Squarks, Selectrons, Photinos, Gluinos, Neutralino
cinquirer
working to upgrade the Standard Model to explain more facts in nature.
These supersymmetric particles are superheavy... heavier than matter,
yet they are somehow shielded from us so we can't sense them. Their
choice of words sounds like voodoo magic, isn't it. Or more complex
than voodoo. With Qi, at least the shadow partner of matter has no
mass and can be felt and manipulated. This is how biochemistry may be
altered by Qi emissions from the hands (by altering the shadow
supersymmetric Qions of the normal particles of the cells and
the biochemistry and their behavior). How about those squarks,
selectrons, etc. What is the implication if they would be found. Are
they static or dynamic. If they are the latter, don't they play some
roles in the health of biological systems. etc. especially if they
have nonlocal properties.
http://physicsweb.org/article/news/3/8/9
"The quarks and electrons, which are fermions, should have bosonic
equivalents called squarks and selectrons, while photons and gluons,
which are bosons, should have fermionic equivalents called photinos
and gluinos." Current research suggests that these particles are
superheavy and hence only new accelerators, such as the powerful Large
Hadron Collider at CERN - which is due to come on-line in 2005 - are
likely to see them. Supersymmetry is also used in nuclear and solid
state physics."
Bjoern Feuerbacher
>
> According to the Supersymmetry Standard Model that many physicists are
> working to upgrade the Standard Model to explain more facts in nature.
> These supersymmetric particles are superheavy... heavier than matter,
> yet they are somehow shielded from us so we can't sense them.
No "shielding" needed. The standard explanation I know is that most
supersymmetric particles simply decay only the lightest type is left -
and this lightest type is supposed to be neutral (so-called
"neutralino"). And neutral particles obviously can't be detected with
standard detectors.
> Their
> choice of words sounds like voodoo magic, isn't it.
Well, if one reads only pop science and doesn't understand the math
behind it...
> Or more complex
> than voodoo. With Qi, at least the shadow partner of matter has no
> mass and can be felt and manipulated.
Evidence for this, please.
> This is how biochemistry may be
> altered by Qi emissions from the hands (by altering the shadow
> supersymmetric Qions of the normal particles of the cells and
> the biochemistry and their behavior).
Evidence for this, please.
And what are "shadow supersymmetric Qions"?
> How about those squarks,
> selectrons, etc. What is the implication if they would be found.
That supersymmetry is correct?
> Are they static or dynamic.
What do you mean by these words here?
> If they are the latter, don't they play some
> roles in the health of biological systems. etc.
Probably not.
1) They decay very fast.
2) They don't interact with normal matter.
> especially if they
> have nonlocal properties.
*All* particles can have non-local properties. Why concentrate on the
supersymmetric partners?
> http://physicsweb.org/article/news/3/8/9
This article is talking about a different type of supersymmetry, as far
as I can see.
> "The quarks and electrons, which are fermions, should have bosonic
> equivalents called squarks and selectrons, while photons and gluons,
> which are bosons, should have fermionic equivalents called photinos
> and gluinos." Current research suggests that these particles are
> superheavy and hence only new accelerators, such as the powerful Large
> Hadron Collider at CERN - which is due to come on-line in 2005 - are
> likely to see them. Supersymmetry is also used in nuclear and solid
> state physics."
Yes - the *concept* of supersymmetry is also used there. But
nevertheless, it's a totally different theory!
Bye,
Bjoern