Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

REPOST - Nature, International Weekly Journal of 'Science' no better than a rag

0 views
Skip to first unread message

kiloVolts

unread,
Aug 5, 2008, 4:44:36 PM8/5/08
to
Apr 29 2005, 4:47 pm

> Compare:
>
> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/full/nature03575.html
>
> Nature 434, 1115-1117 (28 April 2005) | doi: 10.1038/nature03575
>
> Observation of nuclear fusion driven by a pyroelectric crystal
> B. Naranjo1, J.K. Gimzewski2,3 and S. Putterman1,3
>
> with
>
> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97331997000400014&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
>
> Braz. J. Phys. vol.27 n.4 São Paulo Dec. 1997
>
> Catalitically Induced D-D Fusion in Ferroelectrics
>
> V.D. Dougar Jabon1, G.V. Fedorovich2 and N.V. Samsonenko3
> 1Escuela de Fisica, Universidad Industrial de Santander,
> Bucaramanga, A.A.678, Colombia
> 2Theoretical Problem Department, Russian Academy of Sciences,
> Moscow, 121002, Russia
> 3Department of Theoretical Physics, Russian Friendship University,
> Moscow, 117198, Russia
>
> Read the papers and compare. Nature actively encourages and permits
> plagiarism and other crimes of academic dishonesty.
>
> Nature, Science magazine, Scientific American and other so called
> "high impact" publications are no better than disreputable rags.
> National Enquirer is better quality.

0 new messages