Charles Manson and Albert Einstein

[The Starmaker]

What do Charles Manson and Albert Einstein have in common?

Charles Manson didn't kill anybody.

at leat not directly, maybe indirectly....very indirectly.


In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."


https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsYuaoWURDQyNmtvckAswbcqjmkhNg%3A1672623179247&q=albert+einstein+letter+to+his+%22son%22+%E2%80%9Conly+very+indirectly+connected



very indirectly









--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[Richard Hertz]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:

<snip>

> In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."

The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.

ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION OF UNSTABLE URANIUM NUCLEI, AFTER LOSING COHESION BY A SLOW NEUTRON.

LIQUID DROP-LIKE NUCLEI THAT RELEASE BETWEEN 140 AND 230 MeV per fission of nuclei.

Fuck E=mc2 and Einstein cult. Fuck zio Times Magazine. Fuck Princeton.

[JanPB]

See a doctor.

--
Jan

[The Starmaker]

Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
>
> The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.

Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
suppose to talk about it
to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
about all the work being done?

Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
got the electric chair.

Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
connected.

That means he used...liaisons.


a buffer. he used buffers.

[Volney]

On 1/1/2023 9:52 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
>
> The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
>
> ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION OF UNSTABLE URANIUM NUCLEI, AFTER LOSING COHESION BY A SLOW NEUTRON.
>
> LIQUID DROP-LIKE NUCLEI THAT RELEASE BETWEEN 140 AND 230 MeV per fission of nuclei.
>

And the resulting daughter nuclei (+neutrons) will be between 140 and
230 MeV/c^2 less massive than the original uranium atom+neutron.

Einstein proven correct yet again!!!

[Maciej Wozniak]

And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden
by your bunch of idiots GPS and TAI keep measuring
t'=t in forbidden by your bunch of idiots old seconds.

[Paul B. Andersen]

Den 02.01.2023 03:52, skrev Richard Hertz:
>
>
> ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION OF UNSTABLE URANIUM NUCLEI, AFTER LOSING COHESION BY A SLOW NEUTRON.

Right.

And the mass loss in the resulting nuclei will be equal
to the potential energy which is transferred to kinetic energy.

>
> LIQUID DROP-LIKE NUCLEI THAT RELEASE BETWEEN 140 AND 230 MeV per fission of nuclei.

Quite.

One possible fission process is:

1n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n

The atomic weight of these are well known

Left side:
1n 1.008664 u
U-235 235.0439299 u
-------------------
236.0525939 u

Right side:
Ba-141 140.914412 u
Kr-92 91.926156 u
3n 3.025992 u
---------------------
235.866560 u

Lost mass: m = 0.1860339 u

E = mc² ≈ 2.78E-11 J ≈ 174 MeV

But Kryptom-92 and Barium-141 are unstable isotopes,
so this is not the end of the decay chain, and there are
other possible fission processes, so the total released
energy from the fission of an U-235 atom is ≈ 200 MeV.

But you know this, don't you?

Thinking that the following will make the facts go away
is irrational behaviour.

>
> Fuck E=mc2 and Einstein cult. Fuck zio Times Magazine. Fuck Princeton.
>

Maybe it will help if you write it in all capitals?

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[Richard Hachel]

E=mc² is not Einstein.

I beg you to understand that.

E=mc² ( or E=mc²/sqrt(1-v²/c² ), is Poincaré.

Lorentz transformations is Poincaré.

E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²) is Hachel.

Spacial relativistic zoom correct is Hachel.

Proper time and observable speeds new concepts in accelerated frames is
Hachel.

Einstein (and Minkowski) is a pure theological myth.

R.H.

[Richard Hachel]

Le 02/01/2023 à 06:24, JanPB a écrit :

E=mc² is not Einstein.

I beg you to understand that.

E=mc² ( or E=mc²/sqrt(1-v²/c² ), is Poincaré.

Lorentz transformations is Poincaré.

E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²) is Hachel.

Spatial relativistic zoom correct is Hachel.

[Aether Regaind]

Paul B. Andersen:> Den 02.01.2023 03:52, skrev Richard Hertz:
>>
>>
>> ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION OF UNSTABLE URANIUM NUCLEI, AFTER LOSING
>> COHESION BY A SLOW NEUTRON.
>
> Right.
>
> And the mass loss in the resulting nuclei will be equal
> to the potential energy which is transferred to kinetic energy.
>
>>
>> LIQUID DROP-LIKE NUCLEI THAT RELEASE BETWEEN 140 AND 230 MeV per
>> fission of nuclei.
>
> Quite.
>
> One possible fission process is:
>
> 1n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n

Ah! But, you are forgetting that this is particle physics. In particle
physics if the facts don't fit your beloved theory, you can always
invent new particles as Pauli showed with neutrinos. The Pauli approach
would be:

1⋅n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3⋅n + x⋅ℎ⁰

where ℎ⁰ are hertzinos of unspecified number having a collective mass of
0.185 u, and a neutral/0 charge. Problem solved! You just have to search
harder to detect these uncharged hertzinos. A 10,000+ team, a TeV+
accelerator, an ambitious guy like Carlo Rubbia to head the team and a
tight deadline will get the job done.

[The Starmaker]

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> to the world. He never liked the government decision
> to use it over the Japanese.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch


"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein


I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.


Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
people...dead.


I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.

I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...

[The Starmaker]

https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280



I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.

[The Starmaker]

But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?


Are you science guys working at it????



You guys mess up this planet.

[D. Ray]

Jews always hated Germans, and other Europeans, too.

[The Starmaker]

Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
"... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein

(albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)

But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?

This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:

What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.

"You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325


wat about the 'other' scientist?

[The Starmaker]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/

If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.

But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.



Trust the Science.

[The Starmaker]

A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet

The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/



These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.

[The Starmaker]

You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics

What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/

[The Starmaker]

How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps
https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html



Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes.


In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left.


This is suppose to be a secret
You are not suppose to know this..
But there are scientists today
planing to build a rocketship
and take themselves to another planet
and blow up the earth by remote control.
(something like dat)

[The Starmaker]

Neil deGrasse Tyson: How to Blow Up a Planet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBl9dK40dvw


i guess he wants to get rid of...Whitey!

[The Starmaker]

Imagine if you will...
Neil deGrasse Tyson has a son
who sees his father
thinking about
"How to Blow Up a Planet"...

whats to stop his son from
growing up and inspired
to build a bomb to
Blow Up the Earth?


Keep in mind,
Albert Einstein
all on his own
without instructions
from anyone
went out and
gathered his students
and friends to
Build an Atomic Bomb!

Sat around his house
and conspired to convince
the President of the United Stayes
to give them money so they can...
https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


And just recently
Dr.Fauci was sending money
to China lab to build
a virus that would destroy the world.

Dats wat these 'people' do.

They become..."Destroyer of Worlds".


Albert Einstein: "b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-

ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by

providing funds, ..."
https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


Who told Albert Einstein to perform atomic bomb experiments at Universities in the United States?


Are they today working on Blowing Up The Planet? They certaintly thinking about it.

And 'thinking about it' is the path to making it happen.

Oh, but of course..first they need funding from the government.


Sir:

Some recent work by some mad scientis, which has been com-

municated to me be email, leads me to expect that the element blow-

up-the-planet may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-

mediate future that can blow up the planet earth and surrounding planets.

[The Starmaker]

Here is what ChatGPT sez about Albert Einstein:

It is true that Albert Einstein had some indirect involvement in the development of nuclear weapons through his work as a consultant to
the US military during World War II. In the early 1940s, Einstein was asked to serve as a consultant to the US military on the development of weapons, including
the potential use of nuclear energy as a weapon. He agreed to lend his expertise to the effort and worked with a team of scientists at the Army's
laboratory in Washington, D.C., where he helped to develop the first theories about how a nuclear weapon might be designed. However,
Einstein did not have any direct involvement in the construction or testing of nuclear weapons. He was not a member of the Manhattan Project,
the top-secret US government research program that developed the first atomic bombs. Instead, he served as a
consultant and provided his expertise on the theoretical aspects of nuclear weapons development.

However, the details of Einstein's work and the specific contributions he made to the military's weapons development
program have not been widely disclosed. It is likely that much of the information about Einstein's work for the military remains classified to this day.


--
*In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."

[The Starmaker]

Of course, if you ask ChatGPT "How to Blow Up a Planet"
ChatGPT might get a little nervous...
and then end the reponse with..."How about a game of Chess?"



So, I asked ChatGPT: How about the moon instead?

Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth
and has a mass of about 7.3 x 10^22 kilograms. To destroy the moon, you would need to apply a force that is
strong enough to shatter it into pieces. This would require an enormous amount of energy, far beyond what humanity is capable of producing.

Additionally, the moon plays an important role in Earth's ecosystem and the stability of our planet's orbit.
Its gravitational pull helps to regulate the tides and keeps our planet stable as it orbits the sun. Without the moon,
life on Earth would be very different, and it's likely that it would not be able to sustain itself.
It is not advisable to try to destroy the moon or any other celestial body in our solar system. Is there anything else I can help with?

[Paul Alsing]

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 12:59:37 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:

> Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth...

Your ignorance is just mind-blowing...

https://www.universetoday.com/20489/moon-compared-to-earth/

"The volume of the Moon is 21.9 billion cubic km. Again, that sounds like a huge number, but the volume of the Earth is more like 1 trillion cubic kilometers. So the volume of the Moon is only 2% compared to the volume of the Earth."

2%!

[The Starmaker]

I don't know here you got the word "volume" from but
The moon is STILL about one-quarter the size of Earth...

How big is the Moon?

This one's another easy approximation to remember: The Moon is about one-fourth (or a quarter) the size of Earth in width. Put another way, Earth is about four times wider than the Moon.

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1946/five-things-to-know-about-the-moon/



(but everyone knows here you have a pattern and reputation of being wrong...all the time.)

keep up the good work of being ...consistent.


i bet you never heard of ChatGPT either.


boy, are you dumb! you're soooo yesterday.

[Paul Alsing]

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 5:52:01 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 12:59:37 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > > Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth...
> >
> > Your ignorance is just mind-blowing...
> >
> > https://www.universetoday.com/20489/moon-compared-to-earth/
> >
> > "The volume of the Moon is 21.9 billion cubic km. Again, that sounds like a huge number, but the volume of the Earth is more like 1 trillion cubic kilometers. So the volume of the Moon is only 2% compared to the volume of the Earth."
> >
> > 2%!
> I don't know here you got the word "volume" from but
> The moon is STILL about one-quarter the size of Earth...
>
> How big is the Moon?
>
> This one's another easy approximation to remember: The Moon is about one-fourth (or a quarter) the size of Earth in width. Put another way, Earth is about four times wider than the Moon.

How is this relevant to the "blowing up the moon" crap you are spouting?

[JanPB]

All the statements above are false or, at best, without content.

--
Jan

[The Starmaker]

Exactly, you are...irrelevant.

[The Starmaker]

On Mon, 02 Jan 2023 22:51:10 -0800, The Starmaker

>"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
>formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
>
>
>I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
>
>
>Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
>people...dead.
>
>
>I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
>
>I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...

As I mentioned before...

Even after the ww2 ended...Albert Einstein STILL wanted all those
German people...dead.

I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...

I don't know what is the 'characteristics' of a German person is.


I don't know where you look up that kind of information.

I'm pretty sure if I asked Albert Einstein "what is the
'characteristics' of a German person", he probably can tell me since
he wanted them all dead.

What is the 'characteristics' of a German person that makes Albert
Einstein want to kill them all?

Is there like some information of the 'characteristics' of a German
person, or any type of persons listed somewhere?

What keywords do I use?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,

to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2023 22:51:10 -0800, The Starmaker
> >"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> >formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> >
> >
> >I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> >
> >
> >Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> >people...dead.
> >
> >
> >I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> >
> >I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
>
> As I mentioned before...
>
> Even after the ww2 ended...Albert Einstein STILL wanted all those
> German people...dead.
>
> I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
>
> I don't know what is the 'characteristics' of a German person is.
>
> I don't know where you look up that kind of information.
>
> I'm pretty sure if I asked Albert Einstein "what is the
> 'characteristics' of a German person", he probably can tell me since
> he wanted them all dead.
>
> What is the 'characteristics' of a German person that makes Albert
> Einstein want to kill them all?
>
> Is there like some information of the 'characteristics' of a German
> person, or any type of persons listed somewhere?

I remember Albert Einstein said the Germans
have an "aggressive mentality".

Is that in their DNA, inherited? Part of their characteristics?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,