Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
AFM0: Abstract 2020/04/19
50 views
Skip to first unread message
Ned Latham
Apr 19, 2020, 12:40:20 AM4/19/20
to
A Fundamental Matter
Ned Latham
Abstract
The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
world view needs modification or even radical reform. The view taken
here is that the problem dates back to the nineteenth century, when
Thomas Young conducted an experiment that was seen as definitively
contradicting the particle model of light, and Edmond Becquerel
discovered the photovoltaic effect, which was seen as definitively
contradicting the wave model of light. The need for a model consistent
with both results led eventually to Einstein's theory of Special
Relativity, thence to his theory of General Relativity and the present
dilemma. But now a particle model consistent with both results exists.
The Particle Theory of Matter
postulates universality, Newton's Laws of Motion, three fundamental
entities named Space, Force and Matter, and a derived phenomenon
named Energy.
The Particle Model of Light
defines frequency and wavelength as they apply to light and provides
explanations of light's behaviours, including the result of Young's
experiment.
The Particle Model of the Atom
reconciles the atomic models of Bohr, Schrödinger and Dirac.
Suggestions for Research
includes experiments that will unequivocably contradict either
particle theory or relativity theory.
Keywords: particle theory; particle model; Young's experiment
Ned Latham
Abstract
The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
world view needs modification or even radical reform. The view taken
here is that the problem dates back to the nineteenth century, when
Thomas Young conducted an experiment that was seen as definitively
contradicting the particle model of light, and Edmond Becquerel
discovered the photovoltaic effect, which was seen as definitively
contradicting the wave model of light. The need for a model consistent
with both results led eventually to Einstein's theory of Special
Relativity, thence to his theory of General Relativity and the present
dilemma. But now a particle model consistent with both results exists.
The Particle Theory of Matter
postulates universality, Newton's Laws of Motion, three fundamental
entities named Space, Force and Matter, and a derived phenomenon
named Energy.
The Particle Model of Light
defines frequency and wavelength as they apply to light and provides
explanations of light's behaviours, including the result of Young's
experiment.
The Particle Model of the Atom
reconciles the atomic models of Bohr, Schrödinger and Dirac.
Suggestions for Research
includes experiments that will unequivocably contradict either
particle theory or relativity theory.
Keywords: particle theory; particle model; Young's experiment
The Starmaker
Apr 19, 2020, 3:27:49 PM4/19/20
to
Ned Latham wrote:
>
> A Fundamental Matter
> Ned Latham
>
>
> Abstract
>
> The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> world view needs modification or even radical reform.
The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
>
> A Fundamental Matter
> Ned Latham
>
>
> Abstract
>
> The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> world view needs modification or even radical reform.
String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
Simply put, it's taking a wrong and convulted path.
In other words, it belongs in the garbage can.
You don't modify garbage. You throw garbage in a garbage can.
Take it to the back of the barn and shoot it.
> The view taken
> here is that the problem dates back to the nineteenth century, when
> Thomas Young conducted an experiment that was seen as definitively
> contradicting the particle model of light, and Edmond Becquerel
> discovered the photovoltaic effect, which was seen as definitively
> contradicting the wave model of light. The need for a model consistent
> with both results led eventually to Einstein's theory of Special
> Relativity, thence to his theory of General Relativity and the present
> dilemma. But now a particle model consistent with both results exists.
>
> The Particle Theory of Matter
> postulates universality, Newton's Laws of Motion, three fundamental
> entities named Space, Force and Matter, and a derived phenomenon
> named Energy.
>
> The Particle Model of Light
> defines frequency and wavelength as they apply to light and provides
> explanations of light's behaviours, including the result of Young's
> experiment.
>
> The Particle Model of the Atom
> reconciles the atomic models of Bohr, Schrödinger and Dirac.
>
> Suggestions for Research
> includes experiments that will unequivocably contradict either
> particle theory or relativity theory.
>
> Keywords: particle theory; particle model; Young's experiment
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Python
Apr 19, 2020, 4:08:32 PM4/19/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
...
Guffaw!
...
> Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion
> String Theory is founded on Mathematics
> General Relativity is founded on Philosphy
Guffaw!
The Starmaker
Apr 19, 2020, 4:54:06 PM4/19/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > A Fundamental Matter
> > Ned Latham
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
>
> The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
>
> String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
>
> General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
Where is the Science????
>
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > A Fundamental Matter
> > Ned Latham
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
>
> The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
>
> String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
>
> General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
The Starmaker
Apr 21, 2020, 2:59:52 AM4/21/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > >
> > > A Fundamental Matter
> > > Ned Latham
> > >
> > >
> > > Abstract
> > >
> > > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
> >
> > The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
> >
> > String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
> >
> > General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
>
> Where is the Science????
Where is the Physics?
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > >
> > > A Fundamental Matter
> > > Ned Latham
> > >
> > >
> > > Abstract
> > >
> > > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
> >
> > The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
> >
> > String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
> >
> > General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
>
> Where is the Science????
Ned Latham
Apr 21, 2020, 6:46:49 AM4/21/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A Fundamental Matter
> > > > Ned Latham
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Abstract
> > > >
> > > > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > > > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > > > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > > > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > > > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
> > >
> > > The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
Mathematics.
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A Fundamental Matter
> > > > Ned Latham
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Abstract
> > > >
> > > > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > > > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > > > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > > > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > > > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
> > >
> > > The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
> > > String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
> > >
> > > General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
> > Where is the Science????
The Lorentz Transform is a mathematical construct which correctly
predicts the outcomes of physical observations.
The Field Energy equation is a mathematical function which correctly
predicts the outcomes of physical observations.
> Where is the Physics?
The observations, from ancient times on...
It takes mathematics to make the data into theory.
The Starmaker
Apr 21, 2020, 12:02:32 PM4/21/20
to
Math is not Science.
Math does not exist out there in the universe.
You cannot get a theory of everything using a language like Math which
does not exist out there in the universe.
Math is like Evil, it exist only in the mind of man.
Who invented Quantum Mechanics, and I'll point it's source as from a
religion.
The Starmaker
Apr 21, 2020, 12:34:53 PM4/21/20
to
Ned Latham wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A Fundamental Matter
> > > > > Ned Latham
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Abstract
> > > > >
> > > > > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > > > > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > > > > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > > > > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > > > > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
> > > >
> > > > The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
>
> Mathematics.
>
> > > > String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
> > > >
> > > > General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
>
> Mathematics.
Albert Einstein said:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A Fundamental Matter
> > > > > Ned Latham
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Abstract
> > > > >
> > > > > The 2016 abandonment of the campaign to reconcile Quantum Mechanics
> > > > > and General Relativity through String Theory has left science with
> > > > > an apparently unresolvable conflict at it very roots, which raises
> > > > > the question as to whether some fundamental understanding in our
> > > > > world view needs modification or even radical reform.
> > > >
> > > > The problem stems from that Quantum Mechanics is founded on Religion..
>
> Mathematics.
>
> > > > String Theory is founded on Mathematics, and
> > > >
> > > > General Relativity is founded on...Philosphy.
>
> Mathematics.
"Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That’s relativity!"
"seems like.. " means 'descripition of one's *thoughts*
"thoughts" is...Philosphy, a particlar system of philoscophical...thought.
>
> > > Where is the Science????
>
> The Lorentz Transform is a mathematical construct which correctly
> predicts the outcomes of physical observations.
>
> The Field Energy equation is a mathematical function which correctly
> predicts the outcomes of physical observations.
>
> > Where is the Physics?
>
> The observations, from ancient times on...
> It takes mathematics to make the data into theory.
Ned Latham
Apr 21, 2020, 1:38:23 PM4/21/20
to
> Math is not Science.
Yes it is.
> Math does not exist out there in the universe.
> You cannot get a theory of everything using a language like Math which
> does not exist out there in the universe.
man.
> Math is like Evil, it exist only in the mind of man.
Math starts with Number, which exists only in the mind of man.
> Math is like Evil, it exist only in the mind of man.
> Who invented Quantum Mechanics, and I'll point it's source as from a
> religion.
The Starmaker
Apr 21, 2020, 5:08:51 PM4/21/20
to
The Starmaker
Apr 22, 2020, 3:12:12 AM4/22/20
to
The Starmaker
Apr 22, 2020, 2:19:39 PM4/22/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
>
> >
> > > Who invented Quantum Mechanics, and I'll point it's source as from a
> > > religion.
> >
> > Nope. Observations.
>
> I knew you would never pointed out who invented Quantum Mechanics, cause I can easily point out the foundation for it to be a ...Religion.
>
Take Lawrence Krauss for example, when he sez "A Universe from Nothing", if you look closer...you will find that
>
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
>
> >
> > > Who invented Quantum Mechanics, and I'll point it's source as from a
> > > religion.
> >
> > Nope. Observations.
>
> I knew you would never pointed out who invented Quantum Mechanics, cause I can easily point out the foundation for it to be a ...Religion.
>
the word "Nothing" is derived from his religious beliefs, ...it's 'foundation' (the word Nothing) is from his religion.
This is nothing more than 'religious indoctrination' into the sciences.
The Same with Quantum Mechanics. If you look closer to *all* the founders of quantum mechanics, you will find it's
*all* founded on their religion, not science or physics. Religious Indoctrination is all it is.
You people have been had. Hoodwinked!
Tell me, is there such a thing in reality as a ..quantum computer?
0 new messages