info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
NASA (on Dark Matter and Dark Energy); Question: Is Dark Matter local ether?
39 views
Skip to first unread message
Richard Hertz
Feb 5, 2023, 4:29:56 PM2/5/23
to
Dark Energy, Dark Matter
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy
*** EXCERPT ************************************************
What Is Dark Matter?
By fitting a theoretical model of the composition of the universe to the
combined set of cosmological observations, scientists have come up with
the composition that we described above, ~68% dark energy, ~27% dark
matter, ~5% normal matter. What is dark matter?
We are much more certain what dark matter is not than we are what it is.
First, it is dark, meaning that it is not in the form of stars and planets that
we see. Observations show that there is far too little visible matter in the
universe to make up the 27% required by the observations.
Second, it is not in the form of dark clouds of normal matter, matter made up
of particles called baryons. We know this because we would be able to
detect baryonic clouds by their absorption of radiation passing through hem.
Third, dark matter is not antimatter, because we do not see the unique
gamma rays that are produced when antimatter annihilates with matter.
Finally, we can rule out large galaxy-sized black holes on the basis of how
many gravitational lenses we see. High concentrations of matter bend light
passing near them from objects further away, but we do not see enough
lensing events to suggest that such objects to make up the required 25%
dark matter contribution.
.....
********** END OF EXCERPT **********************************
Current theory hypothesize that Dark Matter is concentrated on each galaxy,
and don't exist in the inter-galactic space.
If it's that so, and Dark Matter is distributed evenly within a galaxy, the Solar
System (and Earth) has its share.
According to the above, the total mass of the Solar System (and its parts)
is 25% higher than what is thought for more than three centuries, and HAS
TO AFFECT Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Not to mention GR.
For centuries, it was thought that light propagates in a medium (Maxwell
called it "luminiferous ether".
What if THAT WAS ALWAYS TRUE, and Einstein's relativity is a pile of crap,
but Lorentz's relativity is the real deal?
The concept of a GALACTIC LEVEL ethereal reference frame would make
einstenian relativity disappear OVERNIGHT. ALL OF IT.
And the all of the above, based on Hassenhorl E = 3/4 mc² HAD TO BE
ADDED TO the effect of Dark Energy (68% of the total mass-energy). This,
WITHOUT having a clue about the effect of Dark Matter and Energy on
the propagation of light, either within galaxies or in the inter-galactic space.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, ISN'T IT?
Disclaimer: NASA approve all of the above, including my heuristic extension.
Suggestion: Scientists and bureaucrats of science, better start to
RECALIBRATE all your instruments and systems of units to fit the above.
Anyway, they are used to do this TO ADJUST theories, like atomic missing
mass, definition of 1 second, translation from Gauss or esu-cgs to MKS.
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy
*** EXCERPT ************************************************
What Is Dark Matter?
By fitting a theoretical model of the composition of the universe to the
combined set of cosmological observations, scientists have come up with
the composition that we described above, ~68% dark energy, ~27% dark
matter, ~5% normal matter. What is dark matter?
We are much more certain what dark matter is not than we are what it is.
First, it is dark, meaning that it is not in the form of stars and planets that
we see. Observations show that there is far too little visible matter in the
universe to make up the 27% required by the observations.
Second, it is not in the form of dark clouds of normal matter, matter made up
of particles called baryons. We know this because we would be able to
detect baryonic clouds by their absorption of radiation passing through hem.
Third, dark matter is not antimatter, because we do not see the unique
gamma rays that are produced when antimatter annihilates with matter.
Finally, we can rule out large galaxy-sized black holes on the basis of how
many gravitational lenses we see. High concentrations of matter bend light
passing near them from objects further away, but we do not see enough
lensing events to suggest that such objects to make up the required 25%
dark matter contribution.
.....
********** END OF EXCERPT **********************************
Current theory hypothesize that Dark Matter is concentrated on each galaxy,
and don't exist in the inter-galactic space.
If it's that so, and Dark Matter is distributed evenly within a galaxy, the Solar
System (and Earth) has its share.
According to the above, the total mass of the Solar System (and its parts)
is 25% higher than what is thought for more than three centuries, and HAS
TO AFFECT Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Not to mention GR.
For centuries, it was thought that light propagates in a medium (Maxwell
called it "luminiferous ether".
What if THAT WAS ALWAYS TRUE, and Einstein's relativity is a pile of crap,
but Lorentz's relativity is the real deal?
The concept of a GALACTIC LEVEL ethereal reference frame would make
einstenian relativity disappear OVERNIGHT. ALL OF IT.
And the all of the above, based on Hassenhorl E = 3/4 mc² HAD TO BE
ADDED TO the effect of Dark Energy (68% of the total mass-energy). This,
WITHOUT having a clue about the effect of Dark Matter and Energy on
the propagation of light, either within galaxies or in the inter-galactic space.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, ISN'T IT?
Disclaimer: NASA approve all of the above, including my heuristic extension.
Suggestion: Scientists and bureaucrats of science, better start to
RECALIBRATE all your instruments and systems of units to fit the above.
Anyway, they are used to do this TO ADJUST theories, like atomic missing
mass, definition of 1 second, translation from Gauss or esu-cgs to MKS.
Richard Hertz
Feb 5, 2023, 7:15:38 PM2/5/23
to
possibility that Dark Matter/Energy be real. Curiously, and very karmic, relativity would kill itself. All of it.
Dono.
Feb 5, 2023, 8:05:19 PM2/5/23
to
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:15:38 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> . Curiously, and very karmic, relativity would kill itself. All of it.
You are having wet dreams again, Dick.
> . Curiously, and very karmic, relativity would kill itself. All of it.
Ross A. Finlayson
Feb 5, 2023, 8:22:27 PM2/5/23
to
Richard Hertz
Feb 5, 2023, 8:44:56 PM2/5/23
to
LIST OF CRETINISMS:
1. The first REAL evidence for dark matter came in 1933, when Caltech's Fritz Zwicky used the Mount Wilson Observatory to measure
the visible mass of a cluster of galaxies and found that it was much too small to prevent the galaxies from escaping the gravitational
pull of the cluster. CALCULATIONS, ESTIMATIONS, IMAGINATION, NON ACCOUNTABILITY: THE SECRETS OF PHYSICS.
2. In the 1970s, Vera Rubin and Kent Ford, while based at the Carnegie Institution for Science, measured the rotation speeds of individual
galaxies and found evidence that, like Zwicky’s galaxy cluster, dark matter was keeping the galaxies from flying apart. NO WAY THAT
NEWTON'S THEORY CAN HAVE A CUT ON THIS. NO DARKNESS OR GR FIELD EQUATIONS NEEDED, BUT......
3. Since the 1990s, scientists have been building large experiments designed to catch elusive dark matter particles, but they continue to come up empty-handed. What some still consider the leading candidate for dark matter, called WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles), have not been found in any of the data collected so far, nor have particles called axions; both WIMPs and axions are hypothetical elementary particles proposed to solve outstanding theoretical mysteries in the widely accepted model of particle physics, called the Standard Model, which classifies all known elementary particles and describes three of the four known fundamental forces (the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions, leaving out gravity). Additional dark matter candidates include particles called sterile neutrinos, along with primordial black holes. Some theorists have proposed that modifications to our theories of gravity might explain away dark matter, though this idea is less favored. NO! EINSTEIN HAVE TO STAY AT ALL COST. INVENT MORE SHIT.
4. In 2006, Zurek and colleagues proposed the idea that dark matter could be part of a hidden sector, with its own dynamics, independent of normal matter like photons, electrons, quarks, and other particles that fall under the Standard Model. Unlike normal matter, the hidden-sector particles would live in a dark universe of their own. Somewhat like a school of fish who swim only with their own kind, these particles would interact strongly with one another but might occasionally bump softly into normal particles via a hypothetical messenger particle. This is in contrast to the proposed WIMPs, for example, which would interact with normal matter through the known weak force by exchanging a heavy particle. MAYBE TOM ROBERTS HAS A SAYING ON THIS.
5. Mark B. Wise, the John A. McCone Professor of High Energy Physics, who, in 1982, was among the first to propose that axions could be the missing dark matter particles, says dark matter could be axions, hidden-sector particles, or something else entirely. Wise made his proposal along with John Preskill, Caltech’s Richard P. Feynman Professor of Theoretical Physics and director of the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter (IQIM), and Frank Wilczek of MIT. “We look where we can and where nature tells us to look,” Wise says. “As a theoretical physicist, I am humbled by the universe. We should be embarrassed at some level about how little we know, but this can also be an opportunity to learn more.” NO! THE SMEP HAS TO STAY AS IN 1970+HIGSS.
CONCLUSION: EINSTEIN'S RIGHT, EVEN WHEN BEING WRONG. DARK SHIT IS TRYING TO FIX THE HOLE OF AN ISOTROPIC,
EXPANDING UNIVERSE, AND LCDM IS THE ONLY MODEL THAT SATISFY BOTH BBT AND GR. NO NEWTON ALLOWED.
IMBECILES, CRETINS, INSIGNIFICANT INSECTS. TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS BY USING A MAGNIFYING
GLASS AND THE EQUATIONS OF A SEVERELY MENTAL RETARDED, YET FUNCTIONAL CRETIN.
1. The first REAL evidence for dark matter came in 1933, when Caltech's Fritz Zwicky used the Mount Wilson Observatory to measure
the visible mass of a cluster of galaxies and found that it was much too small to prevent the galaxies from escaping the gravitational
pull of the cluster. CALCULATIONS, ESTIMATIONS, IMAGINATION, NON ACCOUNTABILITY: THE SECRETS OF PHYSICS.
2. In the 1970s, Vera Rubin and Kent Ford, while based at the Carnegie Institution for Science, measured the rotation speeds of individual
galaxies and found evidence that, like Zwicky’s galaxy cluster, dark matter was keeping the galaxies from flying apart. NO WAY THAT
NEWTON'S THEORY CAN HAVE A CUT ON THIS. NO DARKNESS OR GR FIELD EQUATIONS NEEDED, BUT......
3. Since the 1990s, scientists have been building large experiments designed to catch elusive dark matter particles, but they continue to come up empty-handed. What some still consider the leading candidate for dark matter, called WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles), have not been found in any of the data collected so far, nor have particles called axions; both WIMPs and axions are hypothetical elementary particles proposed to solve outstanding theoretical mysteries in the widely accepted model of particle physics, called the Standard Model, which classifies all known elementary particles and describes three of the four known fundamental forces (the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions, leaving out gravity). Additional dark matter candidates include particles called sterile neutrinos, along with primordial black holes. Some theorists have proposed that modifications to our theories of gravity might explain away dark matter, though this idea is less favored. NO! EINSTEIN HAVE TO STAY AT ALL COST. INVENT MORE SHIT.
4. In 2006, Zurek and colleagues proposed the idea that dark matter could be part of a hidden sector, with its own dynamics, independent of normal matter like photons, electrons, quarks, and other particles that fall under the Standard Model. Unlike normal matter, the hidden-sector particles would live in a dark universe of their own. Somewhat like a school of fish who swim only with their own kind, these particles would interact strongly with one another but might occasionally bump softly into normal particles via a hypothetical messenger particle. This is in contrast to the proposed WIMPs, for example, which would interact with normal matter through the known weak force by exchanging a heavy particle. MAYBE TOM ROBERTS HAS A SAYING ON THIS.
5. Mark B. Wise, the John A. McCone Professor of High Energy Physics, who, in 1982, was among the first to propose that axions could be the missing dark matter particles, says dark matter could be axions, hidden-sector particles, or something else entirely. Wise made his proposal along with John Preskill, Caltech’s Richard P. Feynman Professor of Theoretical Physics and director of the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter (IQIM), and Frank Wilczek of MIT. “We look where we can and where nature tells us to look,” Wise says. “As a theoretical physicist, I am humbled by the universe. We should be embarrassed at some level about how little we know, but this can also be an opportunity to learn more.” NO! THE SMEP HAS TO STAY AS IN 1970+HIGSS.
CONCLUSION: EINSTEIN'S RIGHT, EVEN WHEN BEING WRONG. DARK SHIT IS TRYING TO FIX THE HOLE OF AN ISOTROPIC,
EXPANDING UNIVERSE, AND LCDM IS THE ONLY MODEL THAT SATISFY BOTH BBT AND GR. NO NEWTON ALLOWED.
IMBECILES, CRETINS, INSIGNIFICANT INSECTS. TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS BY USING A MAGNIFYING
GLASS AND THE EQUATIONS OF A SEVERELY MENTAL RETARDED, YET FUNCTIONAL CRETIN.
Dono.
Feb 5, 2023, 8:54:12 PM2/5/23
to
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 5:44:56 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> LIST OF MY CRETINISMS:
You have accumulated a lot of them, Dick. Keep at it, dumbestshit.
> LIST OF MY CRETINISMS:
You have accumulated a lot of them, Dick. Keep at it, dumbestshit.
0 new messages