Vigier Paris Conference Sept 15 2003 & Finland
Jack Sarfatti
"Dear Jack,
Thank you for interesting and useful info.
I have sent yesterday the abstract to Richard Amoroso (attached).
...
I am glad to see, that the good correlation between some of our ideas is
existing.
The interplay and feedback [IT <===> BIT] is one of my Unified model
feature also, if under IT to understand a matter (including biosystems)
and under BIT its virtual replica (VR) in Bivacuum, containing the
information about IT. The [IT + BIT] represents in general case complex
multilevel hierarchic system: from microscopic (elementary particles) to
macroscopic (star systems) levels, able to self-organization."
I do not understand what you mean by" VR" and "Bivacuum"?
In Bohm's realism this is very simple. BIT is simply the deBroglie qubit
pilot wave. IT is the "particle" "hidden variable" surfing the wave
according to
v = (h/m)Grad(argPsi)
This is so at least for real particles outside the vacuum.
Self-organization means the BIT Psi has as a source its own IT hidden
variable trajectory making the "fragile" Bohm quantum potential robust.
IT is a system point rolling in gradient flow on the BIT landscape.
Ordinary QM with signal locality means that IT is a "test particle" on a
rigid BIT landscape with a fragile quantum potential where BIT "has no
sources" (Bohm and Hiley).
This is IT FROM BIT without BIT FROM IT.
Post-quantum theory with signal nonlocality means that IT is no longer a
test particle but is modifying the very BIT landscape it is rolling on.
This is spontaneous self-organization pumped from environmental
stochastic inputs from BOTH gauge forces making dynamical phases and
also variable boundaries making Berry topological phases from paths in
parameter space.
"I like your idea, that just a specific (exotic) properties of vacuum
(bivacuum) with /\ < 0 and /\ > 0 are responsible for attractive dark
matter and repulsive dark energy, correspondingly. However, I did not
find in your materials the clear explanation of physical mechanisms,
responsible for such properties of vacuum and the ways of their
regulation (vacuum engineering ;-) )."
Details are in http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Vigier4.pdf
"As you can see from my Unified Model (UM), it contains the mechanism of
Bivacuum 'contraction' due to spin-spin interaction between introduced
Bivacuum fermions (BVF) of opposite spins and Bivacuum 'expansion' due
to Pauli repulsion between BVF of parallel spins in the huge volumes of
3D domains of virtual BC, formed by BVF."
I do not understand that as yet. Why do you need to introduce new ideas
when the old ones seem to work nicely? More with less is always better.
I do not see the need to introduce any new non-orthodox ideas to explain
any of the fundamental data in both the new precision cosmology and also
in high energy particle physics. All of the essential puzzles are IMHO
easily explained and understood needing only mainstream ideas:
1. Einstein's general theory of relativity supplemented by Hagen
Kleinert's "world crystal lattice" analogy and Wheeler's
geometrodynamics of "Mass without mass" etc.
2. Standard quantum field theory in globally flat spacetime.
3. P.W. Anderson's "More is different" general theory of emergent
complexity in spontaneous broken symmetry "ground states".
4. Bohm's quantum realism interpretation of Wheeler's "IT" and "BIT".
5. Lenny Susskind's "world hologram" generalization of Jacob
Bekenstein's "black hole thermodynamics".
6. Feynman-Wheeler/Costa De Beauregard/Hoyle-Narklikar/Cramer/Aharonov
notions of advanced influences from the future.
"The other possible explanation of attraction/repulsion between
particles and macroscopic bodies is related to proposed mechanism of
gravitation in UM. It could be a result of interference of
uncompensated Bivacuum virtual pressure waves, radiated by two or more
interacting bodies, excited by [C - W] pulsation of their elementary
particles. It is shown in hydrodynamic Bjorkness theory, that between
two pulsing in liquid bodies the attraction force has (1/r^2) dependence
and may change to repulsion when the distance between bodies exceeds the
wave-length of density waves in liquid medium (i.e. superfluid
Bivacuum). For details see Chapter 11 in my paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0207027 (see full PDF version)."
I don't understand this.
In my theory
/\zpf = Lp*^-2[1 - Lp*^3|PSI|^2]
The ordinary non-gravitating vacuum has
/\zpf = 0
This corresponds to the critical vacuum condensate density
<|PSI|^2> = Lp*^-3
where
Lp* = Lp^2/3(c/Ho)^1/3 ~ 1 fermi
Anti-gravitating zero point dark energy density causing the large scale
3D space geometry to accelerate in its expansion from the initial
singularity "vortex core" where PSI = 0 has /\zpf > 0 for FRW
Omega(Dark Energy) ~ 0.73. This implies a "low density" superfluid
macro-quantum vacuum condensate density
|PSI|^2 < Lp*^-3
Lp* is the equilibrium Holographic World Crystal Lattice spacing
(combining Kleinert with Susskind). Therefore the "low BEC density"
antigravitating dark energy phase of exotic vacuum has dilated or
expanded unit cells away from equilibrium. Note these are 4D unit cells
with generalized finite groups of different kinds of broken symmetries.
Similarly the gravitating "dark matter" phase of exotic vacuum is "high
density" vacuum condensate with the unit cells compressed smaller than
the equilibrium value where FRW Omega(Dark Matter) ~ 0.23.
Now if you can connect your picture in your
"It is shown in hydrodynamic Bjorkness theory, that between two pulsing
in liquid bodies the attraction force has (1/r^2) dependence and may
change to repulsion when the distance between bodies exceeds the
wave-length of density waves in liquid medium (i.e. superfluid Bivacuum)"
to what I just said, that would be interesting. There seems to be an
analogy or similarity if the equilibrium wavelength of your "density
waves" is my Lp* and your "bodies" correspond to the vertices of the
unit cell in the world crystal lattice?