Mercury's Precession Again fdfd

[Carl Susumu]

Lorentz transformation is used to reverse the negative results of Michelson's experiment to justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter (Lorentz, § 9) which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's equations represent a massless electromagnetic field that conflicts with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter.












Einstein's term Eo/c2 (equ 62) represents the increase in the inertia of an electron after absorbing an electromagnetic photon but Maxwell's electromagnetic field originates from Faraday's induction experiment yet induction is not luminous. In addition, the discontinuous structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon conflicts with the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field. Also, Einstein's term Eo represents the energy of an electromagnetic photon; consequently, the inertia (m), that is represented with Eo/c2 (equ 62), is massless. Einstein is attempting to structurally unify Maxwell's electromagnetic field with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, using an energy equation Eo = mc2 but the inertial (m) of Einstein's energy equation is massless which proves Einstein's structural unification is physically invalid. In Einstein paper, "Does the Inertia of a Body depend upon its Energy Content?" (1905), Einstein describes the decrease of the inertia (L/V2) of an electron that absorbs an electromagnetic photon that photon energy is represented with L/2; consequently, in 1917, Einstein is changing from electron absorption to electron emission then change the symbols from L = m/V2 to Eo = mc2.









em ether


Lorentz uses Maxwell's equations to represent the electromagnetic aether (Lorentz, § 3) then Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment (Lorentz, § 9) to justify the existence of Fresnel optical ether (Michelson, p. 120), composed of matter (Fresnel, § § 33 & 43) which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's massless electromagnetic field cannot be used to represent Fresnel's ether, composed of matter; consequently, Lorentz does not bring harmony to the ether problem. Furthermore, in Einstein's (1905) electrodynamics (special relativity), Einstein alters (transforms) the dimensions of Maxwell's equations to justify light propagating in vacuum but altering the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect yet induction is not luminous; consequently, Maxwell's equations cannot be used to justify light propagating in vacuum (empty space). Furthermore, in Einstein's paper, "Relativity: Special and General Theory" (1917), Einstein uses the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment (Einstein6, § 15), to justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether (Michelson-Morley, p. 334), composed of matter (Fresnel, § § 33 & 43) yet light propagating in vacuum is definitive and irreversible experimental proof Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, does not physically exist which proves Einstein's justification of the optical ether is physically invalid.





Quantum mechanics is based on Planck's blackbody quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect, that emits light and the radio induction effect, to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field, by deriving an energy element, that represents the energy of the blackbody light and radio induction effect emissions but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field. Davisson–Germer (1927) electron scattering experiment is used to justify wave interference but the destructive interference of electrons to form the non-electron fringes of Davission-Germer electron scattering pattern, violates energy conservation.




Schrodinger's probability wave equation (equ 65) is used to derive the equations that represent the atomic orbitals but Schrodinger's electron probability wave equation represents the position probability of an electron that cannot form a negative value used to represent destructive wave interference that is required in the formation of the atomic orbitals.




The gauge transformation is based on Maxwell's equations but representing Maxwell's equations with a potential does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous, nor does the gauge transformation alter the fact that the particle structure of a photon conflicts with the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field. Also, Maxwell's equations represent a massless electromagnetic field that cannot be used to represent the structure of an electron, proton or nuclei that has a mass.


Heisenberg uses a finite electron radius ro to solve the energy problem of an electron point source but Heisenberg's electron point source is radiating an electromagnetic field (energy), in free space, as time increases, which represents an electron, as a physical source, that is generating its own self-energy which violates energy conservation. Also, a finite volume contains an infinite number of positions. When an infinite number of positions is represented with electromagnetic field vectors (energy), an infinite energy is formed. The ether, composed of matter, limits the number of positions forming a finite energy but the ether does not physically exist (vacuum) which proves Heisenberg's electromagnetic fields do not exist.







Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light is based on Faraday's induction experiment that is not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect. Furthermore, the quantum electrodynamics photon conflicts with the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field.







Feynman's quantum electrodynamics uses Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light that is based on Faraday's induction experiment that is not luminous which contradicts Feynman's QED.


Feynman cannot describe interference using QED photons since the formation of the dark fringes of the diffraction pattern (fig 11) would represent the destruction of QED photons (energy) that violates energy conservation. Also, the destroyed QED photons do not contribute to the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern which would result in a measurable reduction in the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern yet experimentally, the total light intensity (dt = 1s), that enters a small aperture, equals the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern which is experimental proof the aperture diffraction effect of light is not formed by interfering QED photons.





(Becher, p. 56). The gauge transformation is based on Maxwell's equations that are derived using Faraday's induction experiment that is not luminous nor is induction an ionization effect which contradicts Feynman's QED. Dirac is combining Maxwell's equations with Schrödinger probability wave equation (equ 65) in the derivation of equation 69 but Schrödinger probability represents the position of an electron and be equated to an Maxwell's electromagnetic field since a position probability does not form a negative value. Also, in the case where Maxwell's equations are used to represent the structure of a QM atomic electron, the structure of an electron that has a mass cannot be represented with a massless electromagnetic induction field.










String theory is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light that electromagnetic field originates from Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous nor is induction an ionization effect which contradicts string theory.

[Carl Susumu]

(Change the inertial with SR)



Lorentz alters the dimensions of Michelson's experiment to reverse the negative result to justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter (Lorentz, § 9).







Einstein's term Eo/c2 (equ 62) represents the increase in the inertial mass of an electron after absorbing an electromagnetic photon but Maxwell's electromagnetic field originates from Faraday's induction experiment and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect yet induction is not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect. In addition, the discontinuous structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon conflicts with the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field. Einstein is attempting to justify Planck and Einstein blackbody derivation that is based on representing the energy of an electromagnetic photon with Planck's blackbody surface electrons and Einstein's representation of the emitting blackbody electromagnetic photons with thermodynamic gas molecules that have a mass yet light is composed of massless light particle which produces a contradiction since the kinetic energy of electrons and gas molecules cannot be used to derive energy equations that represent the energy of electromagnetic photons; consequently, Einstein attempts to structurally unify Maxwell's electromagnetic field with matter using a photon's inertial mass but Einstein's inertial mass represents the increase of the inertia of an electron that absorb an electromagnetic photon but Einstein's inertial mass m = Eo/c2 (equ 62) is massless since Eo represent the energy of an electromagnetic photon and c is the velocity of light which proves Einstein's structurally unification of Maxwell's electromagnetic field with matter, using an energy equation Eo = mc2, is physically invalid. Note: in Einstein paper, "Does the Inertia of a Body depend upon its Energy Content?" (1905), Einstein describes the decrease of the inertia (L/V2 or Eo/c2) of an electron that emits an electromagnetic photon that energy is represented with L which prove Eo of Einstein energy equation Eo = mc2 represents the energy of an electromagnetic photon.

[Carl Susumu]

em ether


Huygens' propagation and Fresnel's diffraction mechanism are based on an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates and forms the diffraction effects in vacuum that is void of the optical ether, composed of matter which contradicts the wave theory of light; consequently, Lorentz support the wave theory of light by attempting to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter with an electromagnetic ether uses Maxwell's equations (Lorentz, § 3) but in the same paper Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment (Lorentz, § 9) to justify the existence of Fresnel optical ether, composed of matter which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's massless electromagnetic field conflicts with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Lorentz does not bring harmony to the ether problem. Lorentz is producing a deception that is also used by Einstein since Einstein also attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations then latter, in 1917, Einstein justifies the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. In Einstein's (1905) special relativity, Einstein attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations but altering the dimensions of the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect and the varying capacitor induction effects that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect yet induction is not an ionization effect; consequently, Maxwell's equations cannot be used to justify the replacement of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether. Lenard's light particles are used to represent the optical ether but Lenard's optic particles are propagating at the velocity of light but the formation of a wave structure requires a stationary light medium or that the medium propagates at a velocity slower then the velocity of the entity that is forming the light wave yet Lenard's optic particles propagate at the velocity of light which proves Lenard's optic particles cannot be used to represent the optical ether that motion forms Einstein light waves. In addition, a wave is a mechanical entity and cannot be formed by a massless electromagnetic field since the formation of a wave requires a medium composed of matter which is experimental proof light is not a wave phenomenon. The radio induction effect is used to justify the wave theory of light but the radio induction effect is represented with electromagnetic field vectors that implies that an electromagnetic field exists in vacuum which is not physical possible since an electromagnetic field vector implies that matter in involved in the production of electromagnetic radio and light waves but a finite volume

[Carl Susumu]

Huygens' propagation and Fresnel's diffraction mechanism are based on an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates and forms the diffraction effects in vacuum that is void of the optical ether, composed of matter which contradicts the wave theory of light; consequently, Lorentz support the wave theory of light by attempting to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter with an electromagnetic ether uses Maxwell's equations (Lorentz, § 3) but in the same paper Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment (Lorentz, § 9) to justify the existence of Fresnel optical ether, composed of matter which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's massless electromagnetic field conflicts with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Lorentz does not bring harmony to the ether problem. Lorentz is producing a deception that is also used by Einstein since Einstein also attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations then latter, in 1917, Einstein justifies the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. In Einstein's (1905) special relativity, Einstein attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations but altering the dimensions of the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect and the varying capacitor induction effects that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect yet induction is not an ionization effect; consequently, Maxwell's equations cannot be used to justify the replacement of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether. Lenard's light particles are used to represent the optical ether but Lenard's optic particles are propagating at the velocity of light but the formation of a wave structure requires a stationary light medium or that the medium propagates at a velocity slower then the velocity of the entity that is forming the light wave yet Lenard's optic particles propagate at the velocity of light which proves Lenard's optic particles cannot be used to represent the optical ether that motion forms Einstein light waves. In addition, a wave is a mechanical entity and cannot be formed by a massless electromagnetic field since the formation of a wave requires a medium composed of matter which is experimental proof light is not a wave phenomenon. The radio induction effect is used to justify the wave theory of light but the radio induction effect is represented with electromagnetic field vectors that implies that an electromagnetic field exists in vacuum which is not physical possible since an electromagnetic field vector implies that matter in involved in the production of electromagnetic radio and light waves but a finite volume, in vacuum, that contains an electromagnetic field represents an infinite number of positions, when an infinite number of positions is represented with electromagnetic field vectors (energy) an energy divergence is created which violates energy conservation. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivation that attempt to structurally unify light with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure.

[Carl Susumu]

Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that formed by water waves, in the cup; consequently, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates, space would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.




Huygens' propagation and Fresnel's diffraction mechanism are based on an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates and forms the diffraction effects in vacuum that is void of the optical ether, composed of matter which contradicts the wave theory of light; consequently, Lorentz support the wave theory of light by attempting to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter with an electromagnetic ether uses Maxwell's equations (Lorentz, § 3) but in the same paper Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment (Lorentz, § 9) to justify the existence of Fresnel optical ether, composed of matter which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's massless electromagnetic field conflicts with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Lorentz does not bring harmony to the ether problem. Lorentz is producing a deception that is also used by Einstein since Einstein also attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations then latter, in 1917, Einstein justifies the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. In Einstein's (1905) special relativity, Einstein attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations but altering the dimensions of the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect and the varying capacitor induction effects that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect yet induction is not an ionization effect; consequently, Maxwell's equations cannot be used to justify the replacement of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether. Lenard's light particles are used to represent the optical ether but Lenard's optic particles are propagating at the velocity of light but the formation of a wave structure requires a stationary light medium or that the medium propagates at a velocity slower then the velocity of the entity that is forming the light wave yet Lenard's optic particles propagate at the velocity of light which proves Lenard's optic particles cannot be used to represent the optical ether that motion forms Einstein light waves. In addition, a wave is a mechanical entity and cannot be formed by a massless electromagnetic field since the formation of a wave requires a medium composed of matter which is experimental proof light is not a wave phenomenon. The radio induction effect is used to justify the wave theory of light but the radio induction effect is represented with electromagnetic field vectors that implies that an electromagnetic field exists in vacuum which is not physical possible since an electromagnetic field vector implies that matter in involved in the production of electromagnetic radio and light waves but a finite volume, in vacuum, that contains an electromagnetic field represents an infinite number of positions, when an infinite number of positions is represented with electromagnetic field vectors (energy) an energy divergence is created which violates energy conservation. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivation that attempt to structurally unify light with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that formed by water waves, in the cup; consequently, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates, space would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.
Plus, in Einstein's paper, "Relativity: Special and General Theory" (1917), Einstein uses the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment (Einstein6, § 15), to justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter yet light propagating in vacuum is definitive and irreversible experimental proof Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, does not physically exist which proves Einstein's justification of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, is physically invalid. Einstein's justification of the wave theory of light is based on Lorentz's contradiction where Lorentz represents the ether with Maxwell's equations to represent an electromagnetic ether then in the same paper Lorentz justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, using the reversal of Michelson-Morley ether experiment which is essential identical to Einstein's justification of the optical ether. Einstein plagiarized the method to justify the existence of the ether from Lorentz's transformations and renaming this process as relativity.

[Carl Susumu]

Einstein is supporting the wave theory of light but justify the existence Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Huygens' propagation and Fresnel's diffraction mechanisms are based on an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates and forms diffraction in vacuum that is void of the optical ether, composed of matter, which contradicts the wave theory of light; consequently, Lorentz first supports the wave theory of light by attempting to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether uses Maxwell's equations (Lorentz, § 3) but in the same paper Lorentz reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment to justify the existence of Fresnel optical ether, composed of matter, (Lorentz, § 9) which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's massless electromagnetic field conflicts with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Lorentz does not bring harmony to the ether problem. Lorentz is producing a deception that is also used by Einstein since in Einstein's special relativity (1905), Einstein also attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations then latter, in 1917, Einstein justifies the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, using the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment. In Einstein's (1905) special relativity, Einstein attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations but altering the dimensions of the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect; consequently, Maxwell's equations cannot be used to justify the replacement of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether. Lenard's light particles are used to represent the optical ether but Lenard's optic particles are propagating at the velocity of light but the formation of a wave structure requires a stationary light medium or a medium that is propagating at a velocity slower then the velocity of the entity that is forming the light wave yet Lenard's optic particles propagate at the velocity of light which proves Lenard's optic particles cannot be used to represent the optical ether that motion forms Einstein's light waves. In addition, a wave is a mechanical entity and cannot be formed by a massless electromagnetic field since the formation of a wave requires a medium, composed of matter (solid, liquid or gas) which is experimental proof light is not a wave phenomenon. The radio induction effect is used to justify the wave theory of light but the radio induction effect is represented with electromagnetic field vectors that implies that an electromagnetic field exists in vacuum which is not physically possible since an electromagnetic field vector implies that matter is involved in the production of electromagnetic radio and light waves but a finite volume, in vacuum, that contains an electromagnetic field represents an infinite number of positions, when an infinite number of positions is represented with electromagnetic field vectors (energy) an energy divergence is created. The optical ether, composed of matter, limits the number of positions in vacuum, when the field vectors are attached to the ether particles which is the reason the existence of the ether, composed of matter, is essential to the wave theory of light but the optical ether, composed of matter does not physically exist which proves Maxwell's electromagnetic fields violates energy conservation and cannot be used to represent the structure of the radio induction effect or light. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field, and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivation that attempt to structurally unify Lenard's light particles with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that forms water waves, in the cup. In addition, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates and spaces, that distances increases, during propagation, would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.
Plus, in Einstein's paper, "Relativity: Special and General Theory" (1917), Einstein uses the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment (Einstein6, § 15), to justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagating in vacuum is definitive and irreversible experimental proof Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, does not physically exist which proves Einstein's justification of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, is physically invalid. Einstein's justification of the wave theory of light originates from Lorentz's transformation where Lorentz describes the ether with Maxwell's equations to represent an electromagnetic ether then in the same paper Lorentz justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, using the reversal of Michelson-Morley ether experiment.

[Carl Susumu]

Quantum mechanics is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light and Planck's blackbody quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect, that emits light and the radio induction effect, to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field, by deriving an energy element, that represents the energy of the blackbody light and radio induction effect emissions but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is the foundation of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field, and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivations attempt to structurally unify Lenard's light particles with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that forms water waves, in the cup. In addition, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates and spaces, that distances increases, during propagation, would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.

[Carl Susumu]

Quantum mechanics is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light and Planck's blackbody quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect, that emits light and the radio induction effect, to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field, by deriving an energy element, that represents the energy of the blackbody light and radio induction effect emissions but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is the foundation of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field, and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivations attempt to structurally unify Lenard's light particles with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that forms water waves, in the cup. In addition, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates and spaces, that distances increases, during propagation, would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.

Furthermore, Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light is based on Maxwell's equations that are derived using Faraday's induction experiment and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect; consequently, Hertz attempts to structurally unite light with induction, using a spark gap experiment, that emits light and the radio induction effect, but Hertz's spark gap also emits electrons. Furthermore, Lenard proves light is composed of particles that energy is dependent on only the frequency which contradicts the energy of a light wave that is dependent on the wave amplitude and the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field; consequently, Planck and Einstein uses the blackbody radiation effect and Boltzmann's entropy to structurally unite light with induction and quantizing Maxwell's electromagnetic field by deriving quantum energy equations that are dependent on only the frequency but Boltzmann's entropy equation is not luminous and the blackbody radiation effect is emitting electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which proves Planck and Einstein structural unification and quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field is physically invalid.

[Carl Susumu]

Quantum mechanics is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light and Planck's blackbody quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect, that emits light and the radio induction effect, to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field, by deriving an energy element, that represents the energy of the blackbody light and radio induction effect emissions but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is the foundation of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field, and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivations attempt to structurally unify Lenard's light particles with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that forms water waves, in the cup. In addition, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates and spaces, that distances increases, during propagation, would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.

Furthermore, Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light is based on Maxwell's equations that are derived using Faraday's induction experiment and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect; consequently, Hertz attempts to structurally unite light with induction, using a spark gap experiment, that emits light and the radio induction effect, but Hertz's spark gap also emits electrons. Furthermore, Lenard proves light is composed of particles that energy is dependent on only the frequency which contradicts the energy of a light wave that is dependent on the wave amplitude and the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field; consequently, Planck and Einstein uses the blackbody radiation effect and Boltzmann's entropy to structurally unite light with induction and quantizing Maxwell's electromagnetic field by deriving quantum energy equations that are dependent on only the frequency but Boltzmann's entropy equation is not luminous and the blackbody radiation effect is emitting electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which proves Planck and Einstein structural unification and quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field is physically invalid. Davisson–Germer (1927) electron scattering experiment is used to justify wave interference but the destructive interference of electrons to form the non-electron fringes of Davission-Germer electron scattering pattern, violates energy conservation.

[Carl Susumu]

(Change the inertial with SR)

Lorentz alters the dimensions of Michelson's experiment apparatus to reverse the negative result in the justification of the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter (Lorentz, § 9).



Einstein's term Eo/c2 (equ 62) represents the increase in the inertial mass of an electron after absorbing an electromagnetic photon but Maxwell's electromagnetic field originates from Faraday's induction experiment and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect yet induction is not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect which is experimental proof light does not have an electromagnetic field structure. In addition, the discontinuous structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon conflicts with the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field. Einstein is attempting to justify Planck and Einstein blackbody derivation that is based on representing the energy of an electromagnetic photon with Planck's blackbody surface electrons and Einstein's representation of the emitting blackbody electromagnetic photons' energy with thermodynamic gas molecules' kinetic energies but the gas molecules' kinetic energies includes a mass yet light is composed of massless light particles which produces a contradiction since the kinetic energies of electrons and gas molecules, that have a real mass, cannot be used to derive energy equations that represent the energy of a massless electromagnetic photon; consequently, Einstein attempts to structurally unify Maxwell's electromagnetic field with matter using a photon's inertial mass but Einstein's inertial mass represents the increase of the inertia of an electron that absorbs an electromagnetic photon but Einstein's inertial mass m = Eo/c2 (equ 62) is massless since Eo represent the energy of an electromagnetic photon and c the velocity of light which proves Einstein's structurally unification of Maxwell's electromagnetic field with matter, using an energy equation Eo = mc2, is physically invalid. Note: in Einstein paper, "Does the Inertia of a Body depend upon its Energy Content?" (1905), Einstein describes the decrease of the inertia (L/V2 or Eo/c2) of an electron that emits an electromagnetic photon that energy is represented with L which prove Eo of Einstein energy equation Eo = mc2 represents the energy of an electromagnetic photon.


Einstein is supporting the wave theory of light by justifying the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Huygens' propagation and Fresnel's diffraction mechanisms are based on an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates and forms diffraction in vacuum that is void of the optical ether, composed of matter, which contradicts the wave theory of light; consequently, Lorentz supports the wave theory of light by attempting to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether uses Maxwell's equations (Lorentz, § 3) but in the same paper Lorentz also reverses the negative result of Michelson's experiment to justify the existence of Fresnel optical ether, composed of matter, (Lorentz, § 9) which produces a contradiction since Maxwell's massless electromagnetic field conflicts with Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter. Lorentz does not bring harmony to the ether problem since Lorentz is producing a deception that is also used by Einstein where, in Einstein's special relativity (1905), Einstein also attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations then latter, in 1917, Einstein justifies the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, using the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment. In Einstein's (1905) special relativity, Einstein attempts to replace Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether, using Maxwell's equations but altering the dimensions of the coordinate system of Maxwell's equations does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect; consequently, Maxwell's equations cannot be used to justify the replacement of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, with an electromagnetic ether. In addition, modern physicists use Lenard's light particles to represent the optical ether but Lenard's optic particles are propagating at the velocity of light but the formation of a wave structure requires a stationary optical ether or an ether that is propagating at a velocity slower then the velocity of light that is required in forming a light wave yet Lenard's optic particles propagate at the velocity of light which proves Lenard's optic particles cannot be used to represent the optical ether that motion forms light waves. In addition, a wave is a mechanical entity and cannot be formed by a massless electromagnetic field since the formation of a wave requires a medium, composed of matter (solid, liquid or gas) which is experimental proof light is not a wave phenomenon. The radio induction effect is used to justify the wave theory of light but the radio induction effect is represented with electromagnetic field vectors that implies that an electromagnetic field exists in vacuum which is not physically possible since an electromagnetic field vector implies that matter is involved in the structure of an electromagnetic radio and light waves but a finite volume, in vacuum, that contains an electromagnetic field represents an infinite number of positions, when an infinite number of positions is represented with electromagnetic field vectors (energy) an energy divergence is created. The optical ether, composed of matter, limits the number of positions in vacuum, when the field vectors are attached to the ether particles which is the reason the existence of the ether, composed of matter, is essential to the wave theory of light but the optical ether, composed of matter, does not physically exist which proves Maxwell's electromagnetic fields violates energy conservation and cannot be used to represent the structure of the radio induction effect or light. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field. Planck and Einstein blackbody derivation attempt to structurally unify Lenard's light particles with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that forms water waves, in the cup. In addition, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates spaces form between light particles that distances increases, during propagation that eliminates the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon. Plus, in Einstein's paper, "Relativity: Special and General Theory" (1917), Einstein uses the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment (Einstein6, § 15), to justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagating in vacuum is definitive and irreversible experimental proof Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, does not physically exist which proves Einstein's justification of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, is physically invalid. Einstein's justification of the wave theory of light originates from Lorentz's transformation where Lorentz describes the ether with Maxwell's equations to represent an electromagnetic ether then in the same paper Lorentz justify the existence of Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter, using the reversal of Michelson-Morley ether experiment.

Quantum mechanics is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light and Planck's blackbody quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field. Planck uses the blackbody radiation effect, that emits light and the radio induction effect, to quantize Maxwell's electromagnetic field, by deriving an energy element, that represents the energy of the blackbody light and radio induction effect emissions but the blackbody also emits electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which contradicts Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is the foundation of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, Lenard's photoelectric effect proves light is composed of particles which contradicts the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field, and Planck and Einstein blackbody derivations attempt to structurally unify Lenard's light particles with Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field but induction is a continuous effect that cannot be represented with a particle structure. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces transverse water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, from a hot air balloon, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original transverse waves are not formed since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that forms water waves, in the cup. In addition, Lenard's light particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, and light propagates and spaces, that distances increases, during propagation, would form between the light particles of a light beam and eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves light in not an electromagnetic phenomenon.

Furthermore, Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light is based on Maxwell's equations that are derived using Faraday's induction experiment and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect that are not luminous, nor is induction an ionization effect; consequently, Hertz attempts to structurally unite light with induction, using a spark gap experiment, that emits light and the radio induction effect, but Hertz's spark gap also emits electrons. Furthermore, Lenard proves light is composed of particles that energy is dependent on only the frequency which contradicts the energy of a light wave that is dependent on the wave amplitude and the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field; consequently, Planck and Einstein uses the blackbody radiation effect and Boltzmann's entropy to structurally unite light with induction and quantizing Maxwell's electromagnetic field by deriving quantum energy equations that are dependent on only the frequency but Boltzmann's entropy equation is not luminous and the blackbody radiation effect is emitting electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which proves Planck and Einstein structural unification and quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field is physically invalid. Davisson–Germer (1927) electron scattering experiment is used to justify wave interference but the destructive interference of electrons to form the non-electron fringes of Davission-Germer electron scattering pattern, violates energy conservation.

[Carl Susumu]

The quantum mechanics gauge transformation is based on Maxwell's equations but representing Maxwell's equations with a potential does not change the fact that Maxwell's equations are derived using Faraday's induction effect and Maxwell's varying capacitor induction effect that are not luminous; consequently, Hertz attempts to structurally unite light with induction, using a spark gap experiment, that emits light and the radio induction effect, but Hertz's spark gap also emits electrons yet induction is also not an ionization effect since Faraday's induction effect represented with Lenz's wire loop induction effect and Maxwell's varying capacitor are not emitting light. Furthermore, Lenard proves light is composed of particles that energy is dependent on only the frequency which contradicts the energy of a light wave that is dependent on the wave amplitude and the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field; consequently, Planck and Einstein uses the blackbody radiation effect and Boltzmann's entropy to structurally unite light with induction and quantizing Maxwell's electromagnetic field by deriving quantum energy equations that are dependent on only the frequency but Boltzmann's entropy equation is not luminous and the blackbody radiation effect is emitting electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which proves Planck and Einstein structural unification and quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field is physically invalid. Quantum mechanics is based on Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field using the blackbody radiation effect yet the blackbody is emitting electrons. The production of light is ALWAYS accompanied by the emission of electrons yet induction is not an ionization effect which proves quantum mechanics, based on Planck's blackbody quantization, is physically invalid. In addition, quantum mechanics is an electromagnetic theory but Maxwell's electromagnetic fields do not physically exist since an electromagnetic vector field implies that an electromagnetic field exists in vacuum which is not physical possible since an electromagnetic field is associated with matter since a finite volume, in vacuum, represents an infinite number of positions, when an infinite number of positions is represented with electromagnetic field vectors (energy) an energy divergence is created which violates energy conservation. The optical ether, composed of matter, forms a infinite energy by attaching the electromagnetic field vector to an ether particle but Fresnel's optical ether, composed of matter does not physically exist (vacuum) which proves Maxwell's electromagnetic field do not exist. Furthermore, quantum mechanics is based on the quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field, using the gauge, but Maxwell's continuous electromagnetic field is not composed of particles. Example, using a water wave analogy, a cup is filled with water. A small disturbance of the cup produces water waves on the surface of the water, in the cup. The water in the cup produces a continuous structure formed by discrete water molecules but when the water in the cup is poured out and falls 200 meters, in free space, the original water, in the cup, becomes wave droplets and the original water waves are not formed by the falling water droplets since spaces form between the water droplets, as the water droplets fall which eliminates the continuity of the water that formed by water waves, in the cup; consequently, electromagnetic particles cannot maintain the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic induction field since as time increases, the electromagnetic particles propagate and spaces would form between the particles which would eliminate the continuity that is required in the formation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field which proves Maxwell's electromagnetic fields do not physically exist; consequently, the gauge transformation of Maxwell's equations cannot be used to represent the structure of a molecule, nuclei, proton, electron or photon, nor does the gauge transformation alter the fact that Maxwell's equations represent a massless electromagnetic field that cannot be used to represent the structure of an molecule, proton, electron or atomic nuclei that has a mass.