Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Einstein's 1905 Moving Clock
26 views
Skip to first unread message
Pentcho Valev
Oct 17, 2020, 12:05:45 PM10/17/20
to
Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
The moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM THE STATIONARY SYSTEM - that is what Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail.
The postulates also entail that, AS JUDGED FROM THE MOVING SYSTEM, the stationary clock lags behind the moving one. The 1905 text quoted above fraudulently implies the opposite. That is, Einstein implicitly suggests that both observers, stationary and moving, will see the moving clock lagging behind the stationary one.
Again: Einstein's 1905 postulates entail that
(A) the moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM THE STATIONARY SYSTEM, and the stationary clock lags behind the moving one AS JUDGED FROM THE MOVING SYSTEM.
Einstein abused logic in 1905 and "deduced" that
(B) the moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM BOTH SYSTEMS.
Why did Einstein abuse logic? Because (A), the valid deduction, doesn't, but (B), the non sequitur, does imply TIME TRAVEL INTO THE FUTURE - the miracle (idiocy) that converted Einstein into a deity:
Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
The moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM THE STATIONARY SYSTEM - that is what Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail.
The postulates also entail that, AS JUDGED FROM THE MOVING SYSTEM, the stationary clock lags behind the moving one. The 1905 text quoted above fraudulently implies the opposite. That is, Einstein implicitly suggests that both observers, stationary and moving, will see the moving clock lagging behind the stationary one.
Again: Einstein's 1905 postulates entail that
(A) the moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM THE STATIONARY SYSTEM, and the stationary clock lags behind the moving one AS JUDGED FROM THE MOVING SYSTEM.
Einstein abused logic in 1905 and "deduced" that
(B) the moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM BOTH SYSTEMS.
Why did Einstein abuse logic? Because (A), the valid deduction, doesn't, but (B), the non sequitur, does imply TIME TRAVEL INTO THE FUTURE - the miracle (idiocy) that converted Einstein into a deity:
Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Pentcho Valev
Oct 17, 2020, 5:25:54 PM10/17/20
to
It follows logically from Einstein's 1905 postulates that, if two clocks are in relative motion, either clock is slow as judged from the other clock's system (SYMMETRIC time dilation). An obvious implication is that
time SPEEDS UP for any traveler.
That is, any traveler who checks stationary clocks against his spaceship's clocks will find stationary clocks slow and his spaceship's clocks FAST. This also means that the traveler sees himself aging FASTER than stationary people.
This is the valid deduction from Einstein's postulates but it is sterile in terms of predictions (if Einstein had obeyed logic in 1905, his special relativity would not have survived). So high priests in the Einstein cult fraudulently teach that
time SLOWS DOWN for the traveler:
Brian Greene: https://youtu.be/Q1y3YnPgaY4?t=1157
Albert Einstein 1911: "The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion..." http://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol3-trans/368
Richard Feynman: "Now if all moving clocks run slower, if no way of measuring time gives anything but a slower rate, we shall just have to say, in a certain sense, that time itself appears to be slower in a space ship." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html
Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down." https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE
Neil deGrasse Tyson: "...Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how time would slow down for you if you are set into motion." http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/back-future-30th-anniversary-neil-degrasse-tyson-talks/story?id=32191481
Jim Al-Khalili: "Einstein showed that for anything (or anyone) travelling at speeds approaching that of light...time literally runs more slowly." https://scienceinschool.org/2009/issue11/timetravel
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
time SPEEDS UP for any traveler.
That is, any traveler who checks stationary clocks against his spaceship's clocks will find stationary clocks slow and his spaceship's clocks FAST. This also means that the traveler sees himself aging FASTER than stationary people.
This is the valid deduction from Einstein's postulates but it is sterile in terms of predictions (if Einstein had obeyed logic in 1905, his special relativity would not have survived). So high priests in the Einstein cult fraudulently teach that
time SLOWS DOWN for the traveler:
Brian Greene: https://youtu.be/Q1y3YnPgaY4?t=1157
Albert Einstein 1911: "The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion..." http://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol3-trans/368
Richard Feynman: "Now if all moving clocks run slower, if no way of measuring time gives anything but a slower rate, we shall just have to say, in a certain sense, that time itself appears to be slower in a space ship." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html
Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down." https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE
Neil deGrasse Tyson: "...Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how time would slow down for you if you are set into motion." http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/back-future-30th-anniversary-neil-degrasse-tyson-talks/story?id=32191481
Jim Al-Khalili: "Einstein showed that for anything (or anyone) travelling at speeds approaching that of light...time literally runs more slowly." https://scienceinschool.org/2009/issue11/timetravel
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
The Starmaker
Oct 17, 2020, 5:50:53 PM10/17/20
to
Pentcho Valev wrote:
>
> Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
>
> Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
is all about...bombs.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
The Starmaker
Oct 17, 2020, 6:01:43 PM10/17/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
> >
> > Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
>
> Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
> Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
> Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
>
> is all about...bombs.
In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...
>
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
> >
> > Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
>
> Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
> Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
> Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
>
> is all about...bombs.
"The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
"Bodies" actually means the bomb shell casing itself.
"Moving" or motion is the actual bomb...moving in motion towards it's target.
And "Electrodynamics" is the mechanics of getting the 'force' behind the bomb to hit it's target and ...explode. (you know, kill the motherfuckers.)
In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...)
"The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
I can see you girls never figured this out.
Shocking.
The Starmaker
Oct 17, 2020, 6:06:24 PM10/17/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
> >
> > Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
> > Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
> > Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
> >
> > is all about...bombs.
>
> In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...
>
> "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
>
> "Bodies" actually means the bomb shell casing itself.
>
> "Moving" or motion is the actual bomb...moving in motion towards it's target.
>
> And "Electrodynamics" is the mechanics of getting the 'force' behind the bomb to hit it's target and ...explode. (you know, kill the motherfuckers.)
>
> In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...)
>
> "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
>
> I can see you girls never figured this out.
>
> Shocking.
In other words, it's not about a rocket with one of the twins inside, or a train..
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
> >
> > Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
> > Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
> > Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
> >
> > is all about...bombs.
>
> In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...
>
> "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
>
> "Bodies" actually means the bomb shell casing itself.
>
> "Moving" or motion is the actual bomb...moving in motion towards it's target.
>
> And "Electrodynamics" is the mechanics of getting the 'force' behind the bomb to hit it's target and ...explode. (you know, kill the motherfuckers.)
>
> In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...)
>
> "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
>
> I can see you girls never figured this out.
>
> Shocking.
the rocket IS THE BOMB!
Moving Bodies which you think means boat, trains, planes...actually means...BOMBS!
The Starmaker
Oct 17, 2020, 6:48:27 PM10/17/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
> > >
> > > Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
> > > Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
> > > Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
> > >
> > > is all about...bombs.
> >
> > In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...
> >
> > "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
> >
> > "Bodies" actually means the bomb shell casing itself.
> >
> > "Moving" or motion is the actual bomb...moving in motion towards it's target.
> >
> > And "Electrodynamics" is the mechanics of getting the 'force' behind the bomb to hit it's target and ...explode. (you know, kill the motherfuckers.)
> >
> > In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...)
> >
> > "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
> >
> > I can see you girls never figured this out.
> >
> > Shocking.
>
> In other words, it's not about a rocket with one of the twins inside, or a train..
>
> the rocket IS THE BOMB!
>
> Moving Bodies which you think means boat, trains, planes...actually means...BOMBS!
>
In other words...
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
> > >
> > > Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for
> > > Empty Space. On the Nature of the Electromotive Forces
> > > Occurring in a Magnetic Field During Motion
> > >
> > > is all about...bombs.
> >
> > In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...
> >
> > "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
> >
> > "Bodies" actually means the bomb shell casing itself.
> >
> > "Moving" or motion is the actual bomb...moving in motion towards it's target.
> >
> > And "Electrodynamics" is the mechanics of getting the 'force' behind the bomb to hit it's target and ...explode. (you know, kill the motherfuckers.)
> >
> > In other words, (since everyone here doesn't understand Einstein's papers...)
> >
> > "The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" really means...bombs.
> >
> > I can see you girls never figured this out.
> >
> > Shocking.
>
> In other words, it's not about a rocket with one of the twins inside, or a train..
>
> the rocket IS THE BOMB!
>
> Moving Bodies which you think means boat, trains, planes...actually means...BOMBS!
>
this
"The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies"
is this
http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
Juan-Carlos Escalona-Martinez
Oct 18, 2020, 5:55:55 AM10/18/20
to
The Starmaker wrote:
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>
>> Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
>
> Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for Empty Space. On the
> Nature of the Electromotive Forces Occurring in a Magnetic Field During
> Motion
you two sisters are deluded, Maxwell never was about a completely empty
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>
>> Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905:
>
> Transformation of the Maxwell-Hertz Equations for Empty Space. On the
> Nature of the Electromotive Forces Occurring in a Magnetic Field During
> Motion
space, always having two afferent tensors associated with, even as
omitted.
mitchr...@gmail.com
Oct 18, 2020, 3:31:44 PM10/18/20
to
sharing Earth's motions of rotation and orbit...
0 new messages