Le 17/05/2022 à 12:34, Python a écrit :
> No. Both Poincaré and Einstein seriously asked the same question,
> thought carefully about it and ended up with similar answers.
>
> Since then a lot of people have been considering this problem too,
> especially to spot what is conventional and what is not in
> synchronization procedure, and why they are needed.
>
> The only confused mind here is yours Richard, for at least 30 years.
The problem with manipulative personalities is that they often manage to
pass themselves off as victims.
And they accuse those who are right of being confused.
Jean-Pierre Messager will explain to us how it is, for example, that he
can tell us that he is not confused in the bullshit he tells and that he
probably believes to be right.
I asked him many times to explain to me how he managed not to be confused
by studying a simple Langevin in apparent speed (ie what I see in my
telescope, and which is "something").
I have as always, and with ALL the "representatives" of the "exact
doctrine" heard the sweet song of the cicadas of the cicadas in the
distance.
I swear to you: with ALL!
But I know where the problem comes from, it is theological.
"We will never be able to put our faith in a guy who is all alone on the
scales and all the science on the other. He is necessarily an idiot who
speaks like Aznavour was an idiot who sang".
He's not confused, Jean-Pierre.
He is strong.
It explains very well how it is that a rocket heading towards me at 0.8c
can be observed with an apparent speed of 4c.
He is not confused.
He knows.
Problem, I'm not confused either, let alone him, because I've pondered the
question for decades.
And he will explain to us that the proper time of the traveler will be 9
years.
That is to say that for 9 years, he will see the earth come back towards
him with a speed of 4 c.
The problem will come when we ask him the question: "but over what
distance, then?"
It is not confused Jean-Pierre.
Sometimes, he makes you laugh so much that you almost find him funny.
Bunches of freaks!
Crazy bunch!
R.H.