On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 6:25:09 PM UTC-6,
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 5:03:16 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 4:45:50 PM UTC-6,
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Where is there uniform motion then?
> >
> > Ther are good APPROXIMATIONS to uniform motion.
>
> Then there is nothing exact for uniform speeds...
There is NOTHING in the universe that is "exact." SO don't pretend that
your assertion has any validity whatever.
> > It all depends upon the
> > specific case under discussion. Claiming that it doesn't exist clouds
> > the issue, which is likely what you consistently try to do.
>
> What about cars and rockets speeds. Where are their steady motions?
>
> THey always have slight changes. These are your approximations.
>
> YOu could calculate inertial frames only in abstract math.
>
> Propulsion speeds are always changing. They are not steady speeds.
>
> >
> > > Most examples are not in uniform motion.
> >
> > It's close enough for anyone except autistic people.
>
> Close enough is not steady inertial frames.
Everyone except you and autistic people understand limitations.
EVERYTHING has limits.
> Einstein's gravity shows they don't exist through change.
You can talk about gravity and Einstein when you can explain the solutions
of his field equations. Until then, you are an arrogant ignoramus.
> > > Linear motion responds everywhere to gravity...
> >
> > Since it takes over 200000000 years for the galaxy to make one rotation,
>
> The galaxy has no rotation.
So you PROVE yourself to be an ignoramus and in denial of reality.
> The arms collective stars are all in orbit.
> Rotation requires a solid radius...
Stop trying to redefine words that have specific meanings.
https://www.universetoday.com/23870/the-milky-ways-rotation/
> > while you'll only live less than 100 years, your assertion is a straw man.
> >
> > > Out in space gravity still gives new motion.
> >
> > Irrelevant in terms of seconds and minutes for most purposes.
>
> Changing speed is the norm not the exception.
Irrelevant and fundamentally misguided.
> > > Where are the steady motions for your proof Gary?
> >
> > You DO like to split hairs, mon ami.
>
> I like to ask questions that people need to avoid.
No, you don't. You like to wallow in stupidity and arrogance.
> > > Can a car or rocket have perfectly uniform motion?
> >
> > A car follows the road, so that's a specious argument. A rocket between
> > the planets is in uniform motion for days and months.
So you now agree with me. Good, maybe there's a glimmering of hope for you.
> > > > You're still not thinking cogently. The rotation period of Mars is
> > > > NOT a constant.
> > >
> > >
> > > To itself it is.
> >
> > To myself, I am. So what? Complete obfuscation on your part.
>
> Do you feel the opposite weight when accelerating.
>
> The best example is getting on the freeway...
>
> Why is there that weight for you but not
>
> for the opposite motion appearance of things
> you see as moving around you?
>
> Don't split hairs yourself and answer a question...
So you don't understand the difference between uniform motion and CHANGE
in motion? Did you flunk calculus?
> > > Real Motion slows rate...
> >
> > No, it doesn't. Don't try to redefine words that already have specific
> > meanings.
>
> Yes it does. How atoms move determine their own rates.
So what happens when an atom is struck by a photon? And cesium-137 decays
into barium-137. Some of the barium atoms are in the ground state but most
of them are in an excited state and emit a gamma photon in a few minutes.
So your claim is doubly false.
> > > that creates an appearance alone of a difference.
> >
> > Yammering nonsense.
>
> Why when you move is their an opposite appearance around you?
> There is weight when that happens.
When I'm sitting in an airplane at the gate and it begins to back out, it
appears that the gate is moving and I'm stationary.
> > > > One in high uniform motion would measure its period to be a
> > > > different value from one standing on Mars.
> > >
> > > Who's in high uniform motion? Is he still in gravity?
> >
> > Irrelevant. You don't even know what "in gravity" means, and no one
> > else does either.
>
> Answers aren't irrelevant.
But they may be unknown.
> They are required.
Oh, really? WHO "requires" them? You? That's just another example of
your arrogance.
> You don't like to answer me do you?
I've been answering you all though this thread. Are you dense as well as
ignorant?
> > > If not there are no inertial frames...
> >
> > Stop repeating bull plop. It still smells bad.
> >
> > > > Thus it is IOTTMCO that NOTHING has "its own motion."
>
> No. It means by nature everything is changing speed.
> Gravity does it. And cars and rockets also do.
> They are not steady in speed over even absolute
> smallest intervals.
Have you measured them? I didn't think so. All of your assertions are
coming from your ignorance and arrogance, a deadly combination.
> > > Everything has its own rate.
> >
> > Nope. I explained that you are dead wrong about that.
> >
> > > That creates a difference in the appearances alone...
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> > But if I am moving wrt the "thing" it's impossible to tell WHO is doing
> > the "moving."
>
> Einstein said that space is unmarked.
> Rate and speed are in absolute dimension.
He didn't say that, lying weasel.
> Their relationship to that becomes an
> appearance relationship to themselves...
>
> > Newton understood this 400 years ago. Why are you dissing
> > him?
> >
> > "Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge?" --Job 42:3
>
> The book of Job didn't belong in the bible.
So your arrogant in that field, too? Are you a Bible "scholar"? Are you
smarter than those who translated it? Your performance in this group
argues against that.
> God gave nothing to Satan to do evil against good people.
>
> God doesn't empower evil...
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
God gives Satan power to tempt EVERYONE. If He didn't, Satan would have NO power. Your lack of understanding in this area is just as bad as your
understanding of physics.
"He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not, is a fool ... shun him."
-- Persian Proverb
You are now shunned.