cold fusion news and more
Autymn D. C.
"Transmutation, The Alchemist Dream Come True" (24 Oct 2007):
http://i-sis.org.uk/alchemistsDream.php
corrections:
beam fusion: formid cells (plasma)
hot fusion: id cells (A year or two ago I discoverd the state of
matter between vapor and plasma/formor--that is, a gas whose mekanic
energy is greater than 0 and would flee its container, whereas a
normal gas/vapor is bound by a tank or planet.)
warm fusion: vapid cells
mild fusion: liquid-vapid cells (room temperature)
cool fusion: liquid cells (LTNR, HPLT)
cold fusion: solid cells (HPLT: http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+fusing)
weld fusion: captid cells (degenerate condensed matter)
(Now, don't say "cells" as "sèlls". I went mead in my greatness and
will go on killing sprees if the world doesn't stop benan utterly
retarded illiterate ineducate trash. By the way, in Latinago, "te"
would be our "th" rather than their "t'e".)
Rotative Reactor (2 pages; Hint: Eric Gisse is a fucken retard who
can't read.): http://hecoaustralia.fortunecity.com/rotative/reactor2.htm
Above is a gassy diffusive separator as a better neutronic mirror;
calculations are on the twoth page. Wouldn't beryllium deuteride be
even better than heavy watter?
Wired 6.11: "What If Cold Fusion Is Real?" (Nov 1998, 11 pages):
http://wired.com/wired/archive/6.11/coldfusion.html
my other posts:
why English is better than muttish: http://google.com/groups?q=foretold-special-relativity
why there are three "generations" of quarks: http://google.com/groups?q=supergenium
how there are no black holes or other scientific myths:
http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+fast-food
how to make overweihty elements without limit or decay:
http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+Z
how magic shells work, how to beammeld neutròn-rich elements, and how
to stabilise a neutròn: http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+neutron+stabil
-Aut
wla...@yahoo.com.br
An interesting dialog on cold fusion can be seen in a blog Chemistry
Forum ( http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=17140.0 )
between the New Energy Times editor Steve Krivit and the owner of the
blog, the nuclear chemist Andre Mitch:
============================
Hi Mitch,
There are a few reasons why New Energy Times doesn't call this subject
"cold fusion" anymore, either with, or without the Looney-Toons
attribution.
There is a theory (published in a reputable peer-reviewed journal) by
Widom and Larsen, that claims to be able to explain most of the "cold
fusion" phenomena without requiring one to invoke magic spells. Take a
look at www.newenergytimes.com/wltheory.
Let me know what you think.
Best regards,
Steve Krivit
Editor, New Energy Times
===================================
And the Mitch's answer:
===================================
sbkrivit: The general gist I get from the above link is that some
unbeknown phenomena is creating thermal neutrons, and it is those
thermal neutrons that are leading to observed heat increases.
I doubt this is happening, but I can knock out the claim that this is
from electron capture on deuterium(2H) or that this is from,
protons(1H).
I made a nice little calculator for these types of things. Link:
http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?page=scripts#Nuclear%20Reactions%20Calculator
Reactions:
Electron Capture on Hydrogen
1H + 1e- ---> 1n
Q = -0.78153017800003 MeV
Electron Capture on Deuterium
2H + 1e- ---> 1n + 1n
Q = -3.0059569539999 MeV
A negative Q-value means that this will not happen spontaneously. This
makes sense, since neutrons are heavier (contain more mass) than
protons. The question then is, where will this additional mass come
from? From the references cited in your post, I see no explanation
accounting for the excess mass of the neutron. In the end, the mass-
energy or the products need to equal the mass-energy of the reactants;
No one can escape the conservation of mass-energy.
====================================
Autymn D. C.
> An interesting dialog on cold fusion can be seen in a blog Chemistry
> between the New Energy Times editor Steve Krivit and the owner of the
> blog, the nuclear chemist Andre Mitch:
Okay, my answers are there.