info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
DTG: A new theory of gravity
62 views
Skip to first unread message
Ken Seto
Nov 18, 2021, 11:10:55 AM11/18/21
to
after 110 yeas of tryingPhysicists failed to uni te gravity with the other forces after110 years of trying. The reason that is that they don’t realize that gravity is a composite force as follows:
1.It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the interacting objects are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is called the CRE force.
3. Gravity between the interacting object is the combined attractive EM force and the repulsive CRE force. That’s why gravity is so weak compare to the other forces.
4. It turns out that the attractive EM force in combination wth the repulsive CRE force is necessary for the moon to maintain a stable orbit aero.ud the earth for billions of years.
1.It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the interacting objects are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is called the CRE force.
3. Gravity between the interacting object is the combined attractive EM force and the repulsive CRE force. That’s why gravity is so weak compare to the other forces.
4. It turns out that the attractive EM force in combination wth the repulsive CRE force is necessary for the moon to maintain a stable orbit aero.ud the earth for billions of years.
Odd Bodkin
Nov 18, 2021, 11:21:27 AM11/18/21
to
look carefully at the quality of what you just posted and ask yourself if
you’re really in shape to do this anymore.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Ken Seto
Nov 18, 2021, 11:35:12 AM11/18/21
to
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 11:10:55 AM UTC-5, Ken Seto wrote:
> after 110 yeas of tryingPhysicists failed to uni te gravity with the other forces after110 years of trying. The reason that is that they don’t realize that gravity is a composite force as follows:
> 1.It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the interacting objects are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
>
> 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is called the CRE force.
>
> 3. Gravity between the interacting object is the combined attractive EM force and the repulsive CRE force. That’s why gravity is so weak compare to the other forces.
>
> 4. It turns out that the attractive EM force in combination wth the repulsive CRE force/pdf is necessary for the moon to maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> after 110 yeas of tryingPhysicists failed to uni te gravity with the other forces after110 years of trying. The reason that is that they don’t realize that gravity is a composite force as follows:
> 1.It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the interacting objects are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
>
> 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is called the CRE force.
>
> 3. Gravity between the interacting object is the combined attractive EM force and the repulsive CRE force. That’s why gravity is so weak compare to the other forces.
>
5. A complete description of the about concept of gravity is available in the following link:
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
Ken Seto
Nov 18, 2021, 11:41:31 AM11/18/21
to
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 11:21:27 AM UTC-5, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > after 110 yeas of tryingPhysicists failed to uni te gravity with the
> > other forces after110 years of trying. The reason that is that they don’t
> > realize that gravity is a composite force as follows:
> > 1.It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the interacting
> > objects are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
> >
> > 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are
> > confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to
> > an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is called the CRE force.
> >
> > 3. Gravity between the interacting object is the combined attractive EM
> > force and the repulsive CRE force. That’s why gravity is so weak compare
> > to the other forces.
> >
> > 4. It turns out that the attractive EM force in combination wth the
> > repulsive CRE force is necessary for the moon to maintain a stable orbit
> > aero.ud the earth for billions of years.
> >
> Ken, I don’t know if you’re recovering from a stroke or what, but please
> look carefully at the hequality of what you just posted and ask yourself if
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > after 110 yeas of tryingPhysicists failed to uni te gravity with the
> > other forces after110 years of trying. The reason that is that they don’t
> > realize that gravity is a composite force as follows:
> > 1.It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the interacting
> > objects are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
> >
> > 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are
> > confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to
> > an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is called the CRE force.
> >
> > 3. Gravity between the interacting object is the combined attractive EM
> > force and the repulsive CRE force. That’s why gravity is so weak compare
> > to the other forces.
> >
> > 4. It turns out that the attractive EM force in combination wth the
> > repulsive CRE force is necessary for the moon to maintain a stable orbit
> > aero.ud the earth for billions of years.
> >
> Ken, I don’t know if you’re recovering from a stroke or what, but please
> you’re really in shape to do this anymore. .
Idiot....what I post is the real cause of gravity.
Arnold Sala
Nov 18, 2021, 11:45:27 AM11/18/21
to
Ken Seto wrote:
> 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are
> confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to
> an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is
> called the CRE force.
you repugnant sack of shit, stealing theories like there is no day
> 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent and the objects are
> confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrux. This gives rise to
> an repulsive effect between the objects and this repulsive effect is
> called the CRE force.
tomorrow. "Is called .." is called your stupid thief ass, that's what is
called. There is a reason bill gaytes wants you thieves vaccinated from
this planet.
Arnold Sala
Nov 18, 2021, 11:50:31 AM11/18/21
to
Ken Seto wrote:
> 5. A complete description of the about concept of gravity is available
> in the following link:
what 2015, you disgusting pile of shit? You stole the whole thing you
> 5. A complete description of the about concept of gravity is available
> in the following link:
don't understand, recently. You evil stupid uneducated crackpot.
Arnold Sala
Nov 18, 2021, 11:51:50 AM11/18/21
to
extreme crank, crackpot Ken Seto wrote:
>> Ken, I don’t know if you’re recovering from a stroke or what, but
>> please look carefully at the hequality of what you just posted and ask
>> yourself if you’re really in shape to do this anymore. .
> Idiot....what I post is the real cause of gravity.
you stole what you post, you stupid charlatan.
>> Ken, I don’t know if you’re recovering from a stroke or what, but
>> please look carefully at the hequality of what you just posted and ask
>> yourself if you’re really in shape to do this anymore. .
> Idiot....what I post is the real cause of gravity.
Odd Bodkin
Nov 18, 2021, 11:56:10 AM11/18/21
to
“creativity”.
Maybe Ed Lake will engage with you and tell you your book is right on
target.
Let’s find out.
Dono.
Nov 18, 2021, 12:02:49 PM11/18/21
to
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 8:10:55 AM UTC-8, seto...@gmail.com wrote:
> snip imbecilities<
Fresh crap from Ken Shito
> snip imbecilities<
Fresh crap from Ken Shito
Ken Seto
Nov 18, 2021, 1:57:16 PM11/18/21
to
Odd Bodkin
Nov 18, 2021, 2:39:35 PM11/18/21
to
Ken Seto
Nov 19, 2021, 10:29:33 AM11/19/21
to
Odd Bodkin
Nov 19, 2021, 11:29:09 AM11/19/21
to
bad it’s not even worth rebutting. Notice that no one has downloaded your
book just to post reviews explaining what’s wrong with it. It’s not worth
any attention at all.
> But you couldn’t find anything wong so you shut the fuck up.
>
Ken Seto
Nov 21, 2021, 12:37:17 PM11/21/21
to
Odd Bodkin
Nov 21, 2021, 3:49:56 PM11/21/21
to
Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are a woodworker. You are not qualified to judge my work. Go back to wake open toys.
>
>
>
Don’t you think you should stop trying to post if you are in such sad
>
> You are a woodworker. You are not qualified to judge my work. Go back to wake open toys.
>
>
>
shape?
--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
0 new messages