True Value of the Fine Structure Constant Revealed

[Jeff]

By using an entirely new way of combining fundamental Quantum
Mechanics with Time Dilation, YES - Time Dilation, we are now able to
reveal the CORRECT value of the Fine Structure Constant to be:
7.29907563x10^-3.

We also reveal direct, absolute proof illustrating how this recently
discovered value is totally correct, plus we also prove, beyond any
doubt possible, that the value currently accepted today by Theoretical
Physics academia: 7.29735257(50)x10^-3, is completely wrong.

For more information describing this new discovery please go to:

> www.godcipher.com <

and click on the link near the bottom left corner of the home page
entitled: "Fine Structure Constant preprint paper".

All comments and opinions welcome.

All the best,

Jeff Lee CENTER for REALITY PHYSICS

[kp]

LOL!

[The TimeLord]

Am Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:18:03 -0700 schrieb Jeff <JLeeC...@aol.com> in
7c74252b-a2fc-4148...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com in
sci.physics.relativity:

> By using an entirely new way of combining fundamental Quantum Mechanics
> with Time Dilation, YES - Time Dilation, we are now able to reveal the
> CORRECT value of the Fine Structure Constant to be: 7.29907563x10^-3.

Actually that is not the correct value.

cf
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?alph|search_for=fine+structure
+constant

and
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/alpha.html

>
> We also reveal direct, absolute proof illustrating how this recently
> discovered value is totally correct, plus we also prove, beyond any
> doubt possible, that the value currently accepted today by Theoretical
> Physics academia: 7.29735257(50)x10^-3, is completely wrong.

So post it. Simply claiming it is like claiming that you have proof that
air is toxic to humans. Let's see the derivation and if it wrong, we'll
let you know.

>
> For more information describing this new discovery please go to:
>
>> www.godcipher.com <
>
> and click on the link near the bottom left corner of the home page
> entitled: "Fine Structure Constant preprint paper".

In that paper, equation 1 is wrong. That is not how the fine structure
constant is defined. The rest of the paper seems to be metaphysical
gobbledygook.

>
> All comments and opinions welcome.
>
> All the best,
>
> Jeff Lee CENTER for REALITY PHYSICS

Once again, someone tries to improve upon real "reality" physics by
assuming garbage and concluding silly stuff. Ever hear of the phrase
"garbage in - garbage out"? It applies to logic as well.

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!