experimental results in order to
catalyze interest. Everything in this paper by the way, is simple arithmetic
(as in, numbers calculated and compared to other numbers), and about the only
complexity is that you need to understand a tiny bit about matrix
multiplication (like that the ?Trace? of a square matrix is just the sum of
all the entries long its upper left to lower right diagonal). If you do not
want to even sort through the matrix stuff, then just look at equations (14)
through (20). These are pure numbers, and you will see how close I get to the
experimental data each and every time. Nobody has ever before explained this
experimental data with such high precision!

People, I am usually careful not to toot too loudly about my work. But I have
to say that this is real, it is fundamental, and it will revolutionize nuclear
and particle theory. The question is no longer if, but when. The discoveries
have been made and they are in print and all they need is attention from the
right places. My ?lab notes? and related work will soon spark a ?scientific
revolution? toward which I have been working for over 40 years. Real results
in hand, I am now doing all that I can to make that happen sooner rather than
later. I welcome any help or support my friends can provide in making that
happen.

Jay
_________________________________________________
Jay R. Yablon
910 Northumberland Drive
Schenectady, New York 12309-2814
Phone / Fax: 518-377-6737
Email: jya...@nycap.rr.com
Co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Blog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
0 new messages