Amazon or NASA?

The Starmaker

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 2:56:56 PM7/24/21

to

Isn't it cheaper
to buy a rocketship to space
from Amazon than it is
from NASA?

I mean, Bezos and Branson
can use their credit card to
build a spaceship to space,
and Mars..

but, if you use NASA shopping...it
will cost you billions and billions and billions of dollars.

I think those motherfuckers at NASA are
RIPPING EVERYBODY OFF!

Could I get a better deal at Walmart? I got a coupon!

Hell, I can go to space and use PayPal!!!

BUT FUKIN NASA WANT TO RIP ME OFF!!!

[whisper] I bet i can go to mars for 15 cents if I use Alibaba Express.

BUT FUKIN NASA WANT TO RIP EVERYBODY OFF!!!!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

%

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 4:19:53 PM7/24/21

to

On 2021-07-24 11:57 a.m., The Starmaker wrote:
> Isn't it cheaper
> to buy a rocketship to space
> from Amazon than it is
> from NASA?
>
>
> I mean, Bezos and Branson
> can use their credit card to
> build a spaceship to space,
> and Mars..
>
> but, if you use NASA shopping...it
> will cost you billions and billions and billions of dollars.
>
>
> I think those motherfuckers at NASA are
> RIPPING EVERYBODY OFF!
>
> Could I get a better deal at Walmart? I got a coupon!
>
>
> Hell, I can go to space and use PayPal!!!
>
>
> BUT FUKIN NASA WANT TO RIP ME OFF!!!
>
>
> [whisper] I bet i can go to mars for 15 cents if I use Alibaba Express.
>
>
>
> BUT FUKIN NASA WANT TO RIP EVERYBODY OFF!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

you don't have a spaceship driver's license

The Starmaker

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 5:06:45 PM7/24/21

to

you never heard of driving without a license????

i no need no stinky license

Vance

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 7:10:32 PM7/24/21

to

The Starmaker wrote

> Isn't it cheaper
> to buy a rocketship to space
> from Amazon than it is
> from NASA?

They're all rockets, so why not hire Amazon to nuke Russia when the time
comes?

Bezos just isn't a big thinker, but if Trump had the money he'd have done it
by now.

The Starmaker

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 8:52:46 PM7/24/21

to

Isn't China the bigger enemy than the Russians???

I would kill the chinks first, how say you?

The Starmaker

unread,

Jul 25, 2021, 8:33:13 AM7/25/21

to

Vance wrote

Don't nuke Russia. That will piss off the Trumpers.

Slavic boy fuckers like Putin will probably escape to Cuba anyway.

Harry Bignall

unread,

Jul 25, 2021, 6:44:46 PM7/25/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Jul 30, 2021, 7:50:46 PM7/30/21

to

Vance wrote

The Starmaker

unread,

Aug 3, 2021, 9:48:25 PM8/3/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Aug 4, 2021, 6:06:34 PM8/4/21

to

Vance wrote

The Starmaker

unread,

Aug 31, 2021, 1:56:39 PM8/31/21

to

Vance wrote

The Starmaker

unread,

Sep 19, 2021, 11:53:36 AM9/19/21

to

Vance wrote

The Starmaker

unread,

Oct 9, 2021, 11:58:53 AM10/9/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Oct 10, 2021, 10:41:22 PM10/10/21

to

Vance wrote

carl eto

unread,

Oct 11, 2021, 4:40:31 PM10/11/21

to

"Such was the state of things when H. A. Lorentz entered upon the scene. He brought theory into harmony with experience by means of a wonderful simplification of theoretical principles. He achieved this, the most important advance in the theory of electricity since Maxwell, by taking from ether its mechanical, and from matter its electromagnetic qualities. As in empty space, so too in the interior of material bodies, the ether, and not matter viewed atomistically, was exclusively the seat of electromagnetic fields. According to Lorentz the elementary particles of matter alone are capable of carrying out movements; their electromagnetic activity is entirely confined to the carrying of electric charges. Thus Lorentz succeeded in reducing all electromagnetic happenings to Maxwell's equations for free space.

As to the mechanical nature of the Lorentzian ether, it may be said of it, in a somewhat playful spirit, that immobility is the only mechanical property of which it has not been deprived by H. A. Lorentz. It may be added that the whole change in the conception of the ether which the special theory of relativity brought about, consisted in taking away from the ether its last mechanical quality, namely, its immobility. How this is to be understood will forthwith be expounded.........More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny ether. We may assume the existence of an ether; only we must give up ascribing a definite state of motion to it, i.e. we must by abstraction take from it the last mechanical characteristic which Lorentz had still left it. We shall see later that this point of view, the inconceivability of which I shall at once endeavor to make more intelligible by a somewhat halting comparison, is justified by the results of the general theory of relativity." (Einstein7, Lecture).

Harry Bignall

unread,

Oct 12, 2021, 1:17:52 PM10/12/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Nov 1, 2021, 6:56:29 PM11/1/21

to

Vance wrote

The Starmaker

unread,

Nov 1, 2021, 6:56:29 PM11/1/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Nov 4, 2021, 2:12:05 PM11/4/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Nov 13, 2021, 5:09:24 PM11/13/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Nov 21, 2021, 5:10:00 PM11/21/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Nov 29, 2021, 5:01:26 PM11/29/21

to

Vance wrote

Harry Bignall

unread,

Dec 4, 2021, 11:55:57 AM12/4/21

to

Vance wrote

The Starmaker

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:58:13 PM1/10/22

to

Vance wrote