info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
[General relativity] Black hole.
30 views
Skip to first unread message
Richard Hachel
May 25, 2022, 5:49:18 AM5/25/22
to
It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
It seems.
But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
void.
It seems.
I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
And how nothing can bend something with its hooked little fingers.
But the weirdest thing about all of this is that scientists are able to
come up with wonderful and extraordinary equations of this.
And the weirdest of the weirdest is that they are unable to give the
simple little equations of basic special relativity without being wrong,
to describe a Langevin without being absurd in apparent mode, or a Tau
Ceti in accelerated mode without being mistaken about how to calculate the
proper times.
But calculating the horizon of a nothing that curves another nothing in
four dimensions, they know.
This degree of science, I cannot approach it.
R.H.
It seems.
But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
void.
It seems.
I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
And how nothing can bend something with its hooked little fingers.
But the weirdest thing about all of this is that scientists are able to
come up with wonderful and extraordinary equations of this.
And the weirdest of the weirdest is that they are unable to give the
simple little equations of basic special relativity without being wrong,
to describe a Langevin without being absurd in apparent mode, or a Tau
Ceti in accelerated mode without being mistaken about how to calculate the
proper times.
But calculating the horizon of a nothing that curves another nothing in
four dimensions, they know.
This degree of science, I cannot approach it.
R.H.
Ken Seto
May 25, 2022, 8:25:15 AM5/25/22
to
On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 5:49:18 AM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
> It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
>
> It seems.
>
> But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
> void.
>
> It seems.
>
> I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
There is no hole. Scientists invented the hole to fit their theory.
> It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
>
> It seems.
>
> But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
> void.
>
> It seems.
>
> I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
Richard Hachel
May 25, 2022, 9:00:51 AM5/25/22
to
spacetime.
Stupid space-time that has no reason to exist.
A pure abstract.
I am not saying that there is no relationship between space and time.
I gave humanity the most beautiful theory of relativity ever proposed
based on anisochrony and the relativity of chronotropy.
The rest is just the theory of monkeys who want to show their navel under
the donations of taxpayers.
It's disgusting.
R.H.
Paparios
May 25, 2022, 9:32:19 AM5/25/22
to
Black holes do exist. For almost 30 years we have been tracking the orbits of star around Sagittarius A*, which is an object (a black hole) located at the center of our galaxy. One of those star (S2) has almost completed two orbits (16.0518 years per orbit). We know all S2 orbital parameters and we know the star reaches (at its closest distance of the black hole) a speed of 7650 km/sec or almost 3% of the speed of light, while passing the black hole at a distance of just 120 AU or about 1400 times its Schwarzschild radius.
Richard Hachel
May 25, 2022, 9:45:40 AM5/25/22
to
trou, il est trou dans quoi?
Il se déplace dans quoi le trou? Il a une vitesse?
Un trou noir a une vitesse par rapport à un autre trou noir?
Tout cela n'est pas très clair.
C'est sombre, une idée de trou noir.
C'est même troublant.
R.H.
Maciej Wozniak
May 25, 2022, 11:15:42 AM5/25/22
to
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 15:32:19 UTC+2, Paparios wrote:
> El miércoles, 25 de mayo de 2022 a las 5:49:18 UTC-4, Richard Hachel escribió:
> > It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
> >
> > It seems.
> >
> > But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
> > void.
> >
> > It seems.
> >
> > I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
> >
> > And how nothing can bend something with its hooked little fingers.
> >
> > But the weirdest thing about all of this is that scientists are able to
> > come up with wonderful and extraordinary equations of this.
> >
> > And the weirdest of the weirdest is that they are unable to give the
> > simple little equations of basic special relativity without being wrong,
> > to describe a Langevin without being absurd in apparent mode, or a Tau
> > Ceti in accelerated mode without being mistaken about how to calculate the
> > proper times.
> >
> > But calculating the horizon of a nothing that curves another nothing in
> > four dimensions, they know.
> >
> > This degree of science, I cannot approach it.
> >
> > R.H.
> You for sure need to read and study more!!!
>
> Black holes do exist. For almost 30 years we have been tracking the orbits of star around Sagittarius A*, which is an object
and a bright source of radiation.
> El miércoles, 25 de mayo de 2022 a las 5:49:18 UTC-4, Richard Hachel escribió:
> > It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
> >
> > It seems.
> >
> > But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
> > void.
> >
> > It seems.
> >
> > I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
> >
> > And how nothing can bend something with its hooked little fingers.
> >
> > But the weirdest thing about all of this is that scientists are able to
> > come up with wonderful and extraordinary equations of this.
> >
> > And the weirdest of the weirdest is that they are unable to give the
> > simple little equations of basic special relativity without being wrong,
> > to describe a Langevin without being absurd in apparent mode, or a Tau
> > Ceti in accelerated mode without being mistaken about how to calculate the
> > proper times.
> >
> > But calculating the horizon of a nothing that curves another nothing in
> > four dimensions, they know.
> >
> > This degree of science, I cannot approach it.
> >
> > R.H.
> You for sure need to read and study more!!!
>
> Black holes do exist. For almost 30 years we have been tracking the orbits of star around Sagittarius A*, which is an object
No, poor halfbrain, your black holes don't exist. It's even
possible to derive it from your Shit - as it's inconsistent.
Richard Hachel
May 25, 2022, 12:46:43 PM5/25/22
to
Le 25/05/2022 à 15:32, Paparios a écrit :
> El miércoles, 25 de mayo de 2022 a las 5:49:18 UTC-4, Richard Hachel escribió:
>> It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
>>
>> It seems.
>>
>> But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
>> void.
>>
>> It seems.
>>
>> I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
>>
>> And how nothing can bend something with its hooked little fingers.
>>
>> But the weirdest thing about all of this is that scientists are able to
>> come up with wonderful and extraordinary equations of this.
>>
>> And the weirdest of the weirdest is that they are unable to give the
>> simple little equations of basic special relativity without being wrong,
>> to describe a Langevin without being absurd in apparent mode, or a Tau
>> Ceti in accelerated mode without being mistaken about how to calculate the
>> proper times.
>>
>> But calculating the horizon of a nothing that curves another nothing in
>> four dimensions, they know.
>>
>> This degree of science, I cannot approach it.
>>
>> R.H.
>
> You for sure need to read and study more!!!
I think that if humanity were a little wiser, on the contrary, it is they
>> It seems that from what it would seem, there is no ether.
>>
>> It seems.
>>
>> But it seems that from what it looks like, there could be a hole in the
>> void.
>>
>> It seems.
>>
>> I find it hard to understand how there can be a hole in nothing.
>>
>> And how nothing can bend something with its hooked little fingers.
>>
>> But the weirdest thing about all of this is that scientists are able to
>> come up with wonderful and extraordinary equations of this.
>>
>> And the weirdest of the weirdest is that they are unable to give the
>> simple little equations of basic special relativity without being wrong,
>> to describe a Langevin without being absurd in apparent mode, or a Tau
>> Ceti in accelerated mode without being mistaken about how to calculate the
>> proper times.
>>
>> But calculating the horizon of a nothing that curves another nothing in
>> four dimensions, they know.
>>
>> This degree of science, I cannot approach it.
>>
>> R.H.
>
> You for sure need to read and study more!!!
who would study alternative theories.
But humanity is not wise.
My long life has taught me that the man - even the very good man who loves
his wife, his work and his children - is arrogant, fat, haughty, and
contemptuous when he learns that his neighbor has a bigger penis than him.
It is unavoidable.
So you make me laugh (O bunch of idiots) when you answer me bullshit like
that.
The reverse is true.
I have spent my life listening to others.
The "others" have spent their lives staring at their penises, their
navels, and trying to silence me as soon as I showed up somewhere.
That's the story of the world.
Bunches of freaks.
Don't add intellectual crap to your verbal crap.
It is unworthy of scientists.
R.H.
0 new messages