Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What the doctor ordered
10 views
Skip to first unread message
mpc755
Jan 13, 2012, 5:27:36 PM1/13/12
to
'Modifying Gravity: You Can't Always Get What You Want'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1697
"At least we discover that they only seem to work if they bring back
dark matter in the form of dark fields. That may be how the Universe
works, but it isn’t what the doctor (Milgrom) ordered."
"However, given that we have yet to find a model of the dark sector
that elegantly wraps together dark matter, dark energy and inflaton"
Who's we?
What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter. Aether displaced by matter
pushes back toward the matter.
Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.
Aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a
solid; an incompressible fluid.
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet;
analogous to the polar jet of a black hole. Dark energy is the change
in state of the aether emitted into and propagating through the
Universal jet.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1697
"At least we discover that they only seem to work if they bring back
dark matter in the form of dark fields. That may be how the Universe
works, but it isn’t what the doctor (Milgrom) ordered."
"However, given that we have yet to find a model of the dark sector
that elegantly wraps together dark matter, dark energy and inflaton"
Who's we?
What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter. Aether displaced by matter
pushes back toward the matter.
Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.
Aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a
solid; an incompressible fluid.
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet;
analogous to the polar jet of a black hole. Dark energy is the change
in state of the aether emitted into and propagating through the
Universal jet.
Robert
Jan 14, 2012, 4:21:11 PM1/14/12
to
I'm not qualified to say what dark matter is, or is not, nor whether
the aether exists.
Therefore, I tend to stick to what is said by those who are qualified.
And just about the only specific things that I have heard any of them
say regarding dark matter is that it accounts for (approx) 25 percent
of the mass energy of the universe, that it exerts a gravitational
field, that it does not emanate light (or any electromagnetism), nor
does it interact with non-dark matter (except gravitationally).
This brief list of knowns is hardly a thorough description of whatever
it is that DM will turn out to be. Indeed, we do not know whether
dark matter is even matter at all.
Given that paucity of information, the most accurate descriptive term
I can think of for (so-called) dark (so-called) matter is, "Anomalous
Gravity Field," or AGF.
As more information develops, then of course, we can test for further
properties of AGF, to see whether it conforms to aether theory (or
theories).
Until then, I am satisfied to savor the mystery.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the aether exists.
Therefore, I tend to stick to what is said by those who are qualified.
And just about the only specific things that I have heard any of them
say regarding dark matter is that it accounts for (approx) 25 percent
of the mass energy of the universe, that it exerts a gravitational
field, that it does not emanate light (or any electromagnetism), nor
does it interact with non-dark matter (except gravitationally).
This brief list of knowns is hardly a thorough description of whatever
it is that DM will turn out to be. Indeed, we do not know whether
dark matter is even matter at all.
Given that paucity of information, the most accurate descriptive term
I can think of for (so-called) dark (so-called) matter is, "Anomalous
Gravity Field," or AGF.
As more information develops, then of course, we can test for further
properties of AGF, to see whether it conforms to aether theory (or
theories).
Until then, I am satisfied to savor the mystery.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpc755
Jan 14, 2012, 5:41:38 PM1/14/12
to
On Jan 14, 4:21 pm, Robert <RobertAr...@msn.com> wrote:
> Therefore, I tend to stick to what is said by those who are qualified.
> And just about the only specific things that I have heard any of them
> say regarding dark matter is that it accounts for (approx) 25 percent
> of the mass energy of the universe, that it exerts a gravitational
> field,
The vast majority of the people you refer to do not say dark matter
> Therefore, I tend to stick to what is said by those who are qualified.
> And just about the only specific things that I have heard any of them
> say regarding dark matter is that it accounts for (approx) 25 percent
> of the mass energy of the universe, that it exerts a gravitational
> field,
exerts a gravitational field. What they say about dark matter is that
there must be more mass associated with galaxies and galaxy clusters
than the visible matter in order for the motion of the matter to be
what has been detected.
I am the one who is saying non-baryonic dark matter (i.e. aether) is
physically displaced by matter. I'm the one who is saying non-baryonic
dark matter (i.e. aether) displaced by matter pushes back toward
matter. I'm the one who is saying non-baryonic dark matter (i.e.
aether) pushing back toward matter is gravity. I'm the one who is
saying it is the non-baryonic dark matter (i.e. aether) which exerts a
gravitational field.
So, it looks like you have a choice. You can choose to stop
understanding what occurs physically in nature which causes a
gravitational field since it is not what the vast majority of those
you refer to understand, or you can continue to correctly understand
what occurs physically in nature which causes gravity.
Non-baryonic dark matter (i.e. aether) displaced by matter exerts a
gravitational field.
mpc755
Jan 16, 2012, 2:25:32 PM1/16/12
to
On Jan 13, 5:27 pm, mpc755 <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.2882
"Discussion - We have shown how a series of simple ansatze allow exact
solutions to be found for Einstein-Aether cosmologies. These models
provide exact descriptions of inflationary dynamics in the very early
universe or the transition to accelerated expansion at recent
cosmological epochs. They show the explicit contribution of the aether
field to creating accelerated expansion in situations where inflation
would not occur in its absence. They can also be extended to include
simple ’tracker’ solutions and allow Einstein-Aether theories to be
more closely tested by cosmological data sets."
mpc755
Jan 17, 2012, 1:57:17 PM1/17/12
to
aether. This one suggesting there is no need for dark matter exotic
particles or for the existence of a mysterious form of dark energy and
dark matter and dark energy are modern versions of the aether.
'Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity. Phenomenology of non-linear
gravity-matter coupling'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.2814
"For example, the dark matter problem may be explained by invoking new
fundamental interactions, rather than assuming exotic particles.
Similarly, the cosmological acceleration of the universe may be
explained in terms of more complicated interactions, rather than
postulating the existence of a mysterious form of dark energy. These
postulates are somehow the modern versions of the aether, suggesting
that perhaps something is missing in our understanding of
gravitational interactions inside matter."
What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter.
Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.
This is what Voyager found evidence of.
'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html
"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like
cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity
of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar
space is compacting it."
The aether displaced by the solar system is pushing back and exerting
inward pressure toward the solar system. This is gravity.
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet;
analogous to the polar jet of a black hole. Dark energy is the change
in state of the aether emitted into and propagating through the
Universal jet.
Robert
Jan 21, 2012, 12:15:05 PM1/21/12
to
The problem with using aether instead of dark matter (or AGF) to
explain astronomical observations is that (unless I am badly mistaken)
aether is that which propagates light waves (and the entire
eletromagnetic spectrum). As such, it should be uniformly
distributed, and indeed, should fill space, somewhat as the ocean
fills the space which it occupies.
Dark matter is not uniformly distributed, and as in the colliding
bullet clusters, it exhibits properties that do not fit the idea of
displacement as I understand your description.
This is not to say that aether does not exist. But if it does, I do
not think it explains the observations associated with DM and DE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
explain astronomical observations is that (unless I am badly mistaken)
aether is that which propagates light waves (and the entire
eletromagnetic spectrum). As such, it should be uniformly
distributed, and indeed, should fill space, somewhat as the ocean
fills the space which it occupies.
Dark matter is not uniformly distributed, and as in the colliding
bullet clusters, it exhibits properties that do not fit the idea of
displacement as I understand your description.
This is not to say that aether does not exist. But if it does, I do
not think it explains the observations associated with DM and DE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> - Show quoted text -
mpc755
Jan 21, 2012, 5:31:10 PM1/21/12
to
On Jan 21, 12:15 pm, Robert <RobertAr...@msn.com> wrote:
> The problem with using aether instead of dark matter (or AGF) to
> explain astronomical observations is that (unless I am badly mistaken)
> aether is that which propagates light waves (and the entire
> eletromagnetic spectrum). As such, it should be uniformly
> distributed, and indeed, should fill space, somewhat as the ocean
> fills the space which it occupies.
> Dark matter is not uniformly distributed, and as in the colliding
> bullet clusters, it exhibits properties that do not fit the idea of
> displacement as I understand your description.
> This is not to say that aether does not exist. But if it does, I do
> not think it explains the observations associated with DM and DE.
>
'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
> The problem with using aether instead of dark matter (or AGF) to
> explain astronomical observations is that (unless I am badly mistaken)
> aether is that which propagates light waves (and the entire
> eletromagnetic spectrum). As such, it should be uniformly
> distributed, and indeed, should fill space, somewhat as the ocean
> fills the space which it occupies.
> Dark matter is not uniformly distributed, and as in the colliding
> bullet clusters, it exhibits properties that do not fit the idea of
> displacement as I understand your description.
> This is not to say that aether does not exist. But if it does, I do
> not think it explains the observations associated with DM and DE.
>
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html
"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."
The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy
clusters. The 'ripple' is a gravitational wave. The 'ripple' is an
aether displacement wave.
The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an
associated aether displacement wave.
Water is an incompressible fluid. When a rock is thrown into a pond
the water the density of the water is remains the same throughout the
pond.
There is zero evidence what is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter
is not uniformly distributed throughout the Universe. All of the
evidence to date in terms of the density of dark matter is evidence
dark matter is evenly distributed throughout the Universe.
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2011/pr201129.html
"Their simulations show that dark matter should be densely packed in
the centers of galaxies. Instead, new measurements of two dwarf
galaxies show that they contain a smooth distribution of dark matter.
This suggests that the standard cosmological model may be wrong."
The ripple created when the bullet clusters collide is an aether
displacement wave.
Jim Hawkins
Feb 21, 2012, 1:24:35 PM2/21/12
to
gas, the mass of whose particles is the 'dark matter' and whose gas pressure
is the force opposing gravity and constituting the dark energy.
dlzc
Feb 21, 2012, 4:33:05 PM2/21/12
to
Dear Jim Hawkins:
On Feb 21, 11:24 am, "Jim Hawkins" <jimhawk...@manx.net> wrote:
...
G, to offset the repulsion of "stuff" that must be here with us. And
then with repulsion, it still should show restriction to motion, so
braking.
Aether has constraints on it...
David A. Smith
On Feb 21, 11:24 am, "Jim Hawkins" <jimhawk...@manx.net> wrote:
...
> Occam's razor would suggest that the ether is a
> highly rarified perfect gas, the mass of whose particles
> is the 'dark matter' and whose gas pressure is the force
> opposing gravity and constituting the dark energy.
Doesn't do the job of Dark Matter then. Makes us require a different
> highly rarified perfect gas, the mass of whose particles
> is the 'dark matter' and whose gas pressure is the force
> opposing gravity and constituting the dark energy.
G, to offset the repulsion of "stuff" that must be here with us. And
then with repulsion, it still should show restriction to motion, so
braking.
Aether has constraints on it...
David A. Smith
mpc755
Feb 22, 2012, 8:36:22 AM2/22/12
to
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet;
analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.
The analogy is a bunch of objects floating downstream and exiting the
analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.
mouth of a river. As the objects exit the river they move away from
one another. This is analogous to dark energy. Even as the objects are
exiting the mouth of the river and moving away from one another the
water still pushes back and exerts pressure toward the objects. This
is analogous to gravity.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter.
matter is gravity.
This is what Voyager found evidence of.
'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html
"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like
cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity
of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar
space is compacting it."
The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of
This is what Voyager found evidence of.
'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html
"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like
cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity
of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar
space is compacting it."
a solid.
'Was the universe born spinning?'
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688
"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a
preferred axis"
The Universe spins around a preferred axis because the Universe is, or
the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar
jet of a black hole.
'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
jet of a black hole.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/releases/2010/10-023.html
'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our
solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion
is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed
outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule
out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right
now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the
clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'
The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or
the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.
The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.
http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html
The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual
emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space
associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in
our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving
outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image
above, '1st Stars' is where the increase in pressure caused by the
aether continually being emitted into the Universal jet causes the
aether to condense into matter.
The following is an image analogous of the Universe, or the local
Universe, we exist in.
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/planetarium/graphics/st_images/BlackHole.jpg
The following is an image analogous of the Universal spin.
http://i.space.com/images/i/612/i02/040817_quasar_illo_02.jpg?1292259454
Dark flow is the aether emitted into the Universal jet. Dark energy is
the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.
0 new messages