Chapt15.65 Unification of 4 Particles of Physics by the Maxwell Equations #1373 New Physics #1580 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On May 15, 1:25 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a strange name to give this chapter, that of a
> unification. This is the first time a physicist has even noted or was
> aware that the particles of physics need to be unified with the
> Maxwell Equations. Sure, every physicist for the past century has
> known of a unification of forces, the 4 forces of physics, but now,
> what I offer is a new unification scheme or network. I offer a
> Unification of the only 4 fundamental particles of physics.
>
> When the Maxwell Equations are the axioms over all of physics, then
> the forces are unified because the Maxwell Equations have only one
> force-- Coulomb force and all the other 3 forces-- strong nuclear,
> weak nuclear, gravity are simply a different version of the Coulomb
> force.
>
> In this unification of particles, what I have to show is that the
> Maxwell Equations allow for only these interactions to take place and
> that these 4 interactions are all part of the same process of
> achieving perpetual motion:
>
> Pair Production
>
> Pair Annihilation
>
> Chemical Bonding
>
> Radioactivity
>
> And they take place upon just 4 particles that are fundamental:
>
> electron
>
> proton
>
> photon
>
> neutrino
>
> Now let me draw a analogy picture so that every reader can instantly
> understand this Unification in the most simple means and terms.
>
> The Atom in Maxwell Equations is a unification of the 4 particles that
> must have perpetual motion. Perpetual Motion is the driving mechanism.
> The Maxwell Equations are perpetual motion equations. Electrons cannot
> have perpetual motion if they are alone, nor can protons have
> perpetual motion if they are alone, because both have finite rest-
> mass. The only means of perpetual motion is the photon or neutrino
> with zero rest mass. So the existence of an Atom comes about as the
> entity that causes the proton, electron to have perpetual motion by
> converting its particles of proton and electron into photons. So, in
> this unification, the Atom is a conversion machine that takes finite
> rest mass, converts it into photons and thus allows the atom or
> compound to be perpetual motion machines.
>
> Chemistry, the entire subject is mostly about the chemical bond, and
> the chemical bond is the conversion of particles with rest-mass to be
> photons with zero rest mass and thus gaining perpetual motion.
>
> Since the proton and electron both have rest mass if alone, they must
> be converted to a photon. And the particle that does the conversion is
> the neutrino.
>
> So now, a single hydrogen atom with a single lonely proton and a
> single lonely electron have no perpetual motion and thus will not
> survive long nor in perpetuity. So it has a major problem and the
> solution is Chemical bonding. So the hydrogen atom bonds to another
> hydrogen atom and its 2 electrons where 1 is converted to a positron
> and this electron + positron combine into forming a gamma ray photon,
> via the help of the neutrino.
>
> Now apparently the 2 protons can survive as being protons with rest
> mass, as long as the electrons are now a gamma ray photon of perpetual
> motion.
>
> But in the nucleus of helium and higher atomic numbered atoms, the
> neutrons are protons + electrons + neutrinos and the nucleus of the
> helium atom with its 4 protons and 2 nuclear electrons and 2 neutrinos
> could form a proton + antiproton = gamma ray photon with perpetual
> motion, along with the 2 nuclear electrons having a nuclear chemical
> bond with the protons.
>
> So, what is needed for Physics so that every particle of physics can
> achieve Perpetual Motion as described by the Maxwell Equations? Well
> only 4 particles are needed proton and electron to be the particles
> that form all of the atoms, and then 2 more particles the photon and
> neutrino to convert rest-mass into 0 rest-mass so that the proton and
> electron can be perpetual motion.
>
> When we look at the 4 Symmetrical Maxwell Equations, the ones with
> magnetic monopoles, we are faced with two entities the positive
> electric charge and the negative electric charge (alternatively the
> magnetic charge). And the 4 Maxwell Equations are equations that solve
> the charges as providing perpetual motion through the conversion by
> neutrinos into photons.

Now the above has a interesting implication with it. It implies that a
electron mingles with a neutrino and converts the electron into a
positron. So that the job of a neutrino is to merely convert electrons
into positrons. And the formula is this:

electron + neutrino ==> positron

So what feature of a ordinary electron would a neutrino alter to make
it into a positron? Well, I would think, according to Hund's Rule of
filling suborbitals that the neutrino alters the spin of the second
entering electron to become a positron. So that if the first electron
is down spin, the neutrino makes sure the second electron is up spin.
But it seems to me that more has to be altered of a electron to become
a positron.

Now I do not think any physicists before me have asked the question of
whether positrons are both coming in a up spin and down spin? Maybe
positrons are like neutrinos that all have a left hand chirality. And
whether this left-handed chirality causes the electron + neutrino to
end up as a positron.

So the implication that the Unification of the Particles of Physics
exist to cause atoms to have perpetual motion by making the electrons
into gamma ray photons makes the neutrino the conversion particle and
it converts a electron into a positron.

So is there anything in the Maxwell Equations that gives us some
indication of a conversion particle? Not the neutrino because the
Maxwell Equations are about charge, either electrical or magnetic and
the neutrino has no charge. But neither does the photon, yet the
Maxwell Equations derive the speed of light.

I think the answer lies in the displacement current of the Ampere/
Maxwell law. A particle that converts is similar to a wave that is
displaced as the displacement current. So if I think of the neutrino
as a displacement current would it be the alteration of a electron
into a positron?

--

More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has
done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen
here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now I need to get really aggressive here, for a near full
understanding of how two electrons in a suborbital of Hund's Rule
becomes a gamma ray photon with perpetual motion.

Now in Chemistry there is a aid to understanding called the Lewis dot
diagram of chemical bonding. If you take chemistry in school, I am
sure you will run across Lewis diagrams. And I discovered a diagram
method for particles of physics when I discovered the photon has to be
a double transverse wave. Old Physics had the photon as this diagram:

E
B

shaped like a reverse "L" where the electric field E
is one pole and the magnetic field B is the 2nd pole of a single
transverse wave.

I depict the photon as this in a double transverse wave with 4 poles:

E-
M+ M-
E+

But even that is inadequate to depict the photon and the neutrino and
two electrons where one is converted to a positron and the two
combining to form a gamma ray photon.

So I need more magnetic monopoles. Dirac computed that the "size" of
the magnetic monopole would be 137/2 (e) where "e" is the electric
charge. And I think Dirac made a mistake, in that it should be
the reverse where 137/2 magnetic monopoles is equivalent to the
electric charge. So that the photon would then be depicted in a AP-
diagram as this:

E-
(137/2)M+ (137/2)M-
E+

Now I need these AP-diagrams and I need the Hund's Rule and of course,
all has to come from the Maxwell Equations.

So the prime base electron looks like this:

E-
(137/2)M+

(shaped like a reverse letter L and is a single transverse wave) And
the proton and positron would switch the signs of positive and
negative. And these diagrams do not include mass.

So the neutrino is going to be a particle of only magnetic monopoles
such as this:

2M+ 2M-

or this:

137M+ 137M-

Now the most important Maxwell Equation law for this is the Faraday
law with magnetic monopoles for it describes the electron as a closed
loop wire (a hole in Space as Hyperbolic geometry) and describes the
positron as a bar magnet of Faraday law as a "ball in Space" as
Elliptic geometry. So that in the Hund's rule as two electrons, one
converted to a positron in a suborbital turns the two particles into a
gamma ray photon. So we have a closed loop wire, the electron and a
positron as the bar magnet thrust through the closed loop wire, which
makes the 2 electrons revolve in perpetual motion around the nucleus
of the atom.

So, what I need to show from the AP diagrams is how a electron as
this:

E-
(137/2)M+

and the second electron:

E-
(137/2)M+

How one of them is mediated by a neutrino so that the one electron
changes its signs to be opposite. Then the two combine to form a gamma
ray photon of this:


E-
(137/2)M+ (137/2)M-
E+

So, what Maxwell Equation mechanism is there for a neutrino to come
along and reverse the signs of an electron?

Well, I think it is in the Faraday law also, that as you put the bar
magnet fully inside the copper coil and then pull the bar magnet out
of the coil that the electromotive force reverses. So what this
implies is that the Hund's rule of a filled suborbital of two
electrons where one converts to a positron and the two combine to be a
gamma ray photon is simply the pure Faraday force law itself in
action.