It is not possible, that neutrinos pass through the Earth. Neutrinosare generated behind a moving electron before his impact in the Earth.

[Lubomir Vlcek]

Neutrinos in Vlcek=B4s theory.
In two official sources, we read:

1.Most neutrinos passing through the Earth emanate from the Sun. About 65 b=
illion (6.5=D71010) solar neutrinos per second pass through every square ce=
ntimeter perpendicular to the direction of the Sun in the region of the Ear=
th.[2]
[2]^ a b J. Bahcall et al. (2005). "New solar opacities, abundances, helios=
eismology, and neutrino fluxes". The Astrophysical Journal 621: L85=96L88. =
arXiv:astro-ph/0412440. Bibcode 2005ApJ...621L..85B. doi:10.1086/428929.
2.Solar neutrino=20
>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solar neutrinos (proton-proton chain) in the Standard Solar Model
Electron neutrinos are produced in the Sun as a product of nuclear fusion. =
By far the largest fraction of neutrinos passing through the Earth are Sola=
r neutrinos.
The main contribution comes from the so-called proton-proton chain reaction=
. The net reaction is:
,
or in words:
4 protons + 2 electrons =3D Helium + 2 electron neutrinos.
The highest flux of solar neutrinos come directly from the proton-proton in=
teraction, and have a low energy, up to 400 keV. There are also several oth=
er significant production mechanisms, with energies up to 18 MeV. [1]
. [1] ^ A. Bellerive, Review of solar neutrino experiments. Int.J.Mod.Phys=
. A19 (2004) 1167-1179
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Review of Solar Neutrino Experiments
Alain Bellerive (Carleton University)
(Submitted on 16 Dec 2003)
This paper reviews the constraints on the solar neutrino mixing parameters =
with data collected by the Homestake, SAGE, GALLEX, Kamiokande, SuperKamiok=
ande, and SNO experiments. An emphasis will be given to the global solar ne=
utrino analyses in terms of matter-enhanced oscillation of two active flavo=
rs. The results to-date, including both solar model dependent and independe=
nt measurements, indicate that electron neutrinos are changing to other act=
ive types on route to the Earth from the Sun. The total flux of solar neutr=
inos is found to be in very good agreement with solar model calculations. F=
uture measurements will focus on greater accuracy for mixing parameters and=
on better sensitivity to low neutrino energies.=20

In fact, according to Vlcek's theory (proven experimental) :
kinetical energy/of electron / Ee=3Dmc2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] in =
direction of motion of electron (from the Universe, to the interior of th=
e star ), where v is velocity of electron
kinetical energy/of wave =3Dof electron neutrinos /=3D=20
Ew =3D mc2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] against direction of motion of=
electron (from the interior of the star, to the Universe ), where v =
is velocity of electron
Star neutrinos originate from the nuclear fusion powering the stars. The d=
etails of the operation of the star we can explain. =20
1. When electrons from the Universe have velocity v =3D 0,6c , then =20
radius of force reach of electron re [4] p. 55-61:
re =3D7,7242296915076524984672268696567e-16m in direction of motion of ele=
ctron=20
from the Universe, to the interior of the star,
re =3D7,5933174273225751416275418610272e-14m against direction of motion of=
electron=20
(from the interior of the star, to the Universe / wave =3Dof electron =
neutrinos / =20
for v/c=3D 0,6 ......electron=20
2.When electrons from the Universe have velocity v =3D 0,9953c , then =
=20
radius of force reach of electron re :=20
re =3D2,9852697367995728469528649797656e-21m in direction of motion of ele=
ctron from the Universe, to the interior of the star,
re =3D5,8533905779558232539269262326763e-14m against direction of motion o=
f electron (from the interior of the star, to the Universe / wave =3Do=
f muon neutrinos / =20
for v/c=3D0,9953 =
........ muon
3.When electrons from the Universe have velocity v =3D 0,99971c , then =
=20
radius of force reach of electron re =3D2,840401487397554751560630135382=
e-24m in direction of motion from the Universe, to the interior of the =
star,

re =3D5,8375618415212342167582430481493e-14m against direction of motion =
of electron (from the interior of the star, to the Universe / wave =
=3Dof tauon neutrinos / =20
for v/c=3D0,99971 ...... tauon
In short, when four protons fuse to become one helium nucleus, two of whic=
h must be converted into neutrons, and each such transition depends on the =
penetration of the two electrons from the Universe, to the interior of th=
e star .
Penetration 1038 to 1058 of high energy electrons from the Universe =
to the interior of the star, transferred huge amounts of energy from the =
Universe into a small space of the star.(Also at the beginning of ignition =
stars in the nebulae too ... there where stars are born ).
This huge cosmic energy is responsible for thermonuclear fusion.
Currently prevailing opinion that the star itself is the source of the nuc=
lear fusion powering the star.
In fact, without a high-energy electrons from other stars of the Universe, =
single star can not be able to a nuclear fusion, because without a high-en=
ergy electrons from other stars, her stellar protons cannot be transform =
into her neutrons.
The idea that inside the star, the mass converted to energy and energy into=
mass, without regard to high-energy electrons from the surrounding Univers=
e, so finally falls. It is unsustainable.
Neutronization, i.e. injection of free electrons to protons to form neutron=
s and neutrinos, as a consequence of the Pauli principle can therefore simp=
ly replace with the above considerations. Although the inverse beta-decay i=
s common to both considerations, the qualitative difference is obvious.
The free electrons in the stars are replaced by high-energy electrons from =
the Universe
and neutrinos are replaced by waves which spread in the opposite direction =
to the movement of high-energy electrons from the Universe, i.e. by kineti=
c energy / of wave =3D of neutrinos / =3D
Ew =3D mc2 [ln | 1 + v / c | - (v / c) / (1 + v / c)] against direction of =
motion of electron (from the interior of the star, to the Universe), where =
v is velocity of electron.
Moreover, formation of a supernova is only possible, if the increase th=
e number of penetrating high-energy electrons from the Universe.
At the end of life star :
1. high-energy electrons from the Universe are penetrating into the star,
2. by waves (=3D by electron neutrinos ) propagated from inside of star =
to her surface , the star expands, more and more. More and more active ar=
e mutual repellent protons of star. In combination with neutrino waves, sta=
r more and more expands.
Gradually grows, its radius will expand about 100 times (RRG =3D 100 RS =85=
Arcturus) and due to conservation of angular momentum (L =3D I*omega =3D =
const) decreases rotation of the magnified star from omegas =3D 2,8* 10-6=
Hz on omegaRG =3D 10-8 Hz. This creates a Red Giant.
This makes that the high-energy electrons from the Universe easily penetr=
ate into the interior of stars (electrons have a small radius of force reac=
h re =3D2,840401487397554751560630135382e-24m in direction of motion =
from the Universe) and in particular the impact of 106 times more (since th=
e volume of Red Giant is a 1003 =3D 106 times greater).=20
Therefore into the interior of Red Giant can easily penetrate slower electr=
ons from the universe too. Total number all electrons from the Universe is =
approximately 107 times more than in the middle of life stars. As a resul=
t, inside the Red Giant arises approximately 107 times more neutrons per =
second.
After some time, almost all protons inside the Red Giant will turn into neu=
trons (repulsive force of protons is replaced without force, or a weak at=
tractive force of neutrons respectivelly ).
After the conversion of protons into neutrons, leads to of neutrons conce=
ntration and a very dense neutron star with a radius of Rns =3D 10 000 km=
, and due to conservation of angular momentum,
neutron star spinning at omegans =3D 1 Hz to 716 Hz .[1]
Together with this reduction of the Red Giant in neutron star, arises emiss=
ion neutrino waves in the opposite direction of movement of electrons from=
the Universe.
This creates a shock wave which ejects the remnants of star into Universe=
- thus creating a circular cloud of gas that is growing with time after t=
he supernova explosion.
The remaining protons, which did not create with electrons from the Unive=
rse neutrons,
create hydrogen atoms - electron capture (K-capture).
And either because some electrons from the Universe have a lower speed of 0=
.003 c - 0.6c or because they are located in areas distant from the center =
of the star where the pressure is significantly lower. These hydrogen atoms=
are entrained by the neutrino waves propagating from inside of the star=
out into Universe.


Conclusion: =20
It is not possible, that neutrinos pass through the Earth. Neutrinos are ge=
nerated behind a moving electron before his impact in the Earth.


References
[1] Jason W.T. Hessels (McGill), Scott M. Ransom (NRAO), Ingrid H. Stairs =
(UBC), Paulo C.C. Freire (NAIC), Victoria M. Kaspi (McGill), Fernando Camil=
o (Columbia)A Radio Pulsar Spinning at 716 Hz Astrophysics (astro-ph) DOI: =
10.1126/science.1123430 arXiv:astro-ph/0601337v1
[2] Fryer, C. L.; New, K. C. B. (2006-01-24). "Gravitational Waves from Gr=
avitational Collapse". Living Rewievs in Relativity 6 (2). Retrieved 2006-=
12-14.=20
[3]Mann, A. K. (1997). Shadow of a star: The neutrino story of Supernova 19=
87A. W.H. Freeman. pp. 122. ISBN 0716730979.
[4] L. Vlcek : New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 19=
96 ISBN 80-85665-64-6. Presentation on European Phys. Soc.10th Gen. Conf.=
=96 Trends in Physics (EPS 10) Sevilla , E 9 -13 September 1996. =20
[5] Woosley, S.; Janka, H.-T. (2005). "The Physics of Core-Collapse Supern=
ovae". Nature Physics 1 (3): 147=96154. arXiv:astro-ph/0601261. Bibcode 200=
5NatPh...1..147W. doi:10.1038/nphys172.
[6]Barwick, S.; et al. (2004-10-29). =93APS Neutrino Study: Report of the N=
eutrino Astrophysics and Cosmology Working Group=94. American Physical Soci=
ety. Retrieved 2006-12-12.=20
[7] Hayakawa, T.; et al. (2006). "Principle of Universality of Gamma-Proce=
ss Nucleosynthesis in Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions". Astrophysical Jo=
urnal Letters 648 (1): L47=96L50. Bibcode 2006ApJ...648L..47H. doi:10.108=
6/507703.=20
[8] S. Myra, E.; Burrows, A. (1990). "Neutrinos from type II supernovae- T=
he first 100 milliseconds". Astrophysical Journal 364: 222=96231. Bibcode 1=
990ApJ...364..222M. doi:10.1086/169405.=20
[9] F. Kirchner : =DCber die Bestimmung der spezifischen Ladung des Elektro=
ns aus Geschwindigkeitsmessungen, Ann. d. Physik [5] 8, 975 (1931)
[10] F. Kirchner : Zur Bestimmung der spezifischen Ladung des Elektrons aus=
Geschwindigkeitsmessungen , Ann. d. Physik [5] 12, 503 (1932)
[11] Ch. T. Perry, E.L. Chaffee : A DETERMINATION OF e/m FOR AN ELECTRON=
BY DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE VELOCITY OF CATHODE RAYS , Phys.Rev.36,904 (1=
930)
[12] J.K. Shultis, R.E. Faw (2002). Fundamentals of nuclear science and e=
ngineering. CRC Press. p. 151. ISBN 0824708342.
[13] Hans A. Bethe, "The Hydrogen Bomb", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists=
, April 1950, page 99. Fetched from books.google.com on 18 April 2011.
[14] "Progress in Fusion". ITER. Retrieved 2010-02-15.
Please refer to:=20

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/ ,=20

1.New trends in physics=20
Vlcek L.: New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996=
=20
ISBN 80-85665-64-6. Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. =96=
Trends in Physics ( EPS10 ) Sevilla, E=20
Vlcek L.: New Trends in Physics /book, elementes pictures, spheres in nuc=
lei, forecasted nuclei, ZOO-3D editorfor interactive inspecting of nuclei =
spheres/, Academic Electronic Press, Bratislava, 2000, CD- ROM,=20
ISBN 80-88880-38-6.=20

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/kniha/contents.html ,=20

Motto , Abstract , Introduction ,=20

Nomenclature and terminology , Criticism of Einstein's Theory of Relativi=
ty , Our New Theory of Relativity ,=20
Theory and Its Comparison with Experiment , Form of the Intensity of the M=
oving Charge Electric and Magnetic Field , Intensity of the Moving Charge =
Electric Field - A New Theory , Kaufmann's Experiment , Electromagnetic=
field. Maxwell's equations.=20
Non-linear form of the interference field , Fizeau's Experiment , Harre's=
Experiment , Doppler's principle - correct relations ,=20
Consequences 1, Possible generalization of the theory relating to all field=
s =20
(gravitational,nuclear, etc.) where the speed of propagatio=
n is constant and equals c ,=20
Calculation of the kinetic energy of a body moving at a give=
n velocity v , Nuclear field , =20
Radius of force reach of particles, calculation of speed, fr=
equencies, and mass particles, =20
"mass defect" notion , Unified theory of field ,=20
Consequences 2 ,A physicist's consience Epilogue , References ,=20
The New Coordinate System In Physics And Magic Numbers ,=20
The New Coordinate System In Physics , Nuclear Shells , Conclusion=20

2.Introduction to my two articles Physics is easy and Physics is beautifull=
=20

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/data/LV_Introduction_to_my_two_articles_Phy=
sics_is_easy_and_Physics_is_beautifull.pdf ,=20

3.Physics is easy=20

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/data/LV_Physics_is_easy.pdf ,=20

4.Physics is beautifull=20

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/data/LV_Physics_is_beautifull.pdf ,=20

5.Neutrino Oscillations=20
http://www.trendsinphysics.info/data/Neutrino_Oscillations_Vlcek.pdf ,=
=20
6.Nuclear fusion=20
http://www.trendsinphysics.info/data/Nuclear_fusion_Vlcek.pdf ,=20

7.Gluons, Mezons, Baryons Gallery=20
https://plus.google.com/photos/100738406901160020308/albums/572877310170=
4182353 ,=20

8.Spheres in nuclei=20
Vlcek L.: New Trends in Physics /book, elementes pictures, spheres in nucle=
i, forecasted nuclei, ZOO-3D editorfor interactive inspecting of nuclei sp=
heres/, Academic Electronic Press, Bratislava, 2000, CD- ROM, ISBN 80-88=
880-38-6.=20

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/prvky/prvkyang.htm ,=20

=20
Lubo Vlcek=20