Questions part II -- Deep questions on negative mass
wschl...@gmail.com
understand it, electrons that are more massive (muons) bind closer to
the proton because the bohr radius depends on mass. Now if a collision
were ULTRA-ULTRA energetic, is it possible the resulting ultra-heavy
electron could be so close to the proton that the electric binding
energy, which is negative, could exceed the atom's total rest energy?
This would mean hydrogen atoms with ultra-heavy electrons might
actually weigh less at a certain point than atoms with lighter
electrons.
Who is to say then that the electrons, when "in an atom" actually
retain their full weight? Maybe they weigh less because of the negative
electrical binding energy and, at a certain cretical mass, maybe the
electron's mass reaches zero? That is, the electrical binding energy
when the rest energy reaches a certain point, might be so negative
that, when you add the rest energy you actually get zero.
So I have a dispute about what actually happens when an electron and a
positron annihilate. I have determined that the rest energy is always 2
M_e C^2. Now electric binding energy is NEGATIVE and becomes MORE AND
MORE NEGATIVE as the electron and positron get closer and clsoer
together.
Most people believe the particles race towards eachother but never
reach the speed of light until a discrete step where they suddenly
ANNIHILATE.
I do not believe there is any such thing as SUDDEN! I am a firm
believer in Gravity as more fundamental than QED. So I believe the
annihilation is GRADUAL.
If I am right, then we can see that as the particles accelerate toward
eachother, the TOTAL ENERGY actually is decreasing since the rest
energy is added by the binding energy which approaches negative
infinity.
Normally we say, an electron can't accelerate to the speed of light and
furthermore we say, acceleration produces radiation. But in this case
it happens so fast something magical happens. The electron actually CAN
reach the speed of light if you treat it as a wave with decreasing
mass! IF you define "mass" as rest energy + binding energy (or is it
1/2?), then mass DECREASES relative to our time prespective.
Certainly relative to the particles, the annihilation takes finite
time. This is supposed to be impossible since as you reach the speed of
light, mass is supposed to increase. The fact that light-speed can
actually be reached (at which point 1 dimension of space is actually
lost and rest energy too) is because NEGATIVE ENERGY IS AT WORK HERE.
What is happening is as the particles approach, BINDING ENERGY WHICH IS
NEGATIVE INCREASES thus counteracting the otherwise ever-increasing
kinetic energy.
At a critical point, the rest energy is OVERWHELMED by (negative)
BINDING ENERGY. At this point light speed is actually REACHED and
according to QED this is an EVENT -- from a wave perspective the rest
energy has dropped from a discrete positive value to zero. A 3-D space
distribution becomes only 2-D.
The remaining kinetic energy appears as photon energy.
If this is possible, perhaps it is reversable -- light waves can
produce electron matter waves. If the light is squeezed matter, can
"squeezed electrons" then be produced? Can standing waves be produced
so the energy oscillates, sometimes being negative?
Perhaps the key to talking to other worlds is negative matter. My
theory was that maybe I CAN produce a negative mass GOLD atom and a
positive mass GOLD atom. Maybe the negative mass gold atom must however
COMBINE with a positive mass gold atom in a parallel universe.
Now how does this new theory affect TIME? Time is supposed to SLOW DOWN
as you speed up but not if negative energy is at work! What is the true
nature of time? Perhaps reassesing the annihilation of an electron and
positron would reveal some suprises.
*** Finally what if a particle accelerator really can create
negative-mass hydrogen by using ultra-duper-duper-heavy electron
particles. How does this affect entropy? My theory was that by charging
the stuff you could do some pretty nifty stuff, a football-sized ship
could reduce its mass to a feather and the buouyancy would propell it
up, possibly even extracting energy from the environment as a kind of
potential (not kinetic) engine if undersea. Not particularly cheaper
than a hydroelectric dam but with all the energy maybe you can
synthesize a new ship from the CO2 and H2O in the ocean.
---
But since TIME is related to gravity and the electron before
annihilation has rest energy and afterwords there are 2 photons with no
rest energy, who are we to say the electron and positron "annihilated"
eachother gradually as described above?
I actually believe QED is wrong! It's an approximation for very large
time scales and at ultra-small time scales, too small presently to be
observed, perhaps superstring theory really comes into play! Perhaps at
small TIME scales the extra dimensions are important even for large
space scales! VERY energetic particles might just be the key to
unlocking extra dimensions IF ultra-fast switches could be made to
detect at ultra-high time resolutions but not small space resolutions.
---
I really do not buy the theory that there are ultimate limits as to the
speed of computers -- given the heat produced there is a limit to the
switch speed. But this assumes a new field, Reality Engineering, is
impossible. Perhaps we can actually engineer realities by restricting
the possibilities that are self-consistant or self-regenerating. I
really believe that understanding the 10^-10000000000 time scale is
important because maybe "by unlikely chance" things happen that
actually LEAD to the observed behavior at QED scales.
Maybe particles don't even exist! Maybe you are just using too large a
time scale, because of a mistaken theory about the maximum switch speed
and thus detection instruments.
Now if string theory is right and parallel universes exist and can
manipulate eachother, maybe a microscopic dot the size of a salt grain
can TALK with other such grains in parallel universes, resulting in a
quantum computer that can actually simulate reality IN REAL TIME.
Maybe these new computers can exist outside of space-time, e.g. maybe I
can go off on a Quantum ACID TRIP. To understand this theory, suppose
our quantum computer takes 10,000,000 years to compute 1 second of
reality, and our universe ENDS. Since it has ended there is no reason
its particles can't be recreated (teleportation from one universe to
another).
Then suppose a new universe is created that is identical up to the
point where our quantum computer is created, but 1 bit is different, a
kind of quantum fork(). The result of a Very Long computation then
appears as NOISE that influences our random numbers -- an eery ghost,
the qubits teleported from another computation.
This theory assumes there not only are parallel universes but our
universe is periodic like a light wave. I believe there is negative
mass and the total mass of the set of all universes is zero. Therefore,
I believe there is NO NET ENTROPY for the entire system of universes.
Certainly a Highly Deceptive and Convincing Subset (our alleged
reality) has positive and CHANGING entropy but for every change here
maybe a parallel world counters it, or duplicates it with negative
mass, or maybe time goes backwords in other worlds.
IF there is no net mass (because we now allow negative mass) perhaps
all these universes really are just a perspective or subset of
EVERYTHING. Maybe there are no real changes in reality.
In that case, who is to say a computer can't be made that runs
10^1000000000000 instructions per second? Maybe it is all about
perspective, or "tapping in-to everything>'
Certainly there is NO WORK being performed by a computer that simulates
several realities since it is truly reversable. So who is to say there
is a "theoretical maximum switch speed" given the heat output....
especially since it may be possible to talk with parallel worlds, use
negative matter electrons to cool it, etc?
If an ultrafast computer is REVERSABLE and I assume all the garbauge
bits are in a parallel universe -- like by chance a vortex lifts a pile
of leaves in this universe and the universe next dore lifts
negative-mass leaves or does something to ballance it out -- than who
is to say a computer can't be made?
Maybe by chance a 1GHz Pentium might run at 10^100000000 instructions
but we mistake it for noise. Maybe if such a fast computer were
available for the ceration of new instruments, maybe the extra
dimensions would be revealed in noise?
So my theory is that perhaps reality is really just a simple fractal,
in a new kind of language or with a new kind of math for reversable
computers in many worlds, that has not yet been discovered. Maybe we
can DEDUCE the extra dimensions of string theory as mathematical nesity.
Autymn D. C.
backwords -> backwards
reversable -> reversible
dore -> door
ballance -> balance
Negative potential/mechanic energy is a sloppy treatment of a
mathematic property; the negative is a vector (pseudoscalar) and not a
scalar:
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/2d04...>.
(Use Google for the old links.)
Instantons are round.
To tap greater dimensions, one needs a skeleton key with the slihtest
and heaviest teeth. The accelerators need to make matter with the
/littlest/ mass first, not /greatest/. Look up my "gimme money" thread
on sci.physics. In the meantime, browse
http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/.
-Aut