...........O
...........a
...........O
...........a
...........O
...........a
...........O
...........a
...........O
...........a
...........O
...........a
...........O
...........a
...........O
where 'O' is an object and 'a' is a relationship between objects.
'.' is a formating character to cope with buggy software.
6. The universe in the final state is as follows:
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
...........b
...........O
where 'O' is an object and 'b' is a relationship between objects.
7. The universe in the current state is as follows:
..................O...O...O
..................b....b...b
............O.a.O.a.O.a.O.a.O
........................b
........................O
.............L2..L1...L0..L1...L2
...........|_________|
..................P1
........................|_________|
...............................P2
where 'O' is an object and 'a' and 'b' are relationships between
objects.
'L2','L1' and 'L0' are levels in the universe structure.
'P1' and 'P2' are particles.
Objects in level L1 are observed as mass.
Objects in level L2 are observed as charge.
Objects in level L3 are observed as color.
Objects in level L4 are observed as spin.
8. Objects are conserved.
9. Level L0 is static.
10. Spatial dimensions appear when level L3 is declared to be static.
======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
I think this is within the charter as a toy model, but posters presenting such models should say so, rather than present them as "truth". Is it going somewhere?
I would be inclined to allow at least two types, to have intermediate
vector bosons as well as elementary fermions, and I would be inclined to
permit subtypes of those, at least in principle.
Regards
--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
substitute charles for NotI to email
Well, it is not stated in a very comprehensible way, and I agree with the
moderator that such models should not be presented as "truth", but there
might be more to it than just a toy. Properly reformulated and possibly
investigated, it could even actually lead somewhere. Not necessarily to
something new, maybe to something we already know, but still.