CERN, LHC, strangelet = droplet of death.
Magnetic
binding energy of constituent element of strangelet is not several
MeV, as they wrote there, but about 500 MeV. So, all their talks about
thermal bath are erroneous. Strange matter is very dangerous!
The value 500 TeV, as a binding energy of (uds) in a strangelet N(uds)
can easily be received from comparison with the rest energy of kaons K
+ and K0, which are correspondingly 493 MeV and 497 MeV.
Kaons (K+ = us~; K0 = ds~) can be side products, occurring at the time
of proton (p=uud) and neutron (n=udd) capture by strange matter
N(uds):
N(uds) + p = (N+1)(uds) + K+ = (N+1)(uds) + e+ + 500 MeV.
(N+1)(uds) + n = (N+2)(uds) + K0 = (N+2)(uds) + 500 MeV.
…
Extremely powerful explosion.
This explosion has specific energy output, which is hundred times
bigger than under the nuclear explosion.
By the way, at the time of November-December collisions there were
more Kaons output that it was theoretically predicted. That means that
we are very close to creation of this dead droplet which can transform
the whole Earth into 10-meterr lump of strange\dead matter.
Space observations says us that periods of pulsars are almost do not
change. That means that strange matter is very stable.
Read about strange matter, strangelets, and strange stars in
Wikipedia. I think that our civilization is crazy. From one hand, it
already knows about a deadly dangerous strange matter; from the other
hand, it tries to create that dead droplet at colliders. I do not
understand you, people.
I wish you to become mentally healthy and STOP all powerful colliders.
Urion
creation of strangelets decreases at higher energies. As the LHC
operates at higher energies than the RHIC or the heavy ion programs of
the 1980s and 1990s, the LHC is less likely to produce strangelets
than its predecessors. Furthermore, models indicate that strangelets
are only stable or long-lived at low temperatures. Strangelets are
bound at low energies (in the range of 1-10 MeV), while the collisions
in the LHC release energies in the range of 14 TeV. The second law of
thermodynamics precludes the formation of a cold condensate that is an
order of magnitude cooler than the surrounding medium. This can be
illustrated by the example of trying to form an ice cube in boiling
water.
Furthermore, the behavior of quark-gluon plasmas may remove the
possibility of strangelets forming in particle accelerators at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_of_particle_collisions_at_the_Large_Hadron_Collider
More:
http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/2003/2003-001/p1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0806.3414
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html
Magnetic
> Stranglets cannot be created in the LHC because the probability of the
> creation of strangelets decreases at higher energies. As the LHC
> operates at higher energies than the RHIC or the heavy ion programs of
> the 1980s and 1990s, the LHC is less likely to produce strangelets
> than its predecessors. Furthermore, models indicate that strangelets
> are only stable or long-lived at low temperatures. Strangelets are
> bound at low energies (in the range of 1-10 MeV),
Binding energy of one element “uds” in strangelet N(uds), if N of
order of a 100 or 1000, can be about 500 MeV.
> while the collisions
> in the LHC release energies in the range of 14 TeV. The second law of
> thermodynamics precludes the formation of a cold condensate that is an
> order of magnitude cooler than the surrounding medium. This can be
> illustrated by the example of trying to form an ice cube in boiling
> water.
At p-p inelastic of-central collision in the region between fling by
protons two droplets can be formed from “sea-quarks” (from Dirac sea).
One droplet N(u~d~s~) will annihilate with matter; another droplet
N(uds) will capture our mater and grow.
Droplet, formed from “sea quarks”, is cold. So the “ice cube in
boiling water” is crude error.
----------
Frm another forum:
Somebody says: “Also the mass of a proton is 938.272 MeV/c^2 and the
mass of a uds is 1,115.683 MeV/c^2.”
I answer:
Mass of a free proton is 938.272 MeV/c^2.
Mass of a proton in deuteron is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in He is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in C is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in Fe is several MeV/c^2 less, and minimal.
These mass differences say us about binding energy.
Strange droplet consisting of a several (uds) is unstable and decay.
AFAIK some authors said that droplet could be stable if it has at
least 10 elements.
The more number of “strange nucleons” inside the droplet, the more
binding energy.
I think that its binding energy properties are analogues to those of a
magnetic hole. So I think that specific binding energy has a limit and
it lays somewhere near 500 MeV (or about of 1/2 of protons rest
energy).
Note. My computation for magnetic hole gives: energy of ruined protons
splits per two parts: 2/3 goes into creation of magnetic field; 1/3
goes into binding energy or simply emitted with radiation.
Strange matter has fermionic structure.
Magnetic hole has bosonic structure.
CERN physicist can create dead droplet, having fermionic, bosonic or
scirmionic structure. Any such condensate is dangerous, because it can
transform the whole Earth into dead extremely dense matter.
Sam Wormley
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Magnetic
Thank for links.
But I hate bb-dogma.
Real cosmology is here: http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists,
politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva and so on.
First of all here: rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch,
rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch
Brian Cox: “Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a
twat”. Source: THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF
THE WORLD. Eric E. Johnson. Page 858. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5480.pdf
I give 50% that in a several days CERN will create a “new quark-gluon
phase” of vacuum. This microscopic magnetized droplet of vacuum
(magnetic hole) will lead to chromomagnetic collapse (x-boson
condensation) of ordinary matter on it, and to explosion of Earth.
Take Brian Cox as a hostage. If CERN would not stop their LHC
experiment cut off the Brian's head.
Dozens of our appeals to presidents and prosecutors in order to forbid
the particle collisions with energy more than 0.1 TeV had failed.
There were even Nobel Prize winners, who had said about the dangers
from collider particle collisions. They were unable to stop the LHC
experiment.
We can see now that court cases are also failed.
So, we can wait only for some miracle forms of our salvation.
Here are some such forms, as I can see them:
1. Rebellion of citizens of Geneva with blocking the entrances to LHC.
2. Nuclear bombardment of LHC, Tevatron, RHIC, Dubna by terrorists.
3. Explosions of oil and gas pipes, leading to Europe.
4. Taking of some physicists as hostages and the threat to cut off
their heads if CERN would not stop the experiment leading to the
global extermination.
I would perform the third point, but I have no sufficient money and
time to buy explosives and to hire co-performers.
We all will be killed in a few days with probability of about 50%. So,
even the nuclear bombardment of LHC with killing of about of 10 000 of
people, with 100% probability, is more humane, than explosion of Earth
by CERN and killing of 6 600 000 000 of people.
Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists,
politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva. First of
all here: rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch,
rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch
Sam Wormley
> On Mar 1, 3:35 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No Center
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
>>
>> Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
>>
>> WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
>> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
>>
>> WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
>> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
>
> Thank for links.
> But I hate bb-dogma.
That's why I included
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Empirical testing is at the heart of science.
bert
>
> - Show quoted text -
LHC Creates great high temperature and this heat is its killer.
Splice wires NG Swiss engineering went NG Wire obeys the inverse
square law,and that is reality Swiss engeneering O Universe
physica 10 Oi va TreBert
Uncle Al
>
> I reread the LSAG report once more and found there another error.
1) http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/104
2) idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
eric gisse
[snip all]
Perhaps you should see a doctor for your paranoid schitzophrenia.
Magnetic
copy and send!
save your children and mothers!
Sam Wormley
> copy and send!
> save your children and mothers!
That's spammer talk!
Brad Guth
Perhaps the 98% missing proton mass at LHC will eventually come back
around and kick those LHC wizards in the butt.
~ BG
Magnetic
Magnetic
>
> - Show quoted text -
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
BURT
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
The ring Big Bang means the hypersphere expanded huge in one instant
then the Big Bang then insued in its surface. Energy and time were
created.
Mitch Raemsch
Magnetic
> Perhaps you should see a doctor for your paranoid schitzophrenia.
Perhaps CERN physicists should see a doctor for their paranoid
schitzophrenia.
--------------
Magnetic
collisions of protons with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton (7 TeV per
collision).
I give about 50% that the dangerous microscopic object will be
created. It will grow, ruining the ordinary matter, and can ruin our
planet or a part of it.
Here is my crude estimation of probable outcomes:
1. Explosion of the whole Earth – 49%.
2. Extermination of Geneva – 1%.
3. Extermination of Europe – 1%.
4. Other harmful unpredictable consequences – 5%.
5. Discovery of new subnuclear energy sources – 5%.
6. Outcomes with no harm and no use – the rest.
At the point 1 we all will die.
At the points 2, 3, 4 a part of humanity will be killed. Destruction
of a part of the Earth will be followed by huge Earthquake all over
the Earth. To raise the probability of survival it is necessary to be
at the free air with the stalk of water, food and warm clothes.
The most probable microscopic dangerous objects are:
1. Microscopic magnetic hole.
2. Growing nucleus, consisting from strange nucleons and/or neutrons
(uds, uss, udd).
3. Microscopic black hole.
According to ideas of Kaluza, Klein and Einstein about additional
short spatial dimension and unification of gravitational and
electromagnetic forces, we can conclude that black holes, at least at
microscopic levels, can be reduced to objects of the first or the
second types. That means that microscopic black hole is in fact a
condensate, consisting from bosons, as magnetic hole, or from
fermions, as strange matter. Condensates have a binding energy per
their constituent elements. This changes the argumentation about
survival and penetrating abilities of black holes, created in cosmic
and collider proton-proton collisions...
--------
My health is already ruined by depression. I know that we all can be
killed. I can not save myself, my family, my land. Criminal stupidity
of corrupted contemporary science had won.
Inertial
"Magnetic" <magnet...@yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:16814ab4-aa1f-4aca...@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
> Tomorrow, despite to our protests, CERN plans to perform the first
> collisions of protons with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton (7 TeV per
> collision).
Hooray .. sanity prevailed
> I give about 50% that the dangerous microscopic object will be
> created.
So far you've been wrong on your predictions.
> It will grow, ruining the ordinary matter, and can ruin our
> planet or a part of it.
Nope
> Here is my crude estimation of probable outcomes:
> 1. Explosion of the whole Earth – 49%.
So .. every time they turn it on there is a 49% change that the earth is
destroyed. So .. almost certain after (say) 10 or 100 runs.
> 2. Extermination of Geneva – 1%.
> 3. Extermination of Europe – 1%.
> 4. Other harmful unpredictable consequences – 5%.
> 5. Discovery of new subnuclear energy sources – 5%.
> 6. Outcomes with no harm and no use – the rest.
Number 6 will be the outcome, of course
> At the point 1 we all will die.
> At the points 2, 3, 4 a part of humanity will be killed. Destruction
> of a part of the Earth will be followed by huge Earthquake all over
> the Earth. To raise the probability of survival it is necessary to be
> at the free air with the stalk of water, food and warm clothes.
And, of course, the actual outcome will be that noone is killed
> The most probable microscopic dangerous objects are:
> 1. Microscopic magnetic hole.
> 2. Growing nucleus, consisting from strange nucleons and/or neutrons
> (uds, uss, udd).
> 3. Microscopic black hole.
>
> According to ideas of Kaluza, Klein and Einstein about additional
> short spatial dimension and unification of gravitational and
> electromagnetic forces, we can conclude that black holes, at least at
> microscopic levels, can be reduced to objects of the first or the
> second types. That means that microscopic black hole is in fact a
> condensate, consisting from bosons, as magnetic hole, or from
> fermions, as strange matter. Condensates have a binding energy per
> their constituent elements. This changes the argumentation about
> survival and penetrating abilities of black holes, created in cosmic
> and collider proton-proton collisions...
>
> --------
>
> My health is already ruined by depression.
That's your problem. get psychological help
> I know that we all can be
> killed. I can not save myself, my family, my land. Criminal stupidity
> of corrupted contemporary science had won.
The only criminally stupid is you. Get help !!
Uncle Al
>
> Tomorrow, despite to our protests, CERN plans to perform the first
> collisions of protons with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton (7 TeV per
> collision).
> I give about 50% that the dangerous microscopic object will be
> created. It will grow, ruining the ordinary matter, and can ruin our
> planet or a part of it.
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/104
<http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100304/full/news.2010.108.html>
http://arxiv/abs/1003.2030
<http://www.jlab.org/news/releases/2006/hypernuclei.html>
John Christiansen
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4BB0C8DF...@hate.spam.net...
Not even a billion collisions would create enough energy to heat 1 liter of
water by 1°K. Magnetic has obviously no idea how little 1 TeV is.
Eric Gisin
Tinfoil Condition Red! LHC 7 TeV mega-blasts tomorrow
'Dr Dark Energy': Only 49% chance of Earth exploding
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/29/7_tev_lhc_forerunner/
J. Clarke
That last sentence has five more words than it needs.
Magnetic
> On 3/29/2010 4:23 PM, John Christiansen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
========
+++++++++++++++
6 700 000 000 ++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++
eric gisse
So when nothing happens, what will you do?
Richard Tobin
Magnetic <magnet...@yandex.ua> wrote:
>Tomorrow, despite to our protests, CERN plans to perform the first
>collisions of protons with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton (7 TeV per
>collision).
We're still heNO CARRIER
Magnetic
TeV per collision were performed.
If a dangerous microscopic condensates (magnetic holes, strangelets or
black holes) were already created then, according to the time of its
growth, which is equal from 1000 seconds to 1000 days, we can suppose
that the most probable days of “our start into cosmos” are from 30-th
of March to the 1-st of April.
Uncle Al
>
> Crime had happened. Collisions with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton or 7
> TeV per collision were performed.
The world ended! WE'RE ALL DOOMED as soon as the paperwork passes
through.
idiot