On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 1:17:51 AM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
<snip>
> Your subject asks us to imagine a world without physicists, but you
> immediately praise a whole bunch of physicists? Maybe you realized
> right away my description of a continuation of the late Middle Ages was
> correct before I said it? And you feel the need to praise physicists for
> planes, trains and automobiles, plus the computer you spew nonsense
> from? You are thankful for a life expectancy of longer than 35 years
> ago, and nobody has had to throw you on the "Bring out your dead!" cart?
> >
> > But:
> >
> > - NO FUCKING RELATIVITY.
> > - No fucking quantum physics.
> > - BBT would have died just at birth.
> > - Cosmology would be based on Poisson's scalar theories.
> > - No E=mc2 would have been stated as a derivation of relativity. Chemists
> > would have created an equivalence for the missing mass, if any.
> > - No cult to a fucking thief, liar, plagiarist, king of science.
> >
> > A new world, much better than this would exist.
> And the truth comes out, once again. It is only one single physicist which you have an issue with.
No, Moroney, not only Einstein and relativity, which include the thread that connect Voigt, FitzGerald, Lorentz, PoincarΓ©, Minkowski, .....
Riemann's geometry and Ricci-Civita derivates should have stay in the realm of pure mathematics, and not invading physics.
Le Maitre should have not had followers, as the BBT is stupid, with no sense. This topic include hundred, if not thousands, of followers.
QM and all the derivates (QFT, QED, etc) should have not happened. Bohr model should had been enough for applied physics and chemistry. And I'm not questioning the derivation of E = mc2 by other means than relativity. It was going around for decades, before 1905.
Note that I'm thinking, above, that it would have come from chemistry and atomic theories that could have existed, to explain phenomena.
All the fuss about radioactivity in his first 30 years, which involved thousand of scientists in that period, ended only for some applications
in medical sciences. I recommend to read: Radioactivity A History of a Mysterious Science.
Also, for you as an EE, this book will open your eyes: Inventing the Electronic Century The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industries, with a new preface (Harvard Studies in Business History). Incredible book.
Also, maybe you'll appreciate some of these (from a long list of books that I have, about history of science):
The Continuous Wave Technology and American Radio, 1900-1932
The worldwide history of telecommunications
Leonhard Euler Mathematical Genius in the Enlightenment
The man who changed everything the life of James Clerk Maxwell
Men of Mathematics The Lives and Achievements of the Great Mathematicians from Zeno to PoincarΓ©
The Forgotten Genius of Oliver Heaviside A Maverick of Electrical Science
The cosmic century a history of astrophysics and cosmology
I stop here. If you want some other recommendations, including many which analyze the impact of relativity in science, ask me.