Quantum mechanics

[carl eto]

Quantum mechanics use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used the represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represents the distance propagated. All of the photons are distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. A photon probability wave represents the possible position of a photon; consequently, the photons are distributed along the entire length between the first and last wave packet; henceforth, a photon probability wave cannot be used to represent the propagation of light because the photon position probability depicts the photons' position uncertainty which protons have a equal probability to exist anywhere in the interval of propagation; consequently, a position uncertainty cannot be used to depict a propagation mechanism of light. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid and nullifies the quantum mechanics wave packet propagation mechanism of light. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.



....................................................................................................................................



The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the wave into a straighten electromagnetic wave then places the straighten axis electromagnetic wave into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave which depicts Schrödinger transformation of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,





-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z).....................81



A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is represented with the wave function,



Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]............(Schrodinger, p. 1065).........................2



"The wave-function physical means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).

"The fluctuation of the charge will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).

"the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).


Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2 / s2) yet a photon is mass-less, and, an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain the particle structure of a propagating electromagnetic photon.


...................................................................................................................................


A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,



-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) )Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)...................................83



The normalization of the Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, does not include the nucleus where the box replaces the nucleus. Also,.....................

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

Individual light waves have quantized energy quantity.
Your light bulb gives off a collection of differently quantized waves of energy.
Einstein said no to his particle in 1937. He said light was a spherical wavelet instead.

Mitchell Raemsch

[Ross A. Finlayson]

"Quantum mechanics uses Planck's black-body radiation, which reflects how hot
things are, "to build the Maxwell shells in the model where standing wave finds up
this formalism".

"The wave-train is the distance."

Complex conjugates, keep the entire action, or, are half the action.

"... a position probability cannot depict a negative value
that is required in representing destructive wave interference ...",
here also is in the sense where under the conjugate,
is what results why that is so - according to probability.

It is Rayleigh and Rayleigh Jeans, then Compton, I think here
you are saying if it is Rayleigh or Rayleigh Jeans, here that
it is Rayleigh, Jeans, Compton, Debye, Maxwell.

I really hope you wrote all that because if it's plagiarism I'd feel terrible.

[carl eto]

On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 10:03:53 PM UTC-8, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> "Quantum mechanics uses Planck's black-body radiation, which reflects how hot
> things are, "to build the Maxwell shells in the model where standing wave finds up
> this formalism".
>
> "The wave-train is the distance."
>
> Complex conjugates, keep the entire action, or, are half the action.
>
> "... a position probability cannot depict a negative value
> that is required in representing destructive wave interference ...",
> here also is in the sense where under the conjugate,
> is what results why that is so - according to probability.
>
> It is Rayleigh and Rayleigh Jeans, then Compton, I think here
> you are saying if it is Rayleigh or Rayleigh Jeans, here that
> it is Rayleigh, Jeans, Compton, Debye, Maxwell.
>
> I really hope you wrote all that because if it's plagiarism I'd feel terrible.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



This is quite nice dear Ross since have said sometime in a logic manner and because of that I will analyses each word of your statement but not all in one day. First starting with your first sentence,
you state:

"Quantum mechanics uses Planck's black-body radiation, which reflects how hot
things are, "to build the Maxwell shells in the model where standing wave finds up
this formalism".

I will have to restate your statement to clarify it:

"Quantum mechanics uses Planck's black-body radiation, which reflects how hot

things are, where Planck quantizes Maxwell's electromagnetic field using resonating electromagnetic standing waves that are formed within the black body"

In your original statement you say that the standing wave is a model but Planck derives an equation that depicts the energy of a photon (e = hv) using the electromagnetic standing waves; therefore, the standing wave structure is not a model but is being used to depict the structure of light. This is extremely important concept since later you may use the argument that a certain structure adequacy is attributed to the model or analogy and it therefore allowable.

Do you accept that Planck's electromagnetic standing wave is a depiction of the structure of a photon?

Here is what happens when you use a model to derive an equation that represent the structure of energy of the entity the model or analogy is representing. In the case of Planck's standing waves, the standing waves are based on acoustical standing wave analogy (model), the problem becomes using the acoustical model to derive an energy equation will result in the described energy equation with physically constants of acoustic which has absolutely nothing structurally to do with light. In other words, physicists need to stop pretending (imaginary) both literally and physically, an get real.

[carl eto]

"The wave-train is the distance."

This is statement is difficult to decipher but I am assuming that you mean the probability waves that are used to form the wave packets from the first to the last wave packet, in the representation of the propagation of light, depicts the distance propagated; henceforth, you are concurring with my statement, jolly good.

"Complex conjugates, keep the entire action, or, are half the action."

Sorry, but this statement is false since the complex conjugate is a mathematical operator that eliminates positive vectors using positive vectors since a position probability is always positive, ol chap.

"... a position probability cannot depict a negative value
that is required in representing destructive wave interference ...",

here also is in the sense where under the conjugate,
is what results why that is so - according to probability.

Sorry my dear friend Ross but it is still not so since positive vectors cannot cancel but if you can find an example where it does I am all open ears since I have been wrong before and I will certainly be wrong until the day I die but hopefully something good will come out of it so anyways it was a good try.

It is Rayleigh and Rayleigh Jeans, then Compton, I think here
you are saying if it is Rayleigh or Rayleigh Jeans, here that
it is Rayleigh, Jeans, Compton, Debye, Maxwell.

Can't seem to get a hold of this last statement but it must have been some good whiskey that you got a hold of ol boy. I suggest some Johnny Walker blue for a good man as your self and Rayliegh, Compton and Debye says cheers to you!

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

If quantum waves as electron subatomic can move through both holes...
it suggests the waves are macro around the partition instead...
OCR reality doesn't exist.

Mitchell Raemsch

[carl eto]

I assuming that you mean electron diffraction? The electrons are not propagating through both holes since an electron is not a wave. Electron wave interference to form the non electron fringes violate energy conservation since the interference of electron matter wave would be involved. ol boy..tally ho.

[Ross A. Finlayson]

Yeah that's about the point that the complex have non-real components,
most of the time in interpretation that complex parts don't themselves
have a meaningful value, here when "their differece is zero, these conjugates
what together are balanced as about the usual linear Hermitian conjugate, beyond
that they are balanced with a well-defined interpretation their difference is
zero, with, not-a-well-defined interpretation".

https://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node133.html

Rayleigh-Jeans, Compton, Maxwell in the middle, then Debye, Airy, Young, ...
basically reflects that electrons are massy and charged while photons
are massless and chargeless, but that all due their wavelength, and energy,
the few functions same for them work out as linear, but, in reality they have
different complex components, which makes for why there are basically
various systems, to get figured out, in terms of electrical current, and the
photon sector. (That electrons go <=c and photons go >= c.)

[Ross A. Finlayson]

Because to arrive at a complex conjugate, the mathematical objects, after
that it reflects for the classical and potential fields, involves an intepretation
of the one side and the other, that are to reconcile: is that what results zero,
could still have many usual power terms ignored, because a usual normalization,
may or may not result after a usual truncation in terms, that the following don't
necessarily agree, in order and even in units.

I.e. that can help explain why the formula that physics offers: actually requires
knowing how it works and was arrived at underneath, in the derivation in the
attachment of physical to mathematical interpretation. I.e. the dynamics of it
all, or resonant as it were, basically only say "there's a vector field with a zero
vector in the middle".

[Python]

Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
...

> Because to arrive at a complex conjugate, the mathematical objects, after
> that it reflects for the classical and potential fields, involves an intepretation
> of the one side and the other, that are to reconcile: is that what results zero,
> could still have many usual power terms ignored, because a usual normalization,
> may or may not result after a usual truncation in terms, that the following don't
> necessarily agree, in order and even in units.
>
> I.e. that can help explain why the formula that physics offers: actually requires
> knowing how it works and was arrived at underneath, in the derivation in the
> attachment of physical to mathematical interpretation. I.e. the dynamics of it
> all, or resonant as it were, basically only say "there's a vector field with a zero
> vector in the middle".

You definitely abandoned any willing of making sense, right Ross?

[thor stoneman]

A position probability of a photon or electron is zero or some positive between 0 and one. Zero being not there and, .2 or 20% chance of the photon or electron being at that specific position; consequently, probably waves cannot depict wave interference since wave interference of a probability wave requires a negative value that is the foundation of the wave theory where quantum mechanics is also a wave theory. Quantum mechanic is a wave theory ol boy which resulted in the complex conjugate, jolly good of them but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is bloody mathematically invalid at least that what I would say. What about you does it strike you as a little bitty bit odd what they are doing, Cheereo and all that my good and trusty friend. Love hearing from you again and give a good and meaningful kiss to your lovely wife, for me and a nice pat on the head and kind word to your dog.

[thor stoneman]

Now Python, you lay off of Ross he is a good friend of mine and trying his best. Why, don't you tally ho to the ISS question and give it a good tug there ol chap since you seem to think you are one of the knights of the round table ready to save the world. So run along now, jolly surely now would be a good time.

[Maciej Wozniak]

Right, he did. That's how messing with common sense ends, Python.

[Ross A. Finlayson]

No, normalization is re-de-normalization, and there are various interpretations
attached to model objects, there is more than particle/wave duality with some
wave/state duality,if you don't know that, much of it is the output of undergraduate
physics classes, and introductory ones at that.

The massive dearth of scientific literacy these days it's poor.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

The electron wave has to go around a macro slit.
The partition is bigger than the wave...

[thor stoneman]

The box representation of the Bohr atom and the switch from Bohr's matter wave to a probability wave represents the normalization.

[thor stoneman]

The normalization of the Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, replaces the nucleus with a hypothetical box; henceforth, the derivation of a atom ends here. Also, Schrödinger’s wave equation is represented with a spherical coordinate system (equ 83) but Schrödinger’s wave function depicts a plane wave that has a constant maximum amplitude is incompatible with the equations of the atomic orbitals, that maximum amplitudes varies. Also, in the derivation of the equations of the atomic orbitals, Schrödinger’s electromagnetic wave is replaced with an electron probability wave. Plus, the reduce mass is added to the exponential of Schrödinger’s wave function (equ 83) where the Legendre polynomials are used within the exponential of Schrödinger’s wave function Ψ to maintain plane wave equation after adding the reduce mass (equ 83); consequently, the electron probability wave of Schrödinger’s wave function Ψ only represents a plane wave which invalidates the equations of the atomic orbitals that are not plane wave equations.

[thor stoneman]

The importance is the Legendre polynomials are in the exponential space and cannot be used to depict probability waves directly as implied by the equations of the atomic orbitals. This is a very monumental analyze of quantum mechanics.

[Odd Bodkin]

I think you need to take yourself directly to the next Recontres de Moriond
conference and announce your findings. It’s in La Thuile, about 2 hours
from Geneva.

Pocket-change for a genius such as yourself.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[thor stoneman]

Thanks!

[thor stoneman]

.

[carl eto]

On Monday, January 31, 2022 at 11:30:46 AM UTC-8, thor stoneman wrote:
> The normalization of the Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, replaces the nucleus with a hypothetical box; henceforth, the derivation of a atom ends here. Also, Schrödinger’s wave equation is represented with a spherical coordinate system (equ 83) but Schrödinger’s wave function depicts a plane wave that has a constant maximum amplitude is incompatible with the equations of the atomic orbitals, that maximum amplitudes varies. Also, in the derivation of the equations of the atomic orbitals, Schrödinger’s electromagnetic wave is replaced with an electron probability wave. Plus, the reduce mass is added to the exponential of Schrödinger’s wave function (equ 83) where the Legendre polynomials are used within the exponential of Schrödinger’s wave function Ψ to maintain plane wave equation after adding the reduce mass (equ 83); consequently, the electron probability wave of Schrödinger’s wave function Ψ only represents a plane wave which invalidates the equations of the atomic orbitals that are not plane wave equations. .

[carl eto]

It is extremely important that the Schrodinger's wave equation is normalized into a particle in a box; therefore, the derivation of the structure of an atom ends at Schrodinger's wave equation since the normalization completely eliminates the atomic structure yet physicists use the normalized wave equation to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals that are depicted on the periodic table! Have physicists lost their collective common sense. When I first took quantum mechanics in 1994, the book, in the introduction, stated that the author was dubious about quantum mechanics but did not state exactly what he was dubious about. At the time I did not know what he was referring to but now I now.

[Odd Bodkin]

What trauma happened to you between 1994 and now?

[carl eto]

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 12:00:27 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:

> What trauma happened to you between 1994 and now?
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Instead of being insulting why do you not say something pertinent to the post. Are you all out of answers? Maybe you can go to another physics site and ask for help.

[Odd Bodkin]

carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 12:00:27 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> What trauma happened to you between 1994 and now?
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
>
> Instead of being insulting why do you not say something pertinent to the post.

Because, “carl”, since you are not well upstairs and this impedes your
ability to absorb new information, there is no real point in responding to
your posts. People who are not consistently lucid are not invited to
sustained conversations that require lucidity.

> Are you all out of answers? Maybe you can go to another physics site and ask for help.
>

[Maciej Wozniak]

On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 20:26:59 UTC+1, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 12:00:27 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> What trauma happened to you between 1994 and now?
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
> >
> > Instead of being insulting why do you not say something pertinent to the post.
> Because, “carl”, since you are not well upstairs and this impedes your
> ability to absorb new information

And when someone doesn't want to listen to a
poor idiot woodworker and absorb his incredible
wisdom - he deserves nothing.

[Odd Bodkin]

Well if he doesn’t want to listen to anything I say, why would I offer it
to him anyway? Geez, you’re dense.

[carl eto]

On the contrary

[Maciej Wozniak]

And why do you, poor halfbrain?
Your Shit has trained you for a task, and you do the task.

[The Starmaker]

Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 12:00:27 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> What trauma happened to you between 1994 and now?
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
> >
> > Instead of being insulting why do you not say something pertinent to the post.
>

> Because, carl, since you are not well upstairs and this impedes your

> ability to absorb new information, there is no real point in responding to
> your posts. People who are not consistently lucid are not invited to
> sustained conversations that require lucidity.
>
> > Are you all out of answers? Maybe you can go to another physics site and ask for help.
> >
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Let's see...

you are not well upstairs

impedes your ability
to absorb

no real point in responding

not consistently lucid

not invited
to
sustained conversations
that require lucidity.

That sounds like the talk of The Odd Bodkin I know....


Why don't you just say what you really feel?


you bully you.


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[The Starmaker]

Let me explain...

this is carl eto's Home.

It's his sandbox. He doesn't need...invitation.

And certaintly not to have sand thrown in his face...

this is his HOME.

this is hs space..

and you go into
his space
his home
his
sandbox
and throw sand in his face
and tell him he is not invited..

YOU ARE A BULLY!!!

I will not have it.


I will not look the other way.

[The Starmaker]

I'm not talking about just a ...bully,

I'm talking about a ...serial bully.

[Ross A. Finlayson]

And your sister!

[The Starmaker]

more like a predatorial serial bully...

[carl eto]

On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 3:21:18 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
> Quantum mechanics use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used the represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represents the distance propagated. All of the photons are distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. A photon probability wave represents the possible position of a photon; consequently, the photons are distributed along the entire length between the first and last wave packet; henceforth, a photon probability wave cannot be used to represent the propagation of light because the photon position probability depicts the photons' position uncertainty which protons have a equal probability to exist anywhere in the interval of propagation; consequently, a position uncertainty cannot be used to depict a propagation mechanism of light. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid and nullifies the quantum mechanics wave packet propagation mechanism of light. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.
>
>
>
> ....................................................................................................................................
>
>
>
> The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the wave into a straighten electromagnetic wave then places the straighten axis electromagnetic wave into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave which depicts Schrödinger transformation of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,
>
>
>
>
>
> -(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z).....................81
>
>
>
> A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is represented with the wave function,
>
>
>
> Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]............(Schrodinger, p. 1065).........................2
>
>
>
> "The wave-function physical means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).
>
> "The fluctuation of the charge will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).
>
> "the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).
>
>
> Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2 / s2) yet a photon is mass-less, and, an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain the particle structure of a propagating electromagnetic photon.
>
>
> ...................................................................................................................................
>
>
> A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,
>
>
>
> -(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) )Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)...................................83
>
>
>
> The normalization of the Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, does not include the nucleus where the box replaces the nucleus. Also,.....................
.

[carl eto]

There is a somatic problem that arises in the derivation of the equations of the atomic orbital but first we must understand the real purpose of quantum mechanics is to derive the equations of the atomic orbital which depicts the conquest of the atom on theoretical terms. The rest of quantum mechanics is subterfuge and fluff since anyone that has taken quantum mechanics is a college course has problem forgotten also if not everything about it. Now, let examine what is going on where the Schrodinger wave function depicts a plane wave yet physicists use a spherical coordinate system to depict Schrodinger's wave equations which is outlandish since a spherical coordinate system is mutually exclusive to a plane wave equation. What is a plane wave equation. WELL

[Odd Bodkin]

This is not one of your better days. Do you recognize that when it happens?
What do you do to stop the spiral?

[carl eto]

Quantum mechanics use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used the represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represents the distance propagated. All of the photons are distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. A photon probability wave represents the possible position of a photon; consequently, the photons are distributed along the entire length between the first and last wave packet; henceforth, a photon probability wave cannot be used to represent the propagation of light because the photon position probability depicts the photons' position uncertainty which protons have a equal probability to exist anywhere in the interval of propagation; consequently, a position uncertainty cannot be used to depict a propagation mechanism of light. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid and nullifies the quantum mechanics wave packet propagation mechanism of light. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.



....................................................................................................................................



The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the wave into a straighten electromagnetic wave then places the straighten axis electromagnetic wave into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave which depicts Schrödinger transformation of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,





-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z).....................81



A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is represented with the wave function,



Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]............(Schrodinger, p. 1065).........................2

"The wave-function physica l means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).

"The fluctuation of the charge will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).

"the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).


Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2 / s2) yet a photon is mass-less, and, an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain the particle structure of a propagating electromagnetic photon.


...................................................................................................................................


A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,

-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) ) Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)......... ..........................83



The normalization of he Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, does not include the nucleus where the box replaces the nucleus. Also,....................


.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vaN01VLYSQ

[carl eto]

dfdfdf

[carl eto]

On Thursday,

Quantum mechanics
use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic
field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used the represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represents the distance propagated. All of the photons are distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. A photon probability wave represents the possible position of a photon; consequently, the photons are distributed along the entire length between the first and last wave packet; henceforth, a photon probability wave cannot be used to represent the propagation of light because the photon position probability depicts the photons' position uncertainty which protons have a equal probability to exist anywhere in the interval of propagation; consequently, a position uncertainty cannot be used to depict a propagation mechanism of light. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid and nullifies the quantum mechanics wave packet propagation mechanism of light. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.



....................................................................................................................................



The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the wave into a straighten electromagnetic wave then places the straighten axis electromagnetic wave into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave which depicts Schrödinger transformation of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,





-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z).....................81

A solution to Schrödinger's wave ...equation is represented with the wave function,

Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]............(Schrodinger, p. 1065).........................2

"The wave-function physica l ...means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).

"The fluctuation of the charge......... will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).

"the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).

Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is............ a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2......... / s2) yet a photon is mass-less, and, an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain the particle structure of a propagating electromagnetic photon.


...................................................................................................................................


A solution to Schrödinger's wave ...........equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,

-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) ) Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)......... ..........................83

The normalization of he Bohr's............ atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid............ since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, does not include the nucleus where the box replaces the nucleus. Also,....................



This is the greatest physics that anyone with any real mind would love.

[Odd Bodkin]

carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> This is the greatest physics that anyone with any real mind would love.
>
>

That’s a psychotic statement, “carl eto”.

[carl eto]

Everyone is entitled to their opinions since this is a free country but it is your own personal opinion and this is my thread and you keep on only submitting insults so I question you motive. If you do not agree with what I have posted why are you posting. It appears to me that it is you that has a problem not me.

[Odd Bodkin]

carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 12:48:01 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the greatest physics that anyone with any real mind would love.
>>>
>>>
>> That’s a psychotic statement, “carl eto”.
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, table
>
>
> Everyone is entitled to their opinions since this is a free country but
> it is your own personal opinion and this is my thread and you keep on
> only submitting insults so I question you motive.

My motive is absolutely transparent. I’m letting you know that you are
obviously mentally ill, whether you are willing to acknowledge that or not.
I’m also letting you know that people will not talk about physics with
someone so obviously mentally ill, and so asking for that is a complete
waste of your time. That is my motive.

I am counting on the expectation that you have ALREADY been told in other
contexts and by other people that you are mentally ill, and so that you
will at least internally recognize that I’m not the only one saying it.

> If you do not agree with what I have posted why are you posting. It
> appears to me that it is you that has a problem not me.
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[carl eto]

On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 1:07:11 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 12:48:01 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>


> My motive is absolutely transparent. I’m letting you know that you are
> obviously mentally ill, whether you are willing to acknowledge that or not.

Don't be ridiculous. You have never meet me and you are probability not a medical doctor. So how can you make a medical Diagnosis ? Maybe it would be more fair to state "In my opinion that..." or maybe you should ask someone for help. It is OK to ask someone for help in these trying times.

[Odd Bodkin]

carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 1:07:11 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 12:48:01 PM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>
>
>> My motive is absolutely transparent. I’m letting you know that you are
>> obviously mentally ill, whether you are willing to acknowledge that or not.
>
>
>
> Don't be ridiculous. You have never meet me and you are probability not a
> medical doctor.

It doesn’t take either to recognize someone who is *obviously* mentally
ill. To *treat* the illness would take a doctor and a different method of
engagement.

Plus, you know as well as I do that you have been told that you are
mentally ill before, by other people, in other contexts.

Just because you won’t go to a medical doctor for it, that doesn’t make the
problem go away.

Can you explain how all those inserted spaces appeared in the text I wrote
above?

> So how can you make a medical Diagnosis ? Maybe it would be more
> fair to state "In my opinion that..." or maybe you should ask someone for
> help. It is OK to ask someone for help in these trying times.
>
>
>

[thor stoneman]

Plus, you know as well as I do that you have been told that you are
mentally ill before, by other people, in other contexts.

Nope.

[Odd Bodkin]

Well, get outside some. Talk to some people. See what happens.

[carl eto]

Quantum mechanics use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used the represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represents the distance propagated. All of the photons are distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. A photon probability wave represents the possible position of a photon; consequently, the photons are distributed along the entire length between the first and last wave packet; henceforth, a photon probability wave cannot be used to represent the propagation of light because the photon position probability depicts the photons' position uncertainty which protons have a equal probability to exist anywhere in the interval of propagation; consequently, a position uncertainty cannot be used to depict a propagation mechanism of light. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid and nullifies the quantum mechanics wave packet propagation mechanism of light. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.



....................................................................................................................................



The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the wave into a straighten electromagnetic wave then places the straighten axis electromagnetic wave into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave which depicts Schrödinger transformation of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,





-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z).....................81

A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is represented with the wave function,



Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]........ ...(Schrodinger, p. 1065).........................2



"The wave-function physical means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).

"The fluctuation of the charge will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).

"the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).

Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2 / s2) yet a photon is mass-less, and, an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain the particle structure of a propagating electromagnetic photon.


...................................................................................................................................

A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,



-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) )Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)...................................83

The normalization of the Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus yet Schrodinger's wave function (equ 83) is used to derive the equations of the atomic orbitals which is physically invalid since the atomic orbitals, derived using Schrodinger’s normalized wave equation, does not include the nucleus where the box replaces the nucleus. Also,.....................

[carl eto]

The Caltech-MIT lunar laser ranging experiment measures the distance from the earth to the moon using a mirrored reflector that was install on the lunar surface during the Apollo 11 mission. At the LICK observatory, a 2.3 W laser beam is directed at the lunar reflector located 238,900 miles from the earth. A 2.3 W laser beam's intensity propagates to the moon and is reflected by the lunar reflector and detected by the LICK observatory. Using A/B = cos θ where A is the diameter of an object on the surface of the moon, B is the distance to the moon and θ is the telescopic resolution that is represented with A/B = θ when A/B → 0. The minimum diameter of an illuminated object that can be viewed from the earth by the LICK (.6 arcsec) is calculated,





A = θ x B = [(.6) / 3600] x (3.84 x 108 m) = 64 km.........................................................................86





For the LICK to detect an illuminated object on the surface of the moon, the object must have the minimum diameter of 64 km (equ 86) yet the lunar reflector has the estimated dimensions of .5 m x .5 m (fig 36). Furthermore, a 2.3 W laser beam, after propagating a distance of 384,472,282 meters, to the moon, would disperse and form a beam diameter of approximately 3,218 meters (2 miles) at the moon. The 2.3 W laser expansion ratio R is derived using the initial 5 mm diameter laser beam that expands to the diameter of two miles after propagating to the moon,





R = d2 / d1 = (3218 m) / (0.005 m) = 643,600............................................................................87





Using the 2.3 W laser expansion ratio R (equ 87), the diameter of a dispersing laser beam after propagating the distance of 477,800 miles is calculated,





R x 2 miles = (643,600) x (3,218 m) = 2,071,104,800 m..............................................................88





After a 2.3 W laser beam propagates the distance of 7.6 x 108 m (distant from the earth to the moon), the laser beam's diameter expands to over two million kilometers which cannot produce a detectable intensity using a photomultipler that is limited to a threshold intensity.



"Hey, wait a sec! Hubble’s resolution is only 0.1 arcseconds, so the lander is way too small to be seen as anything more than a dot, even by Hubble. It would have to be a lot bigger to be seen at all. In fact, if you do the math (set Hubble’s resolution to 0.1 arcseconds and the distance to 400,000 kilometers) you see that Hubble’s resolution on the Moon is about 200 meters! In other words, even a football stadium on the Moon would look like a dot to Hubble." (By Phil Plait | August 12, 2008, Discover online).

[carl eto]

Quantum mechanics use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used to represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represent the distance propagated. All of the photons have an equal probability to be distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.

The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system and the electron depicted with an electron matter wave would simultaneously exist on both sides of an atom. Plus, for a multiple proton atom, positive charged protons cannot exist in the infinitesimal volume of a nucleus. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the curved axis of the oscillating electron matter wave into a straighten axis electron matter wave then replaces the electron matter wave with an electromagnetic wave that is then inserted into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave without the nucleus which depicts Schrödinger transformation (normalization) of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,

-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z)...................................................81

A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is represented with the wave function,

Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]............(Schrodinger, p. 1065)......................................................82

"The wave-function physical means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).
"The fluctuation of the charge will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).
"the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).

Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2 / s2) yet a photon is mass-less.

...................................................................................................................................

A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,

-(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) )Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)..........................................................................83



The normalization of the Bohr's atomic matter wave depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) eliminates the atomic nucleus and replaces the structure of an atom with a hypothetical box; consequently, the derivation of the atomic structure ends with the box normalization yet Schrödinger’s wave equation is represented with a spherical coordinate system (equ 83) in the derivation of the equations of the atomic orbital but Schrödinger’s wave function depicts a resonating electromagnetic wave that is representing an electron encircling a nucleus that is transformed into the box normalization rectangular coordinate system that is incompatible with a spherical coordinate system that begins at the origin since a Bohr’s atom matter wave does not have an origin. Also, Schrodinger normalization eliminates the nuclear protons yet a multiple proton element has a neutral charge which cannot be obtain without the nuclear protons which proves the derivation of the equation of the atomic orbitals is physically invalid.

_______________________________________________________________________________


Quantum mechanics uses a gauge transformation of Maxwell's equations.

"A similar, but more subtle and deep, situation arises in electrodynamics where one can express the (physical) electric and magnetic fields in terms of scalar (ɸ(r,t)) and vector (A(r,t)) potentials via


B(r,t) = ∇ x A(r,t)......................................................................................84


E(r,t) = - ∇ɸ(r,t) - d/dtA(r,t).......................................................................85


....Such a change in potentials is called a gauge transformation, and will be seen to play and important role in the quantum mechanical treatment of charged particle interactions." (Robinett, p.447); (Cohen-Tannoudji, p. 315).

The quantum mechanics gauge transformation is based on Maxwell's equations but the gauge potential does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous nor can the potential of a mass-less and expanding electromagnetic field be used to represent the particle structure of an electron, proton, neutron or atom that has a mass.

[carl eto]

On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 10:32:39 AM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
Quantum mechanic s use Planck's black body derivation of the energy element (hγ) that represents the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field but Planck's derivation is based on the black body surface electrons oscillating an ether that motion forms electromagnetic standing waves that are used to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field yet the black body radiation effect forms in vacuum that is void of an ether, composed of matter, and an expanding electromagnetic field cannot sustain the particle structure of a propagating photon. Furthermore, the quantum mechanics wave packets are used to represent a wave propagation mechanism of light using wave packets that are formed by the superpositioning (interference) of photon position probability waves but only the first and last wave packets are used to represent the propagation of light yet a series of wave packets are formed between the initial and last wave packets that represent the distance propagated. All of the photons have an equal probability to be distributed between the first and last wave packets yet the wave packet mechanism is implying that the photons are concentrated within the first and last wave packets. Furthermore, a photon probability waves that are used to construct the wave packets can only represent a positive value or zero since the photon probability depicts the possible position of a photon; consequently, a position probability cannot depict a negative value that is required in representing destructive wave interference used to construct the wave packets since the minimum value of a photon position probability is zero. Schrödinger's complex conjugate is used to represent destructive wave interference of the photon probability waves (Schrödinger, p. 1066) but the result of the complex conjugate is the cancellation of positive vectors which is mathematically invalid. Davisson–Gerber (1927) electron diffraction experiment is used to justify wave interference using interfering electron matter waves but the destruction of electrons, using electron wave interference, to form the non-electron fringes of the electron diffraction pattern represents the arbitrary destruction of electrons.

>
> The derivation of Schrödinger's photon energy equation is described. de Broglie's electron matter wave is used to represent the structure of the Bohr atom (fig 23) but the circular atomic electron matter wave contained in a circular path, around a nucleus, cannot be represented in a rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate system and the electron depicted with an electron matter wave would simultaneously exist on both sides of an atom. Plus, for a multiple proton atom, positive charged protons cannot exist in the infinitesimal volume of a nucleus. Schrodinger takes Bohr's circular electron matter wave and flattens the curved axis of the oscillating electron matter wave into a straighten axis electron matter wave then replaces the electron matter wave with an electromagnetic wave that is then inserted into a hypothetical box allowing the electromagnetic wave to resonate, within a box, forming an electromagnetic standing wave without the nucleus which depicts Schrödinger transformation (normalization) of the Bohr atomic electron matter wave into a particle-in-a-box electromagnetic standing wave (fig 24) depicted with Schrödinger's wave equation using a rectangular coordinate system,

> -(h2/2m)∇"Ψ( x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z)Ψ(x,y,z) = EΨ(x,y,z)...................................................81

> A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is represented with the wave function,

> Ψ = Σ c u exp[(2πEt/h + θ)i]............(Schrodinger, p. 1065)......................................................82

> "The wave-function physical means and determines a continuous distribution of electricity in space, the fluctuations of which determine the radiation by laws of ordinary electrodynamics." (Schrödinger, Abstract).
> "The fluctuation of the charge will be governed by the Eq. 28, applied to the special case of the hydrogen atom. To find the radiation, that by electrodynamics will originate from these fluctuating charges, we have simply to calculate the rectangular components of the total electric moment by multiplying (28) by x, y, z respectively, then integrating over space, e.g." (Schrodinger, p. 1066).

> "the frequency v will be given by v= E/h....................(11) , h being Planck's constant. Thus the well known universal relation between energy and frequency is arrived at in a rather simple and unforced" (Schrödinger, p. 1056).

> Schrödinger's wave function (equ 82) is a solution to Schrodinger's normalized wave equation. The transition of Schrodinger's normalized electromagnetic standing wave, depicted with the wave function, to a lower energy level results in the emission of a photon that energy is represented with Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) (Schrödinger, p. 1056) but Schrodinger's photon energy equation (hv) represents the units of the kinetic energy (kg m2 / s2) yet a photon is mass-less.


>

> A solution to Schrödinger's wave equation is the wave function (equ 82) represented with,

> -(h2/2m)∇"Ψ + U(r, θ, φ) Ψ(r, θ, φ) = EΨ(r, θ, φ)..........................................................................83

[carl eto]

,

[carl eto]

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 10:35:15 AM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
> ,
.

[carl eto]

h

[thor stoneman]

The box normalized Bohr's atomic matter wave is depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) that mathematically eliminates the atomic nucleus and replaces the effects of the nucleus with a hypothetical box; consequently, the derivation of the atomic structure ends with the box normalization. In the derivation of the equations of the atomic orbitals Schrödinger’s wave equation is represented with a spherical coordinate system (equ 83) but Schrödinger’s box normalization eliminates the atomic nucleus and a spherical coordinate system is used to depict the structure of an atom but the origin of the spherical coordinate system is where the nucleus exists which would result in electrons existing at the position of the nucleus which is physically invalid. Also, in the derivation of the equations of the atomic orbitals, Schrödinger’s electromagnetic wave is replaced with an electron probability wave that is represented with Schrodinger's wave function; in addition, the reduce mass is used within the exponential of Schrödinger’s wave function (equ 83) to represent a multiple electron atom where the Legendre polynomials are also used within the exponential of Schrödinger’s wave function Ψ but the equations of the Legendre polynomials are being directly use to represent the equations of the atomic orbitals probability waves which is mathematically invalid since the polynomials operate within the exponential; consequently, the Legendre polynomials cannot be used directly to represent the atomic orbitals which proves the derivation of the atomic orbital is mathematically invalid. Also, Schrodinger's box normalization eliminates the nucleus yet a multiple proton atom has a neutral charge which is produced by the nuclear photons eliminating the electrons' negative charges but the box normalization eliminates the nuclear protons; also, the compilation of electrons within the volume of an atom would form an electron repulsive force that would prevent the formation of the atomic orbitals.