tomorrow night the magnetic field of growing magnetic hole will push us all to the equator of the Earth in a single high ocean wave.
Magnetic
collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density.
Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will
contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out
within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic
magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of
magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one
day.
This means that tomorrow night the magnetic field of growing magnetic
hole will push us all to the equator of the Earth in a single high
ocean wave. From there we will start into space, being mixed with mud
and with all the water of the whole planet.
This frog levitates (hanging in the air) in a magnetic field with
induction of 16 teslas, because of the diamagnetism of water, and, as
you know, living beings are composed mainly of water.
The magnetic field will accelerate us so that we will overtake
Voyagers. Around us the water will turn into frozen dirty foam of very
low density. The solar wind will give these new formed comets a
further acceleration. An hour later the comets will be hit by wreckage
of the crust of exploded Earth and by a powerful gamma radiation.
After a few years (thousands of years) we will be overtaken by the
shock wave from exploded Sun. Well, after a millions of years, we
could reach to the closest star systems to sow where our viruses, DNA
and the seeds of poplars, daisies, etc.
Cwatters
"Magnetic" <magnet...@yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:da306b6c-c0fd-4b32...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a
> collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density.
> Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will
> contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out
So at least a 90% chance it won't happen.
eric gisse
[snip paranoid schitzophrenic babble]
As the dozen times before, I once again ask you: Once nothing happens, what
will you do?
Aleph
b915-6f8...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Magnetic sat down and wrote
the following words of wisdom:
> December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight,
By "about midnight" do you mean 8 Dec, 9 Dec or 10 Dec?
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored.
Uncle Al
>
> December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a
> collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density.
> Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will
> contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out
> within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic
> magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of
> magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one
> day.
1) Read "Venus im Pelz" by Austrian author Leopold von
Sacher-Masoch to gain insights into your personal problem.
2) When nothing untoward occurs in CERN and your perverse personal
belief system implodes, what will you do - commit suicide, discover
sanity, embrace Christ as your excuse?
3) idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
BradGuth
> December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a
> collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density.
> Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will
> contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out
> within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic
> magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of
> magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one
> day.
>
> This means that tomorrow night the magnetic field of growing magnetic
> hole will push us all to the equator of the Earth in a single high
> ocean wave. From there we will start into space, being mixed with mud
> and with all the water of the whole planet.
>
>
> This frog levitates (hanging in the air) in a magnetic field with
> induction of 16 teslas, because of the diamagnetism of water, and, as
> you know, living beings are composed mainly of water.
>
> The magnetic field will accelerate us so that we will overtake
> Voyagers. Around us the water will turn into frozen dirty foam of very
> low density. The solar wind will give these new formed comets a
> further acceleration. An hour later the comets will be hit by wreckage
> of the crust of exploded Earth and by a powerful gamma radiation.
> After a few years (thousands of years) we will be overtaken by the
> shock wave from exploded Sun. Well, after a millions of years, we
> could reach to the closest star systems to sow where our viruses, DNA
> and the seeds of poplars, daisies, etc.
>
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
Perhaps this is what an LHC “magnetic trap” or wormhole vortex looks
like. Oddly, it seems that posting this kind of information has also
affected my Google Groups (Usenet/newsgroup) performance, at times
dragging it down to its knees. How many Usenet/newsgroup servers are
affected?
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/12/09/what-was-the-norway-spiral/
“Now they have done it, they fired up the LHC and created the black
hole.”
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/12/09/weird-giant-spiral-seen-in-sky-over-norway/
Apparently, this is not a Photoshopped image, as there are several
more just like it, taken from various locations. This morning in
northern Norway, people saw a strange light in the sky which shocked
residents and so far, the phenomenon has yet to be explained. This
picture was taken from a pier, looking to the east, approximately at
07.50 am local time. "I can imagine that it went on for two, three
minutes," said the photographer Jan Petter Jørgensen. "It was
unbelievable. I was quite shaken when I saw it."
“I also received a report today from a geophysicist in Papua,
Indonesia who observed "an enormous flare (bolide?) visible here at
Tomage (2°39'27"S 132°59'27"E), and the sighting was at a bearing
approximately 165 (East of South) and the flare seemed to begin at
about 30 degrees above the horizon." Paul Anderson said the date and
time of the flare was approximately 2009.12.09 12:39 UTC”
You recently suggested nuking our spendy LHC, which isn’t entirely
unacceptable, although even a relatively small tactical nuke should
damage enough LHC helium cooling to force an extended shut-down.
~ BG
BradGuth
> Magnetic wrote:
>
> > December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a
> > collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density.
> > Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will
> > contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out
> > within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic
> > magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of
> > magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one
> > day.
>
> [snip crap]
>
> 1) Read "Venus im Pelz" by Austrian author Leopold von
> Sacher-Masoch to gain insights into your personal problem.
>
> 2) When nothing untoward occurs in CERN and your perverse personal
> belief system implodes, what will you do - commit suicide, discover
> sanity, embrace Christ as your excuse?
>
> 3) idiot
>
> --
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Your perpetual anti-doom and anti-gloom is noted. (ends always
justifies means)
Perhaps this is what an LHC “magnetic trap” or wormhole vortex looks
like. Oddly, it seems that posting this kind of information has also
affected my Google Groups (Usenet/newsgroup) performance, at times
dragging it down to its knees. How many Usenet/newsgroup servers are
affected?
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/12/09/what-was-the-norway-spiral/
“Now they have done it, they fired up the LHC and created the black
hole.”
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/12/09/weird-giant-spiral-seen-in-sky-over-norway/
Apparently, this is not a Photoshopped image, as there are several
more just like it, taken from various locations. This morning in
northern Norway, people saw a strange light in the sky which shocked
residents and so far, the phenomenon has yet to be explained. This
picture was taken from a pier, looking to the east, approximately at
07.50 am local time. "I can imagine that it went on for two, three
minutes," said the photographer Jan Petter Jørgensen. "It was
unbelievable. I was quite shaken when I saw it."
“I also received a report today from a geophysicist in Papua,
Indonesia who observed "an enormous flare (bolide?) visible here at
Tomage (2°39'27"S 132°59'27"E), and the sighting was at a bearing
approximately 165 (East of South) and the flare seemed to begin at
about 30 degrees above the horizon." Paul Anderson said the date and
time of the flare was approximately 2009.12.09 12:39 UTC”
~ BG
Nightcrawler
"Magnetic" <magnet...@yandex.ua> wrote in message news:da306b6c-c0fd-4b32...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a
<garbage snipped>
Maybe a stray beam will cut your head in half.
Headline: "CERN collider exposes vacuum in living being, news at 11."
dlzc
> December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight,
... and Nature continues to mock your incompetence and ignorance.
Chicken Little will proceed to redefine his energy threshold, then
pick the next biggest collider to pick on, until he dies of old age.
And he will continue to pollute the newsgroups with his dire
predictions based only on his ignorance. Is that about right,
"Magnetic"?
In the meantime, we will get ever closer to getting our butts off the
planet and into space, because we can't seem to control population,
and there are some really cool things in space we *need* to see.
David A. Smith
Halmyre
<colin.wattersNOS...@TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote:
> "Magnetic" <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote in message
I'm guessing the actuality will be higher, more like, oh, let's say...
100%.
Followed by 100% probability that the OP will come out with more
codswallop of this sort.
--
Halmyre
Magnetic
Several eV - chemical bomb;
Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
Several TeV - hyper bomb.
Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of
matter.
Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of
matter.
Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a
field.
dlzc
Chicken Little speaks again from the equator, where his fantasy
physics was pushed "tomorrow night". See how he cleverly moves the
deadline and threshold?
PD
No, not so cleverly. Rather transparently and stupidly. But he has no
option, does he?
Uncle Al
>
> Particle's collision energies and bombs:
>
> Several eV - chemical bomb;
> Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
> Several TeV - hyper bomb.
Already an idiot. Hey stooopid - what comes after TeV? Look it up.
--
Uncle Al
Javi
> Particle's collision energies and bombs:
>
> Several eV - chemical bomb;
> Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
> Several TeV - hyper bomb.
>
For your knowledge:
1eV=1.602e-19 joules
1MeV=1.602e-13 joules
1GeV=1.602e-10 joules
1TeV=1.602e-7 joules
Amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of 1g of water at 15ï¿œC
=1cal=4.19 joules=2.62e7 TeV.
Now a question. How much water can you heat with 1TeV?
> Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of
> matter.
Actually, ANY chemical REACTION is accompanied by a change of chemical
structure (by definition). You don't need a bomb.
> Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of
> matter.
ANY, nuclear REACTION, is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure
(again, by definition). Again, you don't need a bomb, you are somwhat
radiactive, so...
> Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a
> field.
That's simply bullshit. It doesn't even make sense.
>
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html
Magnetic
> Magnetic wrote:
> > Particle's collision energies and bombs:
>
> > Several eV - chemical bomb;
> > Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
> > Several TeV - hyper bomb.
>
> For your knowledge:
>
> 1eV=1.602e-19 joules
> 1MeV=1.602e-13 joules
> 1GeV=1.602e-10 joules
> 1TeV=1.602e-7 joules
>
> =1cal=4.19 joules=2.62e7 TeV.
>
> Now a question. How much water can you heat with 1TeV?
>
> > Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of
> > matter.
>
> Actually, ANY chemical REACTION is accompanied by a change of chemical
> structure (by definition). You don't need a bomb.
>
> > Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of
> > matter.
>
> ANY, nuclear REACTION, is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure
> (again, by definition). Again, you don't need a bomb, you are somwhat
> radiactive, so...
>
> > Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a
> > field.
>
> That's simply bullshit. It doesn't even make sense.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
At nuclear explosion only a small fraction of mc^2 of explosive matter
transforms into heat.
At collaptical explosion (1/3 - 1) of mc^2 of explosive matter
transforms into heat.
Astronomers can see collaptical explosions of stars.
Today CERN plan to work at energies 1.18 TeV per protons.
I give 80-90% that CERN will kill not us during this weekend.
You can rise up a little this probability if you make something to
stop the global suicide.
eric gisse
[...]
> Today CERN plan to work at energies 1.18 TeV per protons.
> I give 80-90% that CERN will kill not us during this weekend.
>
> You can rise up a little this probability if you make something to
> stop the global suicide.
>
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html
Under what conditions will you admit to being wrong?
Magnetic
> > Today CERN plan to work at energies 1.18 TeV per protons.
> > I give 80-90% that CERN will kill not us during this weekend.
> > You can rise up a little this probability if you make something to
> > stop the global suicide.
> Under what conditions will you admit to being wrong?
I see that I am not wrong. If I was wrong physicists would show me on
errors, but they are able only to speak about my biography and
character.
Where is your formula?
Read more at
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/index.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html in Russian.
Calculation of magnetic hole (two independent approaches)
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtrru.html in Russian.
Additional proving arguments
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argru.html in Russian.
Crude errors in the LHC safety documents
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezru.html in Russian.
Letters to Prosecutor’s Office of Russia
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/proceng.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/proceq.html in Russian.
LHC and Reproduction of Biospheres
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilru.html in Russian.
Russian language pages are more informative.
Best regards, Ivan Gorelik.
eric gisse
>
>> > Today CERN plan to work at energies 1.18 TeV per protons.
>> > I give 80-90% that CERN will kill not us during this weekend.
>
>> > You can rise up a little this probability if you make something to
>> > stop the global suicide.
>
>> Under what conditions will you admit to being wrong?
>
> I see that I am not wrong. If I was wrong physicists would show me on
> errors, but they are able only to speak about my biography and
> character.
> Where is your formula?
You are ignored because you are a lunatic.
Again, under what conditions will you admit to being wrong?
[snip rest of shit I won't even look at]
Javi
> On Dec 12, 2:10 am, Javi <vze13y...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> Magnetic wrote:
>> > Particle's collision energies and bombs:
>>
>> > Several eV - chemical bomb;
>> > Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
>> > Several TeV - hyper bomb.
>>
>> For your knowledge:
>>
>> 1eV=1.602e-19 joules
>> 1MeV=1.602e-13 joules
>> 1GeV=1.602e-10 joules
>> 1TeV=1.602e-7 joules
>>
>> Amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of 1g of water at 15ï¿œC
>> =1cal=4.19 joules=2.62e7 TeV.
>>
>> Now a question. How much water can you heat with 1TeV?
>>
>> > Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of
>> > matter.
>>
>> Actually, ANY chemical REACTION is accompanied by a change of chemical
>> structure (by definition). You don't need a bomb.
>>
>> > Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of
>> > matter.
>>
>> ANY, nuclear REACTION, is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure
>> (again, by definition). Again, you don't need a bomb, you are somwhat
>> radiactive, so...
>>
>> > Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a
>> > field.
>>
>> That's simply bullshit. It doesn't even make sense.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> At nuclear explosion only a small fraction of mc^2 of explosive matter
> transforms into heat.
> At collaptical explosion (1/3 - 1) of mc^2 of explosive matter
> transforms into heat.
First, there is no such "explosive matter", there is matter and nothing
else. At most, you can talk about explosive substances.
Second, it's true that only a small part of matter transform into heat (and
radiation). But a small part of an atomic bomb means many times the number
of Avogadro (6.2e23 atoms/mol). You wouldn't be able to heat a cup of tea
with the energy released in a collision at the LHC.
>
> Astronomers can see collaptical explosions of stars.
>
And what's the mass of a star? That's stupid.
> Today CERN plan to work at energies 1.18 TeV per protons.
> I give 80-90% that CERN will kill not us during this weekend.
>
> You can rise up a little this probability if you make something to
> stop the global suicide.
The probability is already 100%, please, go to a psychiatrist. You need it,
seriously.
Magnetic
> Magnetic wrote:
> > On Dec 12, 2:10 am, Javi <vze13y...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> Magnetic wrote:
> >> > Particle's collision energies and bombs:
>
> >> > Several eV - chemical bomb;
> >> > Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
> >> > Several TeV - hyper bomb.
>
> >> For your knowledge:
>
> >> 1eV=1.602e-19 joules
> >> 1MeV=1.602e-13 joules
> >> 1GeV=1.602e-10 joules
> >> 1TeV=1.602e-7 joules
>
> >> =1cal=4.19 joules=2.62e7 TeV.
>
> >> Now a question. How much water can you heat with 1TeV?
>
> >> > Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of
> >> > matter.
>
> >> Actually, ANY chemical REACTION is accompanied by a change of chemical
> >> structure (by definition). You don't need a bomb.
>
> >> > Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of
> >> > matter.
>
> >> ANY, nuclear REACTION, is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure
> >> (again, by definition). Again, you don't need a bomb, you are somwhat
> >> radiactive, so...
>
> >> > Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a
> >> > field.
>
> >> That's simply bullshit. It doesn't even make sense.
>
> >> >http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html
> > At nuclear explosion only a small fraction of mc^2 of explosive matter
> > transforms into heat.
> > At collaptical explosion (1/3 - 1) of mc^2 of explosive matter
> > transforms into heat.
> First, there is no such "explosive matter", there is matter and nothing
> else. At most, you can talk about explosive substances.
> Second, it's true that only a small part of matter transform into heat (and
> radiation). But a small part of an atomic bomb means many times the number
> of Avogadro (6.2e23 atoms/mol). You wouldn't be able to heat a cup of tea
> with the energy released in a collision at the LHC.
> > Astronomers can see collaptical explosions of stars.
> And what's the mass of a star? That's stupid.
Idiot!
Do you know the fraction of energy released at the time of gravity
collapse?
Is it smaller or bigger as at the time of nuclear explosion?
My answer:
At the time of magnetic collapse 1/3 of mc^2 is released as heat; 2/3
of mc^2 transforms into magnetic field of magnetic hole.
Then, at mh’s and bh’s radii equality, the rapid gravity collapse
occur. Gravity funnel becomes thinner. Collapse ends by gamma rays
burst and flattening the space, without any black hole formed. The
energy of gamma burst can be about 2/3 of mc^2 of exploded star.
Read more at
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/index.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html in Russian.
Calculation of magnetic hole (two independent approaches)
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtrru.html in Russian.
Additional proving arguments
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argru.html in Russian.
Crude errors in the LHC safety documents
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezru.html in Russian.
Letters to Prosecutor’s Office of Russia
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/proceng.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/proceq.html in Russian.
LHC and Reproduction of Biospheres
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html in English,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilru.html in Russian.
Russian language pages are more informative.
Best regards, Ivan Gorelik.
----------
Bigbangers are ready to put all of us into those comets.
Put bigbangers into prison, if you want to live.
Here is not complete list of your potential killers:
2003 J.-P. Blaizot, J. Iliopoulos, J. Madsen, G.G. Ross, P.
Sonderegger, H.-J. Specht.
2008 John Ellis, Gian Giudice, Michelangelo Mangano, Igor Tkachev,
and
Urs Wiedemann.
And of course, Rolf Heuer, director of CERN, who neglects the opinion
of physicists, saying about dangers of LHC.
The crudest error, made by them, is equating of the consequences of
collider collisions with cosmo-atmospheric collisions. To see the
difference between these consequences look my model with two 10-kg
bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to
cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC
collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.
Astronomers, show me, please, black holes.
No?
But, I can to show you the picturesque magnetic hole.
Here it is: [img]http://darkenergy.narod.ru/sn1987.jpg[/img]
Magnetic holes explain us the cause of several astronomical pulses:
gamma-bursts, huge radio jets, the annihilation lines of electron-
positron pairs, huge velocities of remnants of cosmic catastrophes,
the absence of civilizations which are older, than those, who can
build powerful colliders.
Several days ago an article was published, - gamma rays bursts are
bourn in strong magnetic fields. That is one more proving argument of
magnetic holes.
Javi
> On Dec 13, 4:12 am, Javi <vze13y...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> Magnetic wrote:
>> > On Dec 12, 2:10 am, Javi <vze13y...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >> Magnetic wrote:
>> >> > Particle's collision energies and bombs:
>>
>> >> > Several eV - chemical bomb;
>> >> > Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
>> >> > Several TeV - hyper bomb.
>>
>> >> For your knowledge:
>>
>> >> 1eV=1.602e-19 joules
>> >> 1MeV=1.602e-13 joules
>> >> 1GeV=1.602e-10 joules
>> >> 1TeV=1.602e-7 joules
>>
>> >> Amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of 1g of water at
>> >> 15ï¿œC =1cal=4.19 joules=2.62e7 TeV.
How much energy is a fraction of a small amount of energy, whiz?
>
> My answer:
> At the time of magnetic collapse 1/3 of mc^2 is released as heat; 2/3
> of mc^2 transforms into magnetic field of magnetic hole.
> Then, at mh?s and bh?s radii equality, the rapid gravity collapse
> occur. Gravity funnel becomes thinner. Collapse ends by gamma rays
> burst and flattening the space, without any black hole formed. The
> energy of gamma burst can be about 2/3 of mc^2 of exploded star.
Weren't you talking about gravity collapse? Now it is magnetic collapse?
Where have you got all that bullshit? Do you give those data because God
revealed them to you or do you have some model better than those developed
by thousands of physicists?
Now a serious question. Please answer it. You are pretending being so idiot,
don't you? Because I'm sure that people half as idiot as you seem don't know
how to breath and die.
>
>
> Read more at
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/index.html in English,
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html in Russian.
>
> Calculation of magnetic hole (two independent approaches)
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html in English,
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtrru.html in Russian.
>
> Additional proving arguments
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html in English,
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argru.html in Russian.
>
> Crude errors in the LHC safety documents
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html in English,
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezru.html in Russian.
>
> Letters to Prosecutor?s Office of Russia
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/proceng.html in English,
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/proceq.html in Russian.
>
> LHC and Reproduction of Biospheres
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html in English,
> http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilru.html in Russian.
>
> Russian language pages are more informative.
> Best regards, Ivan Gorelik.
Do you seriously think that somebody is going to waste his time reading that
amount of shit. Well, maybe a psychiatrist. You would be a very interesting
patient.