THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

[George Hammond]

THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
January 1, 2023
FROM: George E Hammond MS physics
.
In 1920 Einstein found the universe was not
"stable" as he had hoTped – it would collapse
under its own gravity.
.
FRIEDMANN discovered a way out of this dilemma – he
said the universe was EXPANDING.
.
He said you could simply multiply the space part (XYZ)
of Einstein's metric:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
by a "EXPANSION FACTOR", a = a(t),
which would convert Einstein's metric to the
Friedmann metric: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
And today this metric, now referred to as the FLRW
(Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker metric)
rules all of Astrophysics.
.
a(t) is called the "scale factor" and expands with time
thus providing an "expanding universe".
.
(da/dt) is known as the "Hubble constant" and is about
7%/gigayear . IOW it takes 1 billion years for the universe
to expand by 7%
.
MORE RECENTLY HAMMOND has discovered that the
phenomenon called "God" is actually a CONTRACTION
of SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME caused by the growth of
the human brain under the age of 20 at a rate of about
5%/year .
.
And, COPYING FRIEDMANN Hammond has proposed
that this can be expressed by the HAMMOND METRIC: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Here the scale factor "a(t)" DECREASES WITH TIME and in fact
begins at around a=3.5 at human birth, and falls to about
a=1.18 at human adulthood.
.
The reason it does not fall to 1.0 at (age 18) is because no one
ever reaches 100% full growth – in fact WHO, UNESCO data
indicate that the world average of adult growth is only about 85%,
of full growth, and since 1/.85=1.18 : –
.
the huge RIEMANN CURVATURE of the "GOD METRIC" leaves
the average adult human being SEEING a World that APPEARS
18% LARGER AND FASTER than it actually is!
.
OBVIOUSLY, such a phenomenon can be terrifyingly frightening
to every human being –and this perceptual phenomenon is known
to history as the: – PHENOMENON OF GOD.,
including notably, the God of the Bible and the God of every other
world religion.
.
As we can see from the above metrics that the
"Hubble constant of God" (da/dt) is a BILLION times larger than
the "Hubble constant of Astrophysics" – we see that the
"curvature power" of God a BILLION TIMES larger than the
"curvature power of Gravity" – save for the instance of being in
the vicinity of a BLACK HOLE !
.
Thus – debate over whether or not there is a real God is NOW OVER !
Richard Dawkins notwithstanding – it has been scientifically proven
and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
.
George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts

[Richard Hertz]

George E Hammond
Psychology, Physics, and Religion

*****************************************
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE E. HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA.

Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt at N.U. and later Distinguished Professor of Physics at TAMU

Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in NewIdeas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd.

Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God, Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp231-244 (Noetic Press)
*****************************************

An 81 years old relativistic FUCKING NUT CASE.

[George Hammond]

> An 81 years old relativistic FUCKIN NUT CASE.
>
[George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA]
Prove it: – gimmy ONE SCIENTIFIC OBJECTION to my OP.
JUST ONE – Put up or shut up!
George

[Richard Hertz]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 7:13:20 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:

> https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/distorting-glass-laughing-mirrors-22072508212.html
>
> The man standing in front of curved mirrors could be you, when young and mentally sane.
>
> The images in any of the distorting (riemannian) mirrors are YOU, as perceived by YOUR FUCKING INSANE MIND.
>
> Science at the highest level of deception. You live a DISTORTED reality. 60 years and counting. No solution available for you,
> unless you repent of your HERETIC interpretation of the REAL world, where we live.

I'll give you some scientific credit IF AND ONLY IF you admit that you're exploring the realms of a subjective pseudo-science, which
we could call PSYCHOPHYSICS, BIOPHYSICS or similar, where you try to integrate HARD sciences with the SOFT sciences that are
those residing in the MEDICAL sciences realms.

Also, you could do yourself a big favor and call relativity as PSYCHOPHYSICS, based on subjective perceptions, full of deceptions for
the HUMAN senses. But still, relativity is a PSEUDO-SCIENCE.

[rotchm]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 4:08:09 PM UTC-5, ghamm...@gmail.com wrote:
> THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

<snip>

Spam reported.
I incite others to do the same.

If you want to be taken seriously, remove the word 'god'.
Else, it just makes you look like a nutcase.
(learn to write clearly and concisely, without any unnecessary gibberish)

[Doodnath Sarti]

George Hammond wrote:

> THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD January 1, 2023 FROM: George E Hammond M̶S̶
> p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ . H̶e̶ s̶a̶i̶d̶ y̶o̶u̶ c̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ s̶i̶m̶p̶l̶y̶ m̶u̶l̶t̶i̶p̶l̶y̶ t̶h̶e̶ s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ p̶a̶r̶t̶ (X̶Y̶Z̶)
> o̶f̶ E̶i̶n̶s̶t̶e̶i̶n̶'s̶ m̶e̶t̶r̶i̶c̶:

> .
> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|

better watch these bad mazafakas. They are going to _pay_their_wives_ for
the misery, *_destroying_the_gas_pipeline_* to europe.

15,000 Active-Duty Troops from Poland on the front lines in Ukraine!
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263092

Hundreds of American troops are in Ukraine – Lavrov
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263077

BREAKING: The World Health Organization Endorses List of Potential Serious
Adverse Effects of mRNA Injection: 100% of DEATHVAX™ Recipients Have Heart
Damage
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263083

*_capitalist_west_*, lying corrupt mazafakas, worth _not_even_a_shit_.

Former President of France Admits: Minsk Agreements Were to DECEIVE
Russia; Allow Ukraine to build for war
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263053

[George Hammond]

[George E Hammond MS physics]
My OP to this thread, is a sterling example
of "clear and concise Physics writing"
.... Go back to school and get your GED.
George

[George Hammond]

[George E Hammond MS physics]
Your name-calling PHILOSOPHICAL HOGWASH BLITZ
is a lame attempt to avoid my SCIENTIFIC CHALLENGE: –
NAMELY: – Prove it: – gimmy ONE SCIENTIFIC OBJECTION

[Richard Hertz]

I gave you one scientific reason: Under ANY approach by medical science to check your brain, it results that you're clinically INSANE!

[George Hammond]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 6:23:44 PM UTC-5, Richard Hertz wrote:

> > Give me one scientific objection to my OP. JUST ONE –

Put up or shut up!
> > George
> I gave you one scientific reason: Under ANY approach by medical science to check your brain, it results that you're clinically INSANE!

.
SNIP NONSCIENTIFIC POSTER
SNIP ALIAS
SNIP SPAM
George

[George Hammond]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 6:00:58 PM UTC-5, Doodnath Sarti wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD January 1, 2023
FROM: George E Hammond M̶S̶
> > p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ . H̶e̶ s̶a̶i̶d̶ y̶o̶u̶ c̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ s̶i̶m̶p̶l̶y̶ m̶u̶l̶t̶i̶p̶l̶y̶ t̶h̶e̶ s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ p̶a̶r̶t̶ (X̶Y̶Z̶)
> > o̶f̶ E̶i̶n̶s̶t̶e̶i̶n̶'s̶ m̶e̶t̶r̶i̶c̶:
> > .
> > | 1 o o o. |
> > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> > | o o 1 o. |
> > | o o o -1.|

> 15,000 Active-Duty Troops from Poland on the front lines in Ukraine!
> https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263092
>

[George E Hammond MS Physics]

SNIP NONSCIENTIFIC POSTER
SNIP ALIAS
SNIP SPAM

SNIP BOT
George

[rotchm]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 7:35:37 PM UTC-5, ghamm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 6:00:58 PM UTC-5, Doodnath Sarti wrote:

Again you shall hear your incompetence and confusions: you reply to a well-known Troll and you didn't even notice it.
This makes you a clueless moron and also a spammer engaging with a troll.
The world does not need any annoying people like you. Learn some respect.

[The Starmaker]

No one knows more about physics than george hammond. George Hammond is
the King of Physics!!!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[The Starmaker]

again?

> George

[George Hammond]

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 7:53:57 PM UTC-5, The STARMAKER wrote:
> George Hammond is the King of Physics!!!

> THE STARMAKER -- to think the unthinkable,
>
[George Hammond MS physics]
Lo – such a magnificent speech yon STARMAKER
Not have I heard such utterances since since the
Magnificent bard himself said :
"give me liberty or give me death"
.
George

[George Hammond]

[George E Hammond MS physics Hyannis Massachusetts]

.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

Someone ought to TELL RICHARD DAWKINS
about HAMMOND's SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
George

[Braydon Germano]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ H̶y̶a̶n̶n̶i̶s̶ M̶a̶s̶s̶a̶c̶h̶u̶s̶e̶t̶t̶s̶]

> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .

> Someone ought to TELL RICHARD DAWKINS about HA̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶'s̶ S̶C̶I̶E̶N̶T̶I̶F̶I̶C̶ P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶
> O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ George

kiss my ass.

[Braydon Germano]

uneducated retard */_rotchm_/*, _portrait_attached_, wrote:

> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 7:35:37 PM UTC-5, ghamm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 6:00:58 PM UTC-5, Doodnath Sarti wrote:
>

> A̶g̶a̶i̶n̶ y̶o̶u̶ s̶h̶a̶l̶l̶ h̶e̶a̶r̶ y̶o̶u̶r̶ i̶n̶c̶o̶m̶p̶e̶t̶e̶n̶c̶e̶ a̶n̶d̶ c̶o̶n̶f̶u̶s̶i̶o̶n̶s̶: y̶o̶u̶ r̶e̶p̶l̶y̶ t̶o̶ a̶

suck large dicks, you stupid sack of shit.

Trudeau’s Brother Says WEF Has ‘Compromising Material’ On Him That Keeps Him In Check
https://newspunch.com/trudeaus-brother-says-wef-has-compromising-material-on-him-that-keeps-him-in-check/

lol.

[George Hammond]

George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
.
Okay, so we've discovered that there is
OBJECTIVE SPACETIME= Astrophysics, what we MEASURE
and
SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME= what we actually SEE
.
The metric of ASTROPHYSICS (what we MEASURE) is: –

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC (Astrophysics)

|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.

While the metric of what we actually SEE is: –

.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

And we note in passing that "a" in the God metric never
falls below 1.18 for ADULTS – which means that the
AVERAGE ADULT –
SEES A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS
.
AND THIS IS KNOWN AS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD
.
This can be an unnerving and sometimes terrifying perceptual
phenomenon – but that isn't the worst thing about it –
fire worst is the fact that this phenomena while
producing a serious respect in the AVERAGE PERSON
.
It produces SEVERE CRIMINAL PSYCHOTIC BEHAVIOR
in an uncomfortable percentage of the population.
.
These PSYCHOTIC INDIVIDUALS assume that this
"invisibility phenomena" is not GOD – but is in fact some
kind of a MENTAL TRICK – and they soon discover that
they can "HIDE THEIR TRUE IDENTITY" and appear to be
a kind and helpful person – when actually they have become
MURDEROUSLY CRUEL and CRIMINALLY MINDED
.
The average person, not knowing what the
PHENOMENON OF GOD is – or what it looks like
is HOPELESSLY and RUTHLESSLY exploited by these
"Evil" PSYCHOTIC INDIVIDUALS
.
Hundreds and hundreds of innocent individuals are
MERCILESSLY ABUSED and/or simply SLAUGHTERED
by these PSYCHOTIC individuals.
.
THEREFORE – for your own defense – it is necessary for you
to understand the NEWLY DISCOVERED
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD that I have published
here on SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY (see the Original Post)
.
George

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

The gravitational metric is a round closed curve field with a center.
Einstein's parabolic metric does not apply.

[George Hammond]

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:24:11 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> The gravitational metric is a round closed curve field with a center.
> Einstein's parabolic metric does not apply.
>

[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA]
.
Why is it always a guy named "MITCH"
who is most likely the "1st-Responder" ?
.
Congratulations on being the first person to ask
a RELATIVITY QUESTION about this on SPR !
.
The Einstein metric for a spherical mass body is
known as the "Schwarzschild Metric". The
Einstein metric for the entire universe is known
as the Friedmann metric. They are not the same
mass – energy configuration.

But you are obviously getting at is WHY the
– OBJECTIVE UNIVERSE
– and
– SUBJECTIVE UNIVERSE
should have
SIMILAR SPACETIME METRICS ?
– – – And believe me – it took me a long time
to figure that out !!
.
And the reason for that is because
THERE IS ONLY ONE REAL UNIVERSE
in the first case (Friedmann metric) it is being
MEASURED by astronomers using standard
rulers and clocks –
while in the latter case is being SUBJECTIVELY
VIEWED by casual observers – – –
– the point being that the only difference
between the Friedmann metric and the
God metric is that you have a "lengthening
ruler and a speeding up clock) in the latter case
caused by the "yearly growth" of the human
observers in the latter case !
.
But in both cases it is THE SAME UNIVERSE
– – –which explains why the 2 metrics are
"SIMILAR TYPE METRICS"
.
Finally – you should get a MEDAL for asking
the first Forensic Relativity question – ever !
.
AND BY ALL MEANS don't hesitate to ask
a further question !

George

[George Hammond]

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:24:11 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> The gravitational metric is a round closed curve field with a center.
> Einstein's parabolic metric does not apply.

[George Hammond]
NO – you're confusing the Schwarzschild metric
with the Friedman metric.
George
.
January 4, 2023
[George Hammond MS physics]
.
HEY MITCH – –Wher'd you go?
.
You're the first one to bounce a RELATIVITY QUESTION
off HAMMOND on SPR – – that makes you SPR–MVP !
.
You woke me up to the simplest HEURISTIC explanation
of the GOD METRIC: –

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
The way to look at this is that its the ordinary
EINSTEIN METRIC

.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.

Formulated for a "lengthening ruler" and a "speeding up"
clock. IOW people under 20 years of age are growing 5%
per year. Which means their SIZE and perceptual SPEED
is increasing 5% per year – which causes the world
(e.g. the Universe) to SHRINK and SLOW DOWN 5% per
year! And this gives us the "GOD METRIC" shown above!
.
IOW the SIZE and SPEED of the world contracts and
slows down for the first 20 years of our lives!
..
And here's the PUNCH LINE: – the world NEVER SHRINKS
DOWN to exactly 1.0 magnification – for the average adult
it stops shrinking and slowing at 118% MAGNIFICATION
because the average adult is only 85% FULLY GROWN
and 1/.85=1.18
.
This means that the average world adult – SEES a world
that is 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER than it ACTUALLY IS
.
And this phenomena is historically known as "GOD" !!!
.
And if you don't think an 18% MAGNIFICATION of REALITY
isn't SCARY, indeed sometimes TERRIFYING, then you are not
thinking IMAGINATIVELY ENOUGH !
.
MITCH for chrissakes take another look at this thing – your
first impression was FORENSICALLY RIGHT ON – so say
ANYTHING – absolutely ANYTHING "SCIENTIFIC" that comes
to mind and it will be greatly appreciated by a groaning
and suffering World!
.
George

[George Hammond]

.
[George E Hammond MS physics]
.
I have finally concluded that Hammond's
.
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.
Should be most properly appear in a
peer reviewed :
.
OPEN ACCESS MEGA JOURNAL such as:
.
"SCIENTIFIC REPORTS"
or
"PLOS-1" (Public Library of Science)
.
This will ensure its existence and open access
in perpetuity worldwide.
.
It's true the APC charges are a couple of grand
but I think I owe it to posterity to ensure the
survival of this historic discovery.
.
Does anyone here know anything about either
one of these "MEGAJOURNALS"?
.
George

[Luigi Tumicelli]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]

> .
> I have finally concluded that Hammond's .

> SCIENTIFIC P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ .
> Should be most p̶r̶o̶p̶e̶r̶l̶y̶ a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ a̶ p̶e̶e̶r̶ r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶e̶d̶ :
> .
> O̶P̶E̶N̶ A̶C̶C̶E̶S̶S̶ M̶E̶G̶A̶ J̶O̶U̶R̶N̶A̶L̶ such as:
> .
> "S̶C̶I̶E̶N̶T̶I̶F̶I̶C̶ R̶E̶P̶O̶R̶T̶S̶"

completely nonsense.

American Airlines drops 3 cities from service, blaming pilot shortage
https://www.bitchute.com/video/x8LIOjFnxNAq/

and bill gaytes and fraudci, drump etc are still *_walking_freely_* the
boulevard, unpunished by the */_Nuremberg_2_/* protocolum.

[George Hammond]

..

Formulated for a "lengthening ruler" and a "speeding up"
clock. IOW people under 20 years of age are growing 5%
per year. Which means their SIZE and perceptual SPEED
is increasing 5% per year – which causes the world
(e.g. the Universe) to SHRINK and SLOW DOWN 5% per
year! And this gives us the "GOD METRIC" shown above!
.

THERE ARE A NUMBER OF MEGA-JOURNAL'S and all of
them have a huge stable of competent Professorial rank
reviewer's on tap.
.
Biology Open (@BiologyOpen), from the Company of Biologists
BMJ Open (@BMJ_Open), from BMJ Publishing Group
Cureus (@CureusInc)
Elementa (@elementascience), from BioONE
FEBS Open Bio (@FEBSOpenBio), from Elsevier
F1000 Research (@F1000Research), from Faculty of 1000
G3 (@geneticsGSA), from the Genetics Society of America
GigaScience (@GigaScience), from BGI
IEEE Access, from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
PeerJ (@thePeerJ)
PLOS ONE (@PLOSONE), from the Public Library of Science
QScience Connect, from QScience
SAGE Open, from SAGE
Scientific Reports (@SciReports), from Nature Publishing
The Scientific World Journal, from Hindawi
SpringerPlus (@SpringerPlus), from Springer
.
THE APC CHARGES range from $1,000 to $3,000 USD
... I have located a couple of reviewer's for PLOS ONE
who appear to have sufficient academic education
(Psychometry – Physics) to be able to competently
review my SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD.
.
ANYONE WHO HAS ANY RECOMMENDATION on these
mega-Journal's – please post it here !
.
. George

[Luigi Tumicelli]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]

> I have finally concluded that Hammond's .

> SCIENTIFIC P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ .
> Should be most properly a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ a̶ p̶e̶e̶r̶ r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶e̶d̶ :

> OPEN ACCESS MEGA JOURNAL such as:

> "S̶C̶I̶E̶N̶T̶I̶F̶I̶C̶ R̶E̶P̶O̶R̶T̶S̶"

> or "PLOS-1" (P̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶ L̶i̶b̶r̶a̶r̶y̶ o̶f̶ S̶c̶i̶e̶n̶c̶e̶)

you are great, lol. What can you do for /_slava_uKraine_/? Can you do
something for /_slava_uKraine_/??

*/_No_one_has_done_enough_for_Ukraine_–_FM__/*
https://www.rt.com/russia/569611-ukraine-aid-not-enough/

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba has urged Kiev’s “partners” to
continue funneling military aid into the country, claiming that “no one
has done enough” to help the nation yet.

“Ukraine is grateful to partners for their military aid, but we should
remain honest with one another: No one has done enough as long as Russian
boots remain on Ukrainian ground. Arming our country for victory is the
shortest way to restoring peace and security in Europe and beyond,” he
tweeted on Monday.

[Luigi Tumicelli]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]

> I have finally concluded that Hammond's .

> SCIENTIFIC P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ .
> Should be most properly a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ a̶ p̶e̶e̶r̶ r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶e̶d̶ :

> OPEN ACCESS MEGA JOURNAL such as:

> "S̶C̶I̶E̶N̶T̶I̶F̶I̶C̶ R̶E̶P̶O̶R̶T̶S̶"
> or "PLOS-1" (P̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶ L̶i̶b̶r̶a̶r̶y̶ o̶f̶ S̶c̶i̶e̶n̶c̶e̶)

speaking the witch, can you do something for /_slava_uKraine_/??

*/_No_one_has_done_enough_for_Ukraine_–_FM__/*
https://www.rt.com/russia/569611-ukraine-aid-not-enough/

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba has urged Kiev’s “partners” to
continue funneling military aid into the country, claiming that “no one
has done enough” to help the nation yet.

“*/_Translation_from_Ukrainian_/*: We have squandered our army again, give
us more armies, and we will continue to pretend that we are fighting
Russia on our own. And don’t forget to sponsor our oligarchs’ luxurious
life in Europe!” he wrote.

[George Hammond]

On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:26:16 PM UTC-5, Luigi Tumicelli wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]
> > I have finally concluded that Hammond's .
> > SCIENTIFIC P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ .
> > Should be most properly a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ a̶ p̶e̶e̶r̶ r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶e̶d̶ :
> > OPEN ACCESS MEGA JOURNAL such as:

.
[George E Hammond MS Physics]
SNIP ALIAS
SNIP BOT
SNIP SPAM

.
[George E Hammond MS physics]
.

|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD

|o o a² o. |
|o o o -1/a²|
.

..Notice that this IS for a "lengthening ruler" and a "speeding up"

clock. IOW people under 20 years of age are growing 5%
per year. Which means their SIZE and perceptual SPEED

is increasing 5% per year – and this causes the subjective world
(subjective Universe) to APPEAR TO SHRINK and SLOW DOWN

5% per year! And this gives us the "GOD METRIC" shown above!

The validity of this is cofirmed by the famous FLRW (Friedmann)
Metric which is of a s SIMILAR form and controls the expansion of
hte (real) "oibjective" Universe in Astrophysics

.
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF MEGA-JOURNAL'S and all of

them have a huge stable of excellent Professorial rank
reviewer's on call to be able to review it.
.

Elementa (@elementascience), from BioONE
FEBS Open Bio (@FEBSOpenBio), from Elsevier
F1000 Research (@F1000Research), from Faculty of 1000
G3 (@geneticsGSA), from the Genetics Society of America
GigaScience (@GigaScience), from BGI
Biology Open (@BiologyOpen), from the Company of Biologists
BMJ Open (@BMJ_Open), from BMJ Publishing Group
Cureus (@CureusInc)
IEEE Access, from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
PeerJ (@thePeerJ)
PLOS ONE (@PLOSONE), from the Public Library of Science
QScience Connect, from QScience
SAGE Open, from SAGE
Scientific Reports (@SciReports), from Nature Publishing
The Scientific World Journal, from Hindawi
SpringerPlus (@SpringerPlus), from Springer
.
THE APC CHARGES range from $1,000 to $3,000 USD
... I have located a couple of reviewer's for PLOS ONE

who appear to have adequate academic education
(in Physics and Psychometry) to be able to reliablyreview my SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD.
.
FURTHERMORE – these mega-Journal's offer UNLIMITED
SPACE for text and DIAGRAMS, ILLUSTRATIONS,
REFERENCES, etc. etc. etc. And they utilize GOOGLE to
search the mega-Journal's publications periodically and copy.
and forward (worldwide) any paper of interest to their
subscribers and mail it directly to their email inbox.
.... This produces a massive worldwide circulation of your
mega-Journal paper to thousands of scientists worldwide.
Thus the impact is greater than even publication of the paper
in the world's most prestigious journal !
.
ANYONE WHO HAS ANY comments about these
mega-Journal's – or recommendations, please post it here !
.
. George

[Luigi Tumicelli]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]

> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. |
> |o o o -1/a²|

WEF Declare Humans *_Who_Wish_To_Live_* Must Become Batteries For AI
https://newspunch.com/wef-declare-humans-who-wish-to-live-must-become-batteries-for-ai/

Vladimir Putin on Deathbed; Orders Military To Prepare for World War 3
https://newspunch.com/vladimir-putin-on-deathbed-orders-military-to-prepare-for-world-war-3/

Asked when he thinks Putin’s death will come, Budanov said that he thought it would be very soon.

‘I think very fast. I hope.’

[Luigi Tumicelli]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]

> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |o o o -1/a²|

these khazars pretend they are jewish.

claiming to be rabbi at wailing wall asking for money for shabbath 1-8-23
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/SPDjXm212Rac

[The Starmaker]

This gave me a headache:
https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:obFJRtZV7UcJ:scholar.google.com/+GEORGE+E+HAMMOND+&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5


it doesn't make any fuckin sense to me!

It's like it was written by a thousand monkies from 20 different countries...and wop!

[George Hammond]

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:01:08 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> This gave me a headache:
> https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:obFJRtZV7UcJ:scholar.google.com/+GEORGE+E+HAMMOND+&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
>

[George E Hammond MS physics]

... Hi STARMAKER... That 1996 paper which is the
LAST PAPER listed on my website: –
.
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond
.
Was written 27 years ago when I was ONLY 53 YEARS OLD !
.
Do you know what kind of f'n energy I had in those days for
chrissakes – I'm now 80 and still moving like a bat outa hell
on a bicycle.
.
I'm goddamned glad I wrote it – because I've decided that
I'm going to publish the SPOG in a MEGA-JOURNAL
where you have practically UNLIMITED SPACE and
UNLIMITED illustrations, diagrams, references, blah blah
blah – and GOOGLE scans these papers and sends copies
all of them to the email inbox of any of their subscribers
who have an interest in the subjects. This increases
TARGETED PUBLICATION to an immense degree –
and above and beyond that – they are OBLIVIOUS to the
SIGNIFICANCE of their papers and only interested in
the SCIENTIFIC RIGOR of the paper – so I don't have to
worry about POLITICS with one of these impersonal
mega-journals !.
.
I'll probably go with PLOS ONE but I may go with
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS – depends on whether they have
a heavyweight enough reviewer to understand the
goddamned thing?
.
It will cost me a couple of grand for the APC charges in
one of these mega-journals – but I don't give a shit –
the real problem is that it will take me 6 months or longer
to WRITE the goddamned thing – and the clock is running
out on me – so I'm gonna have to work around the clock
for 6 months or longer to do it !
.
MEANWHILE – I noticed this guy "Luigi" talking about the
Jews again – and the point is – that the discovery of the
world's first SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD – which is this
right here: –

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = SCIENCE METRIC OF GOD

|o o a o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

Marks the end of the age of Anti-Semitism – because now
it is not the Jews – but "SCIENCE" that holds the
"Keys to the Kingdom of God" – and the sooner I can get this
thing published – the better !
.
George

[The Starmaker]

i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof of God, when in
reality it should be called The Scientific Proof of Everything!!!!

Why don't you entitled it:

The Theory of Everything is no longer a theory!

THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF of EVERYTHING has finally been discovered!!!!

Discovered by the Top Number One Physicists in the WORLD, Richie
Hammond!!!!


am i right, or am i right?

[The Starmaker]

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs

>
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:56:40 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof
>

> Because all animals have feelings, are sentient beings and we must not torture them...


Animals don't have feelings like people do. Animals don't have a consciousness like people do. Otherwise all animals would have the same percentage of being right handed as people and left handed.



>
> Be humane to wild animals, do not torture them in death by boiling them while alive. Sure no-one cares to see spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as spam free zones.

[George Hammond]

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 3:56:38 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof of God, when in
> reality it should be called The Scientific Proof of Everything!!!!
>

[George E Hammond MS Physics]

.... GOD IS A P S Y C H O L O G I C A L PHENOMENON
and it results in this METRIC describing the
Einsteinian Curvature of SUBJECTIVE Reality: –

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = THE SCIENTIFIC
|o o a² o. |= METRIC OF GOD
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Which has been, and is easily measurable, to 2 decimal
point accuracy : – and explains the "contraction and slowing"
of the subjective universe for the first 20 years of our lives: –
including NOTABLY a failure to contract to 1.0 magnification
but actually contracting to 1.18 magnification leaving the
AVERAGE ADULT SEEING a world that is 18% LARGER and
18% FASTER than it actually is: – and this is known historically
as the phenomenon OF GOD !
.
BUT MEANWHILE it is well known that the: –
Einsteinian Curvature of OBJECTIVE Reality: is –

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = THE FRIEDMANN (FLRW)
|o o a² o. | = METRIC OF THE UNIVERSE
|o o o..-1.|
.
AND YOU WILL NOTICE that the 2 metrics are not
the same – and this is because SUBJECTIVE REALITY
and OBJECTIVE REALITY are NOT THE SAME THING !
.
IN PHYSICS: – a theory of everything includes the
explanation of everything in OBJECTIVE REALITY
including GOD: – which means "subjective reality"
as part of "objective reality": – which means "God"
would be in fact PART of any "Theory of Everything".
.
So if the physicists ever discover a
"theory of everything": – they can simply add
Hammond's "Metric of God" to their theory
and it will indeed have the TOTAL
"Theory of Everything".
.
Hope this answers your question…
.
George

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >
> > Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:56:40 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof
> >
> > Because all animals have feelings, are sentient beings and we must not torture them...
>
> Animals don't have feelings like people do. Animals don't have a consciousness like people do. Otherwise all animals would have the same percentage of being right handed as people and left handed.

Now, I know yous are thinking the question...
"What does being being right handed or left handed have
anything to do with..having consciousness????"


If you don't know the answer to that question...

[The Starmaker]

It doesn't answer it.


If

the physicists ever discover a
"theory of everything"

then everything would already be included and
there is no reason to add anything else to everything
since everything is all that exist.



definition of everything: all that exists
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/everything

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 1:42:19 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

> the physicists ever discover a
> "theory of everything"
> then everything would already be included and
> there is no reason to add anything else to everything
> since everything is all that exist.
>
>

.

[George E Hammond MS Physics]

No Tonto: – because "Physicists" do not know
what God is : – Except for a single physicist
named GEORGE HAMMOND – who in fact has
discovered the world's first Scientific Proof of God.
.
So when the agnostic physicists discover the
"Theory of Everything", naturally we will have to
correct their TOE by adding Hammond's SPOG !
.
George

[The Starmaker]

Since, you are the only, single physicst that knows
'what God is', then...

What Is God?

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 3:17:02 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> Since, you are the only, single physicst that knows
> 'what God is', then...
> What Is God?
>

[ George E Hammond MS Physics]
THE S IENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD
==============================
God IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
.....OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
==============================
.
George

[The Starmaker]

It does not coincide with...The Code.


Here is The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'


If you understand the 'order of events'...Before "created"
you have God.

Before God went about to 'create the heavens and the earth'...there was no heavens and the earth.

That means...

there was No presense of any massive objects to cause a 'curvature' of spacetime.

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 3:17:02 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Since, you are the only, single physicst that knows
> > > 'what God is', then...
> > > What Is God?
> > >
> > [ George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > THE S IENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD
> > ==============================
> > God IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
> > .....OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> > ==============================
> > .
> > George
>
> It does not coincide with...The Code.
>
> Here is The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
>
> If you understand the 'order of events'...Before "created"
> you have God.
>
> Before God went about to 'create the heavens and the earth'...there was no heavens and the earth.
>
> That means...
>
> there was No presense of any massive objects to cause a 'curvature' of spacetime.

Then you might ask, "What does the "God" in The Code mean?


I already explained dat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=IkCku4TM8HA&autoplay=1



it's behind her warm smile...

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:55:48 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> [George Hammond] wrote:
> > THE SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD

> > ==============================
> > God IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
> > .....OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> > ==============================

> [STARMAKER[ wrote:
> 'In the beginning, God created
> the heavens and the earth.'

> There was No presence of any massive

> objects to cause a 'curvature' of spacetime.
>

[George E Hammond MS physics]

For chlrissakes STARMAKER –time to "MAN-UP" !
The BIBLE is all about "SUBJECTIVE REALITY"
..
.... There was no "subjective reality" before MAN
came into being. That means the universe "Heaven
and Earth" did not APPEAR IN SUBJECTIVE REALITY
until AFTER MAN WAS CREATED.
.
And "God" is a psychological phenomenon, therefore
GOD did not appear in SUBJECTIVE REALITY until
Man was created.
.
The creation of "subjective reality" only begins when
Man is created – and therefore since Man was created
say a couple of million years ago – he opened his eyes
and saw the Universe – the universe as we see it exists
in "subjective reality" and was therefore created at the
same time Man was created.
.
People don't realize the difference between "objective Creation"
(the Big Bang) and "subjective Creation" (the creation of Man)
in the human mind. The first happened 14 billion years ago, the
latter happened only 1 million years ago ! GET REAL!
.
The BIBLE does not explain the difference between
SUBJECTIVE and OBJECTIVE reality – instead it
describes Subjective Reality in METAPHORICAL,
ALLEGORICAL, and POETIC terminology – which
basically cannot be understood by anyone under
40 years of age ! – And not really understood until
near 80 years of age !!
.
LOOK – it's time to man up – because the world's
1st Scientific Proof of God has been discovered –
and will only be a few years before everybody in
the world KNOWS ABOUT IT – and the Bible is
finally "DECODED".
.
The reason this is necessary is because it has
become necessary to UNITE the world's 5 major
religions – Xtianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism,
and Buddhism.
.
How the hell are you going to unite Xtianity with
Hinduism – "Jesus" doesn't mean anything to a
Hindu... Same for Islam and Buddhism.
.
But they all believe SCIENCE – they all
UNDERSTAND and BELIEVE E=mc² AND for
the same reason they will all understand and
believe: –

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = THE SCIENTIFIC METRIC OF GOD

|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

GOD is now a SCIENTIFIC FACT: – and THAT
UNIVERSALLY UNDERSTOOD SCIENTIFIC FACT
unifies ALL of WORLD RELIGION.
.
And furthermore I'll tell you where this fact will
first surface as a global Necessity – and that's when
we try to unify the world to combat GLOBAL WARMING !
..... It's later than you think !
.
George

[Otto Fiscella]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]

> For chlrissakes STARMAKER –time to "MAN-UP" !

> T̶h̶e̶ B̶I̶B̶L̶E̶ i̶s̶ a̶l̶l̶ a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ "S̶U̶B̶J̶E̶C̶T̶I̶V̶E̶ R̶E̶A̶L̶I̶T̶Y̶"
> .
> And "God" i̶s̶ a̶ p̶s̶y̶c̶h̶o̶l̶o̶g̶i̶c̶a̶l̶ p̶h̶e̶n̶o̶m̶e̶n̶o̶n̶, t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶f̶o̶r̶e̶ G̶O̶D̶ d̶i̶d̶ n̶o̶t̶ a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶
> S̶U̶B̶J̶E̶C̶T̶I̶V̶E̶ R̶E̶A̶L̶I̶T̶Y̶ u̶n̶t̶i̶l̶ M̶a̶n̶ w̶a̶s̶ c̶r̶e̶a̶t̶e̶d̶.

this is incorrect. The khazar gypsy beggar _gay_actor_, cocaine zelenske, destroying the Church, along *_a_proper_Christian_territory_*, he stole as his country, is pointing *_a_whore_as_ambassador_* in a EU country, Bulgaria.

khazar gypsy Zelensky appoints sexologist pyramid schemer as ambassador to Bulgaria
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2023/01/11/zelensky-appoints-sexologist-pyramid-schemer-as-ambassador-to-bulgaria/

[George Hammond]

On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:41:43 AM UTC-5, Otto Fiscella wrote:
.
SNIP CRAP
.
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:55:51 GMT, George Hammond
wrote:
PROOF GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY

I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right. It was 3 am in a honky tonk section of Laural
Maryland a block from where George Wallace was shot. The
three punks in the car started blowing their horn. I knew
it was run or pull the K-Bar over my visor and probably kill
one of them in a fight. I jambed it into reverse flooring
the accelerator and spinning the steering wheel. The car
spun into a 180 facing the wrong way on a divided highway. I
gunned it into the oncoming traffic. The three punks in the
sedan followed suit and came after me. That was the day I
discovered the world's first scientific proof of God. I had
discovered it while studying in the library of Congress on
Capitol Hill and was on my way home. Needless to say I got
away or I wouldn't be here telling you about it.

[George Hammond]

On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 2:48:12 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE SCIENTIFIC METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

If you plug this metric into Maxima
or Mathematica – you will find that
the Riemann curvature IS A BILLION
times larger than gravitational curvature!
.
This means that the "CURVATURE OF GOD"
is 1 billion times larger than the
"curvature of gravity"!
.
The single exception to this – is a
BLACK HOLE
.
That certainly is food for thought!
.
George

[The Starmaker]

"curvature"??? are you sayin God is a woman?

If God is 7 feet 3 inches tall, it is simply not enough mass to make an dent in the universe, or a 'gravitational curvature' as you people call it.



there is no food here...

dis is not a soup kitchen.

[George Hammond]

On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 3:47:00 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> If God is 7 feet 3 inches tall, it is simply not enough mass to make an dent in the universe, or a 'gravitational curvature' as you people call it.
>

[George E Hammond MS physics]

...Look STARMAKER, an "EXPANSION" of the Universe
(da/dt) where "a" is the "Friedman scale factor" implies
that the universe is "CURVED" since the Riemann
curvature itself is proportional to (da/dt) !
.
However da/dt (known as the Hubble constant) for the
real universe is only 7%/gigayear whereas the
"expansion" (growth rate) of humans under 20 yrs old
is 5%/YEAR – this yields the "GOD METRIC" above.
IOW the "curvature of human growth"
is 1 billion times greater than the "curvature of the
universe"
.
IOW the "curvature of SUBJECTIVE space-time"

is 1 billion times larger than the

"curvature of OBJECTIVE of space-time"
.
Which means the "curvature power of God"

is 1 billion times larger than the

"curvature power of gravity"
.
The only known EXCEPTION to this result is
the near infinite curvature near the SCHWARZSCHILD
RADIUS of a black hole !
.
This tells me that the phenomenon of God has
something to do with a BLACK HOLE phenomena !
.
George

[Ciro Di pietro]

George Hammond wrote:

> However da/dt (known as the Hubble constant) for the real universe is
> only 7%/gigayear whereas the
> "expansion" (growth rate) of humans under 20 yrs old
> is 5%/YEAR – this yields the "GOD METRIC" above.
> IOW the "curvature of human growth"
> is 1 billion times greater than the "curvature of the universe"

what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry
somewhere.

[The Starmaker]

And then there was no Light.

[George Hammond]

On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 7:02:17 PM UTC-5, Ciro Di pietro wrote:
> [George Hammond] wrote:
> >

> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) SCIENTIFIC METRIC OF GOD

> > |o o a² o. |
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> >

> > However da/dt (known as the Hubble constant)
> > for the real universe is only 7%/gigayear whereas the
> > "expansion" (growth rate) of humans under 20 yrs old
> > is 5%/YEAR – this yields the "GOD METRIC" above.
> > IOW the "curvature of human growth"

> > is 1 billion times the "curvature of the universe"
>
[Ciro Di pietro] wrote;

> what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry
> somewhere.
>

[George Hammond]
.... Hello Ciro, the selection of your quote above tells me
that you have an eye for SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE.
.
SO TELL ME SOMETHING: – what SOCIAL RELEVANCE do
you think the world's first RIGOROUS Scientific Proof of God
would have on the 2.5 BILLION adult human beings in the
world population today !
.
I would GREATLY APPRECIATE your opinion?
.
George

[Ciro Di pietro]

George Hammond wrote:

> [Ciro Di pietro] wrote;
>> what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry
>> somewhere.
>>
> [George Hammond]
> .... Hello Ciro, the selection of your quote above tells me that you
> have an eye for SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE.

> SO TELL ME SOMETHING: – what SOCIAL RELEVANCE do you think the world's
> first RIGOROUS Scientific Proof of God would have on the 2.5 BILLION
> adult human beings in the world population today !

> I would GREATLY APPRECIATE your opinion?

not sure, it's too complex. But your physical, mechanical approach above,
is nonsensical. You misunderstand the subject, confusing things.
Reverbably.

[George Hammond]

On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 6:30:11 PM UTC-5, Ciro Di pietro wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > [Ciro Di pietro] wrote;
> >> what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry
> >> somewhere.
> >>
> > [George Hammond]
> > .... Hello Ciro, the selection of your quote above tells me that you
> > have an eye for SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE.
> > SO TELL ME SOMETHING: – what SOCIAL RELEVANCE do you think the world's
> > first RIGOROUS Scientific Proof of God would have on the 2.5 BILLION
> > adult human beings in the world population today !
> > I would GREATLY APPRECIATE your opinion?
> >
>

[Ciro Di pietro] wrote;

> not sure, it's too complex. But your physical, mechanical approach above,
> is nonsensical. You misunderstand the subject, confusing things.
> Reverbably.
>
>

[George E Hammond, MS Physics]
.... Your answer "NOT SURE" –Is the most intelligent thing
I've heard on SPR in 6 months !
.
But, your opinion "IT'S TOO COMPLEX" is OBVIOUSLY GREATLY
EXAGGERATED !
.
In 1922 a scrawny Russian math whiz named FRIEDMANN
bailed out Einstein's gravity theory by telling him the Universe
could be made to EXPAND, by simply multiplying his METRIC
by an "Expansion Factor" a=a(t) in which case you get: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE FRIEDMANN METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (FLRW) OF ASTROPHYSICS
|o o o..-1.|
.
EINSTEIN finally realized Friedmann was CORRECT and the
above FRIEDMANN metric RULES ASTROPHYSICS to this day !
.
ALL HAMMOND HAS DONE – is COPY FRIEDMANN
(using a different value for "a" of course) and in addition
to multiplying "XYZ" by "a" just like Friedmann did, Hammond
also divides "t" by "a" – this not only makes objects "larger"
it makes "motion faster" thus t/a² AND WE HAVE: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD

|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|

.
NOW THAT'S PRETTY SIMPLE
.
Of course "a(t)" In Astrophysics begins at "1" at the present time
and INCREASES as time goes on into the future..
.
While "a(t)" In the God Metric begins at 3.5 at birth, and DECREASES
towards 1 at adulthood..
.
STUNNINGLY a(t) never falls to 1.0 but in fact stops at about 1.18 for
THE AVERAGE HUMAN ADULT – because the average adult is only
85% fully grown (according to WHO, UNESCO, etc.) and 1/.85=1.18
.
therefore, the average adult person SEES A WORLD that is
18% LARGER and 18% FASTER than it actually is – and this scares
everyone and has been called the PHENOMENON OF GOD for
thousands of years – (obviously "God" is a fully 100% grown
person, which no one has ever seen) and the phenomenon itself has
.
UNTIL NOW NEVER HAD A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION
MUCH LESS A SCIENTIFIC PROOF !
.
George

[Giovanne Bologna]

George Hammond wrote:

> thousands of years – (obviously "God" is a fully 100% grown person,
> which no one has ever seen) and the phenomenon itself has .
> UNTIL NOW NEVER HAD A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION MUCH LESS A SCIENTIFIC
> PROOF !

you are wasting my time. Suppose no humans, only cats. Bacteria,
molecules, and so on. Go read The Bible. You are an idiot.

[George Hammond]

On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 9:47:09 AM UTC-5, Giovanne Bologna wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > thousands of years – (obviously "God" is a fully 100% grown person,
> > which no one has ever seen) and the phenomenon itself has .
> > UNTIL NOW NEVER HAD A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION MUCH LESS A SCIENTIFIC
> > PROOF !
>

[LAME BRAIN ALIAS wrote]

> you are wasting my time. Suppose no humans, only cats. Bacteria,
> molecules, and so on. Go read The Bible. You are an idiot.

.
[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Your time is worthless !
.
Xenophanes famously noted in 500 BC
that if horses could draw, they would draw
their gods as horses.
.
THAT ALSO GOES FOR CATS !
.
George

[Giovanne Bologna]

George Hammond wrote:

>> you are wasting my time. Suppose no humans, only cats. Bacteria,
>> molecules, and so on. Go read The Bible. You are an idiot.
> .

> [George E Hammond M̶S̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] Y̶o̶u̶r̶ t̶i̶m̶e̶ i̶s̶ w̶o̶r̶t̶h̶l̶e̶s̶s̶ !

> Xenophanes famously noted in 500 BC that if horses could draw, they

> would draw their gods as horses. T̶H̶A̶T̶ A̶L̶S̶O̶ G̶O̶E̶S̶ F̶O̶R̶ C̶A̶T̶S̶ !

you fucking idiot, then what "god" is that you pretend trying to prove.
What an uneducated jerk we have here, ladies and gentlemen. Trying to
prove a "god" which doesn't even exists. Fuck youu. You are a waste.

[George Hammond]

On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 8:35:34 PM UTC-5, Giovanne Bologna wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>

> >> [G. Baloney] wrote:
> >> you are wasting my time. Suppose no humans, only cats. Bacteria,
> >> molecules, and so on. Go read The Bible. You are an idiot.
> > .
> > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] Y̶o̶u̶r̶ t̶i̶m̶e̶ i̶s̶ w̶o̶r̶t̶h̶l̶e̶s̶s̶ !
> > Xenophanes famously noted in 500 BC that if horses could draw, they
> > would draw their gods as horses. T̶H̶A̶T̶ A̶L̶S̶O̶ G̶O̶E̶S̶ F̶O̶R̶ C̶A̶T̶S̶ !
>

> [G. Baloney] wrote:
> you fucking idiot, then what "god" is that you pretend trying to prove.
> What an uneducated jerk we have here, ladies and gentlemen. Trying to
> prove a "god" which doesn't even exists. Fuck youu. You are a waste.
>

[Geo. Hammond, MS Physics (1967)]
Look,
U OVERSTUFFED BULLSHIT ARTIST: –
.
1 – There is a REAL GOD
2 – Both Akhenaton and Moses
officially recognized this around
1300 BC
3 – an American physicist named
HAMMOND accidentally identified
the rigorous scientific proof of this
around 2020 A.D., and furthermore that: –
==========================
God Is an Einsteinian Curvature
of SUBJECTIVE spacetime
==========================
4 – Today the "Curvature of God"
can be scientifically measured to
two -decimal point accuracy in SI
(mks) units.
.
There are approximately 2.5 BILLION
ADULTS in the world, most of them
identifying with the worlds 5 Major
Religions; Christianity, Judaism,
Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism.
.
The advent of the
World's 1st Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
will more than DOUBLE the political
leverage of World Religion..
.
And the World is going to need all the
political unity it can muster since
exhaustive study now appears to indicate
that "God" is very likely the only power
that can actually unify the world population
sufficiently to control Global Warming !
.
George

[Giovanne Bologna]

George Hammond wrote:

> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 8:35:34 PM UTC-5, Giovanne Bologna

>> George E Hammond M̶S̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] Y̶o̶u̶r̶ t̶i̶m̶e̶ i̶s̶
>> > w̶o̶r̶t̶h̶l̶e̶s̶s̶ !
>> > Xenophanes famously noted in 500 BC that if horses could draw, they
>> > would draw their gods as horses. T̶H̶A̶T̶ A̶L̶S̶O̶ G̶O̶E̶S̶ F̶O̶R̶
>> > C̶A̶T̶S̶ !
>>

>> [G̶. B̶a̶l̶o̶n̶e̶y̶] wrote:
>> you fucking idiot, then what "god" is that you pretend trying to prove.
>> What an uneducated jerk we have here, ladies and gentlemen. Trying to
>> prove a "god" which doesn't even exists. Fuck youu. You are a waste.

> [Geo. Hammond, M̶S̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ (1967)]

> .
> 1 – There is a REAL GOD 2 – Both Akhenaton and Moses officially
> recognized this around 1300 BC 3 – an American physicist named HAMMOND
> accidentally identified the rigorous scientific proof of this around
> 2020 A.D., and furthermore that: –

so without them you have another "god". How many gods you have there, you
amoeba idiot. Is that a god or a fart shadow bouncing in your brain??

[George Hammond]

On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 5:21:36 PM UTC-5, Giovanne Bologna wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:

> > .
> > 1–There is a REAL GOD , and furthermore: –

> > ==========================
> > God Is an Einsteinian Curvature
> > of SUBJECTIVE spacetime
> > ==========================
> >

> [G. Baloney] wrote:
> another "god". How many gods you have there, you
> amoeba idiot. Is that a god or a fart shadow bouncing
> in your brain??

.
[Hammond, MS physics MA USA]
Look, Fat Stuff, the "gods" with a "small g" are: –
.
MICKEY MOUSE, DONALD DUCK, PORKY PIG, BUGS BUNNY etc.
.
The Greeks called them "Olympian gods".
The Psychologists call them "2nd–Order Eigenvectors".
.
GOD, WITH A CAPITAL G, IS A 100% FULLY GROWN MAN – –
which no one has ever seen – and has never existed on Earth!
.
Psychologists refer to him as the "4th Order Eigenvector" –
and have dubbed that the "GFP" (Gen. Factor of Psychology)
.
AND THEY HAVE NO IDEA THAT THE SO-CALLED "GFP"
IS ACTUALLY THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!!!!!!!
.
Nor are they AWARE that a messenger named HAMMOND
has arrived on the sceneTO TELL THEM ABOUT IT !
.
George

[George Hammond]

On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 5:21:36 PM UTC-5, Giovanne Bologna wrote:
> >> Trying to prove a "god" which doesn't even exists.

.
[George E Hammond MS Physics, MA USA]
Let me put it in simple mathematical terms: –
.
Suppose the average ADULT in the world
is 5'5" tall with an IQ of 100.
.
And suppose that: –

.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

IS CORRECT.
.
Where "a=a(t)" in this metric begins at 3.5 at birth and
decreases towards 1.0 at adulthood.
.
However it never reaches 1.0, it stops at about 1.18
because every adult (on average) is only 85% fully
grown (WHO, UNESCO) – and 1/.85=1.18.
,
So the average adult, if he was 100% fully grown, would
actually be: – (1.18) (5'5")=6'5" tall, and would have
an IQ of 118
.
THIS MEANS THAT the average ADULT in the world is
walking around SEEING a world that appears
18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it ACTUALLY IS !
.
This STRIKES FEAR into the heart of the average ADULT
and has been noticed for thousands of years and it is
historically known as the PHENOMENON OF GOD
.
And the 1200 page King James Bible describes in detail
the psychological and social effect that this artificial
18% magnification of the SIZE AND SPEED OF "REALITY"
has had on human history !
.
And BTW THIS IS SCIENIFIC PROOF that there is a REAL GOD
.
George

[George Hammond]

[George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA]
.
SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed
that "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –

.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

Is IDENTICAL to the FLRW METRIC if
FLRW is written with "CONFORMAL TIME"
.
The FLRW METRIC is one of the most
highly studied relativistic metrics known
to modern science.
.
SOMEONE on SPR must have a comment
about this intriguing fact ?
.
Please pipe up if you have anything to say
about that !
.
George

[Faustino Biondo]

George Hammond wrote:

> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 5:21:36 PM UTC-5, Giovanne Bologna wrote:
>> >> Trying to prove a "god" which doesn't even exists.
> .
> [George E Hammond MS Physics, MA USA]
> Let me put it in simple mathematical terms: –
> .
> Suppose the average ADULT in the world is 5'5" tall with an IQ of 100.

so you don't have gods on planet Mars. Do it again.

[Faustino Biondo]

George Hammond wrote:

> |a² o o o. |

> |o a² o o. | = T̶H̶E̶ (H̶A̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶) M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ |o̶ o̶ a̶² o̶. |
> |ooo-1/a² |
> Is IDENTICAL to the F̶L̶R̶W̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶ i̶f̶ F̶L̶R̶W̶ is written with "CONFORMAL TIME"
> The FLRW METRIC is one of the most h̶i̶g̶h̶l̶y̶ s̶t̶u̶d̶i̶e̶d̶ r̶e̶l̶a̶t̶i̶v̶i̶s̶t̶i̶c̶ metrics
> known to modern science.

so you have no gods on other planets. You are insignificant, because
it's really regrettable after the history of Hiroshima and Nagasaki what
the todays gutless Japanese government has become. American butlers,
that's basically what they are. One would never expect such a low traitor
mentality from the land of the samurai. It takes a real old timer with
guts to finally say it the way it is!

[Bow Down Before Me]

On 1/23/2023 4:15 PM, George Hammond wrote:

> So the average adult, if he was 100% fully grown, would
> actually be: – (1.18) (5'5")=6'5" tall, and would have
> an IQ of 118
> .
> THIS MEANS THAT the average ADULT in the world is
> walking around SEEING a world that appears
> 18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it ACTUALLY IS !

You mean that since I am 6'5", I am actually a God??

Thanks for letting me know! Because you informed me of this, I will
honor you by making you the very first person I will smite!

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 12:03:47 PM UTC-5, Faustino Biondo wrote:
> so you don't have gods on planet Mars. Do it again.

.
[George Hammond MS Physics]
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn
are all named after ancient Roman, Greek
or Babylonian "gods".
.
They all circulate around the SUN which
Pharaoh Akhenaton designated as "GOD"
or in Egyptian: "Aten".
.
Today modern Psychometry + Hammond has
discovered that the so-called "12 Olympian gods"
are actually 2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors,
and "God" is actually a top, 4th Order Eigenvector
which the psychologists refer to as the "GFP"
(Gen. Factor of Psychology). Hammond has
not yet succeeded in convincing them that the
"GFP" is actually the "God of the Bible".
.
IOW God is REAL !
.
George
.

[George Hammond]

.
[GEH MS Physics]
CORRECTION – ALL of the planets in the solar system
except the Earth – are named after Greek or Roman
God's.
.
MEANWHILE – HAMMOND has discovered that all 12
(in fact 13) of the so-called OLYMPIAN GODS are actually
2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors discovered by a 1000
man PhD Academic Psychometry Army measuring
Personality Structure worldwide using desktop computers
for 50 years in 20 countries in 20 foreign languages.
.
HAMMOND discovered that CUBIC BRAIN CLEAVAGE is the
ORIGIN of the Olympian Gods because there are 13 Symmetry
Axes in a CUBE !
See: –
https://www.academia.edu/92261906/The_spacetime_GOD_METRIC
also: –
https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
.
George

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 1:44:32 PM UTC-5, Bow Down Before Me wrote:
> On 1/23/2023 4:15 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > So the average adult, if he was 100% fully grown, would
> > actually be: – (1.18) (5'5")=6'5" tall, and would have
> > an IQ of 118
> > .
> > THIS MEANS THAT the average ADULT in the world is

> > walking around SEEING a world that appears to be

> > 18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it ACTUALLY IS !

> > And this scary phenomenon is known historically as "GOD" !
.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 6:01:45 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
on ALT.PHILOSOPHY. DEBATE
> Pretty much exactly the "Golden Ass" I was calling you.
> Beyond you, though, the "God is a matrix" ([sic] metric) is well-known as
> a "hoax" on unbelievers and even credulous believers, which matches to
> what I take is your beyond-atrocious personal behavior and psychopathically
> narcissistic unconcern about it.
.
[GEH MS Physics]
You are SCIENTIFICALLY ILLITERATE. You wouldn't
know a 2nd-rank tensor from a batting average.
.
I doubt that you have any academic credentials
whatsoever.
.
You're merely an IGNORANT MOTOR-MOUTH and
such writers are dime a dozen on the Internet.
.
Because you have no SENSE OF RESPONSIBILITY
you have missed the OPPORTUNITY OF A LIFETIME
when the world's first SPOG knocked on your door.
.
So long Jeffrey – you missed your big chance because
you're just another run-of-the-mill pop-mouth punk..
.
George

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 1:44:32 PM UTC-5, Bow Down Before Me wrote:
>

[GH MS Physics] wrote:
SNIP ALIAS
SNIP BOT
SNIP SPAM
.
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 5:55:50 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [GEH MS Physics] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |a² o o o. |

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |o o a² o. |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |ooo-1/a²|
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is IDENTICAL to the FLRW METRIC if

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLRW is written in "CONFORMAL TIME"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>
> [JR] wrote ON ALT.PHILOSOPHY.DEBATE:
> The SPOG a ..."hoax" like I've been saying
>
[GH] wrote:
................ "HOAX" sounds like
an armor piercing strategy !
.
Perhaps you're right.... Labeling the
SPOG as a "HOAX" automatically puts
"scientific credibility" on the anvil !!
..... And once that happens – "it's all
over but the shouting", for the
hoi polloi critics – – !
.
Thanks for initiating the suggestion !

George

[George Hammond]

On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 5:55:50 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

on ALT.PHILOSOPHY. DEBATE:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [GEH MS Physics] wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is IDENTICAL to the FLRW METRIC if

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FLRW is written with "CONFORMAL TIME"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > .
[JR] wrote:
Its a "hoax" like I' ve been saying?
.
[GEH MS Physics]..
.... Hi Jeffrey – I've had another revelation you may
find interesting.
.
We've been writing "AD" after the calendar date for
2023 YEARS now. (Anno Domini)
.
But I think with the advent of the Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
we should restart the CALENDAR again – and stop using
the expression "Anno Domini" – since I now think this should
be referred to as the "Age of the Probatur Deus" meaning the
Age of the "Proof of God".
.
So next year will not be 2024 A.D. I believe it should be
"year 1 PD" (year 1 Probatur Deus" !
.
IOW – "THE AGE OF JESUS" has now SCIENTIFICALLY ENDED !
.
What you think about that suggestion ?
.
George

[Jeffrey Rubard]

That you really, really like "hobby-horse" circular deception techniques?

[Alexander Basso]

George Hammond wrote:

>> SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed that
>> "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –
>> .
>> |a² o o o. |

>> |o a² o o. | = (H̶A̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶) G̶O̶D̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶

>> |o o a² o. |
>> |ooo-1/a² |

nonsense. You are treating tensors like matrices, which reveals you don't
undrestand tensors at all.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

God creates gravitational distance...
What about a quantity of mass curves space?
Einstein claimed what he has no answer for.
How does mass curve space?

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 7:58:51 PM UTC-5, Alexander Basso wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> >> SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed that
> >> "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –
> >> .
> >> |a² o o o. |
> >> |o a² o o. | = (H̶A̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶) G̶O̶D̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶
> >> |o o a² o. |
> >> |ooo-1/a² |

.
> [Alexander Basso wrote:]

> nonsense. You are treating tensors like matrices, which reveals you don't
> undrestand tensors at all.

.
[George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA]
you have used the word "TENSOR" which means
there is one chance in 10 that you actually have a degree
In Physics.
.
IF SO – you should be WELL AWARE that a 2nd rank tensor
CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX
.
In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC TENSOR
is universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX
.
Come back please,
.
George

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 8:56:12 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > >> SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed that
> > >> "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –
> > >> .
> > >> |a² o o o. |
> > >> |o a² o o. | = (H̶A̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶) G̶O̶D̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶
> > >> |o o a² o. |
> > >> |ooo-1/a² |

.
> [Mitch wrote]
> God creates gravitational distance...
>
[George Hammond MS Physics]
Duh... You have used the word "God".
.
Mind telling me exactly what you think "God is?
.
I've told you what I think God is:
============================

God Is an Einsteinian Curvature

of SUBJECTIVE space-time
============================
and that is a PRECISE SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION
which can be experimentally measured to
2 decimal point accuracy
.
You have used the word "God" – mind telling me
what YOUR DEFINITION OF GOD IS?
.
George
.

[George Hammond]

On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 3:25:11 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [GEH MS Physics] wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SOMEONE on SPR must have noticed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that "Hammond's GOD METRIC": –
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is IDENTICAL to the FLRW METRIC if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FLRW is written with "CONFORMAL TIME"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > .

.
[GE Hammond MS Physics]
Listen Jeffrey – you may play "hobby-horse" over on
ALT. Philosophy. Debate, but we don't play"hobby-horse" over
here on SPR
.
SO TELL ME WHY – If the World's First Scientific Proof of God
(SPOG) has been discovered – WHY we shouldn't RESTART the
Justinian – Gregorian calendar at YEAR–1 in commemoration
of this HISTORIC SCIENTIFICO-RELIGIOUS MILESTONE ?
.
THE AGE OF JESUS has scientifically ENDED
..
George

[Alexander Basso]

George Hammond wrote:

>> >> |a² o o o. |
>> >> |o a² o o. | = (H̶A̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶) G̶O̶D̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶ |o o a² o. |
>> >> |ooo-1/a² |
> .
>> [Alexander Basso wrote:]
>> nonsense. You are treating tensors like matrices, which reveals you
>> don't undrestand tensors at all.
>

> IF SO – you should be WELL AWARE that a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY
> IS written as a MATRIX . In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC
> TENSOR is universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX . Come back please,

error number two. Tensors actually extends left, right, north and south.
For instance for a piezoelectric material, it extends right and south.
Thus it's NOT a matrix. Go learn tensors. Alot of slef-established
mathematicians around here are not undrestanding tensors.

[Tom Roberts]

On 2/1/23 7:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX

This is not true. It is the COMPONENTS of the rank-2 tensor, relative to
a specified basis, that can be written as a matrix; the basis is
usually, but not always, a local set of coordinate axes.

The tensor itself is a bi-linear function of two vectors onto the reals.
Unlike its components, the tensor itself is completely independent of
coordinates. In GR, most "tensors" are really tensor fields (but the
second word is usually omitted)....

Tom Roberts

[George Hammond]

On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 4:43:00 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 2/1/23 7:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX
>

> [Tom Roberts] wrote:
> This is not true. It is the COMPONENTS of the rank-2 tensor, relative to
> a specified basis, that can be written as a matrix; the basis is
> usually, but not always, a local set of coordinate axes.
>

[George E Hammond MS Physics]

You conveniently failed to quote the 2nd sentence following
the one you quoted above – in which I say: –

.
> "In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC
> TENSOR is universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX"
.

So CLEARLY – I am talking SPECIFICALLY about the COMPONENTS
of the 4 x 4 metric tensor...
.
And by your own statement above that can be written as a
MATRIX.
.
FURTHERMORE this entire thread is a discussion of this
4 x 4 COMPONENT metric/matrix expressed in Cartesian
coordinates: –

.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |a² o o o. |

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
.

Where the number of carets indicates how many times
this metric which is the CONTEXT of this thread has been
quoted – and is the "CONTEXT" within which my statement
was made.
.
George

[Tom Roberts]

On 2/3/23 1:24 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 4:43:00 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts
> wrote:
>> On 2/1/23 7:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
>>> a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX
>> [Tom Roberts] wrote: This is not true. It is the COMPONENTS of the
>> rank-2 tensor, relative to a specified basis, that can be written
>> as a matrix; the basis is usually, but not always, a local set of
>> coordinate axes.
> [George E Hammond MS Physics] You conveniently failed to quote the
> 2nd sentence following the one you quoted above – in which I say: –
> .
>> "In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC TENSOR is
>> universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX"
> . So CLEARLY – I am talking SPECIFICALLY about the COMPONENTS of the
> 4 x 4 metric tensor...

Yes -- all too many authors, including yourself, discuss tensor
components while calling them "the tensor". My point was that the
distinction is important: the tensor is independent of basis and
coordinates, but its components explicitly depend on the basis
(coordinates).

[That basis/coordinate independence is one of the primary
reasons for using tensors in physical theories.]

> FURTHERMORE this entire thread is a discussion of this 4 x 4
> COMPONENT metric/matrix expressed in Cartesian coordinates

That's your problem -- you are discussing a matrix that is EXPLICITLY
coordinate dependent. Note that coordinates are arbitrary human
constructs, and nature never uses them, so no coordinate-dependent
quantity can accurately model any phenomenon of nature. But here that's
OK, as "GOD" is not any phenomenon of nature -- both "GOD" and those
metric components are figments of your imagination.

[Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does
not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am
normally absent from this thread).

Tom Roberts

[George Hammond]

.... Look Tom –
The Einstein Metric of objective space-time
The Friedmann Metric Of Astrophysics
The Hammond God Metric of Subjective Space-Time
.
Are by definition
ALL COORDINATE INDEPENDENT: –
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|

.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD

|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

You can write them in Cartesian coordinates,
spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system
you choose – because they are tensor equations.
.
====================================
So you are WRONG when you say that the
"God Metric" is "Coordinate Dependent"
it is just as "coordinate INDEPENDENT"
as the FL RW metric of Astrophysics is !!
====================================
.
The problem is that you do not understand the
difference between:
OBJECTIVE space-time
and
SUBJECTIVE space-time
.
You don't even NEED to understand the
DIFFERENCE – just consider them 2 separate
and independent space times with different
METRICS .
.
But for the more Scientifically Inquisitive
reader let me explain that OBJECTIVE
space-time is measured with clocks and rulers,
while SUBJECTIVE space-time is the reality
that you actually SEE – – for instance a
6 month old kid SEES a world that is
4 TIMES LARGER AND 4 TIMES FASTER
THEN AN ADULT
.
And this is WHY a "Friedman type Scale Factor"
a{t} appears in the GOD METRIC !
..
NOW OBVIOUSLY "subjective" space-time is
what is commonly called "Psychological Reality.
Whereas "objective" space-time is psychologically
independent "objective (scientifically measurable)
reality".
.
THIS IS WHY it is called the "GOD METRIC".
.
Now I don't expect you to understand or even CARE
about all that – but let me remind you that there are
billions of people in the world who DO !.
.
And the reason is this is – for 2023 years we have had
to suffer the disgusting experience of sitting in a
Christian church facing a dead body hanging from a
Cross in the front of the Church – because that was
the only way they could "explain what God is".
.
Well guess what Tom – your SPR buddy George has
discovered A SCIENTIFIC Proof of God – that does not
require a dead body hanging from a Cross to scientifically
proof that there is a "REAL GOD".
.
You may not think that's important or significant,
but I think it's so important that we should RESTART
THE JULIAN CALENDAR at year 01 starting in 2024 !
I'm here to tell you that the "Age of Jesus" is over !
We now have a scientific Proof of God !
.
Please don't go away mad– if you have any further
comments about the "God Metric" I would certainly like
to hear about them!
.
George
.

[The Starmaker]

There is no reality in SUBJECTIVE space-time.

and have Never been proven to be a reality.

go back to the drawing board....


call tech support..
error, error, error.


There is no reality in SUBJECTIVE space-time.

and have Never been proven to be a reality.

go back to the drawing board....


call tech support..
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzerror, error, error.
error, error, error.
call tech support..
in India.

you got a billion people who will take your call.

or any 7/11 store can help you.







--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[Tom Roberts]

On 2/3/23 9:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> The Einstein Metric of objective space-time
> The Friedmann Metric Of Astrophysics
> The Hammond God Metric of Subjective Space-Time
> .
> Are by definition
> ALL COORDINATE INDEPENDENT: –

This is just plain not true. All your equations below implicitly use a
specific coordinate system.

> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
> |o o a² o. |
> |o o o..-1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> You can write them in Cartesian coordinates,
> spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system
> you choose – because they are tensor equations.

This is just plain not true. Those are TENSOR COMPONENTS relative to a
specific coordinate system, NOT the tensors themselves. See example
below.

A metric tensor (field) is a bi-linear function of two vectors onto the
reals, evaluated at each point of the manifold [#]. One obtains the
above sets of components by evaluating the tensor on the 4x4 matrix of
basis vectors (at each point), which in these cases are the local
coordinate axes. This is TRIVIALLY OBVIOUS, because you display a 4x4
array of REAL NUMBERS, not any bi-linear function of two vectors onto
the reals.

[#] This is the actual definition, and shows why the
metric tensor defines the dot product between vectors.
The vectors implicitly belong to the tangent space at
each point of the manifold.

> [... further nonsense omitted]

YOU clearly do not understand this.

As a simple example, consider your "EINSTEIN METRIC", which is actually
the COMPONENTS of the Minkowski metric of Special Relativity, expressed
in Minkowski coordinates (x,y,z,t) using units with c=1. When expressed
in terms of spherical coordinates (r,theta,phi,t), the matrix of
COMPONENTS is transformed:
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 r^2 0 0 |
| 0 0 r^2 sin^2(theta) 0 |
| 0 0 0 -1 |
The COMPONENTS are clearly dependent on the coordinates used.

You really should learn something about the subject before attempting to
write about it. And my earlier remark still applies:

[George Hammond]

On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 12:09:58 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> You really should learn something about the subject before attempting to
> write about it. And my earlier remark still applies:
> >> [Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does
> >> not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am
> >> normally absent from this thread).
>
> Tom Roberts

....
....

[George E Hammond MS Physics]

February 5, 2023
.
Hi Tom:
... Dick Feynman famously coined the phrase
"Tickling the Tail of the Dragon" while working on the
atomic bomb at Los Alamos during World War II.
.
You, Tom Roberts, are the only competent relativity Physicist
who has EVER taken a serious look at this Scientific Proof of
God (SPOG) discovery. And I dare say you are now engaged in
another case of "TICKLING THE TAIL OF THE DRAGON".
... IMHO the discovery of the SPOG is roughly equivalent to the
discovery of the world's first Atomic Bomb in that regard!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
With that introduction, I will now proceed to reply to your
previous post here on SPR.
.
... I have posted the following 3 well-known space-time metrics
expressed as 4 x 4 matrices in Cartesian Coordinates.
.
Eqns 1 and 2 have appeared in thousands of textbooks
for decades. They are commonplace and it is well understood
what they mean!
Eqn 3 originates with me and is something new!

.
| 1 o o o. |

| o 1 o o. | = Eqn 1 – EINSTEIN METRIC

| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = Eqn 2 – FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC

|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = Eqn 3 – HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD

|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

You can write these Eqns in Cartesian coordinates,

spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system
you choose –

.
When I said "they are coordinate independent" I
simply meant that if you change the coordinates it
does not change the underlying "physical reality"
of the problem – that remains the same irregardless
of the coordinates used.
.
Okay, so you pointed out that "coordinate independent"
actually (to be technically correct) actually means
something else. I must demur to your opinion and
apologize for my sloppy language. Since I'm 80
years old I've probably forgotten more Physics than
I can remember !
.
.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
MEANWHILE this discussion is not about
"nomenclature arguments". It is ALL ABOUT the
"PHYSICS OF THE PROBLEM". It is all about
the PHYSICS underlying eqn # 3 !
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
Now I am simply saying that it is a proven fact that
eqn 2 is scientifically correct – – the FLRW is one
of the most studied metrics in modern Science.
And furthermore I am saying that you can
UNDERSTAND eqn 3 by comparing it to eqn 2 !
.
Because a=a(t) in eqn 2 is a monotonically
increasing quantity, eqn 2 describes an
"expansion of space" in the 4 dimensional
spacetime of (x,y,z,t). And it has been proven
experimentally that this expansion actually exists
in the real universe, and that eqn 2 accurately
mathematically describes it!
.
KNOWING THAT a=a(t) in eqn 2 is a monotonically
increasing function of "t", it is immediately
mathematically apparent that if "a(t)" in eqn 3 is a
monotonically DECREASING function of time – –
that eqn 3 represents a "contraction" of space and
at the same time an "increasing speed of motion"
in the said spacetime.
.
We immediately notice that FUNDAMENTALLY eqn 3
is merely an EXTENSION of eqn 2, to include the
4th dimension (time) ! And also it has a DECREASING
"scale factor" rather than an INCREASING
scale factor.

IOW there is absolutely no question as to the
mathematical meaning of either eqn 2 or eqn 3.
.
OF COURSE – eqn 3 CANNOT possibly apply to
"real spacetime", it applies to some other
independent spacetime – and this independent
spacetime is referred to here as
HUMAN SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME .
.
OBJECTIVE SPACETIME Is what Astrophysics
measures with clocks and rulers.
SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME is what people actually SEE.
There is a difference between what various people see,
dramatically so with respect to age. A 6-month-old
child actually SEES a world that is nearly

4 TIMES LARGER AND 4 TIMES FASTER

than the world seen by an adult !
.
Therefore a "magnification factor" a=a(t)) must be
used to describe Subjective Spacetime and a(t)
begins at about 3.5 at birth and drops to about 1.18
at adulthood. It does not drop to 1.0, because
according to WHO and UNESCO data, the average
adult in the world is only about 85% fully grown
and 1/.85= 1.18.
.
Meanwhile, using this "human scale factor – a(t)"
we can compose Eqn 3 using the following rationale –
eqn 3 is formulated using the standard Einstein
formula for the "distance" between 2 events in
this new "subjective space-time: ––
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
Where a = a(t) is the above defined "magnification
factor" (scale factor). IOW the above formula
requires a greater number of "feet" of childhood
enlarged objects, hence multiplication by "a" ,
whereas the increased speed of childhood
observed objects, requires a fewer number of
seconds, hence division by "a" (greater speed).
.
And this in turn gives us directly the origin of Eq 3
a.k.a. the Hammond God Metric
.
Now why is it called the "God metric" and the
answer to that is this: – we notice that no one
actually ever achieves "full growth". In fact WHO,
UNESCO and other world health organizations
estimate that the average person in the world is
only 85% fully grown – some more some less –
in 3rd World countries 30 to 40% growth stunting is
not uncommon due simply to starvation, hardship
and disease.
.
As a result of this on a world average adults wind
up only about 85% fully grown and since 1/.85= 1.18,
the average person winds up being 18% short of
full growth – and as explained above this means
that the average adult in the world is walking around

SEEING a world that appears

18% LARGER AND FASTER THAN IT ACTUALLY IS !!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
This phenomenon strikes fear into the hearts of
every human being on Earth, and has been called
historically, for thousands of years, the phenomenon
of "GOD". IOW "God" is identified as a 100% fully
grown human specimen,usually assumed to be a
male, and for the record we realize that no such
person has ever been seen, and indubitably has
never actually physically existed on Earth ! And this
is why it is assumed that God is an INVISIBLE man
who only exists in "Heaven".
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
Now admittedly – the above description does
not PROVE that this "childhood growth
phenomenon" is actually "God" but it proves
that the phenomenon itself definitely EXISTS.
.
However – there is ANOTHER gigantic chunk of
the theory that I have not mentioned in this post
– that DOES PROVE beyond all doubt, that this
"less than full growth phenomenon" is in fact

"the God of the Bible".
.

It turns out that evidence comes from a 50 year,
$100 million study conducted by thousands of
Psychometricians worldwide in 20 languages and
published in a peer-reviewed literature large
enough to fill a library.
... I do not present this evidence here because this is
a "Relativity" newsgroup, and not a "Psychology"
newsgroup.
... However, should anyone be interested, I have
made a entertaining 10 minute YouTube video
which explains all this – and is certainly easy for
anyone with a physics degree to understand: –
.
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
......https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................(YouTube 12-min)
.
.
Okay, Tom, with that I will end this post here, and
congratulate you personally on being the first
Physicist in the world, to actually take a competent
Physics Level look at Hammond's SPOG !
... I'll be sure to share the Nobel Prize with you!
.
George
website located at:
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond.

[Tom Roberts]

On 2/5/23 2:43 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> [...]

What you wrote is not scientific, proves nothing, and has no
relationship whatsoever to what other people mean by "God".

There's no point in continuing. Goodbye.

Tom Roberts

[George Hammond]

On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> [Tom Roberts wrote:]

> What you wrote is not scientific,
>

[George Hammond, MS Physics]
PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED
NOTHING OF THE KIND –
THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION
My CV is posted here –
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
mind posting your CV, Mr. Roberts?
>
> [Tom Roberts wrote:]

> proves nothing, and has no relationship whatsoever
> to what other people mean by "God".
>

[George Hammond, MS Physics]
THAT'S AN UNSUPPORTED NON–SCIENTIFIC OPINION
and has no place in this discussion thread !
>
> [Tom Roberts wrote:]

> There's no point in continuing. Goodbye.
> Tom Roberts
>

[George Hammond, MS Physics]
Goodbye – and don't let the door
hit you in the ass on the way out !
.
I mistook you for a serious Relativity scientist –
turns out you're just another argumentative
Internet crank !
.
George

[Estaban Alduino]

George Hammond wrote:

> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
>>
>> [Tom Roberts wrote:]
>> What you wrote is not scientific,
>>
> [George Hammond, MS Physics]
> PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND –
> THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here –

> h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶.a̶c̶a̶d̶e̶m̶i̶a̶.e̶d̶u̶/G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶/C̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶V̶i̶t̶a̶e̶ mind

> posting your CV, Mr. Roberts?

you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for
username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for
in Physics. Let alone tensors.

[George Hammond]

.
.[George E Hammond MS Physics]
LIAR – there's something wrong with your computer.
.
I'll post my CV – HERE – – you won't have to "click on any URLs "!
.
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE E. HAMMOND
.
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA
..
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt at N.U. and later Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
.
Peer reviewed publications:
.
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in New Ideas In Psychology,
Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd..
Online copy ofpublished paper is posted at:Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994
.
https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3
also a full length free research only copy is located here:
https://tinyurl.com/28tyke6w
.
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July2003, pp231-244(Noetic Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is postedat:
https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God
.
[George E Hammond, MS Physics]
And it still remains highly mysterious about
what Tom Roberts' CV actually is !
.
George

[The Starmaker]

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:20:38 PM UTC-5, Estaban Alduino wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > >>
> > >> [Tom Roberts wrote:]
> > >> What you wrote is not scientific,
> > >>
> > > [George Hammond, MS Physics]

> > > PROVE IT 鈥�SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND 鈥�
> > > THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here 鈥�
> > > h潭t潭t潭p潭s潭://i潭n潭d潭e潭p潭e潭n潭d潭e潭n潭t潭.a潭c潭a潭d潭e潭m潭i潭a潭.e潭d潭u潭/G潭e潭o潭r潭g潭e潭H潭a潭m潭m潭o潭n潭d潭/C潭u潭r潭r潭i潭c潭u潭l潭u潭m潭V潭i潭t潭a潭e潭 mind

> > > posting your CV, Mr. Roberts?
> > you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for
> > username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for
> > in Physics. Let alone tensors.
> .
> .[George E Hammond MS Physics]

> LIAR 鈥�there's something wrong with your computer.
> .
> I'll post my CV 鈥�HERE 鈥�鈥�you won't have to "click on any URLs "!

What I don't truly understand is this thing called...
The God Metric.


There is no God Matric, and there cannot be possiby a God Metric
since...


there is no God.

So, how can someone come up with a matric to something that don't exist?

I don't get it.


Where is this thing you call...God?

[whodat]

On 2/7/2023 3:39 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:20:38 PM UTC-5, Estaban Alduino wrote:
>>> George Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [Tom Roberts wrote:]
>>>>> What you wrote is not scientific,
>>>>>
>>>> [George Hammond, MS Physics]

>>>> PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND –
>>>> THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here –
>>>> h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶.a̶c̶a̶d̶e̶m̶i̶a̶.e̶d̶u̶/G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶/C̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶V̶i̶t̶a̶e̶ mind

>>>> posting your CV, Mr. Roberts?
>>> you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for
>>> username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for
>>> in Physics. Let alone tensors.
>> .
>> .[George E Hammond MS Physics]

>> LIAR – there's something wrong with your computer.
>> .
>> I'll post my CV – HERE – – you won't have to "click on any URLs "!

God is, if nothing else, a cultural icon. Nobody can actually prove he
exists, or doesn't exist. God is the essence of "good and evil" that
makes the system work as well as it does. And it is OK if you fail to
appreciate the contribution to society that makes so long as some
suitably minimum percentage of the world population believes it or at
least fears it could be true.

By your own standards you are nothing. Revel in that for a while.

I fall into the "uncertain but unconcerned" category. There is
actually no safe space when considering God, good, and evil.

[Maciej Wozniak]

On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 11:43:09 UTC+1, whodat wrote:

> God is, if nothing else, a cultural icon. Nobody can actually prove he
> exists, or doesn't exist.

Of course one can, and both. A matter of axioms assumed,
just like other proofs.

[Rusbel Confortola]

George Hammond wrote:

> CURRICULUM VITAE GEORGE E. HAMMOND .

> B̶.S̶. P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA
> M̶.S̶.
> P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA P̶h̶.D̶. C̶a̶n̶d̶i̶d̶a̶t̶e̶
> a̶n̶d̶ T̶e̶a̶c̶h̶i̶n̶g̶ F̶e̶l̶l̶o̶w̶ i̶n̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA ..
> Note: S̶t̶u̶d̶i̶e̶d̶ R̶e̶l̶a̶t̶i̶v̶i̶t̶y̶ u̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ P̶r̶o̶f̶. R̶i̶c̶h̶a̶r̶d̶ A̶r̶n̶o̶w̶i̶t̶t̶ a̶t̶ N̶.U̶. and later
> D̶i̶s̶t̶i̶n̶g̶u̶i̶s̶h̶e̶d̶ P̶r̶o̶f̶e̶s̶s̶o̶r̶ o̶f̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ a̶t̶ T̶A̶M̶U̶ .
> Peer reviewed publications:

it looks like you changed your name, arrived in america. What is your real
name?

[whodat]

If he has a real(tm) name that would be the only real(tm) thing about
him.

[George Hammond]

On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> What I don't truly understand is this thing called...
> The God Metric.
>

.
[George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA]
.
Good news STARMAKER: –
... Hammond's SPOG (Scientific Proof of God)
has passed the test – it's proven to be CORRECT:
see SPR post: –
.
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/VU1ZwYJ5EAAJ
.
His nibs Tom Roberts – could not refute this post –
and he's a qualified relativity expert ! He turned tail
and took a powder when I challenged him to !
.
It's simple – the SPOG is nothing but an extension of the
PROVEN FLRW metric to the 4th dimension – time
and applied to "Human Subjective Spacetime" !!
.
A High School student can understand it for chrissakes !
.
Hammond's SPOG is in fact: –
THE WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.
The "AGE OF JESUS" has scientifically ENDED !
.
The "SCIENTIFIC AGE OF GOD" has BEGUN !
.
And I suggest, in view of that, that we RESTART
the JULIAN CALENDAR on January 1, 2024: –
and I mean start it at "01 PD" (Probatur Deus)
which means "01 Proven God" in English !
The age of A.D. (Anno Domini) HAS OFFICIALLY ENDED.
.
Okay STARMAKER that's the good goddamned news
– the're gonna have to take that crucified body down
off the cross in the front of all the Christian churches,
from now on in – we will be worshiping God himself,
and not the "son of God" from here on in !
.
Thanks for all the support buddy – I appreciate it !
And if you got any Jewish friends – be sure to tell
them the good news !
.
George
.

[The Starmaker]

The "AGE OF GOD" has scientifically ENDED !


There is no God.


Here is the proof! The Metrics of No God!

T h e r
e i s n
o G o d

[The Starmaker]

Notice there are only 3 dimensions, not 4.

and it didn't take a thousand monkies,
just one.

[George Hammond]

On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 6:06:46 AM UTC-5, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 11:43:09 UTC+1,
> whodat wrote:
>

> > [WHODAT wrote:]

> > God is, if nothing else, a cultural icon.
> > Nobody can actually prove he
> > exists, or doesn't exist
>

> [MALUW wrote:]

> Of course one can, and both.
> A matter of axioms assumed,
> just like other proofs.
>

[GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
... Both of you are a couple of aging Jr. College
ignoramuses – AND BOTH OF YOU ARE WRONG
.
Hammond has just succeeded in proving there
IS A REAL GOD right here on SPR –
see: –
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/VU1ZwYJ5EAAJ
.
And you know what – time is running out for
ignoramuses like you two and Richard Dawkins !
.
George

[George Hammond]

On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>

> There is no God METRIC, and there
> cannot be possiby a God METRIC

> since... there is no God.

> I don't get it.
> Where is this thing you call...God?
>

[George Hammond MS Physics]
I'll tell you where God is –
he's right in front of your eyes
.
God causes the average person
to SEE the world appearing 20%
LARGER AND FASTER than it
actually is (by actual measurement).
.
This not only changes the SIZE AND SPEED
of the world – it DRAMATICALLY changes
the FACIAL EXPRESSION of everyone you
meet.
.
PSYCHOTIC CRIMINALS are acutely aware
of this – while the average person is not !
.
This allows them to run rampant through
society committing crimes, atrocities, rapine
and murder with ABSOLUTE IMPUNITY !
.
Wake up you idiot – we now have a scientific
explanation and measurement of the
phenomenon !
.
There sure in hell is
A REAL GOD ! And if you're
not aware of it – you're a
SITTING DUCK !!!
.
George

[George Hammond]

On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 11:51:22 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > There is no God METRIC, and there
> > cannot be possiby a God METRIC
> > since... there is no God.
> > I don't get it.
> > Where is this thing you call...God?
> >

.[George Hammond MS Physics]
Try and understand the explanation given below: –
.

> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> I'll tell you where God is –
> he's right in front of your eyes
> .
> God causes the average person
> to SEE the world appearing 20%
> LARGER AND FASTER than it
> actually is (by actual measurement).
> .

.
[George Hammond MS Physics]
Look STARMAKER – the "God Metric" is given
below, –

.
| 1 o o o. |

| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC

| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC

|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |

|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD

|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.

"a=a(t)" only drops to 1.18 at adulthood for
the average adult in the world – this means we
are saddled with almost a 20% MAGNIFICATION
of the apparent SIZE AND SPEED of "REALITY"
for the rest of our lives! – (This is caused by the
fact that no one ever reaches full growth – the
world average is only around 85%) And this phenomenon has been referred to as "GOD" for thousands of years!
.
.... This also changes the APPEARANCE of every
single person's PERSONALITY – and "psychotics"
are ignorant people who don't realize that this is
"the effect of God" – and they believe it is simply
a "mental trick" to be taken advantage of !

.
> This not only changes the SIZE AND SPEED
> of the world – it DRAMATICALLY changes
> the FACIAL EXPRESSION of everyone you
> meet.
> .
> PSYCHOTIC CRIMINALS are acutely aware
> of this – while the average person is not !
> .
> This allows them to run rampant through
> society committing crimes, atrocities, rapine
> and murder with ABSOLUTE IMPUNITY !
> .
> Wake up you idiot – we now have a scientific
> explanation and measurement of the
> phenomenon !
> .
> There sure in hell is
> A REAL GOD ! And if you're
> not aware of it – you're a
> SITTING DUCK !!!
> .
> George

.
George

[Nicholes Di pasqua]

George Hammond wrote:

> [George Hammond M̶S̶ P̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶]
> SSdsbCB0ZWxsIHlvdSB3aGVyZSBHb2QgaXM= –
> aGUncyByaWdodCBpbiBmcm9udCBvZiB5b3VyIGV5ZXM= .
> G̶o̶d̶ c̶a̶u̶s̶e̶s̶ t̶h̶e̶ a̶v̶e̶r̶a̶g̶e̶ p̶e̶r̶s̶o̶n̶ t̶o̶ S̶E̶E̶ t̶h̶e̶ w̶o̶r̶l̶d̶ a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶i̶n̶g̶ 20% L̶A̶R̶G̶E̶R̶ A̶N̶D̶
> RkFTVEVSIHRoYW4gaXQgYWN0dWFsbHkgaXM= (by actual measurement).

not sure. But Michael can say "I'm not even gay. I just fuck the president
of the united states, Obama, in his ass, in white house". Who wouldn't do
that.