Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?
207 views
Skip to first unread message
Richard Hertz
May 30, 2022, 11:27:58 PM5/30/22
to
This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
citizenship.
Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
citizenship.
Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
The Starmaker
May 30, 2022, 11:41:17 PM5/30/22
to
handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
The Starmaker
May 30, 2022, 11:53:17 PM5/30/22
to
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> >
> > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> >
> > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> >
> > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> >
> > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> >
> > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> > citizenship.
> >
> > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
> >
> > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> >
> > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
>
> What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
> handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
plus 82,000 Einstein's manuscripts, etc are in Israel...
>
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> >
> > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> >
> > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> >
> > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> >
> > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> >
> > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> > citizenship.
> >
> > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
> >
> > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> >
> > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
>
> What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
> handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
you need permission from those guys to see it. Or you can go there and
steal it.
mitchr...@gmail.com
May 30, 2022, 11:55:43 PM5/30/22
to
He took back what he wrote a year before. He had a God.
Mitchell Raemsch
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 12:02:10 AM5/31/22
to
http://www.albert-einstein.org/images/Gravitational_waves_event_Roni_Grosz1.jpg
1905 manuscripts have to be ...redacted first..doc up, forged, cover-up,
fraud...
Richard Hertz
May 31, 2022, 12:21:52 AM5/31/22
to
On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:41:17 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
<snip>
> What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
> handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
I think I was crystal clear.
I'm referring to ANY handwritten document that PRECEDED the June 1905 publication at the ADP journal:
- Scratch pads from 1905 and before.
- Single pages with calculations, derivations, wrong parts that were modified, etc.
- Any kind of note, even written ON pages of papers treating Maxwell (his only reference in the fucking paper).
- ANYTHING that could show how hard the retarded worked in previous years around the topic (as he said: several years of previous work).
You are CONFUSED (but I doubt, because you are a wicky person) with his 1909 RE-WRITING (for the fucking press) of
a stupid page where, FINALLY, the fucking formula E=mc2 was handwritten (because it was becoming more and more popular).
I have to refresh your BRAIN, telling you that the 1905 Einstein REFUSED TO USE "c" in his fucking publication. He used "V" instead.
And the formula was in the form m=L/V2, OK? Find the original ADP 1905 publication.
So, my OP remain as intended. Stop trolling, as you were doing that since June 2009, and created more OP than Mitch.
<snip>
> What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
> handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
I'm referring to ANY handwritten document that PRECEDED the June 1905 publication at the ADP journal:
- Scratch pads from 1905 and before.
- Single pages with calculations, derivations, wrong parts that were modified, etc.
- Any kind of note, even written ON pages of papers treating Maxwell (his only reference in the fucking paper).
- ANYTHING that could show how hard the retarded worked in previous years around the topic (as he said: several years of previous work).
You are CONFUSED (but I doubt, because you are a wicky person) with his 1909 RE-WRITING (for the fucking press) of
a stupid page where, FINALLY, the fucking formula E=mc2 was handwritten (because it was becoming more and more popular).
I have to refresh your BRAIN, telling you that the 1905 Einstein REFUSED TO USE "c" in his fucking publication. He used "V" instead.
And the formula was in the form m=L/V2, OK? Find the original ADP 1905 publication.
So, my OP remain as intended. Stop trolling, as you were doing that since June 2009, and created more OP than Mitch.
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 1:43:06 AM5/31/22
to
Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:41:17 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
> > handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
>
> I think I was crystal clear.
> I'm referring to ANY handwritten document that PRECEDED the June 1905 publication at the ADP journal:
No, you were not "crystal clear". There is no mention in your post of a
>
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:41:17 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
> > handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
>
> I think I was crystal clear.
> I'm referring to ANY handwritten document that PRECEDED the June 1905 publication at the ADP journal:
ADP, journal or the word PRECEDED in your post, or any word to the
effect PRECEDED.
you got lost in your details...engineers you know.
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 2:02:16 AM5/31/22
to
Richard Hertz wrote:
> So, my OP remain as intended. Stop trolling, as you were doing that since June 2009, and created more OP than Mitch.
My first computer was an Osborne..
> So, my OP remain as intended. Stop trolling, as you were doing that since June 2009, and created more OP than Mitch.
a guy came up to
me and asked me if
i want to buy a typerwriter
for my office.
He said the only problem was
a tv was stuck to it.
Richard Hertz
May 31, 2022, 2:29:31 AM5/31/22
to
the CPU to wait half a clock period to get synchronization between the Z-80 and the CRTC in order to access the
64 KB RAM where video memory was allocated.
I redesign it, using an Intel CRTC plus a queue scheme, to allow Z-80 to access RAM 95% of the time. When I fabricated
the solution and partially replaced the circuitry, I DOUBLED the speed of the Osborne. Nothing bad for that epoch.
By the way, you are between 65 and 68 years old, if you didn't lie.
One more thing: I did a copy of the 8KB BIOS, made a disassembler to analyze how it was structured (learned a lot), and
I found a curious branch that directed the Osborne to a HALT Z-80 instruction. I patched the BIOS to bypass such death trap.
Ahh! Those were the good old times, when a personal computer hobby had a meaning.
I had a true S-100 CP/M computer running by then, with different I/O boards for scientific applications. This was years before
I could access to a TI DSP SDK.
Richard Hertz
May 31, 2022, 2:43:45 AM5/31/22
to
Let me tell to those that took offense that I don't give a flying fuck about it.
ANSWER THE QUESTION IN THE OP!
Where are the proofs that the cretin wrote that shit in 1905? NOWHERE, BECAUSE HE DIDN'T WRITE THOSE PAPERS.
Richard Hachel
May 31, 2022, 5:41:28 AM5/31/22
to
Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American
> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
Einstein the God made man on earth.
It's that simple.
R.H.
Python
May 31, 2022, 7:52:00 AM5/31/22
to
work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
understand it by the way...)
Richard Hachel
May 31, 2022, 8:17:26 AM5/31/22
to
Tu n'as toujours pas compris ce que voulait dire le mot "anisochronie"?
Tu n'as toujours pas compris pourquoi je refuse cette procédure de
synchronisation et pourquoi je dis
qu'il est impossible d'accorder ABSOLUMENT deux montres différentes
placées en des endroits différents d'un MEME REFERENTIEL"? Ni pourquoi,
dans le meilleur des cas, chacune avancera sur l'autre d'un temps
équivalent à ΔT=x/c ?
C'est pas sur les capacités des horloges que je tique. C'est sur la
réalité physique que les hommes se croient autorisés à concevoir, et
qui n'existe pas dans la nature.
Il n'y a pas de "plan du temps présent".
C'est un abstrait.
Mais tu m'a beaucoup lu, mon chéri, Jean-Pierre.
Tu le sais, tout ça.
-----------------------------------------------
I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?
You still don't understand why I refuse this synchronization procedure and
why I say
that it is ABSOLUTELY impossible to tune two different watches placed in
different places of the SAME REFERENTIAL"? Nor why, in the best case, each
will advance on the other by a time equivalent to ΔT=x/c ?
It's not about the capacities of the clocks that I tick. It is on the
physical reality that men believe they are authorized to conceive, and
which does not exist in nature.
There is no "present time plan".
It is an abstract.
But you read me a lot, my darling, Jean-Pierre.
You know all that.
R.H.
--
"Mais ne nous trompons pas. Il n'y a pas que de la violence
avec des armes : il y a des situations de violence."
Abbé Pierre.
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=ii0Iru_yqLa0IiHqYGGyXQqWOqU@jntp>
Python
May 31, 2022, 11:25:59 AM5/31/22
to
Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the
>>>> very
>>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>>>
>>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American
>>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
>>
>> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
>> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
>> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
>>
>> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
>> understand it by the way...)
> Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the
>>>> very
>>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>>>
>>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American
>>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
>>
>> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
>> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
>> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
>>
>> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
>> understand it by the way...)
> I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily
fails on the basic of SR, calculus or algebra.
> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?
NOWHERE, and I know WHY, and I told you why.
Richard Hachel
May 31, 2022, 11:45:31 AM5/31/22
to
I understand very well, ME, a simple equation, such as for example the
notion of contraction of distances.
This is one of the basics.
We put:
L'=L.sqrt(1-v²/c²)
Very simple, right?
But precisely, it's not that I don't understand, I understand MUCH BETTER
than the others, including you.
And I understand that's not "exactly" how it works.
And that the real equation that should be taught is a little more
complicated, and even then not much.
L'=L.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)
Don't worry about my cognitive abilities.
Equation moreover, which explains very well WHY in Hachel sauce
relativity, there is NO parodox.
But we play with the snake that bites its tail, I will be answered
authoritatively that there is not (and why not never been) a Langevin
paradox, a train paradox, an Andromeda paradox, nor a paradox of quantum
transmission.
And there, always, always, always, I will answer that the problem, at this
level, is no longer scientific.
He is in the pride of "dogmatists" who do not want to lose.
Which is silly when you look at it.
What's the use of their Pyrrhic victory over me?
Pffff....
R.H.
Python
May 31, 2022, 11:47:29 AM5/31/22
to
You'll die that way, it doesn't matter.
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 1:57:49 PM5/31/22
to
Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> >
> > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> >
> > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> >
> > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> >
> > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> >
> > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> > citizenship.
> >
> > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
> >
> > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> >
> > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
>
> I think that I offended some relativists at this forum, due to my excessive use of foul language.
It's not due to your excessive use of foul language here...
>
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> >
> > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> >
> > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> >
> > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> >
> > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> >
> > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> > citizenship.
> >
> > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
> >
> > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> >
> > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
>
> I think that I offended some relativists at this forum, due to my excessive use of foul language.
it's due to you constantly SCREAM TOO LOUD!
Everyone can hear you screaming, and that loud voice of yours
is distracting other people who cannot concentrate with all
that loud noise you make.
You need to lower your voice because you are breaking
everybody's eardrums!
Don't you hear all the noise you're making????
It's not your foul language, you're just a fuckin loudmouth!
Lower your fuckin voice! You're making too much noise.
Did you know in Israel the people make sooo much noise there that the
Jewish gangsters, (The Kosher Nostra) all want to move out of israel
just to have some peace and quiet.
You people make too much nosie. (even at the dinner table)
You're becoming a ..pest.
watamisaying, you're already a pest.
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 2:01:31 PM5/31/22
to
I know what your problem is, you need some pussy.
Richard Hertz
May 31, 2022, 2:04:14 PM5/31/22
to
Maciej Wozniak
May 31, 2022, 2:48:09 PM5/31/22
to
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 17:25:59 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> > Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
> >> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> >>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
> >>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the
> >>>> very
> >>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> >>>
> >>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American
> >>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
> >>
> >> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
> >> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
> >> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
> >>
> >> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
> >> understand it by the way...)
> > I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
> It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily
Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> > Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
> >> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> >>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
> >>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the
> >>>> very
> >>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> >>>
> >>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American
> >>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
> >>
> >> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
> >> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
> >> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
> >>
> >> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
> >> understand it by the way...)
> > I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
> It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily
and trying to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
it has to be formulable in the language of the
theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
that, poor stinker?
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 2:51:39 PM5/31/22
to
what is wrong with this famous Madison Avenue poster?
https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 7:24:13 PM5/31/22
to
What is wrong with this famous Madison Avenue advertising message?
Richard Hertz
May 31, 2022, 7:33:57 PM5/31/22
to
of mental decline is written here forever.
Are you a fucking Jew hater? Tell it openly, then, asshole.
The Starmaker
May 31, 2022, 11:52:45 PM5/31/22
to
The advertising campaign message reads: "You don't have to be Jewish to love Levy's Real Jewish Rye"
But the picture of the man in the picture is Jewish!
First step:
https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
Second step:
https://c7.alamy.com/comp/DEMJ03/portrait-of-an-orthodox-religious-jewish-boy-with-red-hair-sidelocks-DEMJ03.jpg
https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/young-hasid-in-a-traditional-hat-and-with-long-payos-picture-id855878710?s=612x612
https://www.brooklynunpluggedtours.com/sites/default/files/yarmulke-shtreimel-hasidic-jews-1-1.jpg
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61XfOTE008L._AC_UL1316_.jpg
https://c7.alamy.com/comp/2GJ1N8K/posed-portrait-of-a-teenage-hasidic-jewish-boy-from-the-satmar-group-on-lee-avenue-in-williamsburg-brooklyn-new-york-2GJ1N8K.jpg
Third step: I don't think you people can handle the third step.
Mikko
Jun 1, 2022, 9:18:14 AM6/1/22
to
On 2022-05-31 12:17:24 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
> Tu n'as toujours pas compris ce que voulait dire le mot "anisochronie"?
> Tu n'as toujours pas compris ce que voulait dire le mot "anisochronie"?
> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?
Semantics is not physics.
Mikko
Richard Hachel
Jun 1, 2022, 10:47:10 AM6/1/22
to
We will no longer speak of "gravitation", no more "electricity", no more
"electromagnetism".
That way everyone will be happy.
On peut aussi faire de la physique en ôtant tous les mots.
On ne parlera plus de "gravitation", plus d'électricité, plus
d'électromagnétisme.
Comme ça tout la monde sera content.
Encore, que comme dirait l'autre : "Richard Hachel est un grand génie, il
est le Fils de Dieu de la physique moderne sur la terre, et étant cela,
il sait très bien les finalités de tout cela, ce sera d'ôter aussi les
équations qui dérangent". Ôter le mots "anisochronie" n'est pas le but
ultime. Le but ultime est d'ôter aussi les équations qui vont avec.
C'est à dire :
To²=Tr²+Et²
L'=L.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)
t'=t(1+cosµ.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
To=Tr.sqrt(1+(1/4)Vr²/c²)
et des tas d'autres.
Le but est surtout là.
Le but est toujours là.
C'est comme la théorie woke. Faut être con pour pas comprendre que le
but est la déconstruction du monde,
et le retour à l'âge de pierre intellectuel.
Va savoir pourquoi, François.
R.H.
The Starmaker
Jun 2, 2022, 12:47:57 AM6/2/22
to
The Starmaker
Jun 2, 2022, 1:09:37 AM6/2/22
to
> > Third step: I don't think you people can handle the third step.
>
> The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
It gets worse...
>
> The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
This book
https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
"...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
The Starmaker
Jun 2, 2022, 1:24:02 AM6/2/22
to
> > > Third step: I don't think you people can handle the third step.
> >
> > The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
> It gets worse...
>
> This book
> https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
>
> The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
>
> "...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
>
> Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
>
It is documented that one President of the United States named Thomas
> >
> > The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
> It gets worse...
>
> This book
> https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
>
> The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
>
> "...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
>
> Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
>
Jefferson wrote a letter
to another President of the United States, John Adams that "*all* the
Indians of America were descended from the Jews".
Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States, ...then the
Fourth President of the United
States, James Madison even wrote a book agreeing that he believed that all
the Indians of America were Jewish.
and Who do you think told Thomas Jefferson about the indians? Benjamin
Franklin did!
who told Franklin?
August 12, 1769. Joseph Galloway wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Benjamin Franklin.
March 25, 1774. Benjamin Franklin wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Charles and Edward Dilly, who would publish his book.
The United States of America systematically killed 8 to 100 million
American Indians simply because they believed all the American Indians were Jewish.
Richard Hertz
Jun 2, 2022, 2:53:01 PM6/2/22
to
On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>
> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
>
> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
>
> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
>
> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
>
> There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> citizenship.
>
> Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
>
> Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
>
> Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried
> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>
> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
>
> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
>
> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
>
> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
>
> There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> citizenship.
>
> Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
>
> Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
>
> Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers,
which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount
to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc.
When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community
at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY".
The fucking fraudster knew, by 1906, that his life was going to be UNDER THE MICROSCOPE of historians of science,
as it happened FOR CENTURIES BEFORE.
The CRETIN get rid of anything that could disprove his assertions in that epoch. INFANTILE, CYNICAL ASSERTIONS.
- I did't know about the MMX experiment nor I did about Lorentz work, in particular his 1904 paper.
- I didn't know about the work of Poincaré (even when by 1903, at his homo Academia with Solovine, etc., the book
Science and Hypothesis was widely discussed).
- I didn't know about the works of Heaviside, Larmor and other (Heaviside exploded in anger as his name was used).
- I didn't know about the works of FitzGerald and, in particular Voigt (he used Voigt's notation, but it was a cosmic coincidence).
- I didn't know that a mechanism to use light to synchronize clocks in railway stations was patented around 1900 (EM signaling).
- It's wise to HIDE YOUR SOURCES (1907, to a journalist).
- I didn't know about the work of Dr. Lenard with UV Rays and the photoelectric effect (Mileva worked with him for 6 months by 1903)-
He was a fucking LIAR, DECEIVER, FRAUDSTER, SOCIOPATH who received full support of the Jewish network of power (Cabal).
His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years):
- I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity.
- I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury.
- I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915.
- It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI).
- It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA).
- I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.)
** I never did fundraising for the zionist movement in my travels abroad (the first thing he did at Argentina was to meet zionists at La Plata).
** I didn't know about Eotvos work with gravitational mass before I conceived "the happiest thought of my life".
***************************************
HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
Paparios
Jun 2, 2022, 4:20:31 PM6/2/22
to
El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
>
> HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years.
>
> HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)
Richard Hertz
Jun 2, 2022, 6:00:57 PM6/2/22
to
SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.
The Starmaker
Jun 2, 2022, 6:31:30 PM6/2/22
to
Richard Hertz wrote:
> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of
> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
the 12 tribes?"
I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
tribes.
and I'm not finished...
Richard Hertz
Jun 2, 2022, 6:56:10 PM6/2/22
to
Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason.
https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en
WWII was in the making, in slow motion.
The Starmaker
Jun 2, 2022, 6:59:31 PM6/2/22
to
There are many examples of this "Jewish network of power (Cabal) on the internet and institutions."
Here is one example:
You will see on this website TWO pdf links
https://nuclearprinceton.princeton.edu/atomic-energy-military-purposes-smyth-report
It reads:
A PDF of the Smyth Report can be accessed here:
https://www.orau.org/ptp/pdf/smythreport.pdf
https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/publications/smyth_report.pdf
Now, here is the coverup of trying to remove anything negative about Albert Einstein...
The first pdf if you notice when you open it begins at Chapter 6 (VI)
(they purposly removed Chaperts 1-5 because it mentions Albert Einstein
references to the atomic bomb.) (and they gave it the first Link because it is common
for people to click the first link more than the second link in search engine results)
(that also means that more of the first link will be copied and circulated then the second link will)
The second pdf contains the missing chapters 1-5.
Now, everyone here knows already that there are those out there that are hiding information about Albert Einstein that they don't want the world to see.
But, what are you going to do about it????
COMPLAIN??
That doesn't help.
You have to find the information , and STEAL IT FROM THEM, and then release it free to the public.
The Starmaker
Jun 2, 2022, 8:51:40 PM6/2/22
to
Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
> > You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of
> > the 12 tribes?"
> >
> >
> > I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
> > tribes.
> >
> >
> > and I'm not finished...
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience?
You seem to be suffering from some kind of aliment that I cannot put my finger on...
>
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
> > You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of
> > the 12 tribes?"
> >
> >
> > I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
> > tribes.
> >
> >
> > and I'm not finished...
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience?
You wrote: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of the 12 tribes?"
So, how did you mangage to change the word "I'm" to "him"???
Are you aware that you're...incoherent?
unclear, confused, muddled, unintelligible, incomprehensible, hard to follow, disjointed,
disconnected, unconnected, disordered, mixed up, garbled, jumbled, scrambled, rambling, wandering, discursive,
disorganized, uncoordinated, illogical, inarticulate, mumbled, muttered, stuttered, stammered, slurred, inchoate
Disorganized or incoherent speech · Confused thinking ·
It's possible that you have FTD, frontotemporal dementia.
You need to go see a doctor...quick.
and then make funeral arrangements...
i give you a couple of weeks..the most.
whodat
Jun 2, 2022, 11:14:46 PM6/2/22
to
Richard Hertz
Jun 3, 2022, 1:21:08 AM6/3/22
to
I know these simple facts:
1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by surrendering, even when they believe they were winning.
2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years.
In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour.
Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money. Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the
despise against him only increased.
3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was
acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England
by 1920, US by 1921, etc.
4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile,
Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University.
5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews),
which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran
that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923 Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous
book were the trigger of the development of his national socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews, but
against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck).
6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920, the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed
that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the
power in 1933.
7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental
re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes
looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane.
8. Hitler was used to redirect german hate towards communist USSR, not the West.
The "kabuki theater" in the war against West was shown in full colors when Hitler spared the life of 400,000 britons and french at
Dunkirk. He could have annihilated the concentration on the beach of Dunkirk.
Instead, he started his Barbarrosa Operation against USSR, which didn't end as it was planned by the West cabal.
Einstein, with the worldwide fame provided by the anglosaxon TPTB, was UNTOUCHABLE.
He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis), and fled his native country (was again a German citizen), when he
was signaled to do so. He continued his golden retirement at Princeton, earning early more than anyone posting here.
He was a privileged witness of the timeline that binded WWI and WWII. He saw, first hand, how WWII was slowly cooking for a decade.
He was smart, not intelligent, but VERY SMART.
Paparios
Jun 3, 2022, 11:39:02 AM6/3/22
to
How many trillions of dollars are being wasted on weapons?
Richard Hertz
Jun 3, 2022, 12:06:04 PM6/3/22
to
I think that it's twice that amount in USA and three times in China. These three countries alone amount to about 8 million people working
with jobs directly related to the mass death of others. Double it to cover the whole world and you have 16 million people working in MICs.
Now, double the 1 trillion USD yearly budget allocated to defense in USA to cover NGOs related to war efforts, one way or another ONLY
in the USA. Double it to cover worldwide expenditure related to defense, offense, intelligence, etc.
You got, each year, 16 million people and 2 trillion USD devoted to the actions of killing, surveillance, control and disinformation PER YEAR.
Sad world, isn't it?
If you want to get a more ominous figure, divide each one of those two figures by the number of people that die or "dissapear" per year.
I know that those numbers are a COLD, CYNICAL representation of world affairs in that matter, but they are TRUE and a good estimate.
Now, imagine what could be done EACH YEAR with such manpower and budget, if it was assigned to the progress of civilization.
Now, calculate the totals for one decade or two.
Now, ELIMINATE greedy bankers and finance people (and drug people). Heaven or hell?
whodat
Jun 3, 2022, 1:16:51 PM6/3/22
to
so long as he stayed out of Germany. Therein was the next problem, he
foresaw that Germany might overrun all those sections of Europe that
were of interest to him, so he first thought to emigrate to England but
then after a visit to the United States emigrated here.
You think the buildup to WW2 was slow in Europe, it was not. There was a
lot to do for Hitler to acquire dictatorial power and that was a
constant fast moving initiative highly visible to anyone who was paying
attention.
You're looking at events nearly a century old lacking original primary
news sources with a lot of modern bias superimposed. Good luck with
that.
> He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis), and fled his native country (was again a German citizen),
> when he
> was signaled to do so. He continued his golden retirement at Princeton, earning early more than anyone posting here.
>
> He was a privileged witness of the timeline that binded WWI and WWII. He saw, first hand, how WWII was slowly cooking for a decade.
> He was smart, not intelligent, but VERY SMART.
party was a nationalist communist party as opposed to the Soviet
communism which had international ambitions. An astute reader might
wish to dig into this and parallels to the modern day socialist/communist
initiatives.
The Starmaker
Jun 3, 2022, 1:31:45 PM6/3/22
to
Paparios wrote:
>
> El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 18:00:57 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:20:31 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> > > El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
> > > Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years.
> > >
> > > More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)
> > Crimes in science are crimes against the mankind and don't prescribe.
> >
> > SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.
>
> But the real WMD (weapons of mass destructions) have been and are made by technologist (like engineers).
Well of course, Albert Einstein *INVENTS* WMD (weapons of mass destructions), but he gets the 'little people' to make them for him.
>
> El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 18:00:57 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:20:31 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> > > El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
> > > Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years.
> > >
> > > More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)
> > Crimes in science are crimes against the mankind and don't prescribe.
> >
> > SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.
>
> But the real WMD (weapons of mass destructions) have been and are made by technologist (like engineers).
You cannot build the Empire State Building all by yourself, ...you got to get the 'little people' to make them for you.
War is simply part of nature...ask any ant, or war ant.
There are a lot of people that need to be 'depopulated'...
especially some of yous in the newsgroup.
The Internet used to be so friendly...untill you guys came along and ruin the neighborrhood.
The Starmaker
Jun 3, 2022, 1:35:14 PM6/3/22
to
Thomas Heger
Jun 4, 2022, 2:50:27 AM6/4/22
to
Am 31.05.2022 um 06:21 schrieb Richard Hertz:
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:41:17 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
>> handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
>
> I think I was crystal clear.
> I'm referring to ANY handwritten document that PRECEDED the June 1905 publication at the ADP journal:
>
> - Scratch pads from 1905 and before.
> - Single pages with calculations, derivations, wrong parts that were modified, etc.
> - Any kind of note, even written ON pages of papers treating Maxwell (his only reference in the fucking paper).
No, Einstein mentioned Heinrich Hertz and used (apparently) his book
about 'Über die Ausbreitung der elektrischen Kraft' (about the
distribution of the electric force).
The 14th chapter had the title' equations about the electrodynamics of
moving bodies'.
So Einstein didn't refer to Maxwell himself, but to the adaptation of
Maxwell's theory by Heinrich Hertz.
Unfortunately that book is only available in German (as far as I know).
Einstein didn't provide any proper reference to used material, but
mentioned the name 'Hertz'.
Also used, but not quoted, was (apparently) a book from Henri Poincaré
'Sur la dynamic de la electron' (something like that)
Also used was some material from Hendrik Lorentz (which I have not yet
identified).
> - ANYTHING that could show how hard the retarded worked in previous years around the topic (as he said: several years of previous work).
>
> You are CONFUSED (but I doubt, because you are a wicky person) with his 1909 RE-WRITING (for the fucking press) of
> a stupid page where, FINALLY, the fucking formula E=mc2 was handwritten (because it was becoming more and more popular).
>
It is in my oppinion impossible, that Einstein could have written all of
the 1904/5 papers himself.
One reason:
he worked fulltime (six days a weak at ten hours each) in a patent
office, while having a young family at home.
That would be hard to survive in the first place, but would certainly
restric the amount of time, which Einstein could use to think about
relativity, Brownian motion, Quantum physics and/or the photoelectric
effect.
Also the number of pages to write was huge, if you think about the
available tools for writing in that era. Mainly ink and feathers were
used, because ball pens were invented half a century later.
Books and paper were expensive in those days and the copy machine, let
alone the internet, needed many additional decades for their advent.
But besides of four Earth shattering scientific papers Einstein wrote
also a number of reviews for 'Annalen der Physik' (I guess that were
twenty).
So, in effect he could hardly eat something, because his scedule was
simply overflowing.
TH
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:41:17 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> What do you mean by manuscripts? "Theory of Special Relativity"
>> handwritten by Einsten was sold at an aution for 1.2mil
>
> I think I was crystal clear.
> I'm referring to ANY handwritten document that PRECEDED the June 1905 publication at the ADP journal:
>
> - Scratch pads from 1905 and before.
> - Single pages with calculations, derivations, wrong parts that were modified, etc.
> - Any kind of note, even written ON pages of papers treating Maxwell (his only reference in the fucking paper).
No, Einstein mentioned Heinrich Hertz and used (apparently) his book
about 'Über die Ausbreitung der elektrischen Kraft' (about the
distribution of the electric force).
The 14th chapter had the title' equations about the electrodynamics of
moving bodies'.
So Einstein didn't refer to Maxwell himself, but to the adaptation of
Maxwell's theory by Heinrich Hertz.
Unfortunately that book is only available in German (as far as I know).
Einstein didn't provide any proper reference to used material, but
mentioned the name 'Hertz'.
Also used, but not quoted, was (apparently) a book from Henri Poincaré
'Sur la dynamic de la electron' (something like that)
Also used was some material from Hendrik Lorentz (which I have not yet
identified).
> - ANYTHING that could show how hard the retarded worked in previous years around the topic (as he said: several years of previous work).
>
> You are CONFUSED (but I doubt, because you are a wicky person) with his 1909 RE-WRITING (for the fucking press) of
> a stupid page where, FINALLY, the fucking formula E=mc2 was handwritten (because it was becoming more and more popular).
>
It is in my oppinion impossible, that Einstein could have written all of
the 1904/5 papers himself.
One reason:
he worked fulltime (six days a weak at ten hours each) in a patent
office, while having a young family at home.
That would be hard to survive in the first place, but would certainly
restric the amount of time, which Einstein could use to think about
relativity, Brownian motion, Quantum physics and/or the photoelectric
effect.
Also the number of pages to write was huge, if you think about the
available tools for writing in that era. Mainly ink and feathers were
used, because ball pens were invented half a century later.
Books and paper were expensive in those days and the copy machine, let
alone the internet, needed many additional decades for their advent.
But besides of four Earth shattering scientific papers Einstein wrote
also a number of reviews for 'Annalen der Physik' (I guess that were
twenty).
So, in effect he could hardly eat something, because his scedule was
simply overflowing.
TH
The Starmaker
Jun 5, 2022, 4:49:12 PM6/5/22
to
> > > > Third step: I don't think you people can handle the third step.
> > >
> > > The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
> > It gets worse...
> >
> > This book
> > https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
> >
> > The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
> >
> > "...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
> >
> > Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
> >
>
> It is documented that one President of the United States named Thomas
> Jefferson wrote a letter
> to another President of the United States, John Adams that "*all* the
> Indians of America were descended from the Jews".
> Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States, ...then the
> Fourth President of the United
> States, James Madison even wrote a book agreeing that he believed that all
> the Indians of America were Jewish.
>
> and Who do you think told Thomas Jefferson about the indians? Benjamin
> Franklin did!
>
> who told Franklin?
>
> August 12, 1769. Joseph Galloway wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Benjamin Franklin.
>
> March 25, 1774. Benjamin Franklin wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Charles and Edward Dilly, who would publish his book.
>
> The United States of America systematically killed 8 to 100 million
> American Indians simply because they believed all the American Indians were Jewish.
Of course Thomas Jefferson legalized the genocide with his Indian Removal Act of 1830. (just a land grab)
> > >
> > > The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
> > It gets worse...
> >
> > This book
> > https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
> >
> > The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
> >
> > "...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
> >
> > Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
> >
>
> It is documented that one President of the United States named Thomas
> Jefferson wrote a letter
> to another President of the United States, John Adams that "*all* the
> Indians of America were descended from the Jews".
> Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States, ...then the
> Fourth President of the United
> States, James Madison even wrote a book agreeing that he believed that all
> the Indians of America were Jewish.
>
> and Who do you think told Thomas Jefferson about the indians? Benjamin
> Franklin did!
>
> who told Franklin?
>
> August 12, 1769. Joseph Galloway wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Benjamin Franklin.
>
> March 25, 1774. Benjamin Franklin wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Charles and Edward Dilly, who would publish his book.
>
> The United States of America systematically killed 8 to 100 million
> American Indians simply because they believed all the American Indians were Jewish.
and if you look at the actual document (Indian Removal Act of 1830)..the word "tribes" have only one meaning...The Twelve Tribes of Israel.
Hell, they even suggested then to send them all back to Israel!
Thomas Jefferaon said if those indians would to even raise one hatchet, they will lose all their land.
I'm sure most of yous heard AOC claiming she is a native indian...
https://nypost.com/2022/06/04/aoc-had-awakening-about-indigenous-heritage-at-standing-rock-in-2016/
I won't be surprised if AOC will bring up the genocide of "..the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
Do you think Israel wants their land back?
Thomas Heger
Jun 21, 2022, 1:46:23 AM6/21/22
to
Am 02.06.2022 um 20:52 schrieb Richard Hertz:
>> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
>>
>> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
>>
>> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
>> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
>> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
>> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
>>
>> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
...
>> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
>>
>> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
>>
>> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
>> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
>> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
>> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
>>
>> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
>>
>> Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
>> imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
>>
>> Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
>
> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried
> to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers,
> which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount
> to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc.
ten hours each in a patent office and had a young family at home.
Five-hundred pages would have been impossible to write in such a
situation in a couple of month.
But besides from that, in 1905 he delived three more groundbreaking
papers, from which one won him a Nobel-price and also twenty reviews for
'Annalen der Physik'
So, we need to take the possibility into consideration, that he didn't
and someone else wrote the article(-s).
This would also explain the lack of manuscripts, without the need to
burn them.
> When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community
> at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY".
>
> His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years):
>
> - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity.
> - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury.
> - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915.
> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI).
> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA).
> - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.)
Einstein had used really close copies of some parts of the book of Hertz
about the distribution of the electric force.
This contained variable names, certain concepts and equations and also
the title of chapter 14, which was 'fundamental equations about the
electrodynamics of moving bodies'.
The book 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' of Poincaré seems to be used,
too. At least a few eqaution look relatively close.
...
TH
Richard Hertz
Jun 21, 2022, 12:51:19 PM6/21/22
to
1) Poincaré had corrected and gave the name "Lorentz Transforms" to the group of transforms, that Lorentz had used on
his 1904 paper about relativity, as early as March 1905. Poincaré started to TEACH about this modified Lorentz relativity,
as early as March 1905. His theory was complemented with some work of his "friend" Langevine, a Jewish French who HAD
contact with an intimate friend of Einstein by then (Solovine, Olympia Academy). It was Solovine who got a copy of Poincaré's
"Science et Hypothesis", which was devoured and thoroughly discussed by the Olympia Academy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympia_Academy
2) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron" was not a book, but a theory from Poincaré, adapting Lorentz to the relativity that Einstein plagiarized.
As Poincaré was NOT a physicist, but a mathematician, he published his theory on an Italian mathematical journal by Jan. 1906.
Henri Poincaré
Sur la dynamique de l'électron
1906
Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo 21: 129–176
Adunanza del 23 luglio 1905.
Stampato il 14-16 dicembre 1905
However, Poincaré presented his theory in Paris by June 3, 1905. The theory was known and taught much earlier that year:
https://annales.org/archives/x/marchal3.pdf
EXCERPT:
************
Monday, June 5, 1905. At the French Academy of Science, Henri Poincaré presents : “On the
dynamic of the electron ”, a four pages note, maximum length. That text is edited Friday, June 9 and
sent to all universities. At the beginning of the following week it arrived at Bern where a clerk of the
patent office, that will become famous, prepares for the ‘’Beïblatter zu der Annalen der Physik’’
summaries of the most interesting physics texts, including those of the French Academy of Sciences...
July 1905. Henri Poincaré develops his text and send it for publication, under the same title,
to the ‘’Rendiconti del circolo matematico di Palermo’’. That second text, 47 pages, will be received
July 23 and will be published in January 1906.
Why to such a far away paper that is not even a physics newspaper ? Above all because the
Director of this journal was his friend, but also because the physicists of this time considered Henri
Poincaré as a mathematician, and a mathematician cannot write in a physics journal ! Consequently
that work - the founding work of relativity - will remain almost ignored during the begibbing of the
twentieth century while Sciences were progressing at giant steps...
Because of this injustice against a great pionneer, physicist, mathematician, astronomer and
philosopher of Science, a Russian admirer, the physicist ans academician Anatoly A Logubov,
republished these two texts in 1984 with an update of their mathematical and physical expressions,
and with suitale commands. These new texts have been translated into english in 1995 and have
already been three times republished.
************
3) The theory was advanced, corrected some missunderstandings from Lorentz and included first steps onto gravitation and SR.
https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Sur_la_dynamique_de_l%E2%80%99%C3%A9lectron
Sommaire
Introduction.
§ 1. — Transformation de Lorentz.
§ 2. — Principe de moindre action.
§ 3. — La transformation de Lorentz et le principe de moindre action.
§ 4. — Le Groupe de Lorentz.
§ 5. — Ondes de Langevin.
§ 6. — Contraction des Électrons.
§ 7. — Mouvement quasi-stationnaire.
§ 8. — Mouvement quelconque.
§ 9. — Hypothèses sur la Gravitation.
4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France, the entire scientific community REPUDIATED the theft performed by
Germans (Einstein & Co) and the sentiment was SO STRONG supporting Poincaré's relativity, that Einstein's theory was not
accepted there until 1952, after WWII finished.
Because of this injustice against a great pioneer, physicist, mathematician, astronomer and philosopher of Science, a Russian
admirer, the physicist and academician Anatoly A Logubov, republished these two texts in 1984 with an update of their mathematical
and physical expressions, and with suitable commands. These new texts have been translated into English in 1995 and have already
been three times republished.
*********
Poincaré is the real father of relativity. Einstein and his network of spies and collaborators were just scumbags, thieves, supported
by the zionist cabal, in Europe and USA. The CRETIN was the "Manchurian Candidate" of his time, hand-picked among a bunch of
retarded looking for fame and glory, who lacked honesty and scruples. It was a hard time for the cabal to select a candidate, which had
to be german and jew, in order to push the agenda of jew supremacy in science(physics, mathematics, chemistry).
As it didn't work well initially, because Poincaré kept advancing of concepts of spacetime and gravity, a gifted cretin (Minkowski) that
already had a name in the field and had connections with Poincaré, took relativity to the next step and then suddenly died.
The third in the row, after Levi-Civita completed his work, was Marcel Grossman, who developed the framework of general relativity
in 1912-1913 (his Entwurf).
It has to be noted by anyone here the timeline in the development of relativity, and the jewish network supporting developments.
I can't accept that forum members can be so blind or stupid and refuse to acknowledge the evidence.
I forgot: Include Schwarzschild in the timeline, and you have the picture complete.
Lorentz - Poincaré - Langevin - Solovine - Besso - Drude - Einstein - Planck - Minkowski - Georg Pick -Paul Ehrenfest - Levi-Civita -
Grossman - Schwarzschild - (Lorentz again) - Freundlich (link to Newcomb, USA and Eddington, UK) - Hilbert - etc, etc.
Poincaré, Lorentz, Planck, Hilbert and Eddington were not chosenites.
Lorentz, Planck and Eddington were zionist assets. Not the case of Hilbert.
*********
If the network is completely exposed, you'd be surprised of the involvement of zionists in the push to develop and establish relativity
as THE NEW PHYSICS.
Dono.
Jun 21, 2022, 3:08:36 PM6/21/22
to
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 9:51:19 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> 4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France
Odious kapo
>
> 4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France
Langevin (not "Langevine") was not Jewish. Keep licking the boots of your nazi puppetmasters.
Message has been deleted
Dono.
Jun 21, 2022, 4:37:09 PM6/21/22
to
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 12:28:28 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> A fucking communist all his life.
There is no record of Langevin being a commie. You were caught lying (once again) claiming that he was Jewish, kapo piece of shit.
There is no record of Langevin being a commie. You were caught lying (once again) claiming that he was Jewish, kapo piece of shit.
Message has been deleted
Thomas Heger
Jun 24, 2022, 3:37:11 AM6/24/22
to
Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the
book of Poincaré was written in French, too.
Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein.
So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides
of Italian).
But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost
entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA.
This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign
languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French)
from early childhood or even birth.
This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from Ulm.
Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the
Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't
sound very German.
...
TH
Volney
Jun 24, 2022, 9:00:10 AM6/24/22
to
On 6/24/2022 3:37 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> The important point is:
> Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the
> book of Poincaré was written in French, too.
>
> Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein.
>
> So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides
> of Italian).
>
> But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost
> entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA.
>
> This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign
> languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French)
> from early childhood or even birth.
>
> This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from
> Ulm.
>
> Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the
> Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't
> sound very German.
>
Why do you make up garbage and pretend that it's true?
> The important point is:
> Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the
> book of Poincaré was written in French, too.
>
> Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein.
>
> So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides
> of Italian).
>
> But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost
> entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA.
>
> This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign
> languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French)
> from early childhood or even birth.
>
> This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from
> Ulm.
>
> Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the
> Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't
> sound very German.
>
Richard Hertz
Jun 25, 2022, 1:48:00 AM6/25/22
to
almost 15 years ago.
Or you are a drooling brainless Einstein's fanatic, or you know something that I don't.
Please, share your explanation about the MISSING technical papers (like the HIDDEN 54 pages Einstein-Besso 1913 manuscript) that
correspond to the years 1901-1906/1907.
In those 5 or 6 years, Einstein HAD TO HAVE WRITTEN hundred and hundred of notes, "entwurf", ANY KIND OF TECHNICAL MANUSCRIPTS
Where are they? Left under the bed of some partners at their houses in Berlin, like Max Planck ENTIRE library, burnt by bombs in WWII?
Come on, don't be shy, Volney. Enlighten us with your version of the narrative: Einstein did it all in the head (Tesla?), Einstein used
invisible ink, which vanished after a while?, Einstein didn't think that he was going to be famous so burnt everything?,......
I expect to hear something extraordinary from you.
The Starmaker
Jun 25, 2022, 2:01:29 AM6/25/22
to
and einstein wrote letters to her
somewhere here:
https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/
J. J. Lodder
Jun 25, 2022, 4:23:48 AM6/25/22
to
The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
[-]
> and einstein wrote letters to her
In German, no doubt,
Jan
[-]
>
> Curie spoke 5 languages. What could those 5 languages be?
Polish, Russian, German, French, and English.
> Curie spoke 5 languages. What could those 5 languages be?
> and einstein wrote letters to her
Jan
The Starmaker
Jun 25, 2022, 11:34:44 PM6/25/22
to
>
> Jan
Thomas Heger
Jun 26, 2022, 12:43:35 AM6/26/22
to
foreign languages.
But the question was not, from where Curie got her skills, but from
where Einstein got his language skills in Italian and French.
It is known, that he started to speak late and that he spoke very poor
English after a long time in the USA.
From this we can conclude, that language in general was not his
particular talent.
Now he had contact to a number of French speaking people:
Curie
Langvin
LeMaitre
Poincaré
Now we need to know, how Einstein communicated to these scientists. The
natural assumption would be, that he spoke French fluently.
Also the contact to Michele Besso and the residence of his family in
Italy for several years suggested, that Einstein was fluent in Italian, too.
Now, this would not not fit to his official biography, because if he
spoke Italian, he had no reason to go to Switzerland in the first plance
and could simply have become an Italian.
If so, the Swiss part of his biography would be a good candidate for
fakery, too.
But more important was the part of his life, which was related to his
birth in Germany.
If he was in fact tri-lingual from youth, he could not be born in Ulm,
because that is a city in Germany, where they speak German with a
Swabian accent.
In Munich, they don't speak Italian or French neither, but an odd German
dialect called Bavarian.
Since Einstein spoke neither Swabian nor Bavarian German, but apparently
French and Italian, there exist reasons for doubts about his identity.
TH
Richard Hertz
Jun 26, 2022, 1:00:22 AM6/26/22
to
and finish high school there. Italians rejected him.
Even so, cabal post him as a fucking genius, who devoured Italians books at the public library where he lived with his parents.
Besso managed three languages, and was 10 times smarter than Einstein. Any stupid could get a degree in physics by then,
but getting a degree in engineering was much harder, and Besso got one and made a living with it. Einstein only could taught
to high schoolers (from Jewish families) until he was 30 years old.
And, remember, they were lovers.
Thomas Heger
Jun 28, 2022, 3:24:30 AM6/28/22
to
Einstein must have spoken very good Italian, because he lived in Pavia
several years (at least the web-side of the Jesuit college next door
says so).
The only friend mentioned in SRT was the Italian Michele Besso. Since
Besso had no known knowledge of the German language, we need to assume,
that Einstein spoke italian (fluently!).
A somehow similar considerations would say, that Einstein spoke French,
too, because some other friends were French and had no known knowledge
of German.
Since Einstein was perticularily bad in learning English after decades
living in the USA, we need to assume, that Einstein was tri-lingual from
birth or early youth.
This would only fit to a Swiss citizenship, because French, German and
Italian are the main languages in Sitzerland.
But this would not fit to a German citizenship, because most Germans
didn't know any Italian.
Fortunately Einstein had Swiss citizenship, what is undebated.
Debated is only, WHEN he aquirred Swiss citizenship (and how).
> Even so, cabal post him as a fucking genius, who devoured Italians books at the public library where he lived with his parents.
genius, if languages were concerned:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMvNkl8uts0
In my view:
-he had to read from a manuscript, what he should know by heart
-his English pronounciation is not even at high-school level (after
decades in the USA)
-grammar and words were quite correct, which could stem from the manuscript
-The physical content was way too simple, but still Einstein needed to
read from his script
...
TH
Thomas Heger
Jun 28, 2022, 3:43:10 AM6/28/22
to
British/US/Canadian and so forth were allowed.
E.g. look at this
https://www.amazon.de/Hitler-Britischer-Agent-Solving-History/dp/0985227818
Or:
https://www.amazon.de/Wall-Street-Hitler-Antony-Sutton/dp/0892450045
...
TH
Thomas Heger
Jun 29, 2022, 2:56:10 AM6/29/22
to
Kingdom of Württemberg German Empire (1879–1896)
Stateless (1896–1901)
Switzerland (1901–1955)
Austria during the Austro-Hungarian Empire (1911–1912)
Kingdom of Prussia during the German Empire (1914–1918)
Free State of Prussia (Germany, 1918–1933)
United States (1940–1955)
"
As far as I know, this was not allowed in Germany.
The Geramn rules for citizenship after WWI were, that you may only have
one citizenship and this belongs to the nation called 'Deutsches Reich'
(later 'Bundesrepublik Deutschland') and not to its subdivisions called
'Bundesstaaten' or the former kingdoms, from which the Reich was composed.
see here:
https://uk.diplo.de/uk-en/02/citizenship/acquiring-german-citizenship/2463622
More likely is a Swiss citizenship by birth and a faked identity in his
early years in Germany.
The reason to think so, are:
it was fantastically unlikely, that young Einstein wanted to stay alone
in Munich, went from there to Italy and denounced his German citizenship.
He spoke most likely all the main languages of Switzerland, but very
poor English. Also his German was quite poor.
To aquirre Swiss citizenship was very hard in those days and you could
not become a Swiss citizen just by asking.
It was very unlikely, that a teenager would like to split from his
family in Italy, to go to school in Switzerland, if he had never been
there before.
Much more convincing than his offcial CV is the assumption, that his CV
was faked and he was in fact Swiss from birth.
This would also fit to his extremely anti-German attitudes, what would
not make much sense, if he was in fact German.
But if his vita was a fake, we would need skilled fakes for this task, too.
Such agencies exist, of course, and are usually called 'agencies' (its
members 'agents').
Now we need to search for contacts to agencies of some sort in
Einstein's life and will find, that he had actually a diplomatic
passport, too.
This is a little strange for a physicist, to say the least.
TH
Richard Hertz
Jun 29, 2022, 12:18:08 PM6/29/22
to
0 new messages