Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Optics Communications: Talkers or offenders?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Khrapko
Feb 28, 2010, 9:37:23 AM2/28/10
to
Jocelyn Mendoza Elsevier Customer Support (Contact Email 74656870178)
hoped that Dr Schleich can able to further explain the decision I
received (see http://groups.google.ru/group/sci.physics.electromag/browse_thread/thread/804677ab91d6ca89#).
However, to make matter worse Optics Communications again rejected my
NEW paper without peer reviewing. The nonsense is in progress. Stefan
Maier, Pat Satrjeenpong wrote: “The rejection of an article by one of
the Editors should generally be regarded as a final decision and the
conclusion of the review process.” But “Difference Between Spin and
Orbital Angular Momentum” (SM-220) is a NEW paper (see
http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?module=files&id=7). No
Editors rejected this paper!
Now I see an alternative. Either they do not read papers or we face a
crime related with conflict of interests.
Radi Khrapko, http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/
hoped that Dr Schleich can able to further explain the decision I
received (see http://groups.google.ru/group/sci.physics.electromag/browse_thread/thread/804677ab91d6ca89#).
However, to make matter worse Optics Communications again rejected my
NEW paper without peer reviewing. The nonsense is in progress. Stefan
Maier, Pat Satrjeenpong wrote: “The rejection of an article by one of
the Editors should generally be regarded as a final decision and the
conclusion of the review process.” But “Difference Between Spin and
Orbital Angular Momentum” (SM-220) is a NEW paper (see
http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?module=files&id=7). No
Editors rejected this paper!
Now I see an alternative. Either they do not read papers or we face a
crime related with conflict of interests.
Radi Khrapko, http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/
0 new messages