Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

An alternate interpretation of general relativity

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Victor Porton

unread,
Apr 3, 2013, 5:07:56 PM4/3/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
I discovered a math theory which (among other things) gives an alternate
interpretation of the equations of general relativity (something like to
replacing real numbers with complex numbers in a quadratic equation).

A negative result (all solutions are trivial and thus not really
interesting) is possible, but if we will come to a "positive" result, we
will get Nobel Prize (and I want my half for the topological idea).

Experts in general relativity please collaborate with me.

Read this VERY rough draft:
http://www.mathematics21.org/binaries/reduced-limit.pdf

(don't worry if you don't understand it, it is a VERY rough draft and I am
going to enhance its readability and post about it in this newsgroup again).

To understand it you need first read my topological research monograph:
http://www.mathematics21.org/algebraic-general-topology.html

A quote from reduced-limit.pdf :

``added solutions'' would possibly characterize a ``world above''
described not with real numbers as our world but with singularities. This
may or may not be of physical interest.

``alternate solutions'' would characterize black (or white) holes with
additional information hidden inside. This additional information may
probably solve the well known paradox of information disappearing when it
falls into a black hole.

``disappearing solutions'' would mean that the laws of nature are
possibly more restrictive than considered in more traditional physics. Could
it resolve time-machine related paradoxes?

--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org

Victor Porton

unread,
Apr 11, 2013, 4:31:03 PM4/11/13
to
Well, no, it appeared a more difficult problem than I thought earlier.

There are no straightforward way to define such things as a topology on the
space of singularities (having specified a topology on the set of finite
numbers).

This is probably truly worth Nobel Prize, but not now not for me.
0 new messages