Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The little transistor that could!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

gu...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 1:00:05 PM2/6/12
to
Only those substantially informed of transistors may comprehend:

The Singularity, instead of using mathematical tensors and metric to
describe how Space and it's dimensions unfolded(manifold), can also be
described by one single tiny transistor.

Those with knowledge know there is one main little difference between
a transistor for processing logic and a transistor for STORING MEMORY.

This MEMORY known in computer lingo as RAM by other technocrats is
also called SPACE.

The way RAM stores memory is by an everlasting ever perturbation
output from the transistor to the input of the transistor.

The output is known as the mouth: "In the beginning was the word", and
the input is known as the ear.

To compare one single tiny memory transistor to a Singularity is that
there is no space, this is memory and space is created by both a
transistor and the Singularity.

Thus instead of visualizing a transistor's Input and Output separated
distance or volume wise by an entity we call Space, the Singularity is
instead separated by the 1st true dimension we call TIME.

Thus with each dimensional unit of TIME the SINGLE-pole SINGUL_arity,
as in walky-talky communication, SWITCHES roles from Output to that of
the Input ....thus it becomes a dipole (two poles).

The above is how memory is stored and likely how space began.

With memory using the very same transistor over and over again all of
space is created; the program binary Morse code inside the memory
tells it how much different memory it needs (how big to make space)
and when to refresh it as in a television screen and when to also
process it (modify space).

The hardness to comprehend may be helped by the visual notion that
time is both irrelevant and relevant:

It's is IRRELEVANT how much sequential time it takes the Singularity
(sole transistor) to paint space and all of it's creatures, for the
RELEVANCY of time in each creatures mind is by "comparing" (thus
relevancy) time on the outside to the sequence of time required on the
inside of the mind to process the information coming-in from the
outside.

So a split second for one being can be a million pulse years later to
another being.


2012: Guskz













gu...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 4:34:17 PM2/6/12
to
Yes "logically" it's both silly (because somethings don't make sense)
and also a good simulation of
how a singularity created space.

For space did not exist before but we
keep trying to explain it's existence
as if it always existed...meaning you need a minimum space (or more
transistors) to create a larger space....instead of a SINGULARITY.

Even the Singularity is insufficient it also needs an "x" amount of
Energy to emanate from it (thus you could say not the Singularity but
the Energy created both space and mass)....likewise even a single
transistor requires energy...such as one from a battery (both battery
(in terms of a capacitor which holds a charge) and transistor are a
form of semiconductor(dielectric plates)).
Yes "logically" it's both silly (because somethings don't make sense)
and also a good simulation of
how a singularity created space.

For space did not exist before but we
keep trying to explain it's existence
as if it always existed...meaning you need a minimum space (or more
transistors) to create a larger space....instead of a SINGULARITY.

Even the Singularity is insufficient it also needs an "x" amount of
Energy to emanate from it (thus you could say not the Singularity but
the Energy created both space and mass)....likewise even a single
transistor requires energy...such as one from a battery (both battery
(in terms of a capacitor which holds a charge) and transistor are a
form of semiconductor(dielectric plates)).

gu...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 4:37:21 PM2/6/12
to
So the missing link is how can a single transistor write information
into memory (space) when it will lose this memory (this space) when it
goes to write information into it.... Same as what came 1st the
chicken or the egg? or both?

gu...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 4:32:49 PM2/6/12
to
On Feb 6, 1:00 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yes "logically" it's both silly (because somethings don't make sense)
and also a good simulation of
how a singularity created space.

For space did not exist before but we
keep trying to explain it's existence
as if it always existed...meaning you need a minimum space (or more
transistors) to create a larger space....instead of a SINGULARITY.

Even the Singularity is insufficient it also needs an "x" amount of
Energy to emanate from it (thus you could say not the Singularity but
the Energy created both space and mass)....likewise even a single
transistor requires energy...such as one from a battery (both battery

Paul B. Andersen

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 8:33:35 AM2/7/12
to
On 06.02.2012 19:00, gu...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Only those substantially informed of transistors may comprehend:

that you don't belong to the above mentioned class of people.

[snip proof of statement above]

--
Paul

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/

gu...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 9:13:21 PM2/7/12
to
There's a reason why all the RAM memory is erased when you switch off
the computer.

There's a reason they use RAM even though there's also other forms of
memory that don't get erased.

Cause it's faster, and it's faster cause it's "simpler".

This simplicity represents the singularity.

The ability to even suggest the above shows that I know a little what
I'm talking about, more than Misses Paula B. Anderson.

2012: Guskz

rotchm

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 10:21:26 PM2/7/12
to
0 new messages