Phy#, Ludwig, and such a fecundity
Vladimir N. Binghy
Aren't they concerned with a science, whereof one of the
general principles is a relation of a new knowledge to an old one?
I think we have a good example of a pseudosciense or a scientific
noise, which contaminates the conference.
---
Centre of Interbranch Science, : Dr. Vladimir N. Binghy
Engineering and Nonconventional : Internet: v...@binghy.msk.su
Venture Technologies, PO Box 214, : 095 131-6915
CISE VENT, Moscow 125190 Russia : 095 292-9589
Ludwig Plutonium
From the land of Euler, Mendeleev, Petrzhak and Flerov, you ought
to be ashamed of your post. But you may redeem yourself. Post a
synopsis of the history of Petrzhak and Flerov. Especially Petrzhak.
Tell if they were the first to discover "Spontaneous Fission". When,
day month year, and where was it published or announced? Tell us any
stories of Petrzhak, we have some information on Flerov, and even a
picture, but no information on Petrzhak.
Also, since I am the King of Math and Physics, I order that the
below experiment be performed. Post your results to the Internet.
> In article <35skts$j...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
> Ludwig.P...@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) writes:
>
> > Set-up a NEUTRINO COUNTER behind light polarizations. Especially
> > where the polarizing lens, or sheets, or planes are at 90 degree
> > angles, and see if the Neutrino counters all of a sudden detect a large
> > influx of neutrinos. Also, set up the experiment where a third sheet is
> > placed between the two 90 degree sheets at 45 degree angle (Feynmann
> > describes this experiment in his Lectures) and notice the Neutrino
> > Count different from the two sheets at 90 degrees.
> >
> > This Neutrino Count experiment is very important. If my intuition
> > serves me correctly and it is discovered that light polarization is
> > photons decomposed into neutrinos. Then we will have an immediate way
> > of producing neutrinos "at will". We can produce a "Neutrino Gun". And
> > we can use a Neutrino Gun as a window onto the nucleus and the "Strong
> > Nuclear Interaction". What I am thinking here, is that, if the above
> > turns out to be the truth, then, as Quantum Mechanics rests on top of
> > the foundation of atomic spectra as the "Window into the Atom". Then
> > too, a Neutrino Gun may be the "Window into the Nucleus". The "Atomic
> > Spectra Physics experiments of the pioneers of Balmer, Rydberg, Planck,
> > et al" were the most important experiments in all of physics to date
> > because thanks to the Window of Atomic Spectra we have QM. I can not
> > stress enough, how important it is to see if photons are 2 neutrinos
> > put together.
> > Archimedes Plutonium, A@P
>
> AND lastly with the above experiments of placing NEUTRINO COUNTERS in
> back of light polarizers. Set-up experiments to see if the photon
> energy going into light polarizers, especially the two sheets at 90
> degrees, is equal to the energy coming out. That deficit of energy
> going out is still there, I claim. Only it is neutrinos, heretofore,
> undetected, unobserved, and unmeasured. This is why it is important to
> have NEUTRINO COUNTERS in back of these polarizers.
> We need to correlate the data of missing photon energy out of the
> polarizers and the data of what the Neutrino Counters report.