Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

More dramatic confirmation of General Relativity

4 views
Skip to first unread message

K_h

unread,
May 17, 2012, 3:51:46 PM5/17/12
to
General Relativity has been beautifully confirmed again:

http://phys.org/news/2012-05-penn-astrophysicists-gravity-theory.html

http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6044


Also, cosmological tests have confirmed the General theory to an amazing
degree of precision. Check out these two stories from the latest data
coming out of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey:

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/339591/title/New_data_support_Einstein_on_accelerating_universe

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/147212095.html


Other tests last year also dramatically confirm General Relativity but these
did not get the press attention that they should have. Theories claiming
that space-time has a graininess around 10^(-35) meters have now been
disproven since the Integral results show that if there were any graininess
it could not be more than 10^(-48) meters.

http://phys.org/news/2011-06-physics-einstein.html

http://phys.org/news/2011-09-galaxy-clusters-theory-relativity.html


+

Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
May 17, 2012, 4:10:10 PM5/17/12
to
K_h <KHo...@SX729.com> wrote in message
O_adnVgvFohHyyjS...@giganews.com
Another major blow for the crackpots around here. Poor sods

Dirk Vdm

mpc755

unread,
May 17, 2012, 4:37:51 PM5/17/12
to
On May 17, 4:10 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoor...@hotspam.not> wrote:
> K_h <KHol...@SX729.com> wrote in message
>
>   O_adnVgvFohHyyjSnZ2dnUVZ5v6dn...@giganews.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > General Relativity has been beautifully confirmed again:
>
> >http://phys.org/news/2012-05-penn-astrophysicists-gravity-theory.html
>
> >http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6044
>
> > Also, cosmological tests have confirmed the General theory to an
> > amazing degree of precision.  Check out these two stories from the
> > latest data coming out of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic
> > Survey:
>
> >http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/339591/title/New_data_supp...
>
> >http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/147212095.html
>
> > Other tests last year also dramatically confirm General Relativity
> > but these did not get the press attention that they should have.
> > Theories claiming that space-time has a graininess around 10^(-35)
> > meters have now been disproven since the Integral results show that
> > if there were any graininess it could not be more than 10^(-48)
> > meters.
>
> >http://phys.org/news/2011-06-physics-einstein.html
>
> >http://phys.org/news/2011-09-galaxy-clusters-theory-relativity.html
>
> > +
>
> Another major blow for the crackpots around here. Poor sods
>
> Dirk Vdm

Only a crackpot could interpret the following to mean there is no
ether in general relativity.

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is
unthinkable" - Albert Einstein

Androcles

unread,
May 17, 2012, 5:06:12 PM5/17/12
to

"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@hotspam.not> wrote in message
news:jp3lv9$g1l$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Another major blow from the phys.org comic book. BAM! POW! THUD!
Batman strikes again!




xxein

unread,
May 17, 2012, 6:43:11 PM5/17/12
to
On May 17, 3:51 pm, "K_h" <KHol...@SX729.com> wrote:
> General Relativity has been beautifully confirmed again:
>
> http://phys.org/news/2012-05-penn-astrophysicists-gravity-theory.html
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6044
>
> Also, cosmological tests have confirmed the General theory to an amazing
> degree of precision.  Check out these two stories from the latest data
> coming out of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey:
>
> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/339591/title/New_data_supp...
>
> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/147212095.html
>
> Other tests last year also dramatically confirm General Relativity but these
> did not get the press attention that they should have.  Theories claiming
> that space-time has a graininess around 10^(-35) meters have now been
> disproven since the Integral results show that if there were any graininess
> it could not be more than 10^(-48) meters.
>
> http://phys.org/news/2011-06-physics-einstein.html
>
> http://phys.org/news/2011-09-galaxy-clusters-theory-relativity.html
>
> +

xxein: And 10^(-48) meters does not rule out an ether. It just sizes
it.

Ether is the free energy equilibrium in space. It is perturbed by
lumps of captive energy that we call mass. Various effects come out
of this for different reasons.

email me at att.net for more.

mpc755

unread,
May 17, 2012, 7:16:14 PM5/17/12
to
Aether has mass.

The clumps of energy you are referring to are what we call matter.

Katsumoto Sakuraba

unread,
May 19, 2012, 6:36:03 PM5/19/12
to
On May 17, 9:51 pm, "K_h" <KHol...@SX729.com> wrote:
> General Relativity has been beautifully confirmed again:


however, they ulteriorly discovered a faulty
connected cable, and took a picture of it, as
proof, from them to us

give me a faulty connected, and i can prove
you any theory, with pictures and more !!!
0 new messages