Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

THE DUTCH WINDMILL METRIC (a,a,a,-1/a)

176 views
Skip to first unread message

George Hammond

unread,
Jul 2, 2022, 2:25:04 PM7/2/22
to
THE DUTCH WINDMILL METRIC (a,a,a,-1/a)

Hans grew up in Holland within sight of a
Windmill. Year-by-year as he grew up, the
windmill appeared to grow smaller and
smaller and appeared to turn slower and
slower until he was 20 years old. And then
has maintained the same size and speed.
.
This was caused by the fact that he was
born 20" tall and grew to 70" and 70/20=3.5
magnification "a". Also his "mental speed"
increased by a factor of 20 by the time he
was 20 as evidenced by the fact that the
world divides intelligence by age to get IQ
for people under 20.
.
In college Hans studied Relativity Physics and
realized this phenomena could be written in the
form of a "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME METRIC"
of the form: –
.
| (a^2). 0. 0. 0. |
| 0. (a^2). 0. 0. |
| 0. 0. (a^2). 0. |
| 0 0 0 (-1/a^2) |
.
Where the magnification factor "a" begins at
3.5 at birth and decreases to 1.18 at adulthood.
(The worldwide average of full human growth
is only about 85% and hence the terminal
magnification is a=1/.85=1.18). "a" the
"magnification factor" begins at 3.5 at birth
and decreases to 1.18 at adulthood.
.
Hans then proceeded to plug this metric into
a MAXIMA relativity computer program and
got the following results: –
THE RIEMANN TENSOR is NONZERO
THE EINSTEIN TENSOR is NONZERO
THE SCALAR CURVATURE is NONZERO
and in fact all 3 of these quantities are
proportional to (da/dt)^2 which is about
5%/year for a growing child.
He realized that this is an –
ENORMOUS SPACETIME CURVATURE
by ordinary Relativity standards !
A near BLACK HOLE size curvature!
.
The MAXIMA computer printout can be seen here:
.
https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_curvature_calculation
.
Unknowingly it turns out, Hans had
accidentally discovered the world's first
Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) and that: –
.
GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
OF SUBJECTIVE SPACE TIME
.
Hans (George E Hammond MS physics)

George Hammond

unread,
Jul 3, 2022, 11:26:44 AM7/3/22
to
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Obviously the "Windmill Metric" is a CONFORMAL metric –
quite similar to the well-known FLRW metric.
..
In fact, it could be that human beings actually SEE
"conformal time" – and if we do – Then the Windmill Metric
would be IDENTICAL to the FLRW metric !?
.
George

Maciej Wozniak

unread,
Jul 4, 2022, 2:17:13 AM7/4/22
to
On Sunday, 3 July 2022 at 17:26:44 UTC+2, ghamm...@gmail.com wrote:

> In fact, it could be that human beings actually SEE
> "conformal time"

No, it couldn't be. No human being ever saw time.
If you have a different opinion - what spectrum of
light time radiate, or absorb?

George Hammond

unread,
Jul 4, 2022, 1:15:31 PM7/4/22
to
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Are you a PhD level physicist?
By using the expression "SEE TIME" we really are meaning
"EXPERIENCE TIME".
'
If you are a PhD level Relativity Physicist then you know
that the FLRW metric uses the substitution t=1/T to convert to
"CONFORMAL TIME" – but the "windmill metric" already has a
factor of "1/t" in it.
.
This suggests to me that people under 20 years of age who
are not fully grown, as explained in the OP, are actually experiencing
"conformal time".
.
George

Maciej Wozniak

unread,
Jul 4, 2022, 4:08:20 PM7/4/22
to
On Monday, 4 July 2022 at 19:15:31 UTC+2, ghamm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 2:17:13 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, 3 July 2022 at 17:26:44 UTC+2, ghamm...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, it could be that human beings actually SEE
> > > "conformal time"
> > No, it couldn't be. No human being ever saw time.
> > If you have a different opinion - what spectrum of
> > light time radiate, or absorb?
> [GE Hammond MS physics]
> Are you a PhD level physicist?

No.

> By using the expression "SEE TIME" we really are meaning
> "EXPERIENCE TIME".

I understand very well; you're messing the words to
make the interlocutor confused enough to believe
your idiocies. And "see" looks trustworthy.

George Hammond

unread,
Jul 4, 2022, 9:19:51 PM7/4/22
to
Go jump in a lake.

Maciej Wozniak

unread,
Jul 5, 2022, 1:17:08 AM7/5/22
to
The truth hurts, doesn't it?

George Hammond

unread,
Jul 5, 2022, 9:53:00 AM7/5/22
to
Go fly a kite imbecile.

Volney

unread,
Jul 5, 2022, 2:19:48 PM7/5/22
to
Kꚙkfight!!!

Athel Cornish-Bowden

unread,
Jul 5, 2022, 2:47:00 PM7/5/22
to
If I understand "Kꚙkfight" correctly (fight between crackpots), then
I agree, and I was thinking the same thing.


--
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

George Hammond

unread,
Jul 5, 2022, 6:38:43 PM7/5/22
to
[GE Hammond MS physics]
More interesting is a "Cootfight" (that's a fight between
two 80-year-old scientists).
.... How about it Athel ? – we were both born in 1942 so we're
both 80 years old !
.
Meanwhile, for your reading enjoyment check this out: –
.
[GE Hammond MS physics]
In the original post (OP) of this thread I showed
HOW-WHY the METRIC OF SUBJECTIVE REALITY is –
.
| (a^2). 0. 0. 0. |
| 0. (a^2). 0. 0. |
| 0. 0. (a^2). 0. |
| 0 0 0 (-1/a^2) |
.
And if you plug this metric into MAXIMA or
MATHEMATICA computer program you will find that –
THE MAXIMA printout is here: –
.
https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_curvature_calculation
.
Which shows that: –
1. – The Riemann Tensor is proportional to (da/dt)^2
2. – The Einstein tensor is proportional to (da/dt)^2
.
Note that da/dt is the growth rate of a human being
under the age of 20 – and it is about 5%/year
.
This means, as the WINDMILL METRIC shows, thatthe SUBJECTIVE UNIVERSE is CONTRACTING at
the rate of 5%/year for the first 20 years of our lives!
And not ony that
it is SLOWIS DOWN the rate of 5%/year also.
'
Note that this expansion rate is HUGE in comparison
to the expansion rate of the objective Universe –
in fact 1 trillion times faster ! But it still obeys
the basic "Friedman, Lemaitre, Robertson–Walker" (FL RW)
expansion metric of Relativity of course the explanation
is that "subjective reality" is only a massless vacuum
IMAGE – whereas "subjective reality" is full of mass,
momentum and energy could never expand that fast!
Nevertheless – it still obeys the laws of relativity!!
Some Wag might even say" God obeys the Relativity
traffic laws".
.... Just thought I'd throw something stupid in there
just to be stylishly up to date with Internet standards !
.
Additionally, since the adult person (world average)
only reaches about 85% of full growth, and since
1/.85 = 1.18 all adults (world average) retain a
"permanent residual magnification" of space and
time (speed) of about EIGHTEEN PERCENT
and this permanent lifetime residual effect is
commonly referred to as "GOD".
.
Thus the WINDMILL METRIC is the world's first
Scientific (Relativistic) Proof of God.
.
George Hammond
0 new messages