Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

Maciej Wozniak

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 12:50:56 PM1/8/22

to

https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html

"It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."

Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
minions.

"Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."

But fanatic idiots can always be some threat.

Python

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:03:35 PM1/8/22

to

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>
>
> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>
> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> minions.
>
>
> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."

Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system? Only
a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Maciej Wozniak, who
knows *nothing* on maths and logic.

> But fanatic idiots can always be some threat.

You are not a threat, Maciej. You are an old fart posting rants on
Usenet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture

Meanwhile Maciej Wozniak is still pretending to praise Poincaré
while thinking that all he worked on is bs. Maciej is a demented
old ignorant stupid fart.

Maciej Wozniak

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:16:48 PM1/8/22

to

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >
> > https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >
> >
> > "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >
> > Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> > a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> > minions.
> >
> >
> > "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?

Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?

Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
his insane minions, including some really pathetic stinker not even
knowing what sqrt function is.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture

"It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
solution as the more advantageous."

Every one but an insanee crazie screaming that common sense

Python

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:23:16 PM1/8/22

to

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>
>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>
>>>
>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>>>
>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
>>> minions.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>
> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and

> his [snip profanity],

Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
make EG invalid. How can you be so illiterate???

> including some really pathetic stinker not even
> knowing what sqrt function is.

The "stinker" (did you really check you English-Polish
dictionary on this word Maciej?) is the one who cannot
handle basic of math properly, I mean *you* Maciej.

>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture
>
> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> solution as the more advantageous."

Context? What are you talking about?

> Every one but an insanee crazie screaming that common sense
> is a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> minions.

You are a demented kook, Maciej.

Maciej Wozniak

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:32:37 PM1/8/22

to

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>
> >>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>
> >>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> >>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> >>> minions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> >> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >
> > Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> > Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> > Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> > his [snip profanity],
>
> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> make EG invalid.

They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
Poor idiots.

> > including some really pathetic stinker not even
> > knowing what sqrt function is.
> The "stinker" (did you really check you English-Polish
> dictionary on this word Maciej?) is the one who cannot
> handle basic of math properly

No; did you really check dictionary on this word, poor
stinker? It has a different meaning than "a person
who doesn't know math", of course, this is matching
you as well.

> > "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> > solution as the more advantageous."
> Context? What are you talking about?

Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
Let's try again.
https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html

Python

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:39:08 PM1/8/22

to

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>>>>>
>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
>>>>> minions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>>
>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
>>> his [snip profanity],
>>
>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
>> make EG invalid.
>
> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".

Nope.

> Poor idiots.

Put it singular, use it as a signature.

>>> including some really pathetic stinker not even
>>> knowing what sqrt function is.
>> The "stinker" (did you really check you English-Polish
>> dictionary on this word Maciej?) is the one who cannot
>> handle basic of math properly
>
> No; did you really check dictionary on this word, poor
> stinker? It has a different meaning than "a person
> who doesn't know math", of course, this is matching
> you as well.

It makes *you* a stinker, it is not the *definition* of
stinker. You have issues with language Maciej.

>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
>>> solution as the more advantageous."
>> Context? What are you talking about?
>
> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> Let's try again.
> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html

Let's see:

"... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
propagated in a straight line".

This is exactly what has been done.
Poincaré: 1. Einstein: 1. Python: 1. Wozniak: 0.

Maciej Wozniak

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:49:21 PM1/8/22

to

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> >>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> >>>>> minions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> >>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>>
> >>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> >>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> >>> his [snip profanity],
> >>
> >> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> >> make EG invalid.
> >
> > They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
> Nope.

:) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
gurus, od course.

> >>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> >>> solution as the more advantageous."
> >> Context? What are you talking about?
> >
> > Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> > Let's try again.
> > https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> Let's see:
>
> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> propagated in a straight line".
>
> This is exactly what has been done.

Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
You're even stupider than I thought. Well, well.

Python

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 1:53:05 PM1/8/22

to

Nurses!!! Emergency in room 42!!!

Maciej Wozniak

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 2:00:04 PM1/8/22

to

No answer, poor stinker? Of course.

Python

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 2:11:48 PM1/8/22

to

> [snip evading]

"... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
propagated in a straight line"

Poincaré: 1. Wozniak: 0.

Anyway, you've made a fool of yourself again. Poincaré would have
punch you in the face, disgusting "stinker".

mitchr...@gmail.com

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 2:15:46 PM1/8/22

to

Curved and flat geometries are unified.

Maciej Wozniak

unread,

Jan 8, 2022, 2:27:41 PM1/8/22

to

[Instead proudly announcing some non-euclidean space].

So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
gurus, od course.

Still no answer, poor stinker?

mitchr...@gmail.com

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 2:30:47 PM1/9/22

to

The hypersphere isn't flat but the universe is...