electrons turned photons form planar ecliptic inside atoms? Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1364 New Physics #1568 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, an interesting question now arises, in that a few days ago I
was discussing the idea that electrons inside of atoms form a planar
ecliptic of their orbits. And now I am discussing the idea that two
electrons of a filled suborbital become a gamma ray photon that orbits
the nucleus. So now in the case of say krypton or argon or barium or
mercury, all those filled subshells of paired electrons in
suborbitals, do they form a planar ecliptic structure?

Here as in everywhere in physics, we have to consult the Maxwell
Equations. The reasoning that electrons as particles had to form a
planar ecliptic inside the atom is because that geometry is a Minimal
Principle that Feynman discusses as the inverse square law whether it
be gravity or Coulomb force. For particles in motion a planar ecliptic
is a result of a Minimum Principle of a particle choosing the shortest
path from A to B. But is it the same reasoning for electrons
converting to gamma rays that circle the nucleus? Well I think the
answer is yes in that there is no difference between particles and
waves as to following the Minimum Principle. And perhaps as the last
electron enters the last suborbital to pair up with a resident
electron to form a pair of electrons, it is the Minimum Principle that
converts the two electrons into a gamma ray photon.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day, of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has
done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen
here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now I am taking a lot of liberty here with the Lewis diagram used in
chemistry, only I am using it on electrons.

So the photon is this:

E-
M+ M-
E+

where the E is the electric field and the M is magnetic monopole
field. Now the photon is a double transverse wave and the Lewis
diagram above is of a 4 pole cross section of this double transverse
wave.

Now previously I had the electron Lewis diagram depicted as such:

E-
M+ M-

and the positron as such:

E+
M+ M-

Now I have a bit of a problem with that if the two electrons that
inhabit a suborbital in the Hund's rule were for one of the electrons
to convert to a positron and the two combining to make a gamma ray
photon, has a problem because if we combine them we get this:

E-
2M+ 2M-
E+

So we have twice as many magnetic monopoles.

Now there are two ways to fix that problem and likely many more, but
two stick out. One way is to say that the electron and positron
combining form that strange gamma ray which has 4 magnetic monopoles
rather than 2. Or another fix is that the electron is more like this:

E-
M+

and the positron like this:

E+
M-

so that when the two combine they form a gamma ray photon just as
pictured above.

Now perhaps modern day physics already knows which of those two
choices is correct, or some other choice not listed. Now the above is
a single transverse wave of the electron and positron, and maybe that
is what the Maxwell Equations demand. Maybe if the electron had both
the M+ and M- it would have improper spin or improper quantum numbers.

And then the proton would be like this:

E+
M-

But it is good in physics or any other science to get rid of stuff if
it is possible to rid it. It was good to rid ourselves of epicycles,
to rid ourselves of aether, to rid ourselves of antiparticles at the
first opportunity.

So if we have a hydrogen atom being formed into a helium atom and we
are about to add on the second electron. The first is this:

E-
M+

and the second looks the same, however we add it as Hund's rule in
that the second electron must have an opposite spin, a spin down if
the first is spin up. So as we add it, it converts to this:

E+
M-

Now the two electrons, one a electron and the other a positron form
the helium atom structure by combining to be this:

E-
M+ M-
E+

and thus we end up with a photon gamma ray making the 1s2 orbital of
helium.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake

names, and only 5 posts per day of all posters which reduces or