There are things in the theory of relativity which are true, but which are
extremely poorly said.
It comes down to basic definitions.
Physicists talk about the relativity of time, but they themselves, in
extreme arrogance, say they understand what they are saying when they say
that.
They obviously only understand it if they are pushed to their limits.
And to the simple questions that we can ask them, it will quickly be
obvious that the rapid escape will occur.
My main grievances towards my scientific friends relate to the way they
use abstract words to define the things they would like to understand
without succeeding in all of them.
Example, they say:
"In any other reference frame (R) in uniform motion, the length at each
instant is less than the proper length".
This is NOT what the Lorentz transformations (made by Poincaré) say and
are correct.
It is the interpretation that scientists make of it that is not.
TLs don't say what they're made to say.
I note again: "If an observer moves towards a monochromatic source, there
is a Doppler effect, and the frequency of the source moves towards the
red. If it moves away, it moves towards the blue".
All of this is obviously absurd.
As it is holy written:
"But you guys didn't understand anything!!!"
By dint of talking about abstract things, even the teachers themselves
make incredible blunders.
R.H.