STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
Pentcho Valev
Steve Carlip: "Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of
relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and
he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In
the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote:
". . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of
the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
[. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position." Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector
quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not
clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to
special relativity suggests that he did mean so. THIS INTERPRETATION
IS PERFECTLY VALID AND MAKES GOOD PHYSICAL SENSE, BUT A MORE MODERN
INTERPRETATION IS THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT in general
relativity."
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/loyola-spirex.html
Ignatius of Loyola: "To be right in everything, we ought always to
hold that THE WHITE WHICH I SEE, IS BLACK, if the Hierarchical Church
so decides it...."
Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com
JanPB
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_o...
Speed of light measured at a distance need not be c in GR. This is an
old hat (ca. 1916) which apparently brought you a headache (unlike the
hat in Meyrink's "Golem").
--
Jan Bielawski
Pentcho Valev
Judging from this picture:
http://www.dateline.ucdavis.edu/dl_detail.lasso?id=8187
Steve Carlip is a big boss in Einstein criminal cult, if not the
biggest one. So his idea that the variability of the speed of light is
PERFECTLY VALID AND MAKES GOOD PHYSICAL SENSE but nevertheless THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT if Einstein criminal cult so decides it has
been taken very seriously by Einsteinians. Half of the Einsteinians
immediately started teaching that the speed of light is constant in a
gravitational field:
http://www.astronomynotes.com/relativity/s4.htm
"Prediction: light escaping from a large mass should lose energy---the
wavelength must increase since the speed of light is constant.
Stronger surface gravity produces a greater increase in the
wavelength. This is a consequence of time dilation. Suppose person A
on the massive object decides to send light of a specific frequency f
to person B all of the time. So every second, f wave crests leave
person A. The same wave crests are received by person B in an interval
of time interval of (1+z) seconds. He receives the waves at a
frequency of f/(1+z). Remember that the speed of light c = (the
frequency f) (the wavelength L). If the frequency is reduced by (1+z)
times, the wavelength must INcrease by (1+z) times: L_atB = (1+z)
L_atA. In the doppler effect, this lengthening of the wavelength is
called a redshift. For gravity, the effect is called a GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT."
http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sp_gr.html
"Is light affected by gravity? If so, how can the speed of light be
constant? Wouldn't the light coming off of the Sun be slower than the
light we make here? If not, why doesn't light escape a black hole?
Yes, light is affected by gravity, but not in its speed. General
Relativity (our best guess as to how the Universe works) gives two
effects of gravity on light. It can bend light (which includes effects
such as gravitational lensing), and it can change the energy of light.
But it changes the energy by shifting the frequency of the light
(gravitational redshift) not by changing light speed. Gravity bends
light by warping space so that what the light beam sees as "straight"
is not straight to an outside observer. The speed of light is still
constant." Dr. Eric Christian
Other Einsteinians remained faithful to Divine Albert's original
teaching:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm
"So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is _not_ constant
in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies
as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this
were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational
field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the
calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of
Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal
development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is
widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99
of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in
section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed
of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is c' = c0
( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the
point where the speed of light c0 is measured."
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a
long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated:"In the second
place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT FACTOR."
Einstein zombie world did not react at all. It had entered a new stage
in its development: the hymn "Divine Einstein" had already been
replaced by a new hymn entitled: "Who gives a shit about Einstein, his
theories and the rest of science". Somewhat paradoxically,
Einsteinians love this new hymn.
Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com
Pentcho Valev
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html
http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2005/12/07/ScienceTech/Professor.Profile.Steven.Carlip-1123328.shtml
Who would you rather be: a student or professor?
Steven Carlip: A professor, especially one with tenure.
Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com
Pentcho Valev
> On Jan 14, 5:17 pm,PentchoValev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html
> > SteveCarlip: "Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of
> > relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and
> > he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In
> > the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote:
> > ". . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
> > constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of
> > the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
> > [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
> > light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
> > varies with position." Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector
> > quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not
> > clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to
> > special relativity suggests that he did mean so. THIS INTERPRETATION
> > IS PERFECTLY VALID AND MAKES GOOD PHYSICAL SENSE, BUT A MORE MODERN
> > INTERPRETATION IS THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT in general
> > relativity."
>
> > http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/loyola-spirex.html
> > hold that THE WHITE WHICH I SEE, IS BLACK, if the Hierarchical Church
> > so decides it...."
>
> http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2005/12/07/ScienceTech/Professor.Profile.Steven.Carlip-1123328.shtml
> Who would you rather be: a student or professor?
> Steven Carlip: A professor, especially one with tenure.
The professor, especially the one with tenure, solves once and for all
the problem with the constancy/variability of the speed of light
(Einstein zombie world should realize that it does not make sense to
even talk about this problem):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_frm/thread/674cdc5f74c1911e?
Steve Carlip, Mar 30, 2004: "More generally, there is a strong
argument that it doesn't make sense to talk about the variation of a
dimensionful constant like c; only dimensionless quantities are really
measurable."
Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com
Dono
caliber
sorry man, i cant understand what tha fok is
"speed of light measured at a distance"
shoe tha details in your picture
Lady Chacha
You are http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare
--
Dono is concubine Lady Chacha
Dono
> Supertroll Dono trolled:
>
> You arehttp://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare
Fuck off, JuanShito Alvarez, your have blown your own cover, old fart.
R. Josh iii
Chrétien (catholique) Ignace de Loyola ?
Tu n'arrives pas au centième de leur hauteur, alors à quoi bon cracher
en l'air, tu seras le seul à recevoir les retombées...
Et puis, même si Ignatius prenait le blanc pour le noir (et
inversement), sa congrégation a donné nombre de grands savants,
astronomes, etc., à la science et à la civilisation modernes, alors que
"Peine-Chaud Valet Vaurien" n'a strictement rien apporté au savoir
humain, bien au contraire, puisqu'il ne cherche qu'à en démolir les acquis.
RJ
Dono
Well said, very funny as well :-)