Re: *** *** Re: India - beggar nation, biggest recipient of foreign aid ever
Romanise
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Romanise wrote:
> > On Mar 9, 9:37 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 9, 11:50 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>>> On Mar 9, 9:49 pm, "SPierce" <ecre...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >>>>> "Hunter" <hunte...@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
>
> >> other people's success. Disgusting. This is exactly the reason why
> >> Indians like myself do so much better when abroad - they harmony class
> >> scum, who are lying, bullying, creating trouble, etc. are not there to
> >> pull them down. Like, he is always calling me a communist, even
> >> though I have never said I was.
>
> > You should rejoice finding someone like yourself in harmony, conjuring
> > up your own abuses and sticking to them for dear life.
>
> I have been reading harmony's junk for years. Banerjee is an OK-guy.
He does need reassurance from you.
> >> He is always sneering at my original
> >> work,
>
> > I was trying to find your response to Zinnic's "I would appreciate it
> > if you would give an example of your best evidence (other than the
> > coincidence of the null results obtained by Einstein's or your theory
> > of light) in support of your theory and against Einstein's Special
> > Relativity theory. ", Zinnic in whom you wanted your "greatest genius
> > of all times" confirmed.
>
> I am not enough of an expert in Einsteinian things, but I assure you that
> there have been many anti-Einstein books and articles published and
> written by guys who are very very smart. I have seen many of these books.
> they are definitely out there. Use a search engine to find them.
Any one as great a genius as your woof woof friend? If you point one
out the self proclaime greatest genius of all time on this planet
(very likely he will correct "this planet" by "whole universe").
Did your friend ever tell you why he is trying to publish his theory
on the Usenet and not in any Journal of Physics, even an Australian
one where he claims to have found his recognition?
Me, ...again!
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Romanise wrote:
> On Mar 10, 12:55 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Romanise wrote:
>>> On Mar 9, 9:37 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 9, 11:50 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 9, 9:49 pm, "SPierce" <ecre...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Hunter" <hunte...@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
>>
>>>> other people's success. Disgusting. This is exactly the reason why
>>>> Indians like myself do so much better when abroad - they harmony class
>>>> scum, who are lying, bullying, creating trouble, etc. are not there to
>>>> pull them down. Like, he is always calling me a communist, even
>>>> though I have never said I was.
>>
>>> You should rejoice finding someone like yourself in harmony, conjuring
>>> up your own abuses and sticking to them for dear life.
>>
>> I have been reading harmony's junk for years. Banerjee is an OK-guy.
>
> He does need reassurance from you.
Which "he" are you talking about?
>>>> He is always sneering at my original
>>>> work,
>>
>>> I was trying to find your response to Zinnic's "I would appreciate it
>>> if you would give an example of your best evidence (other than the
>>> coincidence of the null results obtained by Einstein's or your theory
>>> of light) in support of your theory and against Einstein's Special
>>> Relativity theory. ", Zinnic in whom you wanted your "greatest genius
>>> of all times" confirmed.
>>
>> I am not enough of an expert in Einsteinian things, but I assure you that
>> there have been many anti-Einstein books and articles published and
>> written by guys who are very very smart. I have seen many of these books.
>> they are definitely out there. Use a search engine to find them.
>
> Any one as great a genius as your woof woof friend? If you point one
> out the self proclaime greatest genius of all time on this planet
> (very likely he will correct "this planet" by "whole universe").
>
> Did your friend ever tell you why he is trying to publish his theory
> on the Usenet and not in any Journal of Physics, even an Australian
> one where he claims to have found his recognition?
Quite frankly and after (I'm retired now) a career in professional
science, including publishing in peer-reviewed journals in my
specialization, I can tell you that if you have a wacky-idea, it's going
to get rejected. I can also tell you that if you have a good idea, it
might also not be recognized as genius, but recognized as wacky.
Some of the most brilliant work ever done also had a hard time getting
recognized. All of the "established" guys will vote against you because
your work threatens them and their established "knowledge."
There are many examples of this. One is plate tectonics. First guy who
came up with this idea in last 1920s was laughed out of the conference.
Then, some 50 years later, after the guy died, they proved him right.
I once heard two very very very smart mathematical guys argue in front of
a room full of professional scientists for two hours and they left me
behind in a cloud of dust by 5 minutes after they started to argue.
Everyone else was silent, too, for this whole period.
For me to confirm or refute AB's work, it would be beyond me. I am
retired. However, I did have some private email with AB maybe 1-2 years
ago about some of this. I also know one or two guys who are interested in
the promotion of "perpetual motion" machine technology. Its another area I
don't want to get into. It goes against theory, but maybe someday....?????
I'll sit out here in the audience and let the expert guys in the ring go
and "duke it out."
Kamal Prasad (and his buddies), and his bias/ignorance, is a lot easier to
deal with.
Arindam Banerjee
Thanks a lot, again, dear Straydoggie, for your most balanced and
scientific appraisal. Nature supports my work, with lightning and
thunder, redshift and blueshift, the magnetic fields of the stars and
planets, and so on. My new equation relating mass and energy is
extremely intuitive, and school-children can grasp it easily and
well. All physics textbooks will be rewritten, the sooner the
better. As for hard proof, all I have to do is make a model of the
Internal Force Engine.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Art
<adda...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> As for hard proof, all I have to do is make a model of the
>Internal Force Engine.
And all you need for that are some suckers to give you piles
of money, right swindler?
harmony
"Art" <nu...@zilch.com> wrote in message
news:n97gp51dd73nk9ln7...@4ax.com...
no. he thinks first he has to spend most of his time denouncing mahatma
gandhi and einstein. all that leaves time not for any work but making commie
style promises which arindam has been doing for years.
harmony
"Me, ...again!" <arth...@mv.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSF.4.61.10...@osmium.mv.net...
--------------------------
arindam, like his commie fellow-kooks, mistakes science for politics. he
seeks recognition in science using commie-style campaigning among
vulnerables, of whom there are billions including yourself, not convincing
logic among knowledgebles of whom there are far fewer.
btw, you did not answer if you still think the hindus are manipulating their
rubies.
Arindam Banerjee
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:31:50 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee
>
> > As for hard proof, all I have to do is make a model of the
> >Internal Force Engine.
>
> And all you need for that are some suckers to give you piles
> of money, right swindler?
Who have I swindled, o no-name no-fame arsehole? No one. Your
miserable attempts at character assassination are pathetic. I am not
even asking for any support from anyone, o evil swine.
>
> Arthttp://home.ptd.net/~artnpeg
Arindam Banerjee
> "Art" <n...@zilch.com> wrote in message
With low-life crabs like you in charge of all things, good and new
things must needs get delayed. One has to be really strong, to
escape the pull of all you crabs! And after that, it takes time to
acquire the necessary funds on one's own steam. Getting there,
getting there...
In any case, why do you bother, bundree? Scared of the Eastern
Indians getting more notice and foreign investment, huh? Don't worry,
up your tail, swing in joy, go eat a banana.
Arindam Banerjee
> "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote in message
See, how this pathological liar harmony keeps on saying that I am a
communist, with absolutely no evidence for that!
Heh-heh, bundree. Up your tail, swing in joy, go eat a banana.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
What's the difference between "bundree" and "Banerjee"?
harmony
"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_be...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:61f9d06e-4c58-496e...@s25g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
---------------------
not much. it's what commies say when get called but get conostapation.
Arindam Banerjee
What's the difference between "bundree" and "Banerjee"?
AB: bundree is the female of bundurr, or monkey. Banerjee is an
anglicisation of the hereditary title Bandyopadhyay, meaning revered
teacher.
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
"harmony" <a...@hotmail.com> posted:
The word "banerjee" is related to "vanar" or "bandar". "Bandaree" is a female monkey.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
Darwin123
Your father owns an experimental farm.
1) Does this experimental farm grow nuts?
2) What does "Arindam" mean?
harmony
<use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
message news:20100311ZfDhrQdyL7tCERAd4JY4LaA@S3LBm...
quite. arindam is trying to run away from his heritage. isn't that another
strike on his commie outlook.
Arindam Banerjee
> On Mar 11, 4:10 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > What's the difference between "bundree" and "Banerjee"?
>
> > AB: bundree is the female of bundurr, or monkey. Banerjee is an
> > anglicisation of the hereditary title Bandyopadhyay, meaning revered
> > teacher.
>
> Your father owns an experimental farm.
No, he does not. The Mahamilan Sangha owns that farm.
> 1) Does this experimental farm grow nuts?
No. It grows vegetables and fruits, and also produces dairy
products.
> 2) What does "Arindam" mean?
One who keeps the enemy under a state of submission. Arindam does not
kill, he merely subdues, in hopes that they will learn better ways in
due course. Something like Eliot's "Gumby Cat", when dealing with
mice, etc.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Inverse 19 mathematics
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
INDIA MAY BE A BEGGAR NATION BUT ATLEAT IT AIN'T NO CROOK OR A PETTY
THIEF, IT USED ITS MONEY TO IMPROVE THE LOT OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE ,
"GOD BLESS INDIA", MY BIRTH PLACE ( ANGLO INDIAN CHRISTAIN FROM
INDIA). IS THAT O.K FOR YOU!!!!--- Banerjee look at Einsteins math
that is where the proble is 8pi, Wait for Inverse 19, its coming.
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
So, you think that the person nicked "harmony" is actually a female
monkey? I don't know about where you live, but where I live, human
beings don't look anything like monkeys, female or otherwise.
Arindam Banerjee
<ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 1:10 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > What's the difference between "bundree" and "Banerjee"?
>
> > AB: bundree is the female of bundurr, or monkey. Banerjee is an
> > anglicisation of the hereditary title Bandyopadhyay, meaning revered
> > teacher.
>
> So, you think that the person nicked "harmony" is actually a female
> monkey?
It is a common term, used by schoolmasters in India, to describe
naughty pupils. A cultural thingy. Indians usually know how to
distinguish between the real, and the apparent. So when a
schoolmaster calls a pupil a bundurr or bundree, we all in India know
that the recipient of such a description is not actually-actually
simian, but exhibiting behaviour that is simian.
Arindam Banerjee
> <use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
> messagenews:20100311ZfDhrQdyL7tCERAd4JY4LaA@S3LBm...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <4b991e95$0$12462$bbae4...@news.suddenlink.net>,
> > "harmony" <a...@hotmail.com> posted:
>
> >> "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear bundree, I do not have the heritage of your treacherous great-
unca gandi, urine-drinking morarji, thieving harshas, etc. that create
such creatures as you. As a traitor to real hindus, like your great-
unca gandi, you do well to follow frauds and impostors like the jBm.
Cheers, bundree. Up your tail, swing in joy, go eat a banana. You are
always fun to watch - from a great distance!
P. Rajah
Ah, but you haven't seen harmonkey yet......
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
Judging from your reply to me here, you are not a very polite person
nor a deep thinker. In fact, you are more immature mentally than my 11
year old son. Much more immature.
Arindam Banerjee
AB: It is a standard reply to the bundree harmony, when he initiates
trouble. That you note just this, and ignore all the other things that I
write, says something about you. Looks like you and harmony are made for
each other!
Romanise
Reason is the boy (though he could be grandfather physiologically) was
raised by an Indian Policeman, the worst kind of civil servant any
where but more so in a third world country.
Romanise
What has been your personal experience with the editorial boards of
Research Journals in your own field, Mathematics I believe.
You crossed 70? I believe that is the retirement age in USA.
Romanise
> On Mar 12, 12:22 pm, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr."
> > So, you think that the person nicked "harmony" is actually a female
> > monkey?
>
> It is a common term, used by schoolmasters in India, to describe
> naughty pupils. A cultural thingy.
Culture of Christians as well whose school you attended and are proud
for?
Arindam Banerjee
The teachers were not Christians, mostly. The Hindi/Sanskrit teacher
used the expression quite often, especially towards the naughty
pupils.
Arindam Banerjee
>
> - Show quoted text -
The illogic of an old fool is evident here, to all but bundurrs - but
there are so many of them!
Romanise
> The illogic of an old fool is evident here, to all but bundurrs - but
> there are so many of them!
What is illogical in the explanation I gave to ostap_bender_1's
conclusion having convesed with you to some distance?
Arindam Banerjee
Remain in your own illogic and folly, you old fool. You are beyond
hope.
Romanise
Being asked to read proofs of your unparallelled genius on this planet
getting unfolded in couple of threads on Usenet started by you I did
make an effort to meet you half way.
Looks you are now being coy as posters after posters prove you a
deluded idiot, except of course Straydoggie WoofWoof retired
mathematical genius. who strangely comes to your rescue only on
soc.culture.indian.
Romanise
> On Mar 15, 9:20 pm, Romanise <josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Being asked to read proofs of your unparallelled genius on this planet
> > getting unfolded in couple of threads on Usenet started by you I did
> > make an effort to meet you half way.
>
> > Looks you are now being coy as posters after posters prove you a
> > deluded idiot, except of course Straydoggie WoofWoof retired
> > mathematical genius. who strangely comes to your rescue only on
> > soc.culture.indian
>
> One intelligent poster is worth much more than a billion moronic
> posters, and not only Straydoggie who has a PhD, Peter Webb who is an
> engineer supports me directly.
Does the Mathematician(?) Straydoggie have a real name like V
Bhattathiri who I think forced you to come out of closet?
As for Peter Webb I have not seen him accepting whatever you wrote as
much as Zinnic did and who you at first thought was going to be pillar
to support your self claimed unparallelled genius.
> Both these gentlemen are name-fame
> personalities, unlike the cowardly anonymous scum whose opinion you
> naturally value more. When you pick and choose just the negative
> evidence around,totally ignoring the positive, simply in order to put
> me down, all that you show is that you are a typical treacherous mean-
> minded gujju crab. Thoroughly disgusting you come across, full of
> lies and twists, and certainly not worth any more interest!
>
> Now, I will out the headers requested, as really this discussion does
> not concern either maths or physics, philosophy or computers - it just
> shows why and how productive engineers have to leave India. For, scum
> like you do their best to pull them down, exploit them, etc. Thus,
> this poster could be of inerest to Indians, just to show the negative
> mentalities among the old fools who run things in India.
Sounds like your backside is swollen red.
> Unlike the quotawallah, you are not even worth annoying, so don't
> expect any more replies from me.
You can annoy any one who gets annoyed with little children playing
doll houses.
> Arindam Banerjee